Pakistan - An Anthropological Guide

Pakistan -
An
anthropological
guide
by Nacheez Omar Farooq Butt
Pakistan Omar Farooq Butt
Bismillahir Rahmaanir Raheem
Content chapters
Introduction…………..3
1. Pakistan……………..14
2. Metals………………..85
3. The Indus Man……...107
Appendix……………….124
2
Introduction
The Pakistani economy in a new stage of hyperglobalisation
From agricultural tools defining the prehistoric or proto-historic;
through the markers of over-development (electrical accessories)
to the humble and chaste desire of computers as a productive
tool; right down to the idea of living in grace to computers’
system of information processing; the trick of the mode and
means of production isn’t simply in yielding a scientific and
philosophic interpretation of our lives but rather to impart
meaning to our culture, it’s art and so on and so forth.
It is in the nature of civilization, indeed a part and parcel of the
beauty of any people's development that the physical tools we
will have at hand; whether they are tools for ploughing land, or
3
weapons for fighting, accessories and vehicles for everyday use,
or utensils for cooking, or even IT systems; the further down the
chain we go with these, the deeper the involvement of physical
and metaphysical when defining our relation as people with our
world.
History itself is a story of how man was created by Allah
Almighty to fight his lower, carnal self. The fight was to the be
lost first in heaven and is to be won ultimately on earth days
before the kingdom come. Human evolution is a narration of
man’s picking food, picking up stones, making bronze statues,
perfecting metalwork, mobilisation of production in granaries etc,
mobilisation of labour through land, air and space travel as well
as automating of production and ultimately digitalising and
finally information systemising the entire process.
4
It is often therefore a measure of our societal growth that can be
gleaned from how far up or down the food chain or production
line, our main defining tool is by which we have characterised
our society. When man was first created,he was, you could say, a
forager. This level of supply and demand production and
consumption is specific to man in heaven. In the Stone age, we
were at very base use of the world’s resources; in the Bronze Age
we developed metallurgy; in Iron Age we illuminated our metal
work. When we actually talk of history and the world's
geography, then it's possible to look at the species favoured tool
and the species superpower.
Early Muslim countries were superpowers, such as Persia, in
inventing the windmill, Muslims gave the world a symbol of
economic activity. This symbol then became the steam train as
5
Britain’s industrial revolution took the world by storm.
Aeronautical travel, naval prowess and eventually space travel
took hold as USSR, for example led developments. Electricity
then gave us, in Japan, a potential world economic leader. The
domestic appliance, the tool of over-development was used by
USA in it’s nuclear age.
Ultimately the superpowers of India and Pakistan will show how
digitalisation and systemisation can create world economic
leaders amongst others. At the moment, however,the story of
human progress is being led by Chinese production automation.
Whether former tools were well positioned on the evolution of
production, computers are re-creators of reality instead, and do
not validate ourselves and our lives as humans. Rather their role
6
is to recreate the world, in essence, a different type of a part of
the production process’ evolution.
This is why conceptually, it is even harder to understand
information systems as part of computer science. The
development of information systems, lets mankind develop
economically with a view to egalitarian model of industrial
growth in the world, where poorer countries are finding
exponential growth in hyper-globalisation.
In fact, information technology is today a symbol of the day’s
superpower and invariably we see components say “Made in
China” on them. To summarise, the ancient world, like for
example Palestine, was the land of the Prophets (PBUT); early
Islam, home of prehistorical, stone, bronze and iron (tools,
utensils and weapons), Great Britain, home of the steam train,

7
USA home of aeroplanes, Russia home of spaceships, China’s
symbol is now the computer; and Pakistan and India will
symbolise systems and the technology behind them in the future.
Just as a food chain is merely deemed as coming afterwards with
respect to a production line, it is not the evolutionary or
phylogenetic role of technology or any object on the process
diagram rather the factual place on the model which we find it
that informs us of it’s relevance and status as an activity, stage or
any other such activity.
1. The world of work- farming, shepherding, agriculture,
granaries (the food chain)
2. The work of self- Agriculture, transport and electrical
appliances
8
3. The self’s work- Transport, appliances, aerospace travel and
technology (the production line)
4. The self in the world- Aerospace, technology, systems and
information
Pakistani management economics
If our national output is to increase significantly, personal
incomes are to rise; it is through economic or industrial growth.
Through antiquity our economic surplus as a country of Pakistan
has meant our race, our religion has rich people, in good jobs and
a strong culture. The way we manage economically is through
basirat (vision). We need to see the work of soul before body,
God before man, insight before vision and to put our country
before ourselves.
9
As people of Wadi e Sindh civilisation; only Egypt, China and
Iraq are more poignant examples of leader economies. The vast
majority of economies of the world lag behind in sheer size, in
output and in the growth of that output. The Pakistani
Management Economics widens the econometrics of our world to
include population as a driver. On the other side it also shows that
growth and incremental GDP is vital to us. We seek to give and
not take, to be Moses not Pharaoh, to find afiyah in front of bala
by Allah’s permission.
This is the crucial self-realisation we need, other than
appropriating each stage to it’s correct place in it’s planned
sequence; to not overestimate the fact of our socio-economic
disadvantage simply because of political reasons.
10
Worship and Justice
Like a line is drawn, a boundary crossed or a limit is reached and
changes a relationship forever, rule of law or jurisprudence is
only triumphed by worship and religion when it gets out of hand.
It is for no other reason that the former is born from the latter.
The very fact of the superiority of religion over law means that it
is the one thing that can change it.
The sort of insistence of western European countries to their very
real extinction and religious replacement theologically; which is
military war is only to be expected by an intelligent observer of
the fact that they drew the very map of the countries which today
conquer them. This military advantage is due to the better
condition of a geographic definition of a country as opposed to a
historic one.
11
Nevertheless the conquest is still valid in that by and large Islam
is with the great many countries and has itself left nothing or very
little to the system of kufr and shirk, in the sense of survival of
extinction threats.
Toolbox
The computer, like most tools; is not what some people use all of
the time to make money but what all will use to improve the
production already in existence, whatever that may be. If it is not
left to war to determine how the economic realm pans out, we
can see across the world that supergrowth (the rate of growth of
profits over time), human gini (the rate of the gini index over
time) and tasfeef (the metonymisation within as opposed to
outside of a spread or row); show how the Ummah has
globalised, we have come home and we have a job.

12
Radicalisation vs racialisation
Having faced world wars 1-3 as fascism, nazism and zionism; the
future race wars are from reverse colonialism as opposed to
immigration. The exploitation of the term radicalisation (or
extremism or even terrorism) will lead to increasingly partisan
racialised language to explain wars.
13
Chapter 1- Pakistan
1.1 Semitism
Muslims are Semitic peoples, we are the real Semites, Jews are
Nazis. Muslim pragmatism for non-Muslims is such a state of
mind that we say and do as such as Muslims, that non-Muslims
can adopt our religion as we say and do; but this won’t happen
without a miracle from Allah Almighty. We must accept they
need to listen to what we say and do what is correct to do. It is a
matter of understanding on our part as much as on theirs to create
Muslim lands in the West.
At the moment they appeal to the most hideous side of
philosophy in their own sight and in the sight of Judaism. What is
this anti-Christian thought? Anti-semitism. As sons of Japeth ie
Chinese are now economically outmanouvering the West,

14
Europeans and Americans are to be jealous of us as Semites. As
Elamites are part of this continent ie are Asians, they are jealous
of us Indians and Pakistanis too.
Pakistanis are the ancestors of Israelites, Jews are our
descendents. Spiritually and linguistically, Pakistanis precede
Jews in a great number of ways. Pakistan as a nation was created
before Israel. Pakistan is the world’s sole confessional state (ie
dawlat al Islamiyah) or religious state, Israel the world’s only
Apartheid state (Amnesty 2022). Jesus says, “Before Abraham, I
am.”, Bible, John 8:58. Pakistanis are spiritual, Jews are
niggardly.
We are from Ancient Elamites, pre-early Ancient Elamites, living
as is popularly known as Proto-Elamites, after whom are

15
documented, the Early or Old Elamites of over five thousand
years ago. Ancient Elam (Hujjiya in Persian) is named after the
first son of Sam, son of Noah (PBUH). Although this is different
to Persia and Iran as a word it is similar to Khozestan, the main
province. Hujiya is Old Persian for Xuz, in Persian. Early
Elamites are as before Old, Middle or Neoelamites (Pre-Persia),
basically, Ancient Elamites followed Zoroastrianism.
Reciprocalism, the Zakat multiplier
Inspite of Christian majority peoples (cultures) doing their best
all the time to maximise the millions of people, innocent Muslims
that they kill; us Muslims who are a majority here have, instead
of demanding our rights and equality or freedom, managed to
16
dispense a sustainable sense of justice or system of justice
whereby we give zakat freely and help others liberally.
Despite the millions of Muslim girls, Christians tried to give birth
to, who would be Christians too, Muslims have correctly
attributed the phenomenon of mega-rape as an evil of the so-
called sexual revolution not as an effect of Bosnia (an example of
Islam re-entering into Europe). Nonetheless there are sometimes,
in the midst of forced conversions and ill-mannered soft war,
wrongs committed which create an impetus for more severe
social justice to be done to correct them.
Indeed if we are charitable we should understand why we are
here and how it is good if we are. It is the contention of mine that
zakat is a just and good cause on the personal and socio-cultural

17
level. The real paradox of thrift maxim is, “saving is like zakat
but it is taxed and has a negative effect on national income”.
Indeed thrift and scarcity economics is countered by The Holy
Quran teaching that God’s hand is unfettered to all and the
teaching of equality of all humanity before Allah.
Giving away in an economy causes no decrease to national
income and can effect consumption better than savings would, so
it is a purification of wealth. It increases wealth with Allah ta la.
The Say’s law and Keynesian paradox of thrift show that supply
augmentation can spur growth, investment; and savings act at the
same time as inflation. It derives from the Zakat Function, the
real paradox of thrift. People start to redistribute wealth, creating
growth, investing making jobs and costing inflation in the
economy.
18
If, in a recession, aggregate supply falls or contracts as per supply
theorists, this is better. If it goes down, there will be a quality
gain. This is at the cost of economic performance, so both output
levels and prices reflect this.
Indeed if supply siders deal better with inflation, Zakat
economists will too. If instead of expansion of supply, it falls
down, inflation is curbed and there is economic growth. This may
mean we are therefore working harder for ourselves and we drive
the economy harder. Especially in recession and depression. This,
anti-Keynesian or anti-deficitary economics is in line with the
idea that Zakat economics like zakat itself, increases wealth and
doesn’t decrease it.
19
Financially risky cultures are unsatisfied with wealth and this
explains why they are highly borrowing. However borrowing
highly means borrowing from the poor. If in times of recession
this borrowing increases as do deficits and cash, other reserves
and prosperity all fall; then surely it is time for the poor to catch
up.
It is time for revolution; feminist, industrialist, evolutionist, all
are developmental economics’ way forward, our way forward. If
we don’t lend money to the third world for free, we should no
longer expect them not to be richer than us, for all the riches in
social and other capital we all acknowledge they do possess.
In a world of haves and have-nots, we, the comparatively rich
will never be happier for economic superiority. For the have-nots,

20
those in need, it is a struggle for food and starvation; a breath of
fresh air to breathe. What is happening here is that people are
setting a precedent by giving to those who have gone begging, as
ultimately this is like lending money to someone in your family if
they’ve left their wallet at home.
However government deficit, and corporate leverage or gearing
does not fit into this category. It creates a big problem; instead of
offering us an example, a good example that is.
There is a theory of humanity here, in government budgetary
(deficitary) economics and in corporate financial risk. No respect
should be given to Keynes and his ideas let alone to the zombie
corporations in debt.
21
We need to look in life further into our own hearts to know
wealth and riches, to dig deeper into our own souls and our own
private and personal reality.
Here we will find the “compassionate family” or our own
personal “compassionate heart”, one that gives not takes. One
that, like your Prophet, the Beloved of God (SWS) fasts while
others eat, prays whilst they sleep, cries whilst they laugh, feeds
others; prays for others, cries for others (perhaps they would not
do the same for him (SWS)). Happiness and prosperity is
spending money for the poor, but saving for the rich; honesty,
frugality and prudence are all one and the same thing, they are
assumptions of mutual love and respect. They are assumptions of
truth for all in a society.
22
In the above, we see over-borrowing, overtrading, over-lending
and over-consuming witness a country which is victim of
overdevelopment. We should be settling, repaying, paying off and
being poor instead. The real paradox of thrift is giving zakat, the
more we give the more our wealth is purified. It is not just as
simple as; the more we save, national income rises: it is also true
that if we give to others it is good. The consumption function
assumes higher income (so can the others with lower taxes), but a
Zakat function says all income groups should serve poorer people
and this is good.
Borrowing, debt, lending and money itself are all a corruption;
economically we are better off without them as they give rise to
economic recession.
23
They themselves are caused by overdevelopment and give cause
to say the defecitary government is over-borrowing, the zombie
company is over-trading, the family to whom is lent are
overdebted and people using money from their bank accounts are
simply over-consuming.
Given the use of money, small companies and company leverage
is unavoidable, we are led to conclude it is government
borrowing which is untenable. A business may find it
unavoidable to go into debt to start trading, a government has no
excuse. They set the example, indeed they get the ball rolling.
An economy should never run a deficit, especially not in a
recession and definitely not if it is richer than the countries from
whom it borrows. Sadly this is the case for most of the western
24
economies including USA, they are promiscuously aquiring
money from poorer countries, developing economies. This
borrowing trap is a vicious circle which will result in the collapse
of their values and value system as well as the western economics
and western economic system.
Altruism in humans
The opposite of human altruism, the gift of self-sacrifice and
selflessness; is what we see as the foundation of Ancient India
and Ancient Greece: war against ourselves and against those who
warred, by others. To this I add, East and West are Almighty
Allah’s, and we did not create East and West, except it was Allah
Almighty’s!
25
“And to Allah belongs the east and west. So wherever you
(might) turn, there is the face of Allah. Indeed Allah is All-
Encompassing and Knowing.”
The Holy Quran, Surah Al Baqarah
Altruism has been defined as an evolutionary and biological etc,
psychological phenomena. To this I would add that it can be
reciprocal. If the altruism is dependent on completion by another
party and is ipso facto mutual benefit, or basically, compromise
to be made. This is like the truth of “I am”, “I am, You are”, “I
am, You are not”, “I am not, You are” and “I am not, You are
not”.
26
Early and Mature Indus Valley Civilisation
When we think about the Stone Age man, Neolithic man, or
Neanderthal man; it is a simple assumption to use that they were
primitive: No science, so no hypethetico-deduction; no
scholarship, no inductive reasoning. However, with regards to
their powers of intuition and deduction; there are these two very
basic ideas to assume, to grasp how early man evolved language
and communication and so on and so forth:
Either we assume the nature position; whereby although men are
possessed with reason as a faculty, this gives them intuitive
rationality or knowledge such as fire is hot and so is dangerous
and so on, but deductive thinking doesn’t arise in them for want
27
of knowing what are general phenomena and what are specific
phenomena mentally.
Alternatively, we can assume the nurture position; which is that,
even primitive life is full of opposites and so humans are full of
instincts and that may include deductive thought processes that
arise from a basic awareness of positive and negative.
Our thinking about the Stone Age man, Neolithic man, his
neolithic diet, his cave man quality is very present in today’s
culture, true. I would suggest two distinct ways of basically
relating to Neanderthals: firstly, through general knowledge and
common sense understanding: as relates to evolution. Secondly,
through evidence and science, archaeological evidence. I will
draw up two basic proofs of Ancient Pakistan. Firstly, of colours,

28
sizes, shapes and weights of foods and tools (as well as people).
The secondary meaning of which is, the specific proofs of
Elamites in the time of the Neanderthals.
The geography of the Himalayas
The Himalayan Range are the highest mountains on earth, their
mountains are in Pakistan, India, China, Afghanistan, Nepal and
Bhutan. Part of K5 in Pakistan is Chogolisa, named similarly to
the Holy Quran’s Judiyiy (11:44), a 7665 m mountain sufficient
to capture the Great Ark of Noah with it’s triple face.
In our languages or family of languages, the very word “China”
is proof that there was ceramic and aceramic periods of
29
civilisation in the Stone age. Assuming ceramics exosted before
the Great Flood, so did the Ancient Chinese; and it is
hypothesised so did the Ancient Elamites, China being the word
the Dardic or Indic language speaker would have for the area
where ceramics had been found in trade and travel. The word
China could be an isolate from Shina people of Pakistan (Gilgit
Baltistan Province), possibly mixed with the word King as in
Qing dynasty, as well.
Ancient Pakistan helped create East and West
The Ancient Pakistan helped create East and West: The Indus
River Civilisation is, with the discovery of Neolithic sites in
Balochistan between Punjab’s site of Harrapa and Sindh’s
Mohenjo Daro; the potential for significant finds for

30
anthropologists, archaeologists and paleontologists. Studying
either side of the start of the Holocene epoch (around ten
thousand years ago), may or may not reveal human life in now
Pakistan, in Ancient Pakistan; yet proof can emerge on either side
of Harrapan civilisation that indicates that Dharam (the term for
Indian religions) takes root from the interactions with the Indus
River Civilisation, just as its main religion, Hinduism is named
after the same river.
In this way, it can be seen that both Eastern and Western religions
are basically from Pakistanis, or Eastern religions and the
Western world are partly Pakistani isolated cultures. This can be
explained as Ancient Sanskrit, which is the language of original
Indian religious books is either from the Indus River Civilisations
(the linguistic component of which is called Elamo-Dravidian
31
language hypothesis) or Ganges affiliated cultures, from
Kashmir. Given Ganges is almost an ingrown tributary of the
former it may be impossible to exist as that independent of Indus
River Civilisations.
Further to this the Bactrian Empire was to be founded on these
two rivers’ peoples’ theologies. Mehrgarh, sometimes translated
as the love of heaven or heaven on earth, implies that we can see
in our Ancient Pakistani civilisations; the creation of India and
Greece, given India becomes a central theme of Dharam. This
makes Pakistan seem to be founder of that; since Greece is a
founder of Christianity, such as the Koine Greek Bible, a similar
link with Pakistan is founded here.
32
The Bible mentioned in Genesis 2 (10-14), Eden’s river;
assuming as the Indian Ocean flows into four headwaters, this
sounds like the Indus when it mentions Pishon, then it mentions
Gihon, Tigris and Euphrates. Whereas one may think heaven
extends into Ancient Babylon; given the Indus River too has four
headways, the five in total making up the Panch Aab (Indus
becomes Ganga, then Jhelum, Chenab, Ravi and Sutlej) of the
Punjab, this couldn’t be Eden’s river as the Indus River doesn’t
split into the Tigris and Euphrates. However, unlike the Indian
Ocean, no river does, so Pishon and Gihon aren’t names of rivers
either, although Pishin is a village which exists near Quetta, in
Balochistan. Saiyan, Jaiyan, Tigris and Ifrat are mentioned by
Allah’s Blessed Messenger (SWS) in a hadith.
Homo Erectus
33
Hundreds of thousands of years ago, the Pak-subcontinent was
formed, most likely with Sri Lanka, the island to the left of it as
we look at it on the map. As Asia moved, it broke off
disappearing and reappearing to the right of the Sub-continent’s
southerly edge. For this reason, as Adam’s peak was nearest to
Karachi and Mohenjo Daro, Channu daro etc. and it was only
later when it split from the southern tip of now India, that it
became as it is. I would say Sayiddinna Adam (AS) was felled to
earth here, in Pakistan no less.
If the person of the second Adam (Sayiddinna Nuh (AS)) was, as
suggested by famous sociologist, Muhammad Farishta; settled in
Punjab and made Multan a city, what was he looking for? What
were his descendents, such as his son, possibly Saam ibn Nuh’s
relation with the area? Was his son, as Farishta said, founder of
34
the city? Why is Multan known as the city of the Saints? Where
might the Ark of Noah (PBUH) be found? Where in Pakistan
may it have landed? These questions, along with whether the
human of theory, Homo Erectus, before Homo Sapiens as we are
now; existed in Pakistan?
1.2 Ancient Pakistan
Pakistan in the ilhami books
Pakistan is my home country; the Himalayas were visited by
myself when I was 16-17, the same age as Muhammad Bin
Qasim when he conquered Pakistan as a region (Mahmud of
Ghazni conquered India). Urdu is my mother tongue. When we
35
talk of Hinduism, like Hindi comes from the idea of Indus River
peoples of antiquity. We overlook that in this respect, Pakistan is
the Mahabharata, that greater than India.
Of the Hindu texts; Ramayana, Mahabharata etc, Pakistan, as in
Indus River Valley Civilisations people may well prove a factual
link between the people of Bharat and Rama, Krishna etc. (The
Bhagwan). If such a direct link is hypothesised, is it not Pakistan
in the texts that is being fought over, by Rama, Krishna, and
Buddha when he travels away? Where is the proof these people
were not, basically from Now- Pakistan? Sikhism, in Guru
Nanak, hypothesised and failed to disprove these people were
not. Dr David Alpin writes in a book titled “Proto- Elamo-
Dravidian: The evidence and it’s implications” (Vol. 71
Transactions of the American Philosophical Society 1981), that
36
Indian and Hindu etymology is referred to as “Comparative
Dravidian” in a chapter heading of the same name. He examines
the similar phonology and lexicon and devises common
morphemes in PED.
Arabs suffer holocausts too
Given Jews, in the textbook attitude of lay Muslims are,
basically, the extremists behind the terrorists; it is hard to say
Hitler killed a million in Germany, Poland, Romania or
anywhere. Certainly not through military means; he may have
starved to death or tortured to death or even worked them to
death but I don’t imagine him using his secret services to take out
very many Jewish Russians, Dutch, Belgian nor Austrian and the
37
rest. Anyway, Austrians, Poles and some others, including French
were living in his kingdom or Reich.
I don’t think anyone should seriously imagine anybody in their
right minds really thinks this was possible like today’s Christians;
leaders such as the Queen of England, President Bush and
European heads of state. To kill like today’s Christianist leaders
kill (murder / megamurder), is, in my humble opinion of human
history, absolutely unfathomable because of the direct and
indirect murder; military and famine, imposed civil wars etc.
Furthermore the present “Nazis”are killing very far afield. This
makes it doubly horendous. The real reason is that the so-called
“World wars”, by having the head of the snake, helped justify
both capitalism and money-mindedness (what we call

38
freedomism) and indicates freedom by appealing to human
conscience, when really; Hitler, Mussolini and Stalin are no
worse than today’s politicians. In fact, they aren’t as indirect and
subversive.
The greater holocausts
As historians it is essential to understand simply why we have
holocausts as a phenomena. If it is not specific to Semites as the
sons of Noah or not? I would say, as a phenomena, the holocaust;
by which is meant Adolf Hitler’s so-called holocaust, the revenge
of Christianism taken on Jews for the life of Jesus Christ, now
they are no longer “Little boys”, is clearly framed as a Church
which the devil has divided from the state, which one is
responsible is not clear.

39
As a phenomena; holocausts, tending to be Biblical or Arab-
victimisations, such as the Iraq war, Syria war or Palestine itself.
Also, Afghanistan’s war, or Yemen’s, Sudans’; the list is long are
more like Islam is confronting (with atheism in the middle)
freakish forces of modernism, LGBT, liberalism and
conservatism etc. this plays out in a revolutionary way in
Northern Europe; a civil war such as in France, Germany and
USA. In the war-torn countries, it is a very long drawn-out war,
where both sides conceal their enmity towards their enemies.
Gigacides (Continenticide)
40
Gigacides mean that the kuffar, headed by USA are now capable
of annihilating billions of people as the G8 powers, one for each
of the earth’s continents or billion people.
Japan will try to destroy the Far East
France will try to destroy Asia
Britain will try to destroy Pak- subcontinent
Italy will try to destroy North America
Spain will try to destroy South America
Germany will try to destroy Africa
USA will try to destroy the Middle East
Canada will try to destroy Oceania
So far, their attempts have yielded only megawars, futile due to:-
41
1. Chinese Superpower
2. Communist Revolution
3. Reverse migration and conquest
4. America being stolen land
5. Slavery being called out
6. Defeat of European Fascism
7. Muslim Armageddon
8. Australia and New Zealand become the only kufar lands
Christians believe in murder not God
Christians hate people, and by that I mean the type of hatred that
can be termed intense hatred, part of the paranoid schizoid
42
position. The paranoid schizoid position arises as an alternative
to the depressive position. Europeans and Americans specifically
the ethnographic classification for people in Europe and America,
white people, are a minority in London, UK; and so are being led
up the road of being coloured etc. Black and Minority Ethnicities
(BAME) is no longer a technically relevant or correct term, but
the majority coloured in London are the fact of how the West is
experienced as an internal reality.
Europe and indeed Britain, famous for empiricism and pragmatic
liberalism of Locke and others, is no longer marked by “John
Smith in the world”. People are saying, the popular, common
names of townspeople here are rather “Mohammad Hussain”, to
have mercy to God's creation (din, the transaction with Allah ta
Ala, including as His creatures). This notion of common good
43
has the potential to liberate Europe. What can defend from
Europe can also defeat Europe. Islamic independence has 15 to
20 new examples in Europe and Eurasia. Fifteen from Soviet
breakaway; with Bosnia Herzegovina, Kosovo and North
Macedonia on top of these. Islamic independence and not only
about knowing God Almighty. His (SWT) mercy to His creatures,
but as is part of this deen, is to know to allow the individual to
encompass others in a human being’s mercy, in humanity. Islam,
in the sense of Khilafah or Dar al Islam, or even stricter and more
Islamically assimilates societies in other than Muslim lands mean
welding towards love of the governments of Muslim lands. Let us
forgive the old terrorists and come to terms with the fact that
Muslims’ lands are ruled by and consist of people who are, by
and large, pacifist, and indeed peacemakers.
44
Nevertheless, Islam as a religion finds slight differences of
opinion as to whether people are to fit in as part of a collective,
political will or as the distributive of economic migrants; the
nascent nationalist aspect and the religious fervour of today's so
called fundamentalist thinking about Islam, either way will
struggle to gain political impetus for people whose jihad is
founded in practical thinking about religion. If you have to decide
which countries are becoming Muslim in the next thirty years, it
is as much as though we're looking at how different factors affect
a person for him to accept Islam, and then extend our analysis
towards how society will function, and international relations.
Increasingly the rejoinder to colonialism is the trend of reverse
migration. What industrial economies of previous centuries
travelled to Africa and Asia, from Europe; today the direction is
45
opposite. However, the explicated reason as to why reverse
migration along with the economic rise of the non-European
countries is to change, is: if there is an accepted colonial
discourse, eurocentricism and racism impels us to say that
independence, (Islamic European independence) is founded in
migration theories and natural economic theory; only if there is a
decolonial theory, it can be said that not only is Islam in Europe,
but there is an economic industrialization as well as the religious
change internal to Europe and outside of Europe.
As Muslims, we're interested in in the conquest of the West to do
Allah Almighty good works; Satan on the other hand was
interested in the hearts and minds battle. Nevertheless, from
every ocean and every sea, we also like all the humanity
including Europe will be free.
46
Indeed, there's an economic impetus to this religious change;
China and India being overpowering economies. Too, their heir-
apparents, being Indonesia and Pakistan, reverse migrations and
demographic trends will have closely followed the industrial
growth model.
Isolating power from the forces of history
Pakistanis are the children of Adam as opposed to Jews who are
children of Israel. Nevertheless, few people realise that God
created the first Pakistani, Hazrat Adam (AS). The first Israeli on
the other hand is yet to be made.
The personnel of the Sputnik Space Programme beat the US in
Star Wars at their own game and the People’s Republic of China
and the whole of the Soviet Union’s people. Indeed the Chinese
47
agricultural programme was modelled on this and I think others,
especially India and Pakistan should have an agriculture
programme based on this.
Like Jesus Christ defies mortal plotting of Jew, Roman etc, of the
rich and powerful of his time. Love, peace and harmony in
today's day and age, are a defined of death. Happiness is the
ultimate defiance of our society, it’s death instinct. I refer to the
death of our people in terms of subservience to Jew and Roman,
as well as to the rich and to Satan; a battle he has charged us
with, our hearts and our minds.
I don’t believe in money or having friends except that they have
life after death. Such is the temporary nature of this world, that
we best without that which exists in the future: when a martyr

48
pays his sacrifice, the species is murdered without reason as
murder. Living life for another can continue no longer. Living life
for Allah Subhanho wa Taala can. Civil behaviour informs our
civilization and polity.
Given historians say the city of Multan was founded by Prophet
Nuh (AS)’s Great Grandson, Pakistanis and Indians come from
the Prophet Nuh (AS); the second-born, Saam, his first-born,
Elam (Jews come from the younger brother). An example of the
religion of Elam spreading to Babylon is the spread of Shia from
Iran. That said Pakistan, has many Qadiris flourishing, indeed the
Silsilah’s founder was from Iraq.
• Antiquity over Rome and Greece- The original Bible
preferred over classicism is prevalent in the thoughts and

49
imaginings of Muslims today; we refer to the true teachings
of Jesus Christ, not the Jews nor the Christians.
• Holy Quran over the Bible- Whereas the Holy Quran was
revealed after the Bible, it could say a lot about Christianity
which which was previously unknown, such as, what is the
trinity, but as the Bible was continually altered; it can only
collect and replace the Bible. The Pakistani antiquity over
Rome and Greece relates to the precedence of the original
Bible over classicism which teaches them only original sin.
• Prophet Mohammad (SWS) over Jesus- Similarly, as it is
possible for Bible to say anything about the Holy Quran,
which itself as the authority over the Bible. The messenger
of Islam, Prophet Muhammad (SWS) is both the Messenger
of Jesus and his Messiah. Jesus is follower.
50
1.3 Pakistan
The hypothesis from observing modern-day Pakistan, in antiquity
(ie now- Pakistan); which use Tanba not Kaansi; is that in Now-
Pakistan, food was lighter in weight and in colour too (ie. more
colourful and brighter or more white). If we observe weapons and
tools aside, such as cutlery; cooking utensils are brass in ancient
Pakistan, and Bronze in India or Bharat. The food is larger-
grained in Ancient Pakistan than Ancient India: Barley, as
opposed to wheat or rice (which is, however, heavier). Does this
correspond to mental processes in the people who used these
pulses? Are there looser thoughts in Hind such as are small-
minded? Maybe because Indians filled their bellies more, they
had heavier utensils? Maybe they had more wheat therefore
preferred lighter coloured utensils. The Indus River Valley
51
Civilisation never ate to fill but lightened the utensil over time.
Until they started to fill and needed lighter-coloured utensils and
cheaper metals to make them. Having consciously helped other
civilisations develop agriculture and metallurgy, the thoughts of
IRVC remained more or became more developed over time.
Whereas R.E.M. Wheeler’s assumption in “5000 years” is not
only that Aryans or Indians (from Ancient India) were more
active in their relationship with Ancient Pakistanis; is not held,
given he has already relegated us Pakistanis to the Bronze Age,
by disavowing our being part of the Iron Age (by disavowing our
being part of the Mauryan empire). He also assumes our absence
in antiquity by assuming, firstly, that Islam was spread by the
sword, and secondly, that it was itself subjugated by Hinduism.
However, none could reasonably deny Harrapan civilisation
52
being charcolithic and therefore part of the Bronze Age; indeed
Neolithic as per the tools, weapons and utensils.
Even Wheeler includes chopping axes in the plates from “’Pindi”.
The stress he lays on totem; totem poles in place of proper
Islamic minarets, is too unwarranted. We may forgive his above
omission of, our antiquity, our peaceability, the domination of our
personality. But not in his saying Muslims were basically self-
obescient. This is his stupidity.
In showing Pakistan to be hill-folk, (herdsmen and farmers)
5,000 year ago, he rules out us being Highlanders or low-lying
land dwellers. He knew Islam had previously divided the land as
per which side of the Indus were dwellers, but, I believe he failed
53
to recognise the significance of this division and the high and low
of the land. Whereas for early anthropologists, Pakistanis lived
merely on hilltops; for us it is more befitting to devise a theory of
the North West of Indus River, 1500 ft above the South East, and
of the hilly regions; to go beyond village plains and into a cities,
such as were bigger than other areas. That Islam is partly grave
worship or saint worship other than the pristine observance of
teachings in mosques; is something of an idea here.
Islam has never really existed, between the pantheons and
bestiaries as others believe. We were those historically to manage
to avoid critically these things.
Further there is evidence that in the Stone Age, Now-Pakistan
were well able to support and educate civilisations as well as

54
initiate trade relations between two and even more civilisations.
How else has the Ancient Pakistani managed to maintain, in
Sanskrit, and Vedic Sanskrit (it’s extinct form); to support a
language which is informed as a religion? Why else would the
world system be so divided over who, Pakistani or non-Pakistani
is actively engaging the other in formative processes?
Pakistan, a ten thousand year history
It is likely the IRVC predated Sikander Azam and Bharat by
many millenia. The changes in gene pool from Stone Age to
Bronze, indicate Iranian and Middle Eastern influence only. The
height of land West of the River Indus, is a contrast to the
lowland of the East of the River Indus. Though there are too
55
hilly lands obfuscating East Pakistan, also East Bengal; they are
very high.
The reversal of precedence of East and West, high and low, is all
too obvious in the rise of the Vedic Sanskrit and Bactrian
civilisation as well as the fall of Dhaka.
If Greeks, Bharatis and Bangladeshis came to us, they hid their
motive behind a facade of predated civilisation. IRVC created
Europe, created India and created the South East of Asia too. We
have done this by first language growth to Europe, then religion
and cultural growth just to our East. And now, in modern times,
slightly East from there too. It isn’t unlikely Organon
to Mahabharata, to Bangladesh as a modern Gigapower, written
by Pakistani blood and guts, not by foreigners’ ink. Organon tells

56
the tale of Sikander Azam. Mahabharata tells the tale of Indra
invasion. The Gigapowers tells the tale of a new Gigapower,
unbeknowest in the world, from before the self had fought armies
back, unbeknowest to the world.
“Jewellery and metal casting work in excavation Mehrgarh
proved beyond doubt that the people who were there far more
advanced than any civilization for thousands of years lived.
Terms of amazing foresight, were found in jewellers and
metalworkers Mehrgarh devices such as drills, used stone and
copper, rising ovens, stoves, sinks, and a melting pot of brass
works from the merger Forge equipped workshops, a bit like a
modern work. During the excavation of ancient tombs have been
in and around the walls, an abundance of ornaments and
57
jewellery were justified. Tombs, the largest sums were spent on
the artefacts people with complex products, such as figurines of
bronze and terracotta women and animals, baskets, tools, beads,
bracelets, pendants and necklaces. Most of the jewellery found
precious stones such as lapis lazuli, carnelian, agate, turquoise,
shells and pearls. These stones can not be in the region, which
show that the artisans Mehrgarh talks over a large area with lapis
lazuli and copper from the mountains of Afghanistan, agate and
carnelian from Gujarat in India and shellfish, and pearls southern
coast of Pakistan on the Arabian Peninsula, The artefacts from
Mehrgarh are far more advanced and developed as compared to
those obtained from excavations in Turkey and Middle East
especially Jericho.”
- On Mehrgarh I
58
Ilm al umraniyaat
The enquiry that we are making must include questions such as,
are societies such as IRVC, more selfish? Is it because their
thoughts are less developed? How did language develop in these
times? Composites and monoliths, such as the metals and alloys.
What other dichotomies played out over time? Which meat was
eaten?
Was all of this the result of stone age trade and intercontinental
trade? Selflessness is one model, but selfishness, from atama and
anatama, is very narcissistic- sounding. Was all of this caused by
the reaction to their paramanu in their form of religion? Was
there a balance of colour of people, food and tools? Production,
consumption and distribution; change as tools are

59
stronger, people are numerous and food is varied.
Capital cities
Mansura, formerly Brahmanabad; and Multan were both capitals
of Islamic khilafat in the region. Just as former capital, Karachi is
just to the West of the River Sindh; Mansura is just to the East. It
was an early Islamic capital after the Lohana dynasty, and it was
Mahmud of Ghazni who first came here. The contrast with
Multan, which is in the middle of the plains of the Indus on the
higher land, further north; is that Mansura, in Sindh is low-lying
land, to one side of the Indus, at it’s mouth. This contrast plays
out as valleys and villages on the one hand; and the proof of
civilisation; towns and cities, perhaps on the higher land, on the
other. There are six bigger cities than Multan today, in

60
Pakistan; Karachi, former capital; Rawalpindi, mentioned earlier
(next to Islamabad, Capital and seat of government); Faisalabad,
Gujranwala; Peshawar, and Lahore, the heart of Pakistan. Multan,
the city of Saints is a city which proves the hypothesis that there
were cities, they did contribute to civilisation and that there was
in existence, such thing as Ancient Pakistan.
Invasion theory
Mehrgarh has neolithic civilisation going back into ten milennia
before present (BP). This is twice as far as the government of
Pakistan have really acknowledged before in the books and
literature being sponsored in the research. R.E.M. Wheeler was a
researcher, hired by Hakumat-e-Pakistan for the first three years
of it’s existence. He studied Mohenjadaro (which he says
61
is, possibly, literally, “the abode of the dead”) and Harappa cities
or sites as they are known. Since then, in the seventies, Mahrgarh
neolithic sites are being excavated, this has continued until the
nineties. I would posit an independent theory. No migration, nor
invasion theory, but; for migration to hide invasion, we would
need a precipitate causal civilisation. These stone age people
were tooled, weaponed etc. They created, not by migrating, not
by invading, but by entertaining. By hosting. Indeed they hosted
Europe, India, East Asia (possibly even the Far East), as a means
of developing their reciprocal altruism. If Europe, therefore
America; the Far East, and indeed India itself, owe their culture,
and before that their language to us Pakistanis, it is a great
discovery.
62
The precedence of Proto- indo Iranian over Indoaryan by Indo-
European language family scholars, is there in our history, but
who really says that there was civilisation, nay polity in ancient
Pakistan? It would necessitate an Egyptologist or an
Assyriologist to bring proofs of civilisation and cities,
such as prove political civilisation. If this can be proved, Pakistan
is then the very first in the line of ancient civilisations or
countries; as it would precede Assyria, Babylon and Egypt, as
well as ancient Israel, ancient India and China. If an Iranologist
could prove the existence of Sassanid political civilisation, it
would imply some crass form of international, diplomatic
relations as early as the Chalcolithic period of prehistory. This
may well be at the time of the Great Flood. The three sons of
Noah can effect the basic continents:
63
1. Americas/ European....Saam
2.Asia/Far East....Japeth
3. Africa/ Middle East....Haam
In this likelihood, the Iraq-born Noah, seems to have settled in
the Punjab, from here he has given Saam language, Ham religion,
and Japeth, culture. The Persian historian Firishta (Muhammad
Qasim Hindu Shah) admits his great-grandson actually founded
the city of Multan from there. Satem and Centum are similar
sounding words as Saam, it could be said the eldest son of Noah
is a hint how Sayidinna Nuh (alaihi salaam) has grandfathered
the linguistic split within what was originally Proto Indo-Iranian
or Proto Indo- European. The first generation of children after the
flood ie. Sayidinna Nuh (AS)’s grandchildren were having
children afterwards, so they are seen as creating Pakistani cities.

64
Mehrgarh
Whereas the point of comparison for the cities of Mohenjaro
Daro and Harappa are previously thought to be Mansura and
Multan, also based in Sindh and Punjab provinces respectively,
Mohenjaro Daro, Harappa and Mehrgarh relate to Karachi,
Islamabad and Lahore respectively. Further to this, I would like
to add, they correspond to the first man, the second Adam
and the Prophetic link goes on as it can here. My theory of
reciprocal altruism or Tabadala khayalat lays before us a
reasoning for why human beings should both give in to the other
in their life and should even allow yet others to control this. The
idea is that either as laid out before; Sayidinna Nuh (AS), his
firstborn, and the descendents of Saam’s two brothers, Ham and
65
Yafet (one similar, one different in name), form the reason for
Ancient Pakistan preceding first Ancient India and then Ancient
Greece; or that Ancient India first attacked us and then Ancient
Greece attacked them.
Tabadla khayalat expounds the latter idea that Neolithic
Mehrgarh; without any reference to religious figures and
kingdoms governing, was the impetus for aggression and
belligerency which itself was met with interest. Including
Balochistan in the Ancient Pakistan equation is natural, Sindh
and Punjab are there but are referenced in the literature as
Mohenja Daro and Harappa, so at a lower level than Mahrgarh
which is in fact in the part of the country above 4000 ft. Whereas
Darya -e – Sindh is in Sindh and Punjab, it is in Balochistan
where the Indus Plains largely exist so it is naturally where we

66
would expect to find towns and cities rather than the rest of the
river and its tributaries where we would expect valleys and
villages and so on. Khayalat represents Pakistan’s Karachi-
Islamabad- Lahore sensibility. Tabadla khayalat is the notion that
first Hinduism, then Hellenism were reactions first and foremost
to our civilisation, then to themselves. It exists as a theory or a
hypothesis, to disprove the idea that it was purely as a result of
the Great Flood that early civilisations were created and formed.
Because these Neolithic civilisations are evidenced by field
archaeologists’ work, it may be said, not only that we existed but
that we would have gone on to continue to exist and to cause
others to exist too. Tabadla khayalat tells us with respect
not only to the great Flood, the sons of Noah (and the table of
nations etc.) what were the predominant civilisations of the
Neolithic time but also informs us that given Sayidinna Adam
67
(AS), Sayindinna Nuh (AS) and so on were members of cities
which were existing in those times it is those preexisting
civilisations which in turn define all other civilisations as cities
and polities. In this case since Pakistan has been defined as
IVRC, India is called as not-IVRC (ie they are less antiquitous
than Ancient Pakistan).
Further to this Greece should be called not- India. It is part of
Ancient Pakistan’s magnanimity that ancient India and ancient
Greece came into existence. In this way the theory of reciprocal
altruism becomes not only the theory for altruism but the theory
from magnanimity. This is because giving life to India was
altruism but creating Greece which represents the rest of the
world, outside of the Subcontinent was magnanimity.
68
Villages by the river, cities in the plains- Was Mehrgarh the
capital of Ancient Pakistan?
Legend has it, Ancient Pakistan, five million strong, possibly
with a capital city, Mehrgarh; sufferred a 200-year drought and so
it gave way to Hindus, but it could just be a round two of our
brother, the Hindu (round one being the Vedic period). The
origins of Vedic Sanskrit, an extinct language, is a limiting factor
of Ancient Pakistani civilisation. In this respect, it would not
be wrong to say the end of Ancient Pakistan is the beginning of
Hinduism.
This can be seen also in that the beginning of Hinduism and the
beginning of Sanskriti is the end of Ancient Pakistan. The first
69
statement is with regards to the start of our ancient civilisation
and the second with regard to the end of it.
For those who believe Lahore is the capital of Pakistan, or even
that Multan is; they are not completely unfounded in that
mistake. If we study ancient Pakistan, Mehrgarh, an ancient
neolithic site in Balochistan, was a city preceding all others in the
world. Ancient Pakistan, famous for Mohenjo-Daro (near
Karachi) and Harappa (near Multan), has been added to with a
city, presumably the capital city of the region, nearer Quetta,
inbetween the two. Whereas India, Greece, Rome (indeed
Assyria, Babylon and Egypt too) don’t start themselves, as
countries, as themselves (ie there is a big difference between the
origins of the country and the defining features or factors of the
70
same country), all the Muslim countries and civilisations in the
world, particularly in the Middle East, begin as a founded,
grounded, rooted people (culture). It is possible for us to be
bottom-up and grow as grassroots grow.
Formulations of megacities in Ancient Pakistan
Mohenjo Daro is possibly the Ancient Pakistani city where
Sayidinna Adam (alaihi salam) came to build when he first came
to earth. Not far from Karachi, a port city off the Indian Ocean,
and modern Pakistan’s first capital city, it was populated
thousands of years ago by hunters and barley farmers,
much like Mehrgarh, where it is likely the second Adam,
Sayidinna Nuh (AS) was building a city once he was saved from
the great flood.

71
The idea of now Pakistan’s ancient history being one of villages
in valleys ora lack of towns, emerges due to the extraordinary
success our civilisation had with fertilising the germ of
civilisation in both Eastern and Western parts of
the world. In actual fact it is not from the hills that our people
came but we lived in the plains and on the plateaus. Mehrgarh
itself lies between the end of the Indus Plains and the beginning
of the mountainous regions further north.
It is possible to conjecture of the landscape that landforms as
distant as Sri lanka were once joined here (thus the mountain
named “Adam’s peak” here) and this can only be proved by
thorough geological analysis through study of tectonic plates
going back thousands, even tens of thousands of ,years. As it is, it
is likely the Indus Basin where man first settled and the
72
Balochistan plateau is where the second Adam came.
Valley ....Multi-landform.....Highland/mountain
Village....Landscape.....…....Towns and cities
To consider Pakistan, India, China, Bangladesh and Tibet, the
Himalayan countries as formed in a so-called River Basin or
River Valley, where the base of the world’s largest mountains are
sitting is at once absurd and secondly holding within it a tacit
theory of geological variation and a geographical theory for
humanity at large.
That valleys and villages therein are proof of civilisation such as
73
Rawalpindi’s evidence of Neolithic tools and paleontology,
allows landscapes such as are not just uphill but highland or
mountainous or on plains and plateau’s are themselves
justification for towns, cities, capitals (megacities), and
urbanisation is a one-directional thought process.
For the love of heaven, it is inconceivable that without
urbanology; that the historical Euphrates and Tigris of Biblical
paradise, and the fifth and sixth day of genesis creation narrative
as specified in the Holy Quran can be seen to justify using
variables of geology, geomorphology, geography etc. to create
valley theories for the people of the basin.
74
In Surah al Araf and in Ha Mim Sajda, Allah subhanahu wa ta
Ala clarifies how He wa ta Ala created the heaven and earth and
that such as the mountains:
“Firm mountains from above...and He blessed it.. in four
days...He completed....seven heavens in two days....”
Surah Ha Mim Sajda (THQ -Al Fussilat) 10-12
See Tafsir Al Baghawi, al Zajjaj and al Kashshaf for clarity that
these three verses do not contradict a six-day creation narrative.
The relevence of the Himalayan mountain range in the region of
which Pakistan is a part is relevant here. Given the world’s
largest mountains are here it is not completely incorrect to call
now Pakistan as Indus River Valley
75
Civilisation but we mustn’t hasten to think our civilisation is born
in valleys and is only in villages, when in fact the meeting of
mountains and plains in the landscape is possibly where the
world’s biggest city was.
Further the Indus plains are divided into upper and lower. Upper
where the four rivers, Sutlej, Ravi and Chenab; break from the
Indus, which is in the lower only. This is mentioned in Genesis
2:10, and Pakistan’s geography is known as Indus Plain of Punjab
and Sindh, the Highlands (Northern) and Balochistan. These
correspond to Mohenjo Daro, Harappa and Mahrgarh, with the
northern highlands exempted. Alternatively, as per the basin, you
have the Indus Plain Highlands (near Hindu Kush) and Indus
Plain Lowlands (Darya-e -Sindh).
76
In a sense, a reason for the ignoring of the possibility of the pre-
dating of Mesopotamia and Egypt and so on, is that lying
between Indian and Eurasian Tectonic plates made it difficult to
differentiate from a basin. This is evidenced in the fact in the fact
that the plateau is different from the plains at large, and that the
distance of Mehrgarh to the River Indus. This is itself distinct
from the Harappa and Mohenjo daro, in Punjab and Sindh
respectively, in the Indus Delta and in the Plains.
Pakistani Paleontology, urbanology
As the studies of various geological epochs are undertaken the
holocene, ie. the present and past 12,000 years show that since
the last ice age or glacial period, Pakistan or Ancient Pakistan
had cities such as today, where there were fortifications and

77
palaces as well. The size of such cities were around 100 hectares
or miles across:
1. Harappa
2. Mohenjo Daro
3. Dholavira
4. Ganeriwala
5. Rakhigarhi
Other than the thousands of settlements that are assumed then,
hundred or so have been excavated. Although excavated cities are
largely Brone Age, some of these may be neolithic, these are the
mature Harappan or early Harappan civilisation.
78
The major Riverine civilisations of human beings, including early
(so-called prehistorical) human beings are:
1. Indus River speaking Elamite languages
2. Yangtze, Yellow River, speaking Manadrin
3. Nile in Africa
4. Euphrates/ Tigris in Middle East
Indus River has Elamite languages hypothesised for it. From this
language comes Elamodravidian extinct languages, such as
Vedda and Vedantic Sanskrit, Sanskrit being the language of
dharma in India. Just as Yangtze/ Yellow river forms the Riverine
learnt civilisation from Japan to Turkmenistan, the Nile spans
Africa and the Euphrates and Tigris dominate the middle East; so
79
Darya-e-Sindh forms South Asia, from Oceania to the other
continents on the border of Asia. It has marked our learning, our
countries names and democracy is where it is in the world thanks
to us and will only continue along these lines.
The love of heaven -the whereabouts of the lost ark
Scientists tell us around a hundred million years ago of a big
extinction in which the esozoic turned into the cenozoic state of
life on earth. Whereas the former includes Jurassic and
Cretaceous stages, the others are in the latter, including the
present holocene of this ice age.
This is when, most likely, the great flood occurred, it is also an
extinction of all life forms on earth, except for pairs of animals
80
taken on the ark and Prophet Noah (AS) and the sons and their
wives and children.
Assuming Saam was a father already, his eldest being Elam as
per mentioned (in the table of nations); of Sayidinna Nuh (AS)’s
sons, it was the direct descendent of these same folk who would
disembark here, who are accreditted in the writings of the
Persian, Firishta for example, for founding the cities of Multan,
and I am hypothesising Mehrgarh which is loosely translated
“love of heaven” is too. This puts it’s creation as humanities’ first
city and megacity at around 11,650 years ago. It is therefore
likely the ark is still in Pakistan, where it landed and the Sons of
Noah disbanded form it.
81
The lost ark and the search for the lost ark continues to drive
humanity towards excavating the Ancient Pakistani cities and to
find evidence; chemical, paleontological and geological to study
the ice age quaternary, the geological epoch and the last glacial
period. In fact the pleistocene and the holocene together form the
quarternery period.
In k.a. BP (kiloannum before present) the holocene, also the
Flandrian interglacial tells us Mehrgarh periods 1-8 are divided
as five intervals:
1. 10-9 or MP1
2. 9-8 or MP 2
3. 5-8 or MP 3 and 4
82
4. 2.5 to 5 or MPs 5, 6 and 7
5. Till 2.5 or MP 8
These are first the neolithic and mesolithic stone ages, and then
bronze age and iron age (4 and 5) parts of history stretching back
to early and middle stone ages, before this. The new stone age or
stone age revolution of farming and animal domestication in
around stage 3 has true farming and aceramic pottery, although
these are in evidence before. By stage 2, PPNB (Prepottery
Neolithic B) , approximately 8,800 years ago known cities such
as Jericho and Anatolia exist which are according to some
sources 3, 700 years older than Ancient Pakistani cities, however,
there is early evidence in the world of ceramics, pottery and
China as far back as 20,000 years ago.
83
The very word China, as an isolate from Indic languages,
meaning porcelein etc. may partly prove there was a flood before
Prophet Nuh (AS) where people have lived and flourished on
earth, in the Mesolithic or middle stone age.
84
Chapter 2- Metals
2.1. Antediluvian Pakistan
When we consider the decline of Indus River Valley Civilization,
when we talk of Homo erectus, the pre- homosapien hominid
who first graced Planet Earth as we know it thousands of years
ago; in fact, for hundreds of thousands of years, walked upon
earth, as Muslims, it is pertinent to know: firstly, that, as a
species we came to earth with Sayidinna Adam (alaihi salam)
and, that having a second Adam, Sayidinna Nuh (alaihi salam) is
similar, and bares many resemblances to the change to
Homosapiens.
85
Secondly, the early Islam as such is followed with Prophets of
Allah az awajal, (upon whom be peace), mainly from Ancient
Palestine,or more generally, in the Middle East; largely following
in the footsteps of the earlier Prophets, upon whom be peace.
Whereas trade routes and supposed, or assumed international
trade, had routes beginning in the first picture, by the time of
early Islam, whence Muslim identity is present: knowledge of the
Final messenger by name and age is possible. Trade is very
developed and villages, towns and settlements have become cities
and mega-cities with countries.
With the evidence of late from paleontology we can deduce the
earliest of countries in the world is not India, Israel, etc. but
rather Pakistan and Palestine; Egypt, Arabia, Babylon. If today
we find people have more interest in Jericho and so on, then these
86
are seen as more as a reminder of the infighting in civilisational
history. A theory of Pakistani proto-history or Ancient Pakistani
theory proposed by Pakistanologists such as REM Wheeler
amongst others, including Hindus; is the migrant invasion theory,
which says dharam is the reason Ancient Pakistan fell, once it
had risen in the stone age as one of the world's four dominant
areas of human life, the others being Babylon, China and Egypt;
but where did these Indian peoples or Greeks, or immigrants
come from, if at all? If first Indians than Europeans came then
how and why at all? The answer seems to be that the early Indus
man was happy to share his culture with his brother-man. First,
he spread his wings to the east, to enlarge his total grip on our
subcontinent. Then he spread his wings to the west where Europe
was discovered. He had probably already discovered China and
87
the Middle East. So other than go to America, these were the only
possibilities.
I believe what is virtuous above all, to remember and to bare in
mind, as the people who do know God's Messenger, upon whom
the peace and blessing, by name, as Sayindinna Muhammad
(sallallahu alihi wasalam) is that we respect Arab and non Arab;
Arab wa Ajam. What is clear of Ancient Pakistan is that we are,
as Indus man and as Pakistanis now Ajami people. Indians,
Europeans or whoever, other than our Muslim brothers in faith,
have a culture then, that is really no different from one for which
we already have love and have no desire to create hatred for.
Given to this day, The Indus Man (TIM) divides nicely into
oblator and non-oblator, animal sacrificer and non- animal

88
sacrificer; it seems reasonable to assume beyond just drought that
there was actual famine, as after all the Indus Man in the East has
been affected by dharam and restricted from eating animal meat.
The fear of famine, drought and asps is likely a cause for pagan
religions in the area of the sub continent. This is synchronous
with the Prophet Ibrahim (AS) and Ancient Sumerian civilisation,
such as is called Ancient Babylon, Ancient Assyria and Ancient
Egypt,Ancient Mesopotamia etc. Other theories assume only
Elamites were similar and traders with Indus Man. Did the Indus
shifting towards India create dharam in the world? Were the
failures of Indus man to make a surplus output the cause of
famine or drought? Were there tectonic plate shifts or other harsh
geographical changes to the area of the subcontinent?
The theory that Ancient India was borne of Ancient Pakistan,
evidenced by all of above theories is stating metalwork is the
89
cause. Without Alloys, India wouldn’t be known as either ancient
nor a civilisation in it’s own right. It is, in other words, not
invasions that have created the Vedic texts but rather they are a
reaction to murti’s and putla’s built in the stone age and after.
This is why we are not called as a Bronze Age civilisation,
whereas they are. In fact, in the context of La ilaha ilAllah, Nabi
Ibrahim (Peace be upon him) was the first of us Muslims. It is
our language (Elamodravidian), our land (eg. Punjab is where
Ramayana was created) and our puppets from the bronze age
which they worship incorrectly. We Pakistanis, were a prehistoric
civilisation before the famine and it is composite metal that they
(Indians) worship because it is the only time they got ahead of us
for once.
90
The present theories are added to by the mythology theory of the
tripartite epochs of prehistory. Was ancient Pakistan able to create
ancient India by composition of metal through
metallurgy/metalwork? These a real nevertheless small or
relatively small factors; hydrological shift, agricultural failure,
tectonic shift, famine, drought invasion, compared to the idea of
climate overall flood being the additional fact or the ice age as
such.
“A river watering the garden flowed from Eden; from there it was
separated into four headwaters. The name of the first is the
Pishon; it winds through the entire land of Havilah, where there
is gold. The gold of that land is good; aromatic resin and onyx
are also there. The name of the second river is the Gihon; it
winds through the entire land of Cush. The name of the third
91
river is the Tigris; it runs along the east side of Ashur. And the
fourth river is the Euphrates.”
Genesis 2:10-15
New International Version
The first of the “rivers” of the Paradise, Pishon (Genesis 2:11)
that is the land of Pakistan often pronounced “Pakishtaan” by
those of the former East Pakistan, Bengali-speaking of the land of
Bangladesh. What is unclear is the role of Ancient Elamites
(“Persian”people) in aiding and abetting TIM to form Ancient
India, but what is clear is that there is a link to the Tigris and
Euphrates (Genesis 2:15), as a subsident river on earth to the
River Indus, in the Hindu Kush; in Kashmir, the River Ganges.
92
Ancient Pakistan preceded ancient India as Ancient Pakistan is a
stone age civilization, which we refer to as Indus man, a stone
age man or The Indus Man (TIM) who's possibly around on
planet earth ever since the continent was formed half of a million
years ago. It is likely Pakistan is through antiquity have been a
civilization. For the entirety of Paleontological period before the
Indus River Valley Civilization extended and we created India,
this means for hundreds of thousands of years, Pakistani history
preceded Indian history. Throughout the Paleolithic, Mesolithic
and Neolithic periods of prehistory or proto-history, Ancient
Pakistan existed and the Indus man was living in what is now
Pakistan. When we say Muslim India is thousands of years old
but modern India only a handful of decades new, it is for a clear
reason; we are an ancient civilization in prehistory, they are not,
they did not exist. While it is true India was united by
93
Chandragupta Moria in the history of Pakistan in India; this is
only a precursor to Moghul rule of the subcontinent, or reaction
of the Indus man having spread from Ancient Pakistan to the rest
of the Pakistani subcontinent. Why do I say Indus man was alive
ever since the subcontinent was formed for half a million years
ago?
Because, the subcontinent was geographically created when
tectonic plates shifted approximately 50 million years ago.
Human life would only be appropriate to this by approximately
half a million years ago, once he had come to planet Earth. As the
subcontinent is not a continent in it’s own right, it's why I have
said TIM is half a million years old. Human life on this earth, ie.
humankind is. As Pakistanis we’re measured in hundreds of
thousands of years, so called Indians, are measured, if at all in
94
mere decades. As a counter argument Bharati’s war-footed so-
called people's can say as per Homo Neanderthalensis, Pakistan
is 50,000 years old as per Foreign or Aryan Invasion Theory
(Wheeler). Given the ice age we live in began 12,000 years
before present, maybe they say Pakistan is over 10,000 years old.
The very least as a rejoinder to stone age Tim is the villages and
pinds that he has created in the Punjab in central and southern
areas of our subcontinent. It is from here a bronze age has been
developed. It's from here that events of hindu texts were staged,
or as is claimed, took place. It is notable that whereas
Mohenjadaro spread wentinto southern areas and parts of
subcontinent which are now hindu (eg,Saurashtra, Dholavira;
Gujarat etc), Harrappan spread went into northern Tim and made
Buddhism and Hinduism and by extending into present day
Rajastan (kalibangan) and Haryana (rakhigari); Mahrgarh made
95
Multan city and the rest of the villages of the non-sacrificing
peoples of the East, with Ganweriwal and other such Ancient
Pakistani and Now Pakistani cities; after all Pakistan precedes
India in this important way.
In fact, in that the first step to creating India is what basically is
not Indian, ie shepherdry, so it may be possible to allocate each
of the Hindus Texts to the five rivers; Mahabharata and Krishna
from Sutlej, and Brahma from the Ravi, Ram from the Beas,
Ramayana, Tripitikas from the Jhelum and Upanishads from
Chenab.
What is notable is that whereas Darya-e-sindh is from the oceans,
the Arabian Ocean; River ganges is from the land ie. mountains
of the Himalayas.That the Indus comes from Arabian ocean

96
would mean we Pakistanis aren’t folk of the valleys and hills ie.
Pinds, but rather highlanders or uplanders from the Himalayas.
The question of whether India comes from Pakistan means to ask
does Sanskrit originate in Elamodravidian? Does River Ganges
originate from the Indus?Does idol worship originate in
vegetarianism? Perhaps it is more ethically proper to ask instead
of these issues: how has ancient or vedic Sanskrit developed from
Elamodravidian? How is Ganga a mountainous river but Indus an
Oceanic one? Do Hindus miss out on animal sacrifice as per
Abrahamic religion? To answer these questions, study in
comparative linguistics, the geography of the land, river and
oceans, and comparative religious study is required. Nevertheless
as anthropologists and paleoanthropologists, it is possible to say
something good about the social processes of the religion of
97
those people known as Tim, Pakistanis; a people who are the real,
original Punjabis, Gujratis, Indians, Bengali’s etc. To know that
in fact, is to be assured Pakistanis are descendents of upland
people unlike Indians who were village dwellers traditionally,that
Homo Erectus was a Pakistani and not Bharati, and that remains
true because of our Paleolithic history.
Indeed admitting Pakistanis Paleolithic history will prove
(through Radiocarbon dated artefacts from the early or middle
stone age),that Ancient Sumer, Cairo, Babylon and any other
civilisations in the new stone age, such as in Palestine; weren’t
the first cities and towns, and maybe that there was a state or a
megacity in the world before them in Pakistan.
2.2. After the Great deluge

98
Ancient Pakistan, like it’s sister civilisation, Ancient India is a
Pre-Semitic civilisation. What is clear about Ancient Pakistan is
that it is likely a Pre-Noahide civilisation whereas Ancient India,
most likely was not.
When a historian looks at the Indus Man, from the Indus River
(Darya e Sindh) Basin, it is a difficult to conclude that without a
great flood, the Indian villages exist with or without River
Ganges.
It is for this precise reason that paleontology has so little to offer
as it does nothing to further the cause of the people of our
Subcontinent given so little can be known of the thousands of
year old towns and villages in what is something like the
previous epoch of history or even a previous Ice Age.

99
Nevertheless having an antediluvian history means Pakistan,
unlike India is a Paleontological reality, a Prenoahide country.
Whereas this may be worrisome for an Abrahamic religious
country, it is of major importance today as some consolation that
it is also a Presemitic one. It also predates metalurgy.
2.3. Pakistan, before the invention of metallurgy
If metallurgic advancement yields to the two stages of human
advancement, the first is the development of a metal alloy.
Although metalwork before this is largely smelting and
hammering, the deoxidization process of use to purify metals
from the ore, is called reduction. It is the second stage where we
move into the Iron Age,where Iron ore is deoxidized into the
metal and chemical elements we call iron. It is noted that the

100
Bronze Age begins with making alloys and the Iron Age with
making light coloured metals which shine the so- called metallic
colour. The Stone Age on earth begins with life here on the earth,
the first use of stone tools thought to be begun with the advent of
human life on planet earth, hundreds of thousands of years ago.
Inspite of the tripartite theory of proto-history, indeed, despite the
three divisions of prehistory, I am including here life on earth
before the great deluge, so from the fall to Earth until the flood
and from metalurgical invention until the present. The reason is
that radiocarbon dating although perfectly simple a mathematical
calculation yield to periods of around 6000 years, meaning 1/50
of the total human history, approximately.
The second last 50th of the 50ths beginning the last Interglacial
period or the last Ice Age. Given the two metallurgical periods
101
plus the modern period together, and doubled, give us a length of
time of the ice age, around 12,000 years; it is noted that the
modern period is therefore one or two roughly percent of human
history in time.
Carbon 12 or carbon 14 therefore has a weight or a gramme over
t won where n is 50; up until a gram over 2 times 2, and a gram
over 2. As Muslims, Pakistanis we are victims of conspiracies
against our own good selves, the turning point being, of our
capital cities with Islamabad and Rawalpindi, the burning burden
on us is this twining, Islamabad being small to Pindi. It seems the
world is not content with having great cities as we have always
had since time immemorial, indeed our country for us, is a matter
of great pride and honour.
102
The agriculture of the Indus Man is linked inextricably with his
tools and weapons’ material, not least because the utensils are
made of a certain material. It is also on another level agricultural
developments may even, as an opposite, reverse effect; inspire
the metalwork that composes the utensils, tools and so on. Both
the use of barley as opposed to wheat or the introduction of rice
to the Indus Man’s diet can be indicative of a change to the
metallurgical work and then effect of the use of composite
metals. Whereas common theory without knowledge of basic
anthropology would implicate the use of the tool or utensil
determined metalwork; the long run, seminal use of metalurgy,
such as the change from Stone Age is the beginning seen as a
developmental process involving a metaphysical development;
the main inspiration from the unseen world.
103
Two very obvious points of comparison here are as follows: One
the diet has lightened in colour as the primary material tools has
become glossy or shiny; two, the chemical composition that was
one from being made up of single metals, to compounds, with
two or more metals combined to form an alloy or metal. The
opposite is where with Iron ore we have subtracted the oxygen
from the Iron ore and purified it to get Iron.
Bronze Age mega-cities in Pakistan
If, paleontology tells us,cities, miles-wide from one end to
another, existed in this part of the world, it would mean, before
Jericho, Babylon or Cairo;Ancient Pakistan is the cradle of
civilisation. There were these mega cities in the country
104
altogether by the Bronze age,Ancient Pakistan was the cradle of
civilization as we know it.
It is of interest because they are around 50 sites showing cities
just a pind for which is infamous. These were by then megacities
with working guttering for toilets, so good the drainage is better
able to deal with today's monsoons than that in the modern city.
The mega cities including Mohenjodaro, Harappa and Mehrgarh,
indeed today's Karachi, Islamabad, Lahore, Multan owe much to
them.
Unfortunately, interest in Ancient Pakistani Megacities is
therefore limited to the decline of Indus man.
2.4. Pakistan after the invention of metallurgy
105
Iron is used to make the steel, as far as our cutlery, tools, utensils
and other industrial usages go. Early industrialists found adding
carbon to Iron toughens it. We did this first by coking or burning
in a charcoal furnace. To add copper to iron gives the metal a
resistance to corrosion by the elements. It’s non-corrosive
properties mean it has a wide range of uses, as did Bronze and
before that, stone.
As we moved out of the Iron age, or the industrial revolution as it
was; we found an auto-mobile age and a aero-travel age, as well
as the computer age,now. Silicon, a heat resistant material and a
semiconductor, used in computer-chips may too prove a very
useful material which will no doubt take us into the information
age. Because of the nature of computing and information,this has
vast implications for highly populated countries.
106
Chapter 3- The Indus Man (TIM)
3.1 The Indus Man
Does the compounding of our emotions and what not originate in
the elements as they are, lacking isolation and specification? For
example, is love, organic elements; respect, metals; peace, non-
metals; and honour, the noble gases etc?
If this is somewhat true, then is it possible the formation of
Ancient Pakistan took place, with the acceptance of herding and
animal- rearing (bringing milk, meat and an object of sacrifice);
as well as the creation of Ancient India to one side and Ancient
Elamite civilisation on the other?
107
Certainly, a zodiac is not metaphysical; a language’s alphabet can
be though. We need to search for our Ma’bood, not just our Abd.
Monotheism, Monolith, Monism, even Monasticism are greatly
important ideas when compared to polytheism, composites,
dualism and perversions. Indeed, in front of a true spirituality,
every materialism is confounded.
Physical Anthropology takes evidence from stone, metal, organic
compounds’ (ie. carbonised material such as charcoal) evidence
to gain knowledge about past societies, civilisations and cultures.
Whether there were cities in Ancient Pakistan worthy of being
called as altogether a country, is one of the foundational
questions, any anthropologist of the Indus Man must ask. These
ancient cities may or may not have included a capital. There may
or may not have enough of them to constitute a type of country.
108
These Pre-Jericho cities may have preceded Cairo and Babylon
as a centre of civilisation in this world too.
In fact, what modern Anthropologists accepts as the basis of
civilisation; Assyria, Babylon, Egypt, is questioned by this
theory. Like Peking Man, Homo Neanderthalensis and now the
Indus Man, the anthropological evidence for life on earth or
rather the paleontogical evidence for the early man on earth and
the first civilisation here on earth is possibly not linking mankind
to the Middle East as strictly and as sternly as some might have
previously suggested.
The focus of Paleolithic study is trees, fossils and charcoal from
ancient sites. Radiocarbon dating tells us how many half lives (ie
5,370 years approximately) have passed since the physical

109
evidence was formed; but the weight of the carbon is halving as
we neglect and fail to appreciate that other societies than Peking
Man, Java Man, Neanderthals etc. could have been older than
thought previously. If there is no Pakistani paleontological
evidence or study of the paleolithic period in Ancient Pakistan,
we cannot continue to assume it is wrong to study the later
periods of the anthropology of the Ancient Indus Man. If we
assume it is better to overlook the tripartite theory for
archaeology and pre-history and adopt a new theory which is Pre-
stone Age, we are left with two major divisions: Pre-
Metallurgical advances , there was the Bronze Age. Post-
Metallurgical advances, there was the Iron Age, and then there
was modern life as we know it. It is in this theory which has
created rupture of Metal-working (called “Dhaat” in Urdu) in
human culture and can shed light of enormous proportion on our
110
knowledge of Prehistorical man. I am not implicating a lack of a
Stone Age for the Indus Man, rather assuming a question of a
detailed analysis of what was the metalwork done by the Indus
Man; and answering why and how exactly did it culminate in the
prehistorical developments that took place in the life-cycle of the
Indus Man. Was Ancient India an effect of the metallurgical
advancement of Ancient Pakistan? I dont deny the Mesolithic or
Neolithic periods of development of the Indus Man in Ancient
Pakistan but rather acknowledge it is easier to study the smaller
dates in kiloannum before present, than the larger ones. First, a
theory for why India is so profoundly dualistic in nature and
upbringing. If we look at the present Paleontology; science tells
us Assyria (including Palestine in the South) and Babylon
(including Talmudic lands) and Caira (including Ancient Egypt)
111
are the ABC of civilisations and cultures. This is not other than
the fact of the ABC of Islamic civilisations.
What has happened in the growth of Asian economic
developments and the growth of Anthropology has itself led to
new questions being asked and new avenues being explored of
our knowledge of Prehistorical Asians: Peking Man, Java Man,
and now the Indus Man, are recent additions to the neanderthal
man, and other areas of the world, too, have their own
prehistories for the study of the generations.
These add to our knowledge of Ancient man which is based on
sources such as emanate from the ancient East and Middle East.
The question of whether the Indus Man, Ancient India, Java Man
or Peking Man, came first, is then put on hold on a sidelined train
of thought. We can then concentrate on the idea that it is

112
revolution from one mode of production, to another, the next;
which is want to study in Anthropology. Stage one is
paleontological revolution, by this I mean moving from the Stone
Age to the age of post-Neolithic development.
This is Stage one of metallurgy as prehistory. Stage two is
moving from this Bronze, Brass or Chalcolithic to the Iron Age
or a further development of metallurgy. Here the metals are
mixed; whereas Stage one is about the use of lighter metals,
Stage two is about harder metals. Whereas Stage one is about
brittle metals, Stage two is about heavy metals. The colours of
the two Stages is also different; whereas Stage one goes darker
into reds, browns and golds; Stage two is about lighter colours
such as are white, silver and metallic. It is this revolutionary
theory which will allow us to say that what we have and know of
113
the Indus Man is about the two revolutions or nodes of
production. It tacitly implies that if the Indus Man is two- fold ie.
Dawlah al Islam (ie a Muslim country we call Pakistan) and Dar
al Islam (ie. a former Muslim country we say is Hindustan), it
may well prove beneficial to note the division or at least, the
terms of the division and the causes of the precipitative of the
two stages. My theory is that the Indus Man is actually a Muslim
who has al but apostated in a very great respect thousands of
years ago. This we say is in a reaction to Ancient Babylon,
Arabia, Canaan and Egypt being formed.
Without knowing the precise formula for translation of human
emotions from the elements it may be possible to acknowledge
that the right and responsibility of a human beings existence are
given as such.
114
Given the cities of human life in existence in the Bronze Age
were formed of such people who were citizens with rights and
responsibilities, is it not possible to say it was the composition of
metal alloys that led to the development of countries?
If to Copper, we add Tin or Zinc, to create alternatively Bronze or
Brass, has this simply coincided with the “Patriarchs” and their
altruism, self-sacrifice and stories such as highlighting the vitality
of sacrifice?
Around the same time as the Biblical Patriarchs, it can be
observed the religion of the Indus Man is partly pagan and pre-
Islamic and also shows signs of Early Islam. Nevertheless, before
the end of the prehistorical period, we not that the Indus Man has
a type of Duty (Dharma), the beginnings of his own religion. The

115
Rigveda shows this development first, in the Punjab as
Ramayana, and Mahabharata shows a full Ancient India.
As we know of the Great Famine of the Indus Man as a cause of
his hunger for Selfhood and fulfilling duty (Sikhi call the
economic, “Dharam da kirat karna”, it can be said that the
economic agenda is paramount and that so is culinary life. Which
utensil we use to cook, prepare and even eat food is concurrent
with our normal tools and even weapons. In the Stone Age we
had old “Stone Tavey” (stone oven areas); then clay ovens, and
now we use metals. To cook today we use no longer the brittle,
light-coloured metal but harder, reflective metals such as steel.
116
Without separating Stages one and two it will be easy to
condstruct a theory of Zaat from this Dhaat-work or the
metalwork of prehistory:
Indus Man: No famine, statues nor dharam. Flour from small
grain, meat sacrifice.
Post-Indus Man: Dharmic, iconic (iconoclastic). Flour from
large grains and rice. No oblation.
The Indus Man is a monolithic and overt metallurgical period.
Afterwards is a composite and avert period. In other words,
oblation and ablution are present in the Indus Man period but the
theory of the Indus Man is completed with the composition of
metals. Without the overt revolution there is no avert revolution.
By this I mean, Paleontology is ended by the overt revolution and

117
only then is the aversion of the Bronze Age. Ceramics, wood and
other natural materials are all in use but by now it is a lack of
double-take of metal composition which is seen as averted by the
composite metal, Iron. The Indus Man (TIM)’s culture is
informed of pure, raw from the earth as it is, by non-chemical
extraction. Metals from ore etc. The composite is not found in
earth naturally of which we see Zaat paat and dharam.
When the first country of human history was formed it is unlikely
we will know because of the many civilisations it is hard to know
exactly when they were formed; was it Egypt, Palestine, Syria,
Babylon (Iraq), in the Middle East; or Beijing in China. Perhaps
Indus Man preceded all, even Neanderthals in Europe, Mayans in
the Americas and others still in South East Asia. I say this
because of the evidence of the Vidya of wars waged by citizens
118
of areas of Punjab. Ancient Pakistan was always peace-loving,
indeed, we had weapons but as well as being sword-fashioners,
we were peace-makers. We ensured the Vidya etc. were written
by the pen.
If there is a parable of Islam over other faiths in their guns but
our numbers it is such as in the West we dominate by number of
followers. Back in the Pak-Ind Subcontinent, it is reversed. It is
their numbers which have shown millions of Muslims born
yearly too.
It has been said by many that Ancient Pakistan should be
acknowledged as greater than all other civilisations, just as the
pen is mightier than the sword. Today as countries of the world
have enough firepower to destroy us all, this is never more

119
relevant. Nevertheless, it is our powerlessness which is too
relevant. We are helpless in front of a barrage of nuclear bombs.
Only knowing to believe in Allah and the Last Day and to
remember Allah often, we must accept that Qiyamat, the end of
the world is taking place. We must think of our coming
conquering generations. They are surviving this great or global
war and we mustn’t let them inherit wars such as Af-Pak. We
must instead bequeath them UK and USA.
“Verily in the messenger of Allah ye have a good example for
him who looketh unto Allah and the Last Day, and remembereth
Allah much.”
The Holy Qur’an (MMP translation) 33:21
3.2 Revolution
120
Revolution 1- Stone age to Bronze age
Life before Rasulallah (SWS)
Revolution 2- Bronze age to Iron age
Early Islam
Revolution 3- Iron age to modernity
Islam- Coming of Rasulallah (SWS)
3.3 Silicon Valleys
121
What characterises the future as revolutionary is that the Late
Islamic period as opposed to the historial Islamic period, leaves
historical developments such as cars, planes, spacecraft and
nuclear wars, behind.
According to the above breakdown, life on earth has two Golden
Ages in Islam. Knowing Islam we know of the Golden Age but
how does mode, node and means of production develop to find a
new way of sustenance and providence? We had stone, bronze
and iron, now what? Silicon. A semi-conductive material giving
us what we know as electric power. The silicon chip being non-
resistant to heat, can revolutionise our metals as it allows us to
harness nature by electrical energy passing without problem.
Silicon valleys will grow such as in Karachi, and corresponding
122
intellectual centres such as Islamabad. In Hindustan, Bangalore
and Mumbai.
There are two household inventions of the computer age, the
personal or programmed computer, and the smart phone
telecommunication devices, are the tools, weapons and utensils
which don’t necessitate the old famines, wars and problems. Both
run on the microprocessor chip containing silicon, integrated
circuits made in wafers in water at first and then sliced off giving
microchips.
OFB 1444AH
123
Appendix
People Paleolithic Mesolithic Neolithic Chalcolithic Bronze Age Iron Age

Colour Light Brown Brown Brown Dark Dark
brown brown
Size Average Average Average Average Average Average
(Height)
Weight Average Average Average Average Average Average
Table 1: General facts about Ancient Pakistanis (Primary source)
Ancient Ancient Ancient Ancient Ancient Ancient Ancient Ancient
Pakistan India Pakistan India Pakistan India Pakistan India
SIZE SIZE MATERIAL MATERIAL WEIGHT WEIGHT COLOUR COLOUR

Food Big Small Barley Wheat Heavy Light Light Dark
Meat Small Big Grilled Grilled Light Heavy Dark Light
Grain Large Small Mong Others Light Heavy Yellow Brown
Weapon Large axe Large Wood/stone Wood/stone Heavy Heavy Brown/grey Brown/grey
Utensils Small Big Wood Wood Light Heavy Brown Grey
Jewellery Medium Large Precious stones Stones Light Heavy Light Colourful
Tools Small Medium Stone Stone Light Light Light Light
Table 2: Stone Age archaeological evidence
Pakistan India Pakistan India Pakistan India Pakistan India
SIZE SIZE MATERIAL MATERIAL WEIGHT WEIGHT COLOUR COLOUR

Food Small Small Wheat Wheat Light Light Light Light
Meat Small Big Grilled/fried/ Fried/boiled Light Light Dark Light
boiled
Grain Small Small Moong, Masar Mixed Light Heavy Yellow Brown
Weapon Guns Guns and Wood/Metal Metals Heavy Heavy Brown/grey Metallic
bombs
Utensils Small Big Steel Steel Light Light Silver Silver
Jewellery Medium Large Gold Gold Light Heavy Light Colourful
Tools Medium Medium Plastic, wood, Plastic, wood, Light Light Light Light
metal metal
Table 3: Today’s anthropological evidence (primary source)
124
Paleolithic Mesolithic Neolithic Chalcolithic Bronze Age Iron Age Modernity

Roti, rice Barley Wheat Oat Rice Seeds Fruit, veg Corn
Colour Light Dark White White or brown Green Multi-coloured Yellow
Size Large Small Fine Fine Small Light Light
flours grains
Weight Light Heavy Light Heavy Light Heavy Heavy
Daal- Mong Chana Masur Split Every Every Every
Pulse seed type type type

Colour Yellow Black Green All colours All colours All colours All colours
etc
Size Large Small Small All sizes All sizes All sizes All sizes
Weight Light Light Light Light Light Light Light
Utensils
Colour Grey Grey Grey Orang Gold Silver White
e
Size Big Medium Small Small Small Small Small
Weight Heavy Heavy Heavy Heavy Heavy Light Light
Weapons Spear Axe Polished Knives Hammers Swords and Guns,
shields bombs
Colour Grey Grey Grey Orange Gold Silver Metallic
Size Big to Big Large Small Small Small Auto atic, atomic
micro.
Weight Heavy Heavy Heavy Light Small Small Small
Tools Stone Stone Stone Copper Brass Iron Metal
Colour Grey Grey Grey Orange Gold Silver Metallic
Size Big to micro. Large Large Medium Small Small Atomic
Weight Heavy Heavy Heavy Medium Medium Light Light
Instruments Flute Flute Flute Flute Pipe Stringed Synthesiser
Material Wood Wood Wood Wood Brass Wood Wood
Colour Light Light Light Light Yellow Brown. silver Computer
Size Large Large Large Small Small Small Virtual
Weight Heavy Heavy Light Light Heavy Light None
Jewellery
Material Stone Waxed stone Waxed stone Copper Brass etc. Silver Gold
Colour Grey Grey Grey Orange Orange Silver Gold
Size Large Medium Small All sizes All sizes All sizes All sizes
Weight Heavy Medium Light All weights All weights All weights All weights
Table 4: General evolutionary processes
125
Table 5:Chart of Mehrgarh periods in history (2000 year blocks going back until
antediluvian times)
Paleolithic Mesolithic Neolithic Chalcolithic Bronze age Iron age Today

Cooking Barley Lentils Wheat Meat Rice Daals All
Tools, weapons Stones Stone, wood, Agriculture Chalk Copper, bronze, Iron, steel, metal- Cyber-age
and utensils precious stones brass work

Language Proto Indo Proto Indo Indo Iranian Indo European Indo Aryan Indic Urdu
Iranian European
Script Arabic, Semitic Aramaic Iranian Indo-european Indic Arabic Urdu
Prophet Adam (AS) Nuh (AS) Ibrahim (AS) Musa (AS) Dawud (AS) Isa ibn Maryam Muhammad
Mustafa (SWS)
Religion Islam Islam Islam Islam Islam Islam Islam
Culture Mehrgarh Harrapa Mohenjo-daro Ancient Pakistan Ancient Pak-Hind Muslim sub- Nation state
continent
Animals Goat Sheep Sheep Sheep Cattle Cattle All
Message Purity Redemption Friendship Vice- regency Speech Words Love
Islam’s growth from Prophets of Allah (PBUT); SafiAllah
(AS), NajiAllah (AS), KhalilAllah (AS), KhalifatAllah (AS),
KalimAllah (AS), KalimatAllah (AS) to HabibAllah,
Muhammad Mustafa (SWS).
126

Pakistan - An Anthropological Guide

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

You might also like

Pakistan - An Anthropological Guide

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Pakistan - An Anthropological Guide

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Pakistan -

Bismillahir Rahmaanir Raheem

3. The Indus Man……...107

The Pakistani economy in a new stage of hyperglobalisation

From agricultural tools defining the prehistoric or proto-historic;

through the markers of over-development (electrical accessories)

to the humble and chaste desire of computers as a productive

tool; right down to the idea of living in grace to computers’

system of information processing; the trick of the mode and

means of production isn’t simply in yielding a scientific and

philosophic interpretation of our lives but rather to impart

meaning to our culture, it’s art and so on and so forth.

It is in the nature of civilization, indeed a part and parcel of the

beauty of any people's development that the physical tools we

weapons for fighting, accessories and vehicles for everyday use,

or utensils for cooking, or even IT systems; the further down the

chain we go with these, the deeper the involvement of physical

and metaphysical when defining our relation as people with our

History itself is a story of how man was created by Allah

lost first in heaven and is to be won ultimately on earth days

before the kingdom come. Human evolution is a narration of

man’s picking food, picking up stones, making bronze statues,

perfecting metalwork, mobilisation of production in granaries etc,

mobilisation of labour through land, air and space travel as well

as automating of production and ultimately digitalising and

finally information systemising the entire process.

It is often therefore a measure of our societal growth that can be

gleaned from how far up or down the food chain or production

line, our main defining tool is by which we have characterised

forager. This level of supply and demand production and

consumption is specific to man in heaven. In the Stone age, we

we developed metallurgy; in Iron Age we illuminated our metal

work. When we actually talk of history and the world's

geography, then it's possible to look at the species favoured tool

and the species superpower.

Early Muslim countries were superpowers, such as Persia, in

inventing the windmill, Muslims gave the world a symbol of

economic activity. This symbol then became the steam train as

Britain’s industrial revolution took the world by storm.

Aeronautical travel, naval prowess and eventually space travel

took hold as USSR, for example led developments. Electricity

then gave us, in Japan, a potential world economic leader. The

domestic appliance, the tool of over-development was used by

USA in it’s nuclear age.

Ultimately the superpowers of India and Pakistan will show how

digitalisation and systemisation can create world economic

leaders amongst others. At the moment, however,the story of

human progress is being led by Chinese production automation.

Whether former tools were well positioned on the evolution of

production, computers are re-creators of reality instead, and do

is to recreate the world, in essence, a different type of a part of

the production process’ evolution.

This is why conceptually, it is even harder to understand

information systems as part of computer science. The

development of information systems, lets mankind develop

economically with a view to egalitarian model of industrial

growth in the world, where poorer countries are finding