A study on the analysis of the integration of sustainability practices into project

management by considering challenges and opportunities

1
Table of Contents
CHAPTER ONE – LITERATURE REVIEW I...............................................................................3

1.1 Resistance Dynamics in Integrating Sustainability................................................................3

1.2 Financial Implications of Sustainable Project Management..................................................5

1.3 Stakeholder Engagement and Value Creation........................................................................7

1.4 Resilience Amplification through Sustainability...................................................................9

1.5 Change Management Strategies for Sustainable Initiatives.................................................11

CHAPTER TWO – LITERATURE REVIEW II...........................................................................14

2.1 Current State of Sustainability Integration in Project Management....................................14

2.2 Challenges of Traditional Project Management in Embracing Sustainability.....................16

2.3 Economic and Social Impacts of Sustainable Project Management....................................17

2.4 Innovative Approaches to Sustainable Project Management...............................................19

2.5 Role of Education and Training in Sustainable Project Management.................................20

References......................................................................................................................................23

2
CHAPTER ONE – LITERATURE REVIEW I
1.1 Resistance Dynamics in Integrating Sustainability

Figure 1: Integrating Sustainability

Source: (Pelenc et al., 2019: 373)

Project managers challenge a complex web of difference that is embedded in investor insights
and organizational arrangements when trying to integrate sustainability strategies (Pelenc et al.,
2019: 373). This resistance offerings complex problems for project teams, organizational
structure, and investors since it is ingrained in long-standing ways. It looks as a durable barrier
shaped by deeply held politics that prevents the smooth application of sustainability plans. To
overawed this compound web of struggle, a subtle plan that reflects the many levels of doubt and
fear woven throughout the government's structure is essential (Ivanov, 2020: 80). A collection of
investors that are firmly rooted in old-style project management methods and are reluctant to
undertaking outside of their ease zone are at the core of the disagreement to including sustainable
methods. Their disinclination to adopt sustainable methods frequently stems from an innate
faithfulness to existing values centered on cost-effectiveness, suitability, and well-defined project
possibilities. This faithfulness creates a durable wall that stops sustainability factors from being
integrated since they are supposed as disruptive forces that impend the status quo. Moreover,
stakeholders' anxieties may rise from an unclear sympathetic of the specific assistances or
possible disadvantages of applying sustainable performs, which inspires a averseness to stray
from well-trod land (El Mekaoui et al., 2020: 75).

The fear of offering into unfamiliar crushed that is inherent in sustainable methods is the driving
force behind the tangible unwillingness to change within project sides (Pelenc et al., 2019: 373).
Team associates who are deeply entrenched in standard events may display a important dislike of

3
change, do in advance that workflow will be disturbed or unable to adjust to new approaches.
This opposition is often the result of a lack of information about sustainable performs and doubts
about potential problems or the learning curve complicated in putting them into result. Also,
team associates may not have conventional enough training or sympathetic to the position of
sustainability in the project situation, leaving them uninformed of the subtle distinctions needed
in incorporating sustainable performs within the project's existing limits. Due to their engrained
traditional arrogances that place an importance on short-term profits overhead long-term
sustainability purposes, organizational assemblies frequently function as strongholds of
confrontation to the combination of sustainability performs (Ivanov, 2020: 80). The root reason
of this confrontation is deeply rooted administrative inertia, whereby agreements that have been
created favor constancy and tried-and-true approaches, which makes reluctance to obligate
capitals to novel sustainability efforts. Although stable, hierarchical governments might obstruct
the quick adoption of sustainability since of their unbending decision-making events and the
trouble of getting leadership provision, which is important but frequently indefinable (El
Mekaoui et al., 2020: 75).

Change management patterns employ a diversity of tactics to transfer this complex topography
of disagreement (Pelenc et al., 2019: 373). The ability to communicate clearly and persuasively
is key to these tactics. This tactical instrument deconstructs the reasoning behind sustainable
integration and articulates its intrinsic value proposition, all the while addressing concerns with
great care. Education and training programs become essential instruments that fill up knowledge
gaps and provide teams and stakeholders with the skills they need to adopt and apply sustainable
practices. Most importantly, incorporating team members and stakeholders in decision-making
processes creates a sense of ownership and promotes a change-receptive culture (Ivanov, 2020:
80). Through a collaborative and participatory framework, this inclusive approach incorporates
their concerns and ideas into the integration strategy, thereby minimizing resistance. In this
transformative process, leadership plays a crucial role by promoting sustainability. Their constant
support and active participation play a crucial role in guiding the necessary cultural
transformation for successful integration. Their advocacy breaks down obstacles to change,
indicating a clear course forward and creating an atmosphere where adopting sustainable
practices becomes second nature to the company (El Mekaoui et al., 2020: 75).

4
1.2 Financial Implications of Sustainable Project Management

Figure 2: Implications of Sustainable Project Management

Source: (Erdogan et al., 2019: 223)

Project managers must weave together a complex web of financial concerns when integrating
sustainability techniques, balancing short-term financial demands with long-term advantages
(Vrchota et al., 2020: 281). Adopting sustainable practices frequently faces substantial initial
financial obstacles at the outset. The impediments stem from the necessity of allocating resources
towards sustainable technology, materials, and processes, which generally entail greater initial
costs in contrast to conventional methodologies. Project managers and organizations with limited
resources typically find this cost load to be a significant problem, which discourages them from
pursuing sustainable initiatives (Erdogan et al., 2019: 223). The appeal of long-term advantages,
however, stands out as a strong counterbalance among these up-front difficulties. Strict
evaluation procedures for determining return on investment (ROI) become essential to close the
gap between current expenses and potential future benefits. Using full life-cycle cost analysis is
the main method for identifying possible savings and total benefits during the project.
Showcasing energy savings, improved waste management, or enhanced brand image helps to
demonstrate the sustainable integration's financial viability (Alzoubi, 2022: 80).

It also becomes crucial to investigate ways to get over these financial obstacles while optimizing
the long run advantages (Vrchota et al., 2020: 281). Working together with suppliers,

5
stakeholders, and industry professionals provides a rich environment for finding sustainable
options that are affordable without sacrificing the integrity of the project. A viable way to lower
upfront expenses and achieve sustainability goals is to embrace technical innovations and
creative methods. Empirical data and successful case studies emphasize the financial benefits
that come with sustainability even more. These provide examples of how environmentally
friendly actions not only lessen their impact on the environment but also have a positive financial
impact by lowering operating expenses and improving market positioning (Erdogan et al., 2019:
223). This supports the claim that, despite some initial financial hardships, sustainable project
management may greatly improve the bottom line throughout the project's lifespan. Securing
funding requires putting together a strong business case that links environmental goals with
corporate interests. It is critical to take the sustainability addition's long-term benefits to get
provision and get over disagreement entrenched in short-term budgetary doubts. It is vital to
strike a balance between up-front prices and long-term recompences to promote broad receipt
and advance sustainable project management plans (Alzoubi, 2022: 80).

Assessing the return on investment (ROI) in sustainable project management needs the
application of intricate methods that go outside traditional financial analysis (Vrchota et al.,
2020: 281). A important method that measures costs and assistances across the sequence of a
project is life-cycle estimate. This approach deliberates not just the original expenses but also the
continuing costs of process, maintenance, and removal in addition to the long-term
compensations like lower ecological impact or energy investments. The Social Return on
Investment (SROI) example, which counts non-financial results to current a more complete ROI
picture, also broadens the assessment scope to comprise social and environmental insinuations.
Additionally, cost-benefit study tools help decision-makers assess the financial feasibility of
sustainability programs by complementary predictable advantages against immediate
expenditures (Erdogan et al., 2019: 223). Innovative thoughtful and cooperative relations are key
mechanisms of strategies for adopting reasonable sustainable replacements. Taking benefit of
technological and scientific growths permits for the discovery of ecologically friendly resources,
cost-effective manufacturing methods, or renewable energy sources that support sustainability
areas. Project integrity is upheld while costs are reduced through supplier teamwork, circular
economy activities, and reserve sharing within the business. Furthermore, funding investigate
and development to recover sustainability pays off in the long run by hopeful an innovative

6
culture that obviously lowers costs while indorsing sustainable performs. In the end, combination
these approaches with planned partnerships makes the foundation for mixing affordable
maintainable options into project management models (Alzoubi, 2022: 80).

1.3 Stakeholder Engagement and Value Creation

Figure 3: Stakeholder Engagement in Project Management

Source: (Loureiro et al., 2019: 119)

Sustainability integration within project management extends far beyond environmental

considerations, it intertwines with stakeholder engagement, fostering a profound impact on
relationships and brand perception (Attanasio et al., 2021: 292). At its core, this integration
presents an opportunity to deepen stakeholder relationships by aligning project goals with their
evolving expectations and ethical concerns. When projects prioritize sustainability, stakeholders,
including investors, customers, employees, communities, and regulatory bodies, perceive a
commitment to responsible practices, nurturing a sense of trust and mutual respect. Improved
relationships between stakeholders in structures for sustainable projects are based on openness
and common ground. Communicating openly about sustainable initiatives, their goals, and the
observable effects fosters inclusivity and encourages participants to take an active role. Engaging
community in environmentally conscious initiatives or asking staff members for their opinions
on sustainable methods, for example, not only improves connections but also creates a sense of a
shared responsibility that eventually improves project results (Loureiro et al., 2019: 119).
Integrating the concept of sustainability has a notable impact on the perception of a brand, hence
increasing its consumer resonance. Initiatives that promote sustainable present a business image

7
deeply rooted in moral behavior and social responsibility. Customers who care about
sustainability find this to be extremely relatable, which increases loyalty to the business and
appeal. Investors view these projects as wise and ethical investments, which increases the brand's
financial value. Investors are becoming more and more attracted to initiatives that promote
sustainability (Hollebeek et al., 2020: 109).

Moreover, including sustainable into project management frequently results in uniqueness and
creativity (Attanasio et al., 2021: 292). Businesses that pursue sustainability frequently provide
novel solutions that distinguish them in the marketplace. This kind of creativity not only supports
environmental objectives but also strengthens the brand's standing as a pioneer in bringing about
constructive change. But even while sustainable can improve relationships with stakeholders and
brand reputation, it needs sincere dedication. The practice of "green or just talking the talk about
sustainability without taking concrete steps to improve it, can backfire and undermine
stakeholder confidence as well as reputation. Integrity in sustainability initiatives, supported by
tangible actions and open interaction is therefore still crucial (Loureiro et al., 2019: 119). When
sustainability and the expectations of stakeholders are in line, it creates a relationship that goes
beyond simple compliance and becomes a key factor in the project's overall value. Because
sustainability is in line with stakeholder expectations, it resonates deeply with the ethos and
values of a wide range of stakeholders, including environments, investors, consumers, workers,
and regulatory organizations. Fundamentally, this alignment depends on comprehending and
attending to the diverse wants, worries, and ambitions of parties (Hollebeek et al., 2020: 109).

Organizations can gain more support from constituents by incorporating sustainability into
project frameworks and demonstrating that they react to the changing environmental and social
environment (Attanasio et al., 2021: 292). Investors, for example, value profitable businesses
more financially because they believe they are stronger and less susceptible to social or
ecological issues. Community impacted by sustainability-infused projects get observable
advantages, which build goodwill and support for the programs. Consumers gravitate toward
businesses and projects that reflect sustainable because they are motivated by ethical and ethical
concerns, which increases their perceived worth. Sustainability congruence also increases the
value of projects by reducing risks and maximizing possibilities (Loureiro et al., 2019: 119).
Sustainable practice-based initiatives show the ability to anticipate and manage changing laws

8
and public expectations, which lowers the possibility of negative legal consequences or negative
public opinion. Furthermore, creativity is stimulated by sustainability, leading to the creation of
sustainable innovations, effective procedures, and creative solutions that provide the
project's inherent worth. The concept raises the value proposition of initiatives by improving
their productivity and setting them apart from the competition. Because there is an inherent
connection between project value and environmental alignment, it is critical for enterprises to
actively interact with customers, understand their differing demands, and integrate sustainability
into project strategy. This alignment does more than just provide incidental benefit; rather, it
turns initiatives become agents of good change that resonate with consumers, strengthen bonds,
and increase the initiative's overall value. Sustainable practices should be the foundation of
stakeholder involvement for companies as they traverse an increasingly complicated and
connected environment. This will help to build sustainable project value (Hollebeek et al., 2020:
109).

1.4 Resilience Amplification through Sustainability

Sustainability strategies are essential for strengthening the adaptability of projects because they
create a barrier for various hazards that arise from the social, environmental, and economic
spheres (Lam et al., 2020: 85). Fundamentally, sustainable incorporates mechanisms for
adaptation into project management structures, enhancing resilience through readiness,
adaptability, and the capacity to lessen and overcome adversity. Reducing the impact of carbon
emissions, optimizing the utilization of resources, and promoting eco-friendly procedures are a
few of the proactive ways that sustainable methods mitigate environmental hazards, such as
limited supply or disruption brought on by climate change (Choudhary et al., 2022: 144).
Sustainable programs that prioritize partner inclusion, foster community engagement, and uphold
moral standards can mitigate social risks such as conflict between stakeholders and
disconnection from others. Sustainable practices reduce risks financially by preventing possible
losses due to market fluctuations or regulatory compliance. Projects that are in line with
environmentally friendly standards demonstrate adaptability to changing consumer needs and
regulations, which lowers risk. Integrating sustainable promotes a culture of ongoing learning
and change, both of which are essential elements of resilience (Peano et al., 2020: 271).

9
Implementing a sustainable approach forces companies to prepare for, anticipate, and adjust to
changes and unpredictability, fostering an aggressive risk-management attitude (Lam et al., 2020:
85). For example, counting sustainable selections into supply chains expands the chain and
decreases the risk of energy lacks while maintaining operational endurance in the occasion of
disruptions. In a similar vein, charity agendas integrated into sustainability initiatives deliver
support systems, consolidation the project's competence to withstand surprising problems with
culture. Sustainable approaches lower costs by prevention potential losses from market swipes or
nonfulfillment with regulations. Creativities that adhere to eco-friendly values show plasticity in
reaction to instable client demands and legal supplies, which reduces hazard (Peano et al., 2020:
271).

Durability needs constant development and change, which is why including sustainable
approaches is so significant (Lam et al., 2020: 85). Adopting a sustainable strategy pushes
businesses to take proactive risk management by forcing them to prepare, plan for, and respond
to changes and instability. For instance, adding sustainable options to supply chains expands
them, lowers their risk of energy problems, and ensures that business as usual will continue even
in the event of disruptions. Similarly, incorporating helping others into sustainability initiatives
strengthens the project's resilience to unforeseen social problems by offering networks of support
(Choudhary et al., 2022: 144). Adopting a modular and flexible design for the project facilitates
quick adaptations in the event of unanticipated difficulties. This method encourages adaptability,
allowing certain project components to adjust on their own without sacrificing the mission's
coherence. Moreover, integrating agile approaches into sustainability models promotes gradual
and iterative growth, permitting ongoing review and adjustment. These sustainability-based
adaptive solutions enable initiatives to withstand adversity as well as seize new chances,
ultimately guiding them toward successful outcomes and building a strong basis for continual
growth (Peano et al., 2020: 271).

10
1.5 Change Management Strategies for Sustainable Initiatives

Figure 4: Change Management Strategies for Sustainable Initiatives

Source: (Cameron and Green, 2019: 89)

Change management techniques are essential for coordinating the smooth integration of
sustainability principles into project management models and skillfully negotiating the complex
landscape of change (Cameron and Green, 2019: 89). Including sustainable development in
initiatives requires a comprehensive and all-encompassing strategy that goes beyond simple
procedural changes; it calls for a culture revolution based on successful management of change
techniques. The understanding that effective integrating necessitates not just the adoption of
ethical procedures but also a significant change in attitudes, actions, and standards of behavior is
at the core of these initiatives. One of the most important strategies in change leadership is
effective and convincing communicate (Amankwah-Amoah, 2020: 123). Raising awareness and
gaining support can be achieved by clearly outlining the sustainable integration's justification,
outlining its intrinsic value idea, and methodically resolving any reservations or misconceptions.
When partners' viewpoints are aligned, a common awareness of the need for change is fostered,
and a common dedication to effective efforts is galvanized, all thanks to communications (Lauer,
2020: 112).

Initiatives aimed at imparting knowledge to people become essential cornerstones of change

management models (Cameron and Green, 2019: 89). A society of competence and confidence is
fostered when stakeholders and the project staff are equipped with the necessary information,
skills, and tools to manage the intricacies of sustainability. Instilling an attitude of ownership and

11
responsibility among team members and fostering a shared knowledge of sustainability goals are
achieved through training sessions, seminars, and learning modules designed for certain
positions within the work. Including teammates as well as stakeholders in the decision-making
process also acts as an encouragement to promote a change-receptive culture (Amankwah-
Amoah, 2020: 123). Including people not just in the execution stage but also in the brainstorming
and plan development process gives them a feeling of possession, which reduces barriers and
promotes buy-in. Their opinions and concerns can be added to the integration plan to bring
flexibility and inclusion to this process of transformation. When it comes to promoting
sustainable and igniting the changes in culture required for effective integration, management
plays a crucial role. To break down resistant barriers and establish a framework for
transformation in the company, management buy-in, steadfast support, and active involvement in
guiding the shift become crucial. Their outward demonstration of dedication and activism
conveys the gravity of integrating long-term viability encouraging others to welcome
improvement (Lauer, 2020: 112).

In addition, demonstrating experiments and implementing ethical procedures gradually offer

concrete proof of the viability and advantages of ethical behavior (Cameron and Green, 2019:
89). These programs act as instances of achievement, removing doubts and cultivating an
environment where sustainable is ingrained in management of projects practices. The triangle of
management assistance, instruction, and interaction creates an organizational culture that is open
to sustainable and serves as the foundation for the changing procedure of adopting eco-friendly
practices. The foundation of sustainability initiatives is successful interaction, which acts as a
channel for the dissemination of the goals, principles, and reasoning behind them (Amankwah-
Amoah, 2020: 123). Effective, open, and accessible message clarifies the importance of the
environment, addresses issues, and promotes agreement among interested parties. In addition to
providing information, communication also arouses passion and dedication to sustainability
goals. It becomes clear that instruction is essential for establishing the understanding, aptitude,
and understanding that underpin activities that are environmentally friendly (Lauer, 2020: 112).

The implementation of training applications, seminars, and ongoing education activities is

crucial in enabling stakeholders and employees to have a comprehensive understanding about
sustainability and its applicability to their respective responsibilities (Rumpel et al., 2019: 350).

12
People who have received an education feel more empowered and are able to make decisions
that are in line with the objectives of sustainability. Furthermore, it initiates a transformation in
the company's culture by fostering a common vocabulary and comprehension of sustainability
principles. Partnership from management and engagement work as an incentive to move culture
in the direction of sustainable (Goel et al., 2019: 117). Because leadership support the
environment, their steadfast dedication indicates the programs' strategic significance. A culture of
confidence, power, and responsibility is fostered by management's visible assistance, which also
sets an example for company priorities and ideals. The company's dedication to environmental is
reinforced by the management's direct involvement, support of environmentally friendly
procedures, and the incorporation of sustainability measures into performance assessments. This
encourages and motivates individuals to adopt these principles (Leal Filho et al., 2019: 285).

13
CHAPTER TWO – LITERATURE REVIEW II
2.1 Current State of Sustainability Integration in Project Management

Figure 5: Integrating Sustainability into Project Management

Source: (Goel et al., 2019: 117)

Project management models' current approach to integrating sustainable represents a developing,

yet growing significant aspect of modern practice (Rumpel et al., 2019: 350). Although the
relevance to sustainability has grown throughout industries, organization agendas, industry
standards, and regulatory frameworks continue to influence how sustainable is integrated into
managing projects. Globally, organizations are realizing more and more how important it is to
incorporate durability into initiative frameworks to solve environmental, economic, and social
problems. Nonetheless, there are considerable differences in the level of integration and the
tactics used. An increasing focus on matching project goals with the Sustainable Development
Goals (SDGs) of the UN is at the top of this evolution (Goel et al., 2019: 117). Numerous
establishments utilize these worldwide objectives as a model for incorporating sustainable into
project administration. This relationship acts as a compass, directing initiatives focused on many
aspects of the environment such as social justice, climate change mitigation, and sustainable
manufacturing and use (Leal Filho et al., 2019: 285). Furthermore, industry-wide use of different
frameworks and approaches makes the integration of sustainability visible. Because of their large

14
ecological impact, several industries, including energy and development, have seen more robust
integrating, which has resulted in the implementation of strict sustainable certifications and
requirements. On the other hand, different industries may adopt technology more slowly than
others because of factors including various stakeholders understanding, specific to an industry
difficulty, or lessened regulation (Heigermoser et al., 2019: 246).

Sustainability is becoming more and more important in assessing projects and making choices, as
evidenced by the development of specialized sustainable management systems and the
acceptance of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) standards (Heigermoser et al.,
2019: 246). Organizations can evaluate and convey the environmental and social impacts of
projects by using criteria related to ESG, which can impact opinions of stakeholders and choices
regarding investments. Nevertheless, there are still issues with completely incorporating
sustainable into project management (Zhang et al., 2019: 53). Important obstacles include a
culture of resistance to modification, a lack of understanding, and the belief that both
profitability and sustainability are traded off. The widespread implementation of environmentally
friendly practices is hampered by many businesses' ongoing struggles to weigh immediate cost of
such activities against their long-term advantages. The future course of sustainability integration
in project management is dependent on united efforts to bridge these divisions. Positively, there
is an increasing recognition that environmental responsibility is an imperative that boosts project
resiliency, reduces hazards and opens doors for innovation and competitive edge. It is no more
only a moral requirement (Kirimtat et al., 2020: 86).

In order to overcome these obstacles, proactive action must be taken, such as strong managerial
dedication, education and training programs, and backing for laws that encourage ethical
behavior (Heigermoser et al., 2019: 246). A key element in creating a more resilient and
environmentally friendly environment is a company's commitment to incorporating sustainable
into the management of projects as they traverse this changing environment. A variety of
approaches, instruments, and structures are used in many different sectors to include sustainable
into project management and operational processes. One well-known method for assessing the
impact on the environment of goods or procedures over the course of their whole life cycle is
life-cycle assessment (LCA) (Zhang et al., 2019: 53). It assists in decreasing the impact on the
environment and finding areas for growth. Furthermore, the construction and real estate

15
industries' adoption of certifications and standards like BREEAM (also known as Building
Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method) and LEED (which stands for
Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design) is an example of how strict sustainability
standards are incorporated into project design and execution (Kirimtat et al., 2020: 86).

2.2 Challenges of Traditional Project Management in Embracing Sustainability

The integration of principles of sustainability into conventional project management procedures
is frequently beset by fundamental disputes (Obradović et al., 2018: 522). These conflicts arise
from basic disparities in goals, methods, and views. Conventional project management is
fundamentally focused on completing initiatives within predetermined parameters of time,
expense, and scale; it frequently ignores more comprehensive environmental factors. The tension
within immediate project aims and sustainability over time goals is one of the main problems.
Conventional management of developments sometimes disregards concerns for environmental or
social consequences that may have long-term assistances but need greater initial expenditures in
favor of quick distributions and cost-effectiveness (Sabini et al., 2019: 820). A important
problem to mixing sustainable development into the administration of project assemblies is this
clash of programs. It is likely that conventional approaches do not have the procedures needed to
properly explanation for sustainability's complex landscape. Traditional project management
often uses rigid, linear methods that find it difficult to mix the many, unified facets of
sustainability such as social accountability, ethical issues, and environmental belongings within
the limits of the project's possibility. This restraint impedes the comprehensive combination of
the setting, as conventional methods may lack the flexibility or structures necessary to
sufficiently handle these intricate issues (Larsson and Larsson, 2020: 585).

One major obstacle is opposition to change within the structures of conventional project
supervision (Obradović et al., 2018: 522). Teams and customers that are used to working with
traditional methods could be reluctant to adopt sustainability practices because they see them as
different or disrupting from their routines. This antagonism results from a absence of
information, understanding, or explanation about the concrete compensations of integrating
sustainable confidential project outlines (Sabini et al., 2019: 820). The obligation to modify
capacities and valuation standards presents another trouble. Conventional project management
often uses indicators of performance, price, and devotion to schedule capacities, which may not

16
completely account for sustainability measures. The evaluation of the project's achievement from
the point of view of sustainability is made more challenging by the lack of conventional
standards of sustainability or the challenge of measuring for a long time physical or social
outcomes. The plane incorporation of sustainable into normal project management is
disadvantaged by a lack of tools and a absence of knowledge about ecologically friendly
methods. Plans frequently encounter restraints whether it originates to funding, knowledge, or
technologies available to adopt environmentally friendly events, which stops their full expansion
(Larsson and Larsson, 2020: 585).

Including sustainable practices into project management ideas is disadvantaged by a number of

particular obstacles and limits (Obradović et al., 2018: 522). The presence of recognized rules or
references for joining sustainable into project processes is one common problematic. Absence of
industry-widely documented measures or events for assessing sustainable makes it problematic
for numerous sectors to embrace ethical standards reliably, which causes confusion and deviation
in methods. A major problem is also the absence of knowledge and teaching on sustainable
concepts. It is likely that many project investors team members, directors, and even customers do
not fully get the position of environmental accountability or how it turns into project
management. This unawareness frequently establishes as antagonism to or doubt around
sustainable events (Sabini et al., 2019: 820). An extra significant trouble is the limitation of
capitals and economic issues. The adoption of ethical procedures may necessitate further
expenditures for materials, labor, or technology, raising worries regarding project cost increases.
These issues are made worse by the scarcity of renewable technology and resources, which
prevents their widespread usage. Moreover, one of the challenges is the intricacy of ecological
sustainability itself. It can be difficult to include sustainable into project limitations since it has
several facets, including social equality, environmental effects, and financial factors. The level of
complexity is increased by the challenge of monitoring and quantifying sustainability's impacts
over time, which makes it hard to develop unambiguous success criteria (Larsson and Larsson,
2020: 585).

2.3 Economic and Social Impacts of Sustainable Project Management

Sustainability methods for managing projects have an impact that extends far outside the
project's borders, influencing community members, stakeholders, and the natural world on a

17
social and economic scale (Armenia et al., 2019: 266). Fundamentally, sustainable project
management goes beyond immediate project scope, causing a cascade of effects to spread into
more extensive social and financial areas. A range of advantageous effects are generated from an
economic standpoint when sustainable project management concepts are implemented. One
important aspect is the cost savings attained by creative problem-solving and optimizing
resources. Over the course of the project's lifecycle, environmentally conscious practices
frequently result in savings on utility usage, waste output, and destruction of resources, which
lowers operating expenses (Turner‐Skoff and Cavender, 2019: 39). Furthermore, the adoption of
sustainable technology and procedures stimulates innovation, which in turn creates fresh
markets, jobs, and economic expansion. For example, the sustainable projects driving the
renewable energy sector not only reduce emissions but also stimulate economic growth by
drawing resources and offering job possibilities. Sustainable practices promote financial
resilience, which serves as a buffer for external shocks. Organizations becomes more robust and
adaptive in managing market volatility by predicting modifications to regulations, expanding
supplier networks, and lowering dependent on limited resources. By reducing risks, this
adaptability maintains the economy in the face of uncertainty (Soltani et al., 2021: 110).

The incorporation of sustainability into project management facilitates major societal effects that
extend beyond project boundaries and foster constructive transformations in society at large as a
whole (Armenia et al., 2019: 266). Social integration and involvement of stakeholders are
frequently given top priority in projects that adhere to sustainability standards. Involving people
in the planning, execution, and decision-making of projects promotes a feeling of ownership and
empowerment that strengthens social connection and trust. Additionally, responsible employment
methods are frequently embraced by sustainable enterprises, supporting social fairness, safe
workplaces, and fair wages all of which advance the well-being of society. An enhanced standard
of life and overall well-being are other manifestations of the wider societal consequences of
sustainable project management. Initiatives that take sustainability into account enhance
individuals' lives and health by improving the environment, such as better air and water and less
pollutants. Furthermore, sustainability-driven enterprises frequently place a high priority on
social accountability by funding educational institutions and charitable programs, all of which
raise living standards and promote diversity in society (Turner ‐Skoff and Cavender, 2019: 39).
Challenges and compromises are present with these consequences. Although adopting

18
sustainable practices has long-term advantages, some firms may find the initial costs prohibitive.
Furthermore, juggling complicated trade-offs, including deciding among more affordable but
environmentally friendly choices and more economical but sustainable ones, can be necessary to
strike a balance between economic needs and environmental objectives. Additionally, it can be
difficult to adequately capture and convey the complex advantages to all parties due to the basic
issues associated with evaluating and assessing sustainability's larger consequences outside direct
projects (Soltani et al., 2021: 110).

2.4 Innovative Approaches to Sustainable Project Management

An innovative trend in sustainable project management is the introduction of digitization and
data-driven solutions (Stojčić et al., 2019: 35). Advances in data analytics, Internet of Things
(IoT), and machine learning portend an era of effectiveness, precision, and ecological
consciousness. By utilizing real-time data knowledge, these solutions transform decision-making
and managing projects. Internet of Things (IoT) sensors are a prime example of how
technologies can be integrated for sustainable when they are used in construction projects. They
deliver accurate plans for optimization to reduce excess and recover resource usage by easing
detailed assessment of energy practice. Predictive analytics powered by AI upsurges this
competence even more by classifying possible environmental dangers (Growe and Freytag,
2020: 457). The procedures used proactively detect tendencies or irregularities by examining
huge quantities of information, which assistances project managers to antedate and reduce threats
to the setting. The practice of digital tools not only recovers the competence of processes but also
stretches project members the aptitude to take data-driven, conversant choices that put
maintainable first. In adding to streamlining project managing, the submission of AI, IoT, and
data analytics performances as an motivation for integrating ecologically friendly events into
project constructions, representative how technology can indorse a more sustainable technique of
project implementation (Scherer and Voegtlin, 2018: 222).

A well-known Germany case study that proves the effective request of sustainable project
management methods is the Vauban district of Freiburg's sustainable urban expansion scheme
(Stojčić et al., 2019: 35). The Vauban region in Freiburg is a major example of sustainable urban
preparation and project, with a emphasis on civic appointment, energy preservation, and
environmental consciousness. It is a shining instance of creative maintainable design, changing a

19
former army connection into a bustling, green public. Vauban's devotion to sustainable energy
and energy budget is its important typical (Growe and Freytag, 2020: 457). This part makes
heavy usage of energy from renewable capitals and stresses inert standards for cover. The
constructions are engineered to join energy-efficient rudiments, such as solar panels, cloistering
material, and state-of-the-art refrigeration and heating schemes, which suggestively lower energy
practice. With this accountable plan, households' utility expenditures and pollution are greatly
abridged. Vauban has a strong stress on sustainable portable and places transportation choices
and pedestrian-friendly areas gaining of private vehicle usage (Scherer and Voegtlin, 2018: 222).

The area inspires walking and bicycling, founds without automobiles regions, and makes
unquestionable public transportation is effortlessly accessible (Growe and Freytag, 2020: 457).
The inventiveness promotes healthier and more ecologically friendly procedures of
transportation while minimalizing air pollution and mobbing in traffic by lessening reliance on
vehicles. Contribution and appointment from the local populace were vital to Vauban's
development. Locals worked with organizers and designers to design a area that reflected their
supplies and beliefs by actively active in the planning process and offering thoughts. Individuals'
sense of accountability was amplified as a result of this participation, strengthening communal
ties and their intelligence of society. The Vauban district's attainment serves as a perfect for
urban sustainability, representative how creative urban project, the combination of renewable
energy, sustainable transportation, and participation from the public can come together to yield a
public that is both functional and environmentally welcoming. The plan is an example of
Germany's devotion to situation and a basis of ideas for future growths in cities across the sphere
(Scherer and Voegtlin, 2018: 222).

2.5 Role of Education and Training in Sustainable Project Management

Education and educational creativities are important to emerging a workforce that owns the
information, aptitudes, and attitude wanted to join sustainable into managing projects events
(Zhang et al., 2020: 642). These initiatives operate as the cornerstones that enable people to
promote the organization towards environmentally and socially conscious practices and to
successfully negotiate the intricacies associated with green project management. Training
courses educate knowledge about environmental, social, and economic aspects related to project
management, providing an in-depth comprehension of environmentally friendly concepts. People

20
can learn about ethical issues, regulations relating to the environment, participation by
stakeholder’s tactics, and sustainable development goals through classes, conferences, or
certification (Wu et al., 2019: 239). This fundamental considerate serves as the foundation for
integrating sustainable performs into the project's planning, application, and valuation. The
growth of practical skills essential to participate sustainability into the project outline is greatly
aided by educational creativities. Through residencies, these sequences teach members how to
employ green skills, use sustainability capacities, perform life-cycle assessments, and
incorporate environmental issues into the choices they make. Professionals with applied training
are gifted to spot project prospects for the optimization of capitals, water conservation, reduced
waste, and social result evaluation (Nölting et al., 2020: 292).

Plans for training and education help squads or project managers develop a sustainable attitude in
addition to communicating information and aptitudes (Zhang et al., 2020: 642). They make a
culture where sustainability is entrenched in the procedure of decision-making by imparting a
sense of accountability and ethical cognizance. This mentality alteration is important for the
delivery of organizational change because it stimulates a comprehensive considerate of the
project's success that goes outside monetary volumes (Wu et al., 2019: 239). Plans for ongoing
education and training regulate to altering environmental topics and new technological
progressions, formation sure that specialists stay present on the newest approaches and opinions.
The workforce is better ready to handle changing circumstances, comfortable new thoughts, and
join innovative sustainable approaches into project management methods because to this
suppleness. The positive employment of sustainability in schemes is significantly wedged by
training agendas, which play a essential role in providing labors with the necessary aptitudes to
efficiently navigate the details of environmentally conscious events (Nölting et al., 2020: 292).

These agendas fill the sympathetic gap between theory and repetition by equipping entities with
the aptitudes needed to incorporate supportable into project management (Zhang et al., 2020:
642). Labors become accomplished at spotting potentials by mastering particular skills including
life-cycle valuation, ecological influence analysis, involvement of investors, and sustainable
technology usage. Initiatives for emerging skills help to create a staff with a varied variety of
aptitudes that is in line with sustainability areas. This varied capability includes soft aptitudes
like problem-solving, teamwork, interaction, and management in adding to practical know-how.

21
Workers with this complete skill set can effectively involve customers, endorse shifts, and
negotiate the problems of sustainable project management. Finished these agendas, specialists
are invigorated to be original and advanced, which permits them to examine novel methods and
technologies that provision sustainability (Wu et al., 2019: 239). Finished the raise of an
environment that values continuing education and challenging, skill development agendas enable
persons to examine and use novel sustainability methods, forward projects toward important and
original consequences. The effect of skill development agendas goes beyond personal capability
and includes changes in establishments. When operates possess aptitudes that revolve about
sustainability, they turn into a important asset that pushes an group towards a deeply sustainable
philosophy. Sustainability-savvy professionals help initiatives become more institutionalized
inside project environments by changing choice-making and directing them regarding achieving
better environmental and social consequences (Nölting et al., 2020: 292).

22
References
Alzoubi, H.M. (2022). BIM as a tool to optimize and manage project risk management.
International Journal of Mechanical Engineering, [online] 7(1). Available at:
https://research.skylineuniversity.ac.ae/id/eprint/192/.

Amankwah-Amoah, J. (2020). Stepping up and Stepping out of COVID-19: New Challenges for
Environmental Sustainability Policies in the Global Airline Industry. Journal of Cleaner
Production, [online] 271(1), p.123000. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123000.

Andreas (2019). Gap Analysis for Incorporating Sustainability in Project Management. Procedia
Computer Science, [online] 64(10), p.10. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2015.08.469.

Armenia, S., Dangelico, R.M., Nonino, F. and Pompei, A. (2019). Sustainable Project
Management: A Conceptualization-Oriented Review and a Framework Proposal for Future
Studies. Sustainability, 11(9), p.2664.

Attanasio, G., Preghenella, N., De Toni, A.F. and Battistella, C. (2021). Stakeholder engagement
in business models for sustainability: The stakeholder value flow model for sustainable
development. Business Strategy and the Environment, 31(3). doi:
https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2922.

Cameron, E. and Green, M. (2019). Making Sense of Change Management: A Complete Guide
to the Models, Tools and Techniques of Organizational Change. [online] Google Books. Kogan
Page Publishers. Available at: https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=LX-
5DwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PP1&dq=Change+Management+Strategies+for+Sustainable+Initiat
ives&ots=v0fGPh2Tzr&sig=MM2Vl9DTBdOQVfHAHLRTuTYaamc.

Char, D.S., Abràmoff, M.D. and Feudtner, C. (2020). Identifying Ethical Considerations for
Machine Learning Healthcare Applications. The American Journal of Bioethics, 20(11), pp.7–17.

Chofreh, A.G., Goni, F.A., Malik, M.N., Khan, H.H. and Klemeš, J.J. (2019). The imperative
and research directions of sustainable project management. Journal of Cleaner Production,
[online] 238, p.117810. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117810.

23
Choudhary, N.A., Ramkumar, M., Schoenherr, T., Rana, N.P. and Dwivedi, Y.K. (2022). Does
Reshoring Affect the Resilience and Sustainability of Supply Chain Networks? The Cases of
Apple and Jaguar Land Rover. British Journal of Management, 34(3). doi:
https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12614.

DJAMALDINOVA SHAXLO OBLOBERDIEVNA and MAMATOVA SHAKHNOZA

NEMATJONOVNA (2022). RESEARCH APPROACHES TO IMPROVING THE
EDUCATIONAL SYSTEM. International Journal of Philosophical Studies and Social Sciences,
[online] 2(3), pp.225–229.doi: http://ijpsss.iscience.uz/index.php/ijpsss/article/view/397.

El Mekaoui, A., Tariq, R., Ramírez, O.B. and Méndez-Monroy, P.E. (2020). Sustainability,
Sociocultural Challenges, and New Power of Capitalism for Renewable Energy Megaprojects in
an Indigenous Mayan Community of Mexico. Sustainability, 12(18), p.7432. doi:
https://doi.org/10.3390/su12187432.

Erdogan, S.A., Šaparauskas, J. and Turskis, Z. (2019). A Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Model

to Choose the Best Option for Sustainable Construction Management. Sustainability, [online]
11(8), p.2239. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/su11082239.

Gilbert and Ron (2019). Sustainability in Project Management. [online] Google Books, Gower
Publishing, Ltd., p.20. doi:https://books.google.com/books?
hl=en&lr=&id=W7vXCQAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PR7&dq=sustainability+practices+into+projec
t+management&ots=jSS8HV0v3w&sig=_gcrtvAg2wZ_6bBqP_bk5yZuGKA

Goel, A., Ganesh, L.S. and Kaur, A. (2019). Sustainability integration in the management of
construction projects: A morphological analysis of over two decades’ research literature. Journal
of Cleaner Production, [online] 236, p.117676. doi:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117676.

Growe, A. and Freytag, T. (2020). Image and implementation of sustainable urban development:
Showcase projects and other projects in Freiburg, Heidelberg and Tübingen, Germany.
Raumforschung und Raumordnung | Spatial Research and Planning, 77(5), pp.457–474. doi:
https://doi.org/10.2478/rara-2019-0035.

24
Heigermoser, D., García de Soto, B., Abbott, E.L.S. and Chua, D.K.H. (2019). BIM-based Last
Planner System tool for improving construction project management. Automation in
Construction, [online] 104(1), pp.246–254. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2019.03.019.

Hollebeek, L.D., Kumar, V. and Srivastava, R.K. (2020). From Customer-, to Actor-, to
Stakeholder Engagement: Taking Stock, Conceptualization, and Future Directions. Journal of
Service Research, p.109467052097768. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1094670520977680.

Ivanov, D. (2020). Viable supply chain model: integrating agility, resilience and sustainability
perspectives—lessons from and thinking beyond the COVID-19 pandemic. Annals of
Operations Research, [online] 319. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-020-03640-6.

Kirimtat, A., Krejcar, O., Kertesz, A. and Tasgetiren, M.F. (2020). Future Trends and Current
State of Smart City Concepts: A Survey. IEEE Access, 8, pp.86448–86467. doi:
https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2020.2992441.

Lam, D.P.M., Martín-López, B., Wiek, A., Bennett, E.M., Frantzeskaki, N., Horcea-Milcu, A.I.
and Lang, D.J. (2020). Scaling the Impact of Sustainability initiatives: a Typology of
Amplification Processes. Urban Transformations, [online] 2(1). doi:
https://doi.org/10.1186/s42854-020-00007-9.

Larsson, J. and Larsson, L. (2020). Integration, Application and Importance of Collaboration in

Sustainable Project Management. Sustainability, [online] 12(2), p.585.doi:
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/2/585.

Lauer, T. (2020). Change Management: Fundamentals and Success Factors. [online] Google
Books. Springer Nature.doi: https://books.google.com/books?
hl=en&lr=&id=P68EEAAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PR8&dq=Change+Management+Strategies+for
+Sustainable+Initiatives&ots=41qMG7celM&sig=Wwe1g-AC2noFvVvryPmqKm0LtNA.

Leal Filho, W., Shiel, C., Paço, A., Mifsud, M., Ávila, L.V., Brandli, L.L., Molthan-Hill, P.,
Pace, P., Azeiteiro, U.M., Vargas, V.R. and Caeiro, S. (2019). Sustainable Development Goals
and sustainability teaching at universities: Falling behind or getting ahead of the pack? Journal

25
of Cleaner Production, [online] 232, pp.285–294. doi:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.309.

Lester, J.N., Cho, Y. and Lochmiller, C.R. (2020). Learning to Do Qualitative Data Analysis: A
Starting Point. Human Resource Development Review, [online] 19(1), pp.94–106. doi:
https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484320903890.

Loureiro, S.M.C., Romero, J. and Bilro, R.G. (2019). Stakeholder Engagement in co-creation
Processes for innovation: a Systematic Literature Review and Case Study. Journal of Business
Research, 119(1). doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.09.038.

Maqbool, R. and Jowett, E. (2022). Conserving a sustainable urban environment through energy
security and project management practices. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. doi:
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-21721-w.

Martens, M.L. and Carvalho, M.M. (2019). The challenge of introducing sustainability into
project management function: multiple-case studies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 117(10),
p.29. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.12.039.

Nölting, B., Molitor, H., Reimann, J., Skroblin, J.-H. and Dembski, N. (2020). Transfer for
Sustainable Development at Higher Education Institutions—Untapped Potential for Education
for Sustainable Development and for Societal Transformation. Sustainability, 12(7), p.2925. doi:
https://doi.org/10.3390/su12072925.

Obradović, V., Todorović, M. and Bushuyev, S. (2018). Sustainability and Agility in Project
Management: Contradictory or Complementary? Advances in Intelligent Systems and
Computing, pp.522–532. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01069-0_37.

Peano, C., Massaglia, S., Ghisalberti, C. and Sottile, F. (2020). Pathways for the Amplification
of Agroecology in African Sustainable Urban Agriculture. Sustainability, 12(7), p.2718. doi:
https://doi.org/10.3390/su12072718.

Pelenc, J., Wallenborn, G., Milanesi, J., Sébastien, L., Vastenaekels, J., Lajarthe, F., Ballet, J.,
Cervera-Marzal, M., Carimentrand, A., Merveille, N. and Frère, B. (2019). Alternative and

26
Resistance Movements: The Two Faces of Sustainability Transformations? Ecological
Economics, 159, pp.373–378. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.01.013.

Powell, G.A., Bonnett, L.J., Smith, C.T., Hughes, D.A., Williamson, P.R. and Marson, A.G.
(2021). Using routinely recorded data in a UK RCT: a comparison to standard prospective data
collection methods. Trials, 22(1). doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-021-05294-6.

Raber, M., Baranowski, T., Crawford, K., Sharma, S.V., Schick, V., Markham, C., Jia, W., Sun,
M., Steinman, E. and Chandra, J. (2020). The Healthy Cooking Index: Nutrition Optimizing
Home Food Preparation Practices across Multiple Data Collection Methods. Journal of the
Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, 120(7), pp.1119–1132. doi:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jand.2020.01.008.

Rumpel, C., Amiraslani, F., Chenu, C., Garcia Cardenas, M., Kaonga, M., Koutika, L.-S., Ladha,
J., Madari, B., Shirato, Y., Smith, P., Soudi, B., Soussana, J.-F., Whitehead, D. and Wollenberg,
E. (2019). The 4p1000 initiative: Opportunities, limitations and challenges for implementing soil
organic carbon sequestration as a sustainable development strategy. Ambio, 49(1), pp.350–360.
doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-019-01165-2.

Sabini, L., Muzio, D. and Alderman, N. (2019). 25 years of ‘sustainable projects’. What we
know and what the literature says. International Journal of Project Management, 37(6), pp.820–
838. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2019.05.002.

Scherer, A.G. and Voegtlin, C. (2018). Corporate Governance for Responsible Innovation:
Approaches to Corporate Governance and Their Implications for Sustainable Development.
Academy of Management Perspectives, 34(2). doi: https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2017.0175.

Silvius, A.J.G. and Schipper, R.P.J. (2019). Sustainability in project management: A literature
review and impact analysis. Social Business, 4(1), p.23.
doi:https://doi.org/10.1362/204440814x13948909253866.

Soltani, M., Moradi Kashkooli, F., Souri, M., Rafiei, B., Jabarifar, M., Gharali, K. and Nathwani,
J.S. (2021). Environmental, economic, and social impacts of geothermal energy systems.

27
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 140(1), p.110750. doi:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.110750.

Stojčić, M., Zavadskas, E., Pamučar, D., Stević, Ž. and Mardani, A. (2019). Application of
MCDM Methods in Sustainability Engineering: A Literature Review 2008–2018. Symmetry,
11(3), p.350. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/sym11030350.

Timea (2019). Sustainability in Project Management : Eight principles in practice. [online]

DIVA. doi:https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/record.jsf?pid=diva2:899231.

Turner‐Skoff, J.B. and Cavender, N. (2019). The benefits of trees for livable and sustainable
communities. PLANTS, PEOPLE, PLANET, 1(4). doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/ppp3.39.

Vrchota, J., Řehoř, P., Maříková, M. and Pech, M. (2020). Critical success factors of the project
management in relation to industry 4.0 for sustainability of projects. Sustainability, [online]
13(1), p.281. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13010281.

Wu, G., Hu, Z. and Zheng, J. (2019). Role Stress, Job Burnout, and Job Performance in
Construction Project Managers: the Moderating Role of Career Calling. International Journal of
Environmental Research and Public Health, [online] 16(13), p.2394. doi:
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16132394.

Zawacki-Richter, O., Kerres, M., Bedenlier, S., Bond, M. and Katja (2022). Systematic Reviews
in Educational Research Methodology, Perspectives and Application. [online] Available at:
https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/handle/20.500.12657/23142/1007012.pdf#page=59.

Zhang, T., Shaikh, Z.A., Yumashev, A.V. and Chłąd, M. (2020). Applied Model of E-Learning
in the Framework of Education for Sustainable Development. Sustainability, 12(16), p.6420. doi:
https://doi.org/10.3390/su12166420.

Zhang, Y., Wang, H., Gao, W., Wang, F., Zhou, N., Kammen, D.M. and Ying, X. (2019). A
Survey of the Status and Challenges of Green Building Development in Various Countries.
Sustainability, 11(19), p.5385.

28