Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Adsorption Sample Problems
Adsorption Sample Problems
Adsorption Sample Problems
isotherm (15-16). Experimental q–p isothermal data can be Using (15-25), the best straight line is drawn through a plot
fitted to (15-19) by a nonlinear curve fit or by converting (15- of points p=q versus p, giving a slope of (1=qm) and an inter-
19) to the following linear form, and using a graphical cept of 1=(qmK). Theoretically, K should change rapidly with
method or a linear-regression program to obtain k and n; temperature but qm should not, because it is related through
ym by (15-7) to Sg. The Langmuir isotherm predicts an
log q ¼ log k þ ð1=nÞlog p ð15-20Þ asymptotic limit for q at high pressure, whereas the Freundlich
In the graphical method, data are plotted as log q versus log p; isotherm does not, as shown e.g. by the curve for Columbia G
the best straight line through the data has a slope of (1=n) and activated carbon in Figure 15.11.
an intercept of log k. In general, k decreases, while n increases
with increasing temperature, approaching a value of 1 at high
temperatures. Although (15-19) is empirical, it can be derived Other Adsorption Isotherms
by assuming a heterogeneous surface with a nonuniform dis- Valenzuela and Myers [23] fit isothermal, pure-gas adsorp-
tribution of heat of adsorption (Brunauer [21]). tion data to the three-parameter isotherms of Toth:
mp
Langmuir Isotherm q¼ ð15-26Þ
ðb þ pt Þ1=t
The Langmuir equation [28] is restricted to Type I iso-
where m, b, and t are constants for a given adsorbate–
therms. It is derived from mass-action kinetics, assuming
adsorbent system and temperature.
that chemisorption is the reaction. Let the surface of the
Honig and Reyerson devisied the three-constant UNILAN
pores of the adsorbent be homogeneous (DHads ¼ constant),
equation:
with negligible interaction forces between adsorbed mole-
cules. If u is the fraction of surface covered by adsorbed n c þ pes
molecules, (1 u) is the fraction of bare surface, and the q¼ ln ð15-27Þ
2s c þ pes
net rate of adsorption is the difference between the rate of
adsorption on the bare surface and the rate of desorption on where n, s, and c are the constants for a given system and
the covered surface: temperature. The Toth and UNILAN isotherms reduce to the
Langmuir isotherm for t ¼ 1 and s ¼ 0, respectively.
dq=dt ¼ ka pð1 uÞ kd u ð15-21Þ
p 1 p 1:760p
¼ þ ð15-25Þ q¼
q qm K qm 1 þ 0:01285p
C15 09/22/2010 Page 582
The predicted values of q from the two isotherms are: In a similar fashion, as shown by Yon and Turnock [30], the
Freundlich and Langmuir equations can be combined to give
q, cm3 (STP) of CH4/g carbon the following extended relation for gas mixtures:
p, psia Experimental Freundlich Langmuir 1=n
ð qi Þ 0 k i pi i
qi ¼ P 1=n ð15-33Þ
40 45.5 51.3 46.5 1 þ k j pj j
165 91.5 79.6 93.1 j
350 113 101 112
where (qi)0 is the maximum loading, which may differ from
545 121 115 120
(qi)m for a monolayer. Equation (15-33) represents data for
760 125 128 124
nonpolar, multicomponent mixtures in molecular sieves rea-
910 126 135 126
sonably well. Broughton [31] has shown that both the
970 126 138 127
extended-Langmuir and Langmuir–Freundlich equations
The Langmuir isotherm fits the data significantly better than the
lack thermodynamic consistency. Therefore, (15-32) and
Freundlich. Average percent deviations, in q, are 1.01% and 8.64%, (15-33) are frequently referred to as nonstoichiometric iso-
respectively. One reason for the better Langmuir fit is the trend to an therms. Nevertheless, for practical purposes, their simplicity
asymptotic value for q at the highest pressures. Clearly, the data do often makes them the isotherms of choice.
not fit a linear isotherm well at all. Both (15-32) and (15-33) are also referred to as constant-
selectivity equilibrium equations because they predict a sepa-
ration factor (selectivity), ai,j, for each pair of components, i,
j, in a mixture that is constant for a given temperature
§15.2.2 Gas Mixtures and Extended Isotherms and independent of mixture composition. For example, (15-
32) gives
Commercial applications of physical adsorption involve mix-
tures rather than pure gases. If adsorption of all components qi =qj ðqi Þm K i
except one (A) is negligible, then adsorption of A is esti- ai;j ¼ ¼
pi =pj ðqj Þm K j
mated from its pure-gas-adsorption isotherm using the partial
pressure of A in the mixture. If adsorption of two or more As with vapor–liquid and liquid–liquid phase equilibria
components in the mixture is significant, the situation is com- for three or more components, data for binary and multi-
plicated. Experimental data show that one component can component gas–solid adsorbent equilibria are scarce and
increase, decrease, or have no influence on adsorption of less accurate than corresponding pure-gas data. Valen-
another, depending on interactions of adsorbed molecules. A zuela and Myers [23] include experimental data on
simple theoretical treatment is the extension of the Langmuir adsorption of gas mixtures from 9 published studies on 29
equation by Markham and Benton [29], who neglect interac- binary systems, for which pure-gas-adsorption isotherms
tions and assume that the only effect is the reduction of the were also obtained. They also describe procedures for
vacant surface area for the adsorption of A because of applying the Toth and UNILAN equations to multi-
adsorption of other components. For a binary gas mixture component mixtures based on the ideal-adsorbed-solution
of A and B, let uA ¼ fraction of surface covered by A and uB ¼ (IAS) theory of Myers and Prausnitz [32]. Unlike the
fraction of surface covered by B. Then, ð1 uA uB Þ ¼ extended-Langmuir equation (15-32), which is explicit in
fraction of vacant surface. At equilibrium: the amount adsorbed, the IAS theory, though more accurate,
ðkA Þa pA ð1 uA uB Þ ¼ ðkA Þd uA ð15-28Þ is not explicit and requires an iterative solution procedure.
Additional experimental data for higher-order (ternary and/or
ðkB Þa pB ð1 uA uB Þ ¼ ðkB Þd uB ð15-29Þ higher) gas mixtures are given by Miller, Knaebel, and Ikels
[33] for 5A molecular sieves and by Ritter and Yang [34] for
Solving these equations simultaneously, and combining re-
activated carbon. Yang [25] presents a discussion of mixture
sults with (15-23), gives
adsorption theories, together with comparisons of these theo-
ð qA Þ m K A pA ries with mixture data for activated carbon and zeolites. The
qA ¼ ð15-30Þ
1 þ K A pA þ K B pB data on zeolites are the most difficult to correlate, with the sta-
tistical thermodynamic model (SSTM) of Ruthven and Wong
ðqB Þm K B pB [35] giving the best results.
qB ¼ ð15-31Þ
1 þ K A pA þ K B pB
A A
Radke and Prausnitz [37] have been fitted to the Freundlich and
Langmuir isotherms, (15-35) and (15-36), with the average devia-
tions indicated, for solute concentrations up to 50 mmol/L:
Co Co
mp mp
osi osi
te te Absolute Average
B
B Acetone in Water (25 C): Deviation of q, %
(a) (b) q1 ¼ 0:141c0:597
1 (1) 14.2
A A 0:190c1
q1 ¼ (2) 27.3
Com 1 þ 0:146c1
pos Com
ite B
Adsorption
q0*
B
le
ab
v or
q* Fa A
r
ea
Lin C e
bl
o ra c
f av
Un Figure 15.34 Effect of shape of isotherm
on sharpness of concentration wave front.
0 c0 z (a) Isotherm shapes. (b) Self-sharpening wave
c
(b)
(a) front caused by a favorable adsorption isotherm.
Loading = qF*
LES
and curves of cf=cF and cb =cb become coincident. The bed
Loading = 0
depth at which CPF is approached depends upon the non-
LES
linearity of the adsorption isotherm and the importance of
B LES
adsorption kinetics. Cooney and Lightfoot [130] proved the A
existence of an asymptotic wave-front solution, including LUB
LES
effects of axial dispersion. Initially, the wave front broadens
because of mass-transfer resistance and/or axial dispersion.
Analytical solutions for CPF from Sircar and Kumar [131]
and a rapid approximate method based on Freundlich and 1
B
Langmuir isotherms from Cooney [132] are available to esti-
mate CPF concentration profiles and breakthrough curves
using mass-transfer and equilibrium parameters. q/qF
When the constant-pattern-front assumption is valid, it
A
can be used to determine the length of a full-scale adsorbent 0
tb ts te
bed from breakthrough curves obtained in small-scale labora- t, time for adsorption step
tory experiments. This widely used technique is described by
Figure 15.35 Determination of bed length from laboratory
Collins [133] for purification applications. measurements.
Total bed length is taken to be
LB ¼ LES þ LUB ð15-86Þ
the sum of the length of an ideal, equilibrium-adsorption sec- EXAMPLE 15.14 Scale-Up for Fixed-Bed Adsorption.
tion, LES, unaffected by mass-transfer resistance Collins [133] reports the experimental data below for water-vapor
cF Q F t b adsorption from nitrogen in a fixed bed of 4A molecular sieves for
LES ¼ ð15-87Þ
qF rb A bed depth ¼ 0.88 ft, temperature ¼ 83 F, pressure ¼ 86 psia, G ¼
entering gas molar velocity ¼ 29.6 lbmol/h-ft2, entering water con-
where QF is the volumetric feed flow rate, plus a length of tent ¼ 1,440 ppm (by volume), initial adsorbent loading ¼ 1 lb=100
unused bed, LUB, determined by the MTZ width and the lb sieves, and bulk density of bed ¼ 44.5 lb/ft3. For the entering gas
cf=cF profile within that zone, using moisture content, cF, the equilibrium loading, qF, ¼ 0.186 lb H2O/
Le lb solid.
LUB ¼ ðts tb Þ ð15-88Þ
ts
cexit, ppm cexit, ppm
where Le=ts ¼ the ideal wave-front velocity. The stoichio- (by volume) Time, h (by volume) Time, h
metric time ts divides the MTZ (e.g., CPF zone) into equal
areas A and B as shown in Figure 15.35, and Le=ts corre- <1 09.0 650 10.8
sponds to the ideal wave-front velocity. Alternatively, ts, may 1 9.0 808 11.0
be determined using 4 9.2 980 11.25
Z te 9 9.4 1,115 11.5
cf 33 9.6 1,235 11.75
ts ¼ 1 dt ð15-89Þ
0 cF 80 9.8 1,330 12.0
142 10.0 1,410 12.5
For example, if ts equalizes areas A and B when it is equi- 238 10.2 1,440 12.8
distant between tb and te, then LUB ¼ MTZ/2. A conserva- 365 10.4 1,440 13.0
tive estimate of MTZ ¼ 4 ft may be used in the absence of 498 10.6
experimental data.
C15 09/22/2010 Page 606
Determine the bed height required for a commercial unit to be oper- Let ts ¼ the midpoint or (9.76 þ 12.25)=2 ¼ 11 h. The ideal wave-
ated at the same temperature, pressure, and entering gas mass veloc- front velocity ¼ Le=ts ¼ 0.88=11 ¼ 0.08 ft/h. From (15-87), LUB ¼
ity and water content to obtain an exiting gas with no more than 9 0.08(11 9.76) ¼ 0.1 ft. MTZ ¼ 0.2 ft and LB ¼ 1:96 þ
ppm (by volume) of water vapor with a breakthrough time of 20 h. 0:1 ¼ 2:06 ft.
Solution
B B
C
C
A
A
Distance
into
B
bed