Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Test Bank For Dimensional Analysis Calculating Dosages Safely 2nd by Horntvedt
Test Bank For Dimensional Analysis Calculating Dosages Safely 2nd by Horntvedt
7. A fraction represents parts of a whole and is written with a numerator on top and a
on bottom.
3
8. 2 + =
4
5 3
9. + =
9 9
3 1
10. 3 + =
8 4
4 3
11. – =
5 5
9 1
12. – =
3 9
7 3
13. × =
2 14
4 1
14. 3 × =
5 3
1 1
15. ÷ =
4 8
7 2
16. ÷ =
8 3
Fractions-2
Test Bank for Dimensional Analysis Calculating
Dosages Safely 2nd by Horntvedt
full download link at: https://testbankbell.com/product/test-bank-for-dimensional-analysis-
calculating-dosages-safely-2nd-by-horntvedt/
ANSWERS
Fractions
CHAPTER 2
1. When working with fractions, what is the term for the greatest common number that
divides evenly into both the numerator and the denominator?
1. Divisor
2. Factor
3. Dividend
4. Product
ANS: 2
Rationale: The greatest common number, or factor, is one that divides evenly into both the
numerator and the denominator.
2. When adding fractions with different denominators, the fractions must be changed to have
a common denominator. What is the term for this change?
1. Transforming
2. Averaging
3. Lowering
4. Raising
ANS: 4
Rationale: Adding fractions with different denominators involve “raising” fractions to higher
terms to have a common denominator.
ANS: 1
Rationale: Reducing a fraction to the lowest terms involves finding a factor that divides
evenly into both the numerator and denominator. (2) refers to adding fractions, (3) refers to
subtracting fractions, and (4) refers to multiplying fractions.
Fractions-3
Test Bank for Dimensional Analysis Calculating
Dosages Safely 2nd by Horntvedt
full download link at: https://testbankbell.com/product/test-bank-for-dimensional-analysis-
calculating-dosages-safely-2nd-by-horntvedt/
4. Which statements are true when discussing improper fractions? Select all that apply.
1. Numerators are greater than or equal to their denominators.
2. Improper fractions contain both a whole number and a fraction.
3. The value of an improper fraction is greater than or equal to one.
4. Numerators are less than their denominators.
5. Improper fractions contain a numerator and denominator that are both divisible by the
number two.
ANS: 1, 3
Rationale: Improper fractions have numerators that are greater than or equal to their
denominators. The value of an improper fraction is equal to or greater than one. Mixed
fractions contain both a whole number and a fraction. Proper fractions have numerators
that are less than their denominators. Divisibility by two does not affect whether a fraction
is proper or improper.
ANS: 1, 2
Rationale: Adding fractions requires finding a common denominator for the fractions,
adding the numerators, and then reducing the result to the lowest terms. Subtracting
fractions requires finding a common denominator for the fractions, subtracting the smaller
fraction from the larger one, and then reducing the result to the lowest terms. The other
options do not require finding a common denominator.
ANS: 3
Rationale: Mixed fractions contain both whole numbers and fractions. (1) refers to
improper fractions, (2) refers to proper fractions, and (4) is incorrect.
Fractions-4
Test Bank for Dimensional Analysis Calculating
Dosages Safely 2nd by Horntvedt
full download link at: https://testbankbell.com/product/test-bank-for-dimensional-analysis-
calculating-dosages-safely-2nd-by-horntvedt/
7. A fraction represents parts of a whole and is written with a numerator on top and a
on bottom.
ANS: denominator
Rationale: A fraction represents parts of a whole and is written with a numerator on top
and a denominator on bottom.
3
8. 2 + =
4
�
ANS: 2 �
Rationale: Convert 2 into a fraction with a common denominator by multiplying 2 × 4 = 8.
8 3 11
Then add the numerators: + = . To represent this as a mixed number, divide 11 ÷ 4
4 4 4
3
= 2, with 3 left over, or 2 4 .
5 3
9. + =
9 9
�
ANS:
�
5 3 8
Rationale: Add the numerators: + = .
9 9 9
3 1
10. 3 + =
8 4
�
ANS: 3 �
27
Rationale: First, convert the mixed number into an improper fraction: . Then find a
8
2
common denominator for the second number: 8. So, the second number is converted to .
8
27 2 29
Add the numerators:
8
+ 8
= . To represent this as a mixed number, divide 29 ÷ 8 = 3
8
5
with 5 left over, or 3 8.
4 3
11. – =
5 5
𝟏
ANS:
�
4 3 1
Rationale: Subtract the numerators: – = .
5 5 5
Fractions-5
Another random document with
no related content on Scribd:
CHAPTER XI.
A REVOLUTIONARY HOUSEWIFE.
The settlers builded great chimneys with ample open hearths, and
to those hearths the vast forests supplied plentiful fuel; but as the
forests disappeared in the vicinity of the towns, the fireplaces also
shrank in size, so that in Franklin’s day he could write of the big
chimneys as “the fireplaces of our fathers;” and his inventions for
economizing fuel had begun to be regarded as necessities.
The kitchen was the housewife’s domain, the chimney-seat her
throne; but the furniture of that throne and the sceptre were far
different from the kitchen furnishings of to-day.
We often see fireplaces with hanging cranes in pictures illustrating
earliest colonial times, but the crane was unknown in those days.
When the seventeenth-century chimney was built, ledges were left
on either side, and on them rested the ends of a long heavy pole of
green wood, called a lug-pole or back bar. The derivation of the word
lug-pole is often given as meaning from lug to lug, as the chimney-
side was often called the lug. Whittier wrote:—
And for him who sat by the chimney lug.
Others give it from the old English word lug, to carry; for it was
indeed the carrying-pole. It was placed high up in the yawning
chimney, with the thought and intent of its being out of reach of the
devouring flames, and from it hung a motley collection of hooks of
various lengths and weights, sometimes with long rods, sometimes
with chains, and rejoicing in various names. Pot-hooks, pot-hangers,
pot-hangles, pot-claws, pot-cleps, were one and the same; so also
were trammels and crooks. Gib and gibcroke were other titles. Hake
was of course the old English for hook:—
Niddy-noddy,
Two heads and one body.