20231230-Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. To Chief Commissioner of Victoria Police MR Shane Patton - COMPLAINT-Supplement 2

Page 1
1
2
3 Mr Shane Patton, Chief Commissioner of Police (Australia, Victoria date) 30-12-2023
4 Email via HEIDELBERG.UNI@police.vic.gov.au
5
6 Cc: Cr Tom Melican Mayor tom.melican@banyule.vic.gov.au
7 Alison Champion alison.champion@banyule.vic.gov.au
8 Cr Fiona Mitsinikos fiona.mitsdinikos@banyule.vic.gov.au
9 Cr Elizabeth Nealy elizabeth.nealy@banyule.vic.gov.au
10 Cr Mark Di Pasquate mark.dipasquale@banyule.vic.gov.au
11 Cr Alida McKern alida.mckern@banyule.vic.gov.au
12 Cr Peter Dimarelos peter.demarelos@banyule.vic.gov.au
13 Cr Rick Garotti rick.garotti@banyule.vic.gov.au
14 Cr Peter Casteldo peter.castaldo@banyule.vic.gov.au
15 Jan Richardson enquiries@banyule.vic.gov.au
16 Janet Redgrave Team Leader Development Planning enquiries@banyule.vic.gov.au
17 Mr RomanWojtkowski enquiries@banyule.vic.gov.au
18 Banyule City Council enquiries@banyule.vic.gov.au
19
20 20231230-Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. to Chief Commissioner of Victoria Police Mr Shane Patton –
21 COMPLAINT-Supplement 2
22 Sir,
23 it appears that you still did not respond to my 21 December 2023 COMPLAINT and for this
24 I will so to say further up the ante.
25 Constitutionally we do not actually have a valid Federal Government or a valid State
26 Government and municipal/shire councils are not a level of government and certainly any “local
27 government”. See some outline below.
28 There are those who claim that because a referendum failed such as the 1988 referendum for
29 acceptance of councils to be recognised in the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act
30 1900 (UK) or the Voice then this would prohibit any one to pursue them. In my view this is
31 utterly and totally wrong. A referendum is for the electors to approve a certain proposal to amend
32 the constitution but failing that a parliament can still legislate regarding a failed issue provided
33 the constitution in its current form doesn’t prevent it.
34 For example, the Voice referendum failed, as did for example the republic referendum and the
35 council referendums but reality is that unless the constitution already permitted for a
36 (State/Federal) government to legislate on such an issue it cannot be pursued. The Voice kind of
37 legislation is beyond State and Federal legislative powers! See my Scribd blog for explanation.
38 The first issue is that only the Electors can approve an amendment of the constitution. While the
39 High Court of Australia at times purports to amend the constitution such as in Sue v Hill re
40 “Australian Citizenship” being a nationality and in Sykes v Cleary regarding the application of
41 S44 of the constitution both these decision were constitutionally not valid! I have canvassed this
42 extensively in documents published at https://www.scribd.com./inspectorrikati and as such no
43 need to set it out in this document.
44
30-12-2023 Page 1 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, or E-mail
admin@inspector-rikati.com See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati
Page 2
1 When we consider the failure of the referendum regarding councils to be recognised as a level of
2 government then in my view this was the end of the matter. It is the constitution which dictates
3 the level of governments that are applicable, which are the British Parliament (with the EU in
4 some regards) due to the UK membership for many years) , the Federal Parliament (being the
5 Central Government) and the State Parliaments (being the Local Governments). There is no
6 doubt that prior to federation there were people who referred to a council as ‘local government’
7 but that doesn’t mean that constitutionally it is a “local government”. After all, the State
8 Government is the “Local Government” in constitutional terms. Again I canvassed this
9 extensively at my blog.
10
11 The original (Colonial) Victorian Constitution Act 1855 is no more and the purported Victorian
12 Constitution Act 1975 is not a constitution at all but merely a purported legislation which is
13 beyond the Victorian Parliaments legislative ability to create.
14 Surely, a Chief Commissioner of Police should have an understanding of the basic legal template
15 upon law enforcement is based? It appears to me we have grossly incompetent persons as Chief
16 Commissioner of Police who instead of being ‘hands on’ to ensure that the basic legal
17 constitutional provisions are applied we have to say it kindly utter fools going along with
18 whatever treason/terrorism, etc, politicians are up to.
19 If neither the original (Colonial) Victorian Constitution Act 1855 and the purported Victorian
20 Constitution Act 1975 are applicable then what constitution, if any, exist? Well, the (Colonial)
21 Victorian Constitution Act 1855 upon federation was TRANSFORMED into the (State)
22 Victorian Constitution Act 1855. Again, I have extensively canvassed this at my blog and so no
23 need to repeat the same. The documents are available for downloading and I do not charge for
24 anyone to download them.
25
26 HANSARD 9-2-1898 Constitution Convention Debates
27 QUOTE
28 Mr. HIGGINS.-No, because the Constitution is not passed by the Parliament.
29 END QUOTE
30
31 Hansard 8-3-1898 Constitution Convention Debates
32 QUOTE
33 Sir JOHN DOWNER.-Now it is coming out. The Constitution is made for the people and
34 the states on terms that are just to both.
35 END QUOTE
36
37 Hansard 1-3-1898 Constitution Convention Debates (Official Record of the Debates of the National Australasian
38 Convention)
39 QUOTE
40 Mr. GORDON.-Well, I think not. I am sure that if the honorable member applies his
41 mind to the subject he will see it is not abstruse. If a statute of either the Federal or the
42 states Parliament be taken into court the court is bound to give an interpretation according
43 to the strict hyper-refinements of the law. It may be a good law passed by "the sovereign
44 will of the people," although that latter phrase is a common one which I do not care much
45 about. The court may say-"It is a good law, but as it technically infringes on the
46 Constitution we will have to wipe it out." As I have said, the proposal I support retains
47 some remnant of parliamentary sovereignty, leaving it to the will of Parliament on either
48 side to attack each other's laws.
49 END QUOTE
50
52 QUOTE

Page 3
1 Dr. COCKBURN: All our experience hitherto has been under the condition of
2 parliamentary sovereignty. Parliament has been the supreme body. But when we embark
3 on federation we throw parliamentary sovereignty overboard. Parliament is no longer
4 supreme. Our parliaments at present are not only legislative, but constituent bodies. They
5 have not only the power of legislation, but the power of amending their constitutions. That
6 must disappear at once on the abolition of parliamentary sovereignty. No parliament
7 under a federation can be a constituent body; it will cease to have the power of
8 changing its constitution at its own will. Again, instead of parliament being supreme, the
9 parliaments of a federation are coordinate bodies-the main power is split up, instead of
10 being vested in one body. More than all that, there is this difference: When parliamentary
11 sovereignty is dispensed with, instead of there being a high court of parliament, you bring
12 into existence a powerful judiciary which towers above all powers, legislative and
13 executive, and which is the sole arbiter and interpreter of the constitution.
14 END QUOTE
15
16 Because within S106 of the constitution the States are created “subject to this constitution” it
17 means that legal principles embedded in this constitution are applicable to the States.
18 Again:
19 No parliament under a federation can be a constituent body; it will cease to have the
20 power of changing its constitution at its own will.
21
22 Hence, the purported Victorian Constitution Act 1975 enacted by State Parliament is no
23 constitution at all!
24
25 It may be argued that the UK enacted the 1986 Australian Act, however no Parliament can deny
26 a subsequent Parliament to exercise its constitutional legislative powers. Meaning any British
27 Parliament could simply legislate again regarding the Commonwealth of Australia. In any event
28 Ss51(xxxviii) is only referring to Clause 9 of the constitution and not the first 8 clauses. Hence,
29 nothing can be done to turn Australia into a republic, as not even the electors have the powers to
30 amend the first 8 Clauses of the Constitution Act. .
31 The EU legislation comes into play only where the UK was a party to the EU and the EU
32 legislation was overriding UK law other than UK constitutional laws. Again I have set this out in
33 great details in documents published at my blog.
34
35 As the Framers of the Constitution made clear only criminal charges can be laid against a person
36 in the name of the Monarch. Meaning any criminal charges in the name of the DPP are without
37 any legal validity.
38 Often judges criticise a person appearing before a court to claim to be a “sovereign citizen”, and
39 constitutionally they are, and this exposes the judges not to understand/comprehend what the
40 constitution is about. “Sovereign Citizen” doesn’t mean that a person is not bound by laws that
41 were validly enacted, but rather that no “Sovereign citizen” can be denied his/her constitutional
42 rights.
43 Again, we appear to me to have grossly incompetent Chief Commissioners of Police who lack to
44 understand their obligation is not to please politicians in power no matter what but to uphold the
45 rule of law. The police firing rubber bullets at parents holding their small children at Shrine of
46 Remembrance I view were despicable acts of TREASON & TERRORISM against citizens
47 exercising their constitutional rights to peacefully protest.
48
49 I recall there was this female police officer on a recorded videotaped interview who made clear
50 that after the interview she would resign because, to say it in my own words, she didn’t want to
51 be a party to treason and terrorism against citizens. It was my view then and since that she would
Page 4
1 make a real good Chief Commissioner of Police, because to her the rule of law and not the rule
2 of politicians should be enforced.
3
4 HANSARD 17-3-1898 Constitution Convention Debates (Official Record of the Debates of the National
5 Australasian Convention)
6 QUOTE Mr. DEAKIN.-
7 What a charter of liberty is embraced within this Bill-of political liberty and religious
8 liberty-the liberty and the means to achieve all to which men in these days can reasonably
9 aspire. A charter of liberty is enshrined in this Constitution, which is also a charter of
10 peace-of peace, order, and good government for the whole of the peoples whom it will
11 embrace and unite.
12 END QUOTE
13 And
15 QUOTE
16 Mr. SYMON (South Australia).- We who are assembled in this Convention are about to
17 commit to the people of Australia a new charter of union and liberty; we are about to
18 commit this new Magna Charta for their acceptance and confirmation, and I can
19 conceive of nothing of greater magnitude in the whole history of the peoples of the
20 world than this question upon which we are about to invite the peoples of Australia to
21 vote. The Great Charter was wrung by the barons of England from a reluctant king. This
22 new charter is to be given by the people of Australia to themselves.
23 END QUOTE
24 And
26 QUOTE
27 Mr. BARTON.- We can have every faith in the constitution of that tribunal. It is appointed
28 as the arbiter of the Constitution. . It is appointed not to be above the Constitution, for
29 no citizen is above it, but under it; but it is appointed for the purpose of saying that
30 those who are the instruments of the Constitution-the Government and the
31 Parliament of the day-shall not become the masters of those whom, as to the
32 Constitution, they are bound to serve. What I mean is this: That if you, after making
33 a Constitution of this kind, enable any Government or any Parliament to twist or
34 infringe its provisions, then by slow degrees you may have that Constitution-if not
35 altered in terms-so whittled away in operation that the guarantees of freedom which
36 it gives your people will not be maintained; and so, in the highest sense, the court you
37 are creating here, which is to be the final interpreter of that Constitution, will be such a
38 tribunal as will preserve the popular liberty in all these regards, and will prevent,
39 under any pretext of constitutional action, the Commonwealth from dominating the
40 states, or the states from usurping the sphere of the Commonwealth.
41 END QUOTE
42
43 “Political liberty” is not that one on political grounds can go out and harm another person.
44 Criminal laws that are validly enacted do apply in certain circumstances. As such, “Political
45 Liberty” as with “religious liberty” are the rights of citizens as long as they do not interfere with
46 the rights of others.
47 With “religious liberty” a follower may yell out something of the religious scripture of his/her
48 faith but which may amount to harming others. Such expression is not exercise of “Religious
49 Liberty” because it fails the smell test of being strictly for religious purposes without seeking
50 directly/indirectly to harm others.
51
52 When it came to the protest such as at the Shrine of Remembrance the protesters had their
53 constitutional rights to protest against the “covid scam” mandates.
Page 5
1
3 Convention)
4 QUOTE Mr. BARTON (New South Wales).-
5 I do not think the word quarantine, for instance, which is used in the sub-section of the 52nd
6 clause, is intended to give the Commonwealth power to legislate with regard to any
7 quarantine. That simply applies to quarantine as referring to diseases among man-kind.
8 END QUOTE
9
10 At time of federation there was no federal Parliament and it would take months before it was
11 known who was elected to be a Member of Federal Parliament and for this the Framers of the
12 Constitution made clear that the States would have “concurrent” legislative powers in regard to
13 matters within Section 51 and/or existing State legislation (formerly Colonial legislation) would
14 be applicable as follows:
15
17 QUOTE
18 Mr. BARTON.-I was going to explain when I was interrupted that the moment the
19 Commonwealth legislates on this subject the power will become exclusive.
20 END QUOTE
21
23 QUOTE
24 Mr. BARTON (New South Wales).-If this is left as an exclusive power the laws of the
25 states will nevertheless remain in force under clause 100.
26 Mr. TRENWITH.-Would the states still proceed to make laws?
27 Mr. BARTON.-Not after this power of legislation comes into force. Their existing laws
28 will, however, remain. If this is exclusive they can make no new laws, but the necessity of
29 making these new laws will be all the more forced on the Commonwealth.
30 END QUOTE
31
33 QUOTE Mr. HOWE.-
34 My only desire is to give power to the Federal Parliament to achieve a scheme for old-age
35 pensions if it be practicable, and if the people require it. No power would be taken away
36 from the states. The sub-section would not interfere with the right of any state to act in the
37 meantime until the Federal Parliament took the matter in hand.
38 END QUOTE
39
40 Meaning that the “concurrent” legislative powers of the States was no more the moment the
41 Commonwealth commenced to legislate upon a particular Section 51 subject matter. The High
42 Court of Australia in fact is on record about this regarding taxation issues. Meaning, that when
43 the Commonwealth commenced to legislate mas to ‘weight and measures” then the States had to
44 retire from this. Technically this means that not a single traffic camera, traffic light, etc is
45 constitutionally valid unless approved by the Commonwealth.
46 There was however a major problem in 1904, and that is that those who had been in the debates
47 to create the constitution, once in power they wanted to twist and infringe upon the constitution
48 and judges were not immune of such power abuse. Indeed they banned the usage of the Hansard
49 records in 1904, so they could twist and infringe upon what the constitution actually stood for,
50 and remained to do so for some 70 odd years, by then they did themselves refer to the Hansard,
51 but the disaster that had unfolded was considerably.
52 With the 1919 pandemic States closed borders violating the constitution but well who knew
53 about the Hansard recorded legal principles. And so with the 2020 “covid scam” this was relied
54 upon even so I wrote extensively to expose this rot. Let say a police officer were to intercept Mr
Page 6
1 Purple for exceeding the speed limit and Mr Purple then respond that he always has been
2 speeding and never been booked for this and so the police officer now cannot book him for
3 speeding. Would any Chief Commissioner of Police go along with this kind of claim or would it
4 simply be held that any past violation of the rule of law cannot excuse it to do so again?
5 The same is with the “covid scam” border closures, what was done in 1919 cannot and doesn’t
6 excuse to violate the constitution again. If a Chief commissioner of Police is so grossly
7 incompetent to understand/comprehend what is constitutionally permissible then he should find
8 himself/herself a job that might be in his/her competence.
9 It might be claimed that the High Court of Australia in Palmer v WA the court held that WA was
10 entitled to close the borders. Well if one read the Reason of Judgment and so the very last
11 paragraph where the judge quoted part of the Hansard debate then checking the Hansard page
12 you find that the judge actually took the quotation out of context and did not at all to:
13
15 Convention)
20 END QUOTE
21
22 As the ‘mandates’ were a form of quarantine, etc, then clearly this was within the exclusive
23 legislative, executive and administrative powers of the Commonwealth, since the
24 Commonwealth enacted the 1908 Quarantine Act superce3ded by the Biosecurity Act 2015
25 (Cth). But again, because of the High Court of Australia in 1904 having banned (albeit
26 unconstitutionally) the usage of the Hansard States like the State of Victoria was continuing with
27 for example Fairfield infectious disease Hospital after 1908. In my view each person held there
28 would have a legitimate right to sue the State of Victoria for having been unconstitutionally held
29 at the Fairfield Hospital after 1908.
30
31 Victoria had a Chief Health Officer not being a Chief Medical Officer (as I understand he had no
32 medical qualifications) who then commenced with the mask mandates, a sheer and utter
33 nonsense as soon after he started to change what he directed, after all he seemed to lack the
34 science to base it upon. Again my blog canvass this issue extensively.
35 Then we had the nonsense of social distancing again without any scientific research to validate
36 it. We had the locking of people in high rising flats, the ring of steel nonsense, the 5 km limit non
37 sense, the one person in a household to go shopping, the pandemic of the unvaccinated (which
38 turned out to be the pandemic of the vaccinated) the exclusion of the unvaccinated, and in the
39 process the Victorian Police in my view was aiding and abetting with the mass murder upon the
40 many Victorians and others. And I understand Banyule City Council like other councils were all
41 in it.
42 Remember then Premier Daniel Andrews announcing he was not interested in citizen’s rights?
43 Remember he claimed it was about ‘saving lives’ while in real terms he appeared to me to allow
44 mass murder, etc to go on?
45 And let us not ignore all the collaborators with Daniel Andrews, etc.
46 We have for decades council health centres as I understand it involved in what they call
47 childhood vaccinations, regardless the science doesn’t at all exist to prove each and every
48 vaccination is appropriate for each child. Hence the drastic increase in AUTISM.
49 And despite that pharmaceutical companies have failed to really combat influenza, they decided
50 to rename influenza as “covid-19” and well this now allowed for not just the harm against
51 Australians but also the murder of many! And the Chief Commissioner of Police somehow to me
52 seemed to sit on his backside doing nothing to ensure it was all lawful.
Page 7
1 As Neil Ferguson (UK) made clear he even wanted to claim that Hay Fever was also a covid-19
2 variant so it would be more financially profitable for the investors.
3
4 In my view the Victorian Police was more acting like the NAZI Brown Shirts then as a police
5 force to uphold the rule of law. The State of Victoria had no legislative, executive and/or
6 administrative powers to implement and enforce the mandates and this in my view means that
7 none of those in the police force were acting lawfully. In my view each and every police officer
8 who participated in the terrorism against Victorians can be sued personally.
9
11 QUOTE Sir JOHN DOWNER.-
12 I think we might, on the attempt to found this great Commonwealth, just advance one step,
13 not beyond the substance of the legislation, but beyond the form of the legislation, of the
14 different colonies, and say that there shall be embedded in the Constitution the righteous
15 principle that the Ministers of the Crown and their officials shall be liable for any
16 arbitrary act or wrong they may do, in the same way as any private person would be.
17 END QUOTE
18
19 Every hospital that denied medical care should be sued and so their CEO’s personally, etc.
20
21 The same with councils that went about to go along with mandates and even enforced them
22 against employees ignoring the rights of the employees. It is totally absurd to enforce a rule that
23 an employee must inflict self-harm (the jab) to be able to continue to work.
24
25 I yesterday happen to watch a video of a ‘Gary’ who made clear that councillors are really board
26 of directors of a company.
27
28 As I indicated councils are actually registered corporations which cannot legislate as they are not
29 a level of constitutional acknowledged Parliament. Councils do not have the separation of
30 powers structure that is the legal principle in the constitution.
31 Whereas the State & Federal Parliament are bound by drawing monies from the consolidated
32 Revenue Funds by Appropriation Bills, councils seem to go outside this system and so
33 unconstitutionally. Indeed when the stock-market crash eventuated many councils lost a lot of
34 monies in their investments, which proves councils were not collecting monies merely for
35 services but were gambling big time in foreign stock markets and other investments of monies
36 they unconstitutionally had extorted from property owners and others.
37
38 The High Court of Australia in a case of the Commonwealth v Sydney Council 1904 held that
39 council rates were a form of State land taxation. As councils are corporations they cannot charge
40 any State Land Taxation and this may underline why the High Court of Australia banned then
41 the usage of the Hansard as otherwise their deception was to be exposed. In any even the
42 Commonwealth commenced Land Taxation on 11 November 1910 and that wiped out the States
43 to tax property holders about their land and so the alleged delegated taxation powers by councils.
44 Once a Commonwealth legislative power is exercise it always remains to be exclusive
45 Commonwealth legislative powers regardless if the Commonwealth may later abolish the
46 powers.
47
48 Despite my long ago request to Banyule City Council to refund my unconstitutional council
49 rates, it simply totally ignored any response. It means that now I will no longer pay the extortion
50 and there is really nothing that Banyule City Council can do about it unless it within the limits of
51 being a corporation submit to me an account regarding services I accept it to provide for.
52
Page 8
1 While councils generally will go to VCAT to get an order against a property owner, the problem
2 is that my complaint rest upon my constitutional rights and what the constitution stands for and
3 as such VCAT not being a court invested with federal jurisdiction cannot invoke jurisdiction.
4
5 As I previously indicated that neither the magistrates Court of Victoria the County Court of
6 Victoria, the Supreme Court of Victoria, the Federal Court of Australia or even the High Court
7 of Australia can hear and determine any matters in dispute this is because of the 2 December
8 2002 court order where I disputed the constitutional validity of the purported Australian
9 Citizenship Act, as without any validly commissioned judge no court can hear and determine any
10 issue in dispute!
11 Likewise, it applies to those claiming to be OFFICERS OF THE COURT when in fact they
12 claim to be Australian citizens by nationality which is not a constitutional recognised nationality.
13
14 Again, on 8 April 2020 I then lodged a complaint with the Victorian Ombudsman in which I
15 included:
16
18 Convention)
23 END QUOTE
24
25 The Victorian Ombudsman responded that this was a matter for IBAC because allegedly she had
26 no jurisdiction. Allegedly she is bound by what the government does. What an utter and sheer
27 nonsense! After all the State of Victoria was acting unlawful and that should have been her
28 business of the Victorian Ombudsman.
29
30 But my 13 April 2020 complaint to the Victorian Human Rights Commission never even
31 received to my knowledge any response.
32
33 Then IBAC responded that it was not an issue of “public interest”.
34
35 So, IBAC simply railroaded my complaint and well if it is not of “public interest” to mass
36 murder Victorians and others then why do we have any murder trials?
37
38 https://karenkingston.substack.com/p/secretary-austins-military-order-00a?utm_source=post-
39 email-title&publication_id=1103773&post_id=140106532&utm_campaign=email-post-
40 title&isFreemail=true&r=1a0316&utm_medium=email
41 SECRETARY AUSTIN’S MILITARY ORDER TO MASS INJECT the US ARMED
42 FORCES is Not Only Unlawful, It's an Act of Treason
43 A letter drafted and sent by Karen Kingston on August 31, 2021, for receipt by US Air Force
44 Academy General Moga, from a US Senator
45 QUOTE
46 KAREN KINGSTON
47 28 DEC 2023
48 December 27, 2023: Following is a letter I was asked to write for Senator Ron Johnson to
49 oppose the military vaccine mandate, specifically for the US Airforce Academy (USAFA). I
50 sent the below letter on August 31, 2021.
51 Excerpts from August 31, 2021 Letter - We Are in a War

Page 9
1 General Moga, because the serious near- and long-term damage of these experimental
2 chimeric, gain-of-function viral-gene-based agents to the USAFA Cadets is unknown.
3 Mandating they be ‘vaccinated’ is no different than playing Russian roulette with their
4 lives and is a threat to our National Security.
5 You should be aware that evidence has been brought forward that the synthetic mRNA in
6 these COVID-19 INJECTIONS were developed in collaboration with the People’s Republic
7 of China military, the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) and Chinese scientists. The EUA
8 INJECTIONS, developed in collaboration with the PLA military, deliver trillions of disease-
9 causing spike proteins that can cause serious harm and death to those service men and women
10 who are injected. Injected military personnel can also infect others through the phenomena
11 known as “viral shedding,” which has been well document by our own FDA.
12 According to the patents for these mRNA encapsulated ‘vaccines’, these injections
13 also contain graphene oxide – a constituent material of Hydrogel. Hydrogel is an
14 advanced technology able to host electromagnetic fields and transmit data and signals to
15 and from the injected subjects from an external wireless device. If you were to follow
16 through with Secretary Austin’s order, the Hydrogel subjects would be our USAFA
17 Cadets.
18 SECRETARY AUSTIN’S MILITARY ORDER TO MASS INJECT the US ARMED
19 FORCES with ‘COVID-19 VACCINES’ is not only unlawful, but an act of
20 treason. These experimental gain-of-function, chimeric-viral, gene-based agents are
21 bioweapons intended to poison, harm, and kill. These bioweapons were made by and forced
22 upon the American people and US Military by foreign and domestic terrorists.
23 On behalf of the American people, you must refuse to follow the orders of Secretary Austin or
24 resign from office immediately.
25 Share
26 To my knowledge, my claims were believed to be false by the senator and his other advisors.
27 What I wrote in the August 2021 letter was backed by dozens of credible references. Nothing
28 I wrote was an opinion.
29 The claims that were considered to be false or exaggerated likely were;
30  mRNA is not a biologic - mRNA is a suite of nanotechnologies,
31  mRNA injections will cause unprecedented disease and death,
32  mRNA injections are bioweapons,
33  and that US and foreign governments and military forces are behind the
34 development and deployment of mRNA injections.
35 Nearly two years later, the above factual statements have now ALL been claimed to be true
36 by other key influencers and medical experts.
37 “Breaking News”
38 Hence, much of what is covered in the August 2021 letter has been “Breaking News”
39 throughout 2023. Other claims that have been proven to be true are my October 2021
40 reporting on the genetic alterations (explicitly highlighting the use of plasmid DNA in the
41 vials) and that the mRNA injections would cause massive, rapid onsets of advanced Stage 3
42 and 4 cancers.
43 It is important to note that Pfizer can be sued and criminally prosecuted. This has always been
44 the case. Despite incredible pressure, threats and physical attacks, I have never wavered on
45 any of my findings. I am relieved to see Texas is suing Pfizer and thankful for Attorney
46 General Paxton’s bravery and brilliant legal expertise.
47 Credit Where Credit is Due
48 To give reverence to Dr. Lee Merritt and the expression “credit where credit is due,” to my
49 knowledge Dr. Lee Merritt was the first medical influencer in 2021 to call the mRNA
Page 10
1 injections bioweapons and to ask the medical freedom movement to reframe their perspective
2 from “being in a pandemic” to “being in a war.”
3 END QUOTE
4
5 https://www.theepochtimes.com/health/top-covid-events-of-the-year-reveal-facts-unspoken-and-unknown-
6 5551693?utm_source=partner&utm_campaign=vigilantf&src_src=partner&src_cmp=vigilantf
7 Top 10 COVID Events of the Year: Revealing the Facts Unspoken and Unknown
8 Here are the top 10 major events that took place in relation to COVID in 2023.
9 QUOTE
10 “It’s as simple as black and white. You’re vaccinated, you’re safe. You’re
11 unvaccinated, you’re at risk. Simple as that,” Dr. Fauci said on an MSNBC
12 program during the Delta wave.
13 END QUOTE
14 And
15 QUOTE
16 “SARS-CoV-2, endemic coronaviruses, RSV, and many other ‘common cold’ viruses
17 … have not to date been effectively controlled
18 END QUOTE
19 And
20 QUOTE
21 “The vaccines for these two very different viruses (influenza and SARS-CoV-2
22 viruses) … have common characteristics: they elicit incomplete and short-lived
23 protection against evolving virus variants that escape population immunity,” the
24 authors wrote.
25 END QUOTE
26 And
27 QUOTE
28 “The low to moderate certainty of evidence means our confidence in the effect
29 estimate is limited, and that the true effect may be different from the observed
30 estimate of the effect,” the authors concluded, adding that “pooled results of
31 [randomized controlled trials] did not show a clear reduction in respiratory viral
32 infection with the use of medical/surgical masks.”
33 END QUOTE
34 And
35 QUOTE
36 In the spring of 2023, researchers found that mRNA COVID-19 vaccines contain
37 DNA fragments, including controversial SV40 genes, previously undisclosed to the
38 public.
39 Genetic scientist Kevin McKernan initially discovered that DNA fragments were
40 packaged into lipid nanoparticles with the mRNA vaccine segments so that the DNA
41 could enter cells. However, this means the fragments pose a risk of being integrated
42 into the cell’s genome
43 END QUOTE
44 And
45 QUOTE
46 “Pfizer never disclosed the SV40 information to the EMA. They gave them a plasmid
47 map of what the plasmid consisted of, with all of the features labeled, with the
48 exception of the SV40 site,” Mr. McKernan said on EpochTV’s American Thought
49 Leaders program.
50 END QUOTE
51 And
52 QUOTE
53 Apart from being a safety concern, the DNA fragments also indicated potential problems
54 with drug regulation, Mr. McKernan said.
Page 11
1 Initially, Pfizer intended to make its vaccines using a PCR machine, which would have
2 been more expensive and time-consuming. However, the company later switched to using
3 bacteria, likely because that method is faster and more efficient.
4 Pfizer never tested for the safety implications this change would have.
5 “They never ran the clinical trials on that material [bacteria]. Clinical trials were run on this
6 PCR process, and then they switched to a new process after the clinical trials,” Mr.
7 McKernan said.
8 END QUOTE
9 And
10 QUOTE
11 Health Canada confirmed its knowledge of the SV40 contamination in the Pfizer
12 vaccines but added that “the sponsor did not specifically identify the SV40 sequence.”
13 The EMA echoed the statement with a similar response.
14 END QUOTE
15 And
16 QUOTE
17 Two years after health authorities criticized the use of ivermectin for treating COVID-
18 19, with some doctors’ medical licenses suspended for prescribing it, a lawsuit revealed
19 that doctors actually could prescribe ivermectin as a therapeutic for COVID.
20 “FDA explicitly recognizes that doctors do have the authority to prescribe ivermectin to
21 treat COVID,” Ashley Cheung Honold, a Department of Justice lawyer representing the
22 FDA, said during oral arguments on Aug. 8 in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th
23 Circuit.
24 END QUOTE
25 And
26 QUOTE
27 The FDA’s Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER) Sentinel Program is
28 insufficient to assess the serious risks of myocarditis, pericarditis, and subclinical
29 myocarditis associated with the Pfizer vaccine. When the vaccine was approved, the
30 program lacked sufficient power to assess the magnitude of risk. Also, it was
31 insufficient for following up on cases of long-term symptoms and recovery.
32 Emails from the FDA CBER Review Team in August 2021 reveal that the FDA was aware
33 that the vaccines may have contained endotoxins. In the email, the FDA asked Pfizer
34 questions about its process for measuring endotoxins in the vaccines. It is not revealed
35 why the vaccines would contain endotoxins. However, E. coli bacteria—which Pfizer
36 used to make DNA for its mRNA vaccines—produce endotoxins, so this is a possible
37 explanation.
38 END QUOTE
39 And
40 QUOTE
41 10. Not Messenger RNA but Modified RNA, Vaccines Form Aberrant Proteins
42 While the COVID-19 mRNA vaccines on the market were advertised as messenger
43 RNA, meaning naturally occurring RNA in the body, documents from Pfizer and studies
44 on Moderna vaccines showed that the actual mRNA used is modified RNA, or modRNA.
45 Naturally occurring mRNA is primarily composed of uridine, while the modRNA in
46 vaccines has had most of the uridine switched to pseudouridine to make the vaccines
47 hardier and more resistant to immune degradation. An article by Epoch Times guest
48 columnist and molecular scientist Klaus Steger provided a detailed explanation.
49 The sequences have also been changed to induce faster reading of the mRNA, which
50 can affect the final protein produced. Prior research found that an altered reading speed
51 would affect how the final protein folds, which could lead to the formation of new, non-
52 spike, aberrant proteins.
Page 12
1 END QUOTE
2 And
3 QUOTE
4 Brodie Brock
5 1 day ago
6 The reality and SAD truth is not ONE person responsible for orchestrating the greatest
7 CON and CRIME against humanity in the history of time has remotely been held
8 accountable. Not ONE person on entire planet. In fact, it’s being pushed as if nothing is
9 wrong still. I hear ads on the radio and TV daily now pushing the injections. It’s all just
10 “allowed” to continue. Look what was done to humanity these past 4 years and not ONE!
11 END QUOTE
12
13 Obviously it is then a question why did in Australia the TGA, Department of health, APHRA
14 and others prevent Ivermectin and other drugs to be used and even suspend medical doctors
15 where those medical doctors were pursuing to do their job?
16
17 QUOTE
18 Two years after health authorities criticized the use of ivermectin for treating COVID-
19 19, with some doctors’ medical licenses suspended for prescribing it, a lawsuit revealed
20 that doctors actually could prescribe ivermectin as a therapeutic for COVID.
21 “FDA explicitly recognizes that doctors do have the authority to prescribe ivermectin to
22 treat COVID,” Ashley Cheung Honold, a Department of Justice lawyer representing the
23 FDA, said during oral arguments on Aug. 8 in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th
24 Circuit.
25 END QUOTE
26
27 When will the Australian federal Police and all Chief Commissioners of Police in the States and
28 Territories finally get of their backsides and charge each and every person who was pushing the
29 “covid scam” and also their collaborators for the harm inflicted and that includes the thousands
30 of deaths?
31
32 https://vigilantnews.com/post/italian-health-minister-under-investigation-for-murder-for-
33 concealing-covid-19-vaccine-deaths/
34 Italian Health Minister Under Investigation for Murder for Concealing COVID-19 Vaccine
35 Deaths
36 “He knew the shots were killing people and gave orders to local health authorities to conceal
37 deaths and serious side effects.”
38 QUOTE
39 “Former Italian Health Minister Roberto Speranza is under investigation for homicide after
40 emails reveal that from the very start of the vaccinations, he knew the shots were killing
41 people and gave orders to local health authorities to conceal deaths and serious side effects
42 in order to reassure Italian citizens of their safety and to not jeopardize the vaccination
43 campaign,” reported InfoWars contributor Greg Reese in viral X post shared by Alex
44 Jones.
45 These staggering accusations were been reported on by both a German and Italian news
46 network.
47 END QUOTE
48 And
49 QUOTE
50 The Rome Public Prosecutor’s office is investigating Roberto Speranza, the Italian
51 government’s Health Minister, during the time of COVID measures. He was responsible
52 for the vaccination campaign. The investigations are the result of complaints related to the

Page 13
1 so-called AIFA emails from the Italian Medicines Agency. The former director of AIFA,
2 Nicola Magrini, is also under investigation.
3 END QUOTE
4 And
5 QUOTE
6 The publication of these internal emails revealed that they had been aware of the dangers
7 of the COVID vaccination from the start. The accusation is that the responsible minister
8 and the head of the drug authority knowingly and deliberately exposed the unsuspecting
9 Italian population to this risk.
10 END QUOTE
11
12 During Senate Estimates it was clear that TGA John Skerritt as I understood it never did do all
13 relevant testing. He came across to me as being on the payroll of the pharmaceutical companies
14 to push the “gene therapy” DEPOPULATION bioweapon jab no matter what and I understand
15 he too was concealing deaths of children to avoid a backlash by citizen s against the jabs.
16 In my view John Skerrit and then Health Minister Greg Hunt were falsely claiming the jabs were
17 “safe and effective” which they were in no position to do so long before the clinical trials were
18 to be completed. The Department of health in my view published false and misleading
19 information on its website, including about DNA, and in my view this was an elaborate
20 conspiracy to push the jabs no matter what.
21 As I stated we do not have any valid Federal Government and/or State/Territory Government
22 because they all were in on the “covid scam” and by the provisions of Section 44 and s45 they
23 all automatically were no longer Members of Parliament and neither could claim any special
24 protection as again:
25
27 QUOTE Sir JOHN DOWNER.-
28 I think we might, on the attempt to found this great Commonwealth, just advance one step,
29 not beyond the substance of the legislation, but beyond the form of the legislation, of the
30 different colonies, and say that there shall be embedded in the Constitution the righteous
31 principle that the Ministers of the Crown and their officials shall be liable for any
32 arbitrary act or wrong they may do, in the same way as any private person would be.
33 END QUOTE
34
35 Neither could the Federal Government claim ‘NATIONAL SECURITY” as to cover up their
36 involvement in crimes and conspiracy to criminal action, etc. When the Commonwealth engages
37 in any commercial contract using taxpayer’s monies then the taxpayers are entitled to full
38 disclosure of all terms and conditions. While politicians and their officials may desire to delay
39 the facts to come out, TREASON is not subject to any Statute of Limitations.
40 Remember the videos of Brad Hazzard Minister for Health NSW to coral about 4,000 children
41 into an arena and have them jabbered as he and the Chief Health Officer made clear it was for
42 the New World Order then in my view they clearly by their own claims they were in violation
43 of Section 44 of the constitution and by Section 45 stripped of their positions, etc.
44
45 We had the army getting involved also, albeit unconstitutionally as I did canvas also in the past.
46
47 https://expose-news.com/2023/12/26/excessd-eaths-covid-vaccine-5-month-countdown-to-death/
48 Shocking Truth behind COVID Vaccines: 52.5k Brits Died Suddenly in 8 Months in 2022
49 due to Vaccination with Official Data proving they cause a 5-Month Countdown to Death
50 QUOTE
51 As the death toll rises, a dark shadow has been cast over Britain.

Page 14
1 Official data reveals that from April 2022 through to December 2022, 407,910 deaths
2 occurred, with 47,379 excess deaths against the 2015-2019 five-year average.
3 As the investigation deepens, it has become increasingly clear that the Covid-19
4 vaccines are the most likely cause of the unprecedented loss of life in Britain. The
5 evidence is damning, with a startling correlation between the rollout of the vaccines
6 and the spike in deaths.
7 We were told the vaccines would bring hope and healing amid an alleged global
8 pandemic. But now, it seems that they have instead brought even more devastation
9 and pain.
10 END QUOTE
11 And
12 QUOTE
13
14 And in the five months between January and May 2022, deaths again increased, with the
15 triple vaccinated accounting for the majority at 82%.
16 Source Data
17 The evidence is clear and undeniable: the vaccines have been and are still killing people,
18 with the deadly consequences being fully realised approximately five months after each
19 vaccination.
20 This is a tragedy of epic proportions,
21 END QUOTE
22
23 https://www.theepochtimes.com/health/top-covid-events-of-the-year-reveal-facts-unspoken-and-unknown-
24 5551693?utm_source=partner&utm_campaign=vigilantf&src_src=partner&src_cmp=vigilantf
25 Top 10 COVID Events of the Year: Revealing the Facts Unspoken and Unknown
26 QUOTE
27 2. Vaccines Cannot ‘Effectively’ Control COVID: Fauci After Resigning

Page 15
1 The resignation of Dr. Anthony Fauci, former director of the National Institute of Allergy
2 and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), was noteworthy given his role in leading the United
3 States pandemic response and his actions soon after resigning.
4 Dr. Fauci was very vocal in encouraging vaccine uptake and regularly appeared on
5 television programs motivating people to get vaccinated.
6 “It’s as simple as black and white. You’re vaccinated, you’re safe. You’re
7 unvaccinated, you’re at risk. Simple as that,” Fauci said on Dr. an MSNBC program
8 during the Delta wave.
9 Before the Delta wave in the United States, Dr. Fauci compared vaccinated people to “dead
10 ends” for the virus on CBS’s Face the Nation.
11 However, on Jan. 11, weeks after his resignation at the end of 2022, Dr. Fauci and two
12 other researchers published a paper in Cell Host & Microbe that gained traction due to
13 their comments on the effectiveness of vaccines in controlling respiratory viruses.
14 “SARS-CoV-2, endemic coronaviruses, RSV, and many other ‘common cold’ viruses
15 … have not to date been effectively controlled by licensed or experimental vaccines,”
16 the authors wrote in their introduction.
17 Dr. Fauci and two other researchers published a paper in Cell Host and Microbe. In the
18 paper, they wrote, “SARS-CoV-2 [and other ‘common cold’ viruses] … have not to
19 date been effectively controlled by licensed or experimental vaccines.” (Stefani
20 Reynolds-Pool/Getty Images, The Epoch Times)
21 END QUOTE
22
23 And for this Scott Morrison keeps the contract secret because the scam would be fully exposed.
24 There ought to be absolutely no doubt that this elaborate scam succeeded also because we lacked
25 competent police who would investigate but rather so to say were rolling over to suit the
26 politicians. They all must face the legal consequences. I understood that at one stage it was
27 claimed that about 1300 police and other security guards had not been properly sworn in and that
28 somehow the State Government legislated to overcome this issue, however as I have shown
29 above that they can be held legally accountable as any purported legislation cannot overcome
30 this. Too often politicians are involved in treason/terrorism and other unlawful conduct and so to
31 say get away with it and that must be stopped. Police who refuse to do their job must be held to
32 be associates of the criminal conduct and also be held legally accountable.
33
34 Banyule City Council is nothing more but a corporation and has no legal standing to
35 purportedly charge so called “council rates” that is an unconstitutional alleged delegated State
36 Land Taxation. Not even the State government can charge State Land Taxation as it is exclusive
37 Commonwealth legislative powers since 11 November 1910!
38
39 Neither has Banyule City Council any legal standing to trespass or otherwise enter my property
40 ESTATE IN FEE SIMPLE without my or my wife’s consent. And they must be held legally
41 accountable for having trespassed, causing damage and in particular harm to my wife Olga and
42 for their repeated nonsensible NOTICIFICATION TO NOTICE TO ENTER. Also their
43 ongoing STALKING, vandalizing Olga’s car, etc.
44 It is the Victorian Police task to ensure that Banyule City Council is prevented to repeat
45 their criminal conduct on 3 January 2024, as I understand Angela O’Brien indicated to do
46 so again.
47
49 QUOTE Mr. DEAKIN (Victoria).-
50 The record of these debates may fairly be expected to be widely read, and the observations to which I
51 allude might otherwise lead to a certain amount of misconception.
52 END QUOTE

Page 16
1
3 QUOTE Mr. HIGGINS:
4 I think it is advisable that private people should not be put to the expense of having
5 important questions of constitutional law decided out of their own pockets.
6 END QUOTE
7
8 Meaning any litigation involving the constitution cannot be subject to any orders for cost against
9 me.
10
11 Let us not ignore the fear mongering about the Monkey Pox and that people should be jabbed
12 against it. Well let us consider also the following:
13
14 https://www.lewrockwell.com/lrc-blog/measles-smallpox-are-regularly-confused-for-one-
15 another/
16 Measles & Smallpox Are Regularly “Confused” For One Another
17 QUOTE
18 Historical Fact:
19 Measles & Smallpox have been regularly “Confused” for one another – for a very long
20 time.
21 Why?
22 In reality, they are the same detoxification process just with different labels and assigned
23 different made-up “viral” causes for basically the same symptoms.
24
25 END QUOTE
26
27 What we really seem to have is ongoing fear mongering this so pharmaceutical companies can
28 earn a lot of monies and citizens health will deteriorate due to the poison that is injected as this
29 will rather harm citizens than improve their health and wellbeing status.

Page 17
1 We now have charlatans with their snake oil jabs, so when you become ill the pharmaceutical
2 companies can make mo0re money from your suffering.
3 Let us be very clear if due to a manufacturing issue a person dies then generally being it car
4 maker or others they must account for it. With the jabs (“gene therapy” DEPOPULATION
5 bioweapon jabs) , it is clear that Pfizer and others deliberately concealed relevant details and so
6 no citizen could be deemed to have given “informed consent” to a jab and this poses the question
7 how gross incompetent is the Chief Commissioner of Police to have ignored to investigate
8 matters and pursue legal accountability for any offenders?
9
10 Scott Morrison requested the Australian Federal Police to investigate regarding COVID
11 issues, and well, let the AFP do its job and do a proper investigation as I now have
12 requested in this COMPLAINT.
13 This document can be downloaded from:
14 https://www.scribd.com/document/518990686/20210806-Mr-G-H-Schorel-Hlavka-O-W-B-to-
15 Reece-Kershaw-Chief-Commissioner-of-the-Australian-Federal-Police-COMPLAINT-2
16 QUOTE 20210806-Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. to Reece Kershaw Chief Commissioner of the Australian
17 Federal Police COMPLAINT
18 Reece Kershaw 6-8-2021
19 Chief Commissioner of the Australian Federal Police
20 Forwarded via email/mail
21
22 Cc: Mr Scott Morrison via email
23 acv@health.gov.au Advisory Committee on Vaccines, Therapeutic Goods Administration
24 PO Box 100, WODEN ACT 2606 Attn: Pharmacovigilance and Special Access Branch, MDP 122
25
26 Committees@health.gov.au Committee Support Unit, Therapeutic Goods Administration
27 PO Box 100, WODEN ACT 2606 Attn: Scheduling & Committee Support Section, MDP 122
28
29 Mr Daniel Andrews Premier daniel.andrews@parliament.vic.gov.au
30
31 Mr Martin Pakula, martin.pakula@parliament.vic.gov.au, attorney-general@justice.vic.gov.au
32
33 20210806-Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. to Reece Kershaw Chief Commissioner of the Australian Federal Police
34 COMPLAINT
35 Sir,
36 I understand from news report that a special AFP team has been appointed regarding online
37 publications relating to the COVID-19 issue. I view therefore that it is within the AFP
38 investigative powers to investigate all relevant issues and not just those which the Government
39 may desire to be investigating to perhaps aids in its overthrow of the Commonwealth of
40 Australia Constitution Act 1900 (UK) and so the provisions therein.
41
42 https://www.9news.com.au/national/coronavirus-anti-vaxxers-targeted-special-team-detectives-fears-could-target-
43 vaccine-hubs/fad28908-9340-4d0e-80f7-f5e21d61f0e7
44 Coronavirus: Anti vaxxers targeted by special team of detectives amid fears they could target
45 vaccine hubs (9news.com.au)
46 Fears vaccine hubs could be 'targeted' as online chatter spikes
47 QUOTE
48 A special team of AFP detectives has been appointed by the Federal Government to
49 watch the online interactions of the anti-vaccination "movement".
50 END QUOTE
51
52 My concern is also that the Federal Government is aiding and abetting with the States as to
53 succeed in this to install a NEW WORLD ORDER, violating our constitutional rights, by
54 providing funding for the unconstitutional lockdowns or any state/territory.
55
Page 18
1 Hansard 23-3-1897 Constitution Convention Debates (Official Record of the Debates of the National
2 Australasian Convention)
3 QUOTE Mr. BARTON:
4 We ought to leave it open to this extent, that while we agree upon essentials, and express ourselves fully
5 and freely upon all our views, still, so far as our views are not negatived by any principle here laid down,
6 their embodiment in any resolution may stand over for Select Committee and afterwards [start page 20] for
7 Committee of the whole House, when they may be debated with the freest publicity and fullest
8 freedom. I believe we shall by this process best arrive at conclusions; not that, as many of us would like.
9 we shall be able to drive our own particular views to an issue at once, but we shall discuss all these matters,
10 both constitutionally and otherwise, and then we may arrive at views which, though contrary to our
11 present opinions, shall essentially represent the views of those who sent us here to deal with the
12 problems we have to discuss.
13 END QUOTE
14
15 The legal principle of the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900 (UK) is that We,
16 the People, elect our representatives to act on our behalf laws and governance for “peace, order
17 and good” governance. A NEW WORLD ORDER that would take over those legal principles
18 would be akin to treason by those who are promoting and/or aiding and abetting in this regard to
19 apply/install the NEW WORLD ORDER.
20 Mr Brad Hazzard purported NSW Minister for health is recorded at least on 2 videos making
21 known he is using the NEW WORLD ORDER. In my view, this disqualifies him from being a
22 Member of any Australian Parliament as provided for in Section 44 of the constitution to which
23 the States within Section 106 are “subject to this constitution”. Likewise, any other purported
24 Member of any Australian Parliament who is aiding and abetting in this TREASONOUS
25 conduct.
26 .
28 QUOTE
29 Mr. CARRUTHERS:
30 This is a Constitution which the unlettered people of the community ought to be able to understand.
31 END QUOTE
32 QUOTE 20210806-Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. to Reece Kershaw Chief Commissioner of the Australian
33 Federal Police COMPLAINT
34
35 This so far 7045 pages COMPLAINT appears not to have been investigated. Nevertheless it is
36 on record, and I can rely upon this in any litigation.
37
38
39
40 We need to return to the organics and legal principles embed in of our federal constitution!
41
42 This correspondence is not intended and neither must be perceived to state all issues/details.
43 Awaiting your response, G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. (Gerrit)
44 MAY JUSTICE ALWAYS PREVAIL®

45 (Our name is our motto!)

20231230-Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. To Chief Commissioner of Victoria Police MR Shane Patton - COMPLAINT-Supplement 2

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

You might also like

20231230-Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. To Chief Commissioner of Victoria Police MR Shane Patton - COMPLAINT-Supplement 2

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

20231230-Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. To Chief Commissioner of Victoria Police MR Shane Patton - COMPLAINT-Supplement 2

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Page 1

30-12-2023 Page 1 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

30-12-2023 Page 2 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

30-12-2023 Page 8 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

30-12-2023 Page 12 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

30-12-2023 Page 13 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

30-12-2023 Page 14 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

30-12-2023 Page 15 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

30-12-2023 Page 16 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

44 MAY JUSTICE ALWAYS PREVAIL®

You might also like