Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Claas Baler Rollant 240 250 250 254 255 Roto Cut Operators Manual
Claas Baler Rollant 240 250 250 254 255 Roto Cut Operators Manual
https://manualpost.com/download/claas-baler-rollant-240-250-250-254-255-roto-cu
t-operators-manual/
**Claas Baler Rollant 240 250 250 254 255 Roto Cut Operator's Manual** Size :
7.79 MB Format : PDF Language : English Brand: Claas Type of machine:
Yet hence it cannot be inferred, that because the wife may not put
away her husband, or renounce him, as he may do her in the case of
adultery; therefore the people cannot disown the king in the case of
the violation of the royal covenant. For the king's power is not at all
properly a husband's power, 1. The wife, by nature, is the weaker
vessel, but the kingdom is not weaker than the king. 2. The wife is
given as an help to the man; but here the man is given as an help to
the common-wealth. 3. The wife cannot limit the husband's power;
as subjects may limit their sovereigns. 4. The wife cannot prescribe
the time of her continuing under him; as subjects may do with their
sovereigns. 5. The wife cannot change her husband; as a kingdom
can do their government. 6. The husband hath not power of life and
death; but the sovereign hath it over malefactors. Yet giving, and
not granting, his power were properly marital: if the case be put,
that the man do habitually break the marriage-covenant, or take
another wife, and turn also cruel and intolerable in compelling his
own wife to wickedness; and put the case also, that she should not
get a legal divorce procured, who can doubt but she can disown
him, and leave him? For this case is excepted out of that command,
1 Cor. vii. 10. Let not the wife depart from her husband, meaning for
mere difference in religion, or other lesser causes; but adultery doth
annul the marriage relation. See Pool's Synopsis critic, in locum. So
when a prince breaks the royal covenant and turns tyrant, or without
any covenant commits a rape upon the common-wealth, that
pretended relation may and must be disowned. Hence, we see, there
is no relation can bring a king or ruler under the object of the duty
of the fifth command, except it be that of a fiduciary patron, or
trustee, and public servant: for we cannot own him properly either
to be a father, or a master, or a husband. Therefore what can
remain, but that he must be a fiduciary servant? Wherefore if he
shall either treacherously break his trust, or presumptuously refuse
to be entrusted, upon terms and conditions to secure and be
accountable for, (before God and man) religion and liberty, we
cannot own his usurped authority. That metaphor which the learned
Buchanan uses, de jure regni, of a public and politic physician, is not
a relation different from this of a fiduciary servant; when he
elegantly represents him as entrusted with the preservation and
restoration of the health of the politic body, and endowed with skill
and experience of the laws of his craft. If then he be orderly called
unto this charge, and qualified for it, and discharges his duty
faithfully, he deserves, and we are obliged to give him the deference
of an honoured physician; but if he abuse his calling, and not
observe the rules thereof, and instead of curing, go about wilfully to
kill the body he is entrusted with, he is no more to be owned for a
physician: but for a murderer.
The low and mean condition of them to whom belongs the power
of judgment, does not diminish its dignity; when the king then is
judged by the people, the judgment is of as great dignity as if it
were done by a superior king; for the judgment is the sentence of
the law. 2. They are superior in power: because every constituent