Jack Smith Disputes Trump's Presidential Immun

You might also like

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 1

U.S.

Politics World Opinion Media Entertainment Sports Lifestyle Video AI More Watch TV

POLITICS

Jack Smith disputes Trump's presidential immunity claim


in appeals court
Smith argues that Trump claiming immunity from prosecution 'would be particularly dangerous'
By Andrea Vacchiano Fox News

Published December 30, 2023 3:45pm EST

Jack Smith’s gag order against Trump ‘plays into his critics’: Kerri Kupec Urbahn
Fox News legal editor Kerri Kupec Urbahn joins ‘The Story’ to discuss Special Counsel Jack Smith asking for a gag order on former President Trump and the
battle over Colorado’s ballot decision.

U.S. Department of Justice Special Counsel Jack Smith has filed an argument disputing
President Trump's claim to presidential immunity amid his 2020 election interference
case.

The document was filed Saturday in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia.

The intent of the filing was to ask for the "review of the order of the district court (Chutkan,
J.) denying his motions to dismiss based on Presidential immunity and principles of
double jeopardy."

"Immunity from criminal prosecution would be particularly dangerous where, as here, the
former President is alleged to have engaged in criminal conduct aimed at overturning the
results of [an] election," Smith wrote in the filing.

SPECIAL COUNSEL IN TRUMP CASE UNCONSTITUTIONAL, FORMER REAGAN AG SAYS

Jack Smith, U.S. special counsel, speaks during a news conference in Washington, D.C. (Al Drago/Bloomberg via Getty
Images/File)

"A President who unlawfully seeks to retain power through criminal means unchecked by
potential criminal prosecution could jeopardize both the Presidency itself and the very
foundations of our democratic system of governance," the special counsel added.

The document also accused Trump of "conspir[ing] to use knowingly false claims of
election fraud with the goal of overturning the legitimate results of that election and
disenfranchising millions of voters."

"For the foregoing reasons, the Court should affirm the district court’s order denying the
defendant’s motions to dismiss on Presidential immunity and double-jeopardy grounds,"
the conclusion read. "For the reasons given in the Government’s motion to expedite
appellate review, including the imperative public importance of a prompt resolution of this
case, the Government respectfully requests the Court to issue the mandate five days after
the entry of judgment."

TRUMP CALLS CLAIMS HE'S A THREAT TO DEMOCRACY A 'HOAX,' SAYS BIDEN IS THE
REAL THREAT: 'I WILL SAVE DEMOCRACY'

"Such an approach would appropriately require any party seeking further review to do so
promptly," the conclusion added.

The U.S. Supreme Court recently rejected Smith's appeal to expedite their assessment of
the immunity claim before it went fully through a federal appeals court. Trump's legal team
asked the court to deny Smith's request.

"This appeal presents momentous, historic questions," the brief said. "An erroneous denial
of a claim of presidential immunity from criminal prosecution unquestionably warrants
this Court’s review. The Special Counsel contends that ‘[i]t is of imperative public
importance that respondent’s claims of immunity be resolved by this Court.'"

More from Politics


22 mins ago
Maine secretary of
state’s house
'swatted' day after
Trump ballot
disqualification
decision

2 hours ago
Jack Smith disputes
Trump's presidential
immunity claim in
Former President Trump (Sean Rayford/Getty Images/File) appeals court

2 hours ago
DOJ torched after
"That does not entail, however, that the Court should take the case before the lower courts prosecutors
complete their review," the filing added. "Every jurisdictional and prudential consideration announce Sam
Bankman-Fried will
calls for this Court to allow the appeal to proceed first in the D.C. Court." not face trial on
illegal political
donations
Fox News Digital's Lillian Le Croy and Danielle Wallace contributed to this report.
3 hours ago
A tiny, shrinking
percentage of
Andrea Vacchiano is a breaking news writer for Fox News Digital and Fox Business. You can follow her
American journalists
on X at @andrea_vacch or send story tips to andrea.vacchiano@fox.com .
are Republicans,
study finds

U.S. World Politics Entertainment Business Lifestyle


Crime U.N. Executive Celebrity News Personal Finance Food + Drink
Military Conflicts Senate Movies Economy Cars + Trucks
Education Terrorism House TV News Markets Travel + Outdoors
Terror Disasters Judiciary Music News Watchlist House + Home
Immigration Global Economy Foreign Policy Style News Lifestyle Fitness + Well-being
Economy Environment Polls Entertainment Video Real Estate Style + Beauty
Personal Freedoms Religion Elections Tech Family
Fox News Investigates Scandals Faith

Science Tech Health TV About Other


Archaeology Security Coronavirus Shows Contact Us Fox Business
Air & Space Innovation Healthy Living Personalities Careers Fox Weather
Planet Earth Drones Medical Research Watch Live Fox Around the World Fox Nation
Wild Nature Computers Mental Health Full Episodes Advertise With Us Women's World Cup 2023
Natural Science Video Games Cancer Show Clips Media Relations Fox News Shop
Dinosaurs Military Tech Heart Health News Clips Corporate Information Fox News Go
Children's Health Compliance Fox News Radio
Outkick
Newsletters
Podcasts
Apps & Products

New Terms of Use New Privacy Policy Your Privacy Choices Closed Captioning Policy Help Contact Us Accessibility Statement

This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. ©2023 FOX News Network, LLC. All rights reserved. Quotes displayed in real-time or delayed by at
least 15 minutes. Market data provided by Factset . Powered and implemented by FactSet Digital Solutions . Legal Statement . Mutual Fund and ETF data provided by
Refinitiv Lipper .

You might also like