Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Characterization of Refined Carrageenan From Kappaphycus Alvarezii
Characterization of Refined Carrageenan From Kappaphycus Alvarezii
1
Department of Aquatic Product Technology, Bogor Agricultural University (IPB
University), Bogor, Indonesia
2
Center of Coastal and Marine Resources Studies, Bogor Agricultural University (IPB
University), Bogor, Indonesia
*E-mail: kustiaz@apps.ipb.ac.id
1. Introduction
Content from this work may be used under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 licence. Any further distribution
of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the title of the work, journal citation and DOI.
Published under licence by IOP Publishing Ltd 1
EMBRIO 2019 IOP Publishing
IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science 404 (2020) 012071 doi:10.1088/1755-1315/404/1/012071
Cellulolytic enzymes produced by various types of microorganisms, such as fungi. There have been
many explorations of cellulolytic enzymes produced by fungi. Aspergillus sp. and Trichoderma sp. are
known have ability to produce cellulolytic enzymes with high activity (Sivaramanan 2014, Reddy et al
2014). Carrageenan extraction can be done by utilizing fungi as a cellulolytic enzyme producer. The
ability of fungi to produce cellulolytic enzymes is very important in the extraction process, but it is also
necessary to use cellulolytic fungi that safe to use. Varadarajan et al (2009) reported that enzymatic
carrageenan extraction using Aspergillus niger produced more carrageenan yield than the conventional
extraction. Muthezilan et al (2014) has also performed carrageenan extraction using pure enzyme
produced from coastal plant endophytic shoots and obtained a higher yield until 52%.
The endophytic fungus strain (EN) isolated from seagrass has been known to produce extracellular
cellulase enzyme (Oktavia et al 2014). In previous research, EN fungus produced cellulase with high
cellulolytic activity. Irma (2018) has reported that EN fungus could be used in carrageenan extraction
from Kappaphycus alvarezii by utilizing EN fungal culture directly. Based on information about EN
capability from previous research, further research is needed to know the ability of cellulase enzyme
isolated from EN fungus in the carrageenan extraction process. The aims of this research were to obtain
carrageenan extract from Kappaphycus alvarezii using EN fungal cellulase and to determine the effect
of extraction period, EN cellulase enzyme concentration as well as the interaction between extraction
period and concentration of EN cellulase enzyme on carrageenan extract yield.
2.4.1. Yield. The yield of carrageenan extraction was calculated based on the ratio between
carrageenan weight produced and weight of dried seaweed that was processed respectively.
2
EMBRIO 2019 IOP Publishing
IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science 404 (2020) 012071 doi:10.1088/1755-1315/404/1/012071
2.4.2 Sulfate content. The carrageenan was weighed 1 g and put into the Erlenmeyer flask 50 mL of
HCl 0.2 N then refluxed for 6 h until the solvent became clear. This solvent was transferred into a cup
glass and heated to boiling. Furthermore, 10 mL of BaCl2 solution was added over the water bath for 2
h. The precipitate formed was filtered with a non-gray filter paper and washed with boiling water to
chloride free. The filter paper was dried into the dryer ovenat 1,000°C until white ash was obtained. Ash
was cooled in a desiccator and then weighed (FMC Corp 1977).
2.4.3 Viscosity. Viscosity measurement was done by dissolving 1.5% carrageenan water then heated
in a boiling water bath until the solvent temperature reached 75°C. Viscosity was measured using
viscometer. The hot solvent was adjusted to a precise, viscometer was turned on and the temperature of
the solvent was measured. When the solvent temperature reached 75°C and the viscosity value was
measured on a scale of 1 to 100. The measurement was done after one minute of a full rotation for
spindle number three (FMC Corp 1977).
2.4.4 Gel strength. The 1.6% carrageenan solution and 0.16% KCl were heated in a bath of boiling
water with regular stirring to 80°C. The volume of the solution was 50 mL. The hot solution was then
put into the 4 cm diameter mould and kept at 10°C for two hours. The gel in the mould was inserted into
the measuring instrument (Rheoner RE-3305). The plunger that will be in contact with the gel was in
the middle. The plunger was activated and the samples were measured. Evaluation of measurement
results was done by reading the resulting graph. The maximum force (gel strength) can be read on the
recorder (FMC Corp 1977).
2.4.5 Acid-insoluble ash content (FMC Corp. 1977). The carrageenan was boiled with 25 mL of 10%
HCl for 5 minutes. The unsolved ingredients were filtered using a non-gray filter paper, then cooled in
a desiccator for further weight.
The semi-pure enzyme was obtained by precipitation using 80% of ammonium sulfate. The value of
semi-pure cellulase enzyme activity was 0.014 U/mL. This semi-pure cellulase enzyme was used in the
carrageenan extraction. This result was still low if compared to the cellulolytic activity of the best known
producer of cellulases Trichoderma reesei. Zhao et al (2018) reported the cellulase production of T.
reesei cultured in different media and pretreatment. The cellulase production by T. reesei cultured in
steam-treated willow was 0.7 U/mL and increased to 1.6 U/mL when the culture medium was induced
with acetic acid.
3
EMBRIO 2019 IOP Publishing
IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science 404 (2020) 012071 doi:10.1088/1755-1315/404/1/012071
20
15
10
5
0
2h 3h 2h 3h 2h 3h
0% 1% 2%
Treatment
Figure 1. Effect of cellulase enzyme concentration and time of extraction on carrageenan yield.
Based on the results of yield analysis, it is known that the enzyme concentration factor, extraction time
and interaction between the two factors show the significant effect with p-value <0.01. The highest yield
produced in this study was carrageenan obtained from 1% enzyme concentration and 3 h of extraction
time. The highest yield value was 30.96%.
The yield of this treatment had a value of 6.44% higher than the treatment without enzyme addition.
However, when compared to some previous studies on enzymatic extraction of carrageenan, the yield
value in this study was still lower than other studies. Varadarajan et al (2009) yielded 45% of
carrageenan, while Muthezilan et al (2014) obtained carrageenan yield of 52% by extraction using
purified enzyme with dialysis. This is allegedly due to differences in the value of cellulase enzyme
activity used in carrageenan extraction. The research of Varadarajan et al (2009) used a cellulase enzyme
with an activity value of ≥700 U/g in the carrageenan extraction process.
The value of yield with 1% enzyme concentration was the highest accounting for 28.42%. There was
4.51% difference if compared to the treatment with no enzyme addition. This means that the addition of
1% cellulase enzyme from EN fungus increased the productivity of carrageenan extraction by 4.51%.
The highest value of yield based on the extraction period was obtained after 3 hours extraction with
27.89%. This result shows that the extension of extraction period increased the carrageenan by 2.72%.
4
EMBRIO 2019 IOP Publishing
IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science 404 (2020) 012071 doi:10.1088/1755-1315/404/1/012071
18 a a a a a a
16
Figure 2. Effect of cellulase enzyme concentration and time of extraction on carrageenan sulfate
content.
Based on the result of sulfate content analysis using ANOVA, it is known that the interaction between
enzyme concentration and time of extraction did not have a significant effect on the sulfate content with
p-value>0.01. The sulfate content of carrageenan in this study ranged from 16.05% to 16.95%, the value
still meets the quality standard of carrageenan according to FAO (2007) with sulfate content ranged
from 15-50%. Although the sulfate content in this study still meets the standards, this value remains
very low when compared to the sulfate content of the carrageenan produced using alkali compounds.
Wenno et al (2012) in his research obtained the value of sulfate content in carrageenan was 27.43%.
3.4. Viscosity
Viscosity is the power of molecular flow in the solution system. Viscosity test was done to know the
degree of viscosity of carrageenan solution at a certain concentration and temperature. In this study,
viscosity measurements were performed using 1.5% carrageenan solution at 75°C and measured by a
Brookfield viscometer. The result of viscosity analysis can be seen in figure 3.
35 b
30 d d
c
Viscosity (cP)
25 a a
20
15
10
5
0
2h 3h 2h 3h 2h 3h
0% 1% 2%
Treatment
Figure 3. Effect of cellulase enzyme concentration and time of extraction on carrageenan viscosity.
Based on the results of viscosity analysis using ANOVA, it was found that enzyme concentration factor,
extraction time and interaction between two factors showed a significant effect with a p-value<0.01.
Viscosity of carrageenan extracted for 2 h was higher than that of 3 h extraction with a difference of
2.67 cP. This result shows that the extension of extraction time decreased the viscosity value by 2.67
cP.
5
EMBRIO 2019 IOP Publishing
IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science 404 (2020) 012071 doi:10.1088/1755-1315/404/1/012071
The enzyme concentration had a significant effect on the viscosity value, with the highest value at the
enzyme concentration level of one percent and the lowest for the treatment with no enzyme addition.
The results of this analysis indicate that the addition of enzyme concentration increased carrageenan
viscosity with a concentration limit of 1%. The highest viscosity value 29.5 cP was found in the
interaction of treatment level of enzyme concentration of 1% and 2 h of extraction time. Overall, the
carrageenan viscosity value still follows the quality standard of carrageenan according to FAO that is
above 5 cP.
20.04
20
14.6
15
10
5
0
2h 3h 2h 3h 2h 3h
0% 1% 2%
Treatment
Figure 4. Effect of cellulase enzyme concentration and time of extraction on carrageenan gel strength.
The gel strength values generated in this study ranged from 14.6 gF to 24.75 gF, with the highest value
in the SB carrageenan with treatment 3 h of extraction time and 1% of enzyme concentration. SB
carrageenan has the lowest sulfate content compared with other treatments. This result is similar to that
of Wenno et al (2012) that the smaller of sulfate content increases the consistency of carrageenan gel
strength.
6
EMBRIO 2019 IOP Publishing
IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science 404 (2020) 012071 doi:10.1088/1755-1315/404/1/012071
d
c
b
a
Figure 5. Functional groups of each hydrolysis product with different enzyme concentration, FTIR
spectrum (a) commercial carrageenan, (b) carrageenan with 0% enzyme, (c) carrageenan with enzyme
1% (d) carrageenan with 2% enzyme.
4. Conclusion
The enzyme of marine fungus EN can be used to extract carrageenan. Enzyme concentration, extraction
period and interaction of extraction time and enzyme concentration are affect the yield value, viscosity
and gel strength of the carrageenan.
Acknowledgements
References
Campo V L, Kawano D F, Silva Júni-or D B and Carvalho I 2009 Carrageenan: biological properties,
chemical modifications and structural analysis Carbohydr. Polym. 77 167-180
FAO 2007 Compendium of Food Additive Specifications (Rome: FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture
Technical Paper)
FMC Corp 1977 Carrageenan Marine Colloid Monograph Number One (New Jersey: Marine Colloids
Division FMC Corporation) pp 23-29
Irma A D 2018 Hidrolisis Rumput Laut Menggunakan Kapang Endofit Laut dengan Media yang
Berbeda [Undergraduate Thesis] (Bogor: IPB University)
Muthezilan M, Jayaprakash K, Karthik R and Hussain A J 2014 Endophytic fungal cellulose for
extraction of carrageenan and its use in antibiotics amended film preparation Bios. Biotech. Res. As.
11 307-312
Necas J and Bartosikova L 2013 Carrageenan: a review Vtr. Medic. 58 187-205
Oktavia Y, Andhikawati A, Nurhayati T and Tarman K 2014 Karakterisasi enzim kasar selulase kapang
endofit dari lamun JITKT 6 209-218
Reddy P L N, Babu B S, Radhaian A and Sreeramulu A 2014 Screening, identification and isolation of
cellulolytic fungi from soils of chittoor district India Int. J. Cur. Microbiol. Appl. Scienc. 3 762-771
Sivaramanan S 2014 Isolation of cellulolytic fungi and their degradation on cellulosic agricultural
wastes JAIR 2 458-463
Smith B C 2011 Fundamentals of Fourier Infrared Spectroscopy (Boca Raton: CRC Press)
7
EMBRIO 2019 IOP Publishing
IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science 404 (2020) 012071 doi:10.1088/1755-1315/404/1/012071
Varadarajan S, Ramli N, Ariff A, Saaid M and Yasir S M 2009 Development of high yielding carragenan
extraction method from Eucheuma Cotonii using cellulase and Aspergillus niger Prosiding Seminar
Kimia Bersama UKM-ITB ed A Isak and J salimon (Selangor: Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia) pp
462-469
Webber V, Carvalho S M, Ogliari P J, Hayashi L and Barreto M P L 2012 Optimization of the extraction
of carrageenan from Kappaphycus alvarezii using response surface methodology Ciênc. Tech. Alim.
32 812-818
Wenno M R, Thenu J L and Lopulalan C G C 2012 Karakteristik kappa karaginan dari Kappaphycus
alvarezii pada berbagai umur panen JPBP 7 61-67
Winarno F G 1990 Teknologi Pengolahan Rumput Laut (Jakarta: Pustaka Sinar Harapan)
Zhao C H, Liu X, Zhan T and He J 2018 Production of cellulase by Trichoderma reesei from pretreated
straw and furfural residues RSC Advances 8 36233-36238