Appeal and Review

You might also like

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 4

APPEAL & REVIEW

FUNDAMENTAL DISTINCTION BETWEEN


APPEAL & REVIEW

APPEAL REVIEW

 Party wants to question  Party wants to question


the substantive the procedural fairness of
correctness of the the proceedings
decision  Party is of the opinion that
the method used by the court
 Party believes that the in arriving at its conclusion
court came to a wrong was flawed or irregular
conclusion on the facts in  Not the correctness of the
issue or the law decision, but the validity of
the decision is being
questioned here
OTHER DIFFERENCES BETWEEN APPEALS
AND REVIEWS

APPEAL REVIEW

 Since an appeal is a re-evaluation  When a matter is taken on review, it is


of the decision of the court, it is unlikely that the irregularity will
generally a matter of argument, appear from the record, since the
objection will often concern a mistake
based on the record of the or fault by the decision maker
proceedings alone  The parties are therefore not bound
 The parties are strictly bound to the to the record and may make use of
record extrinsic evidence
 Appeals are brought before court  Reviews are brought before court by
by lodging a notice of appeal way of application
 The notice describes the grounds of  The affidavits which are annexed to
appeal the notice of motion set out evidence
 Specific time limits apply of irregularity
 Reviews need not be brought within a
 The notice describes the grounds of
appeal fixed period of time
 Within a reasonable time
EXAMPLES

APPEAL REVIEW

 A judgement which is not  A judgement which is not supported by


justified by evidence any evidence at all
 Rejection of competent evidence may,
 A decision regarding the depending on the circumstances, be
right of a party to amend grounds for either an appeal or review
a pleading  Process by which proceedings of
inferior courts are brought before
 A decision regarding the superior courts as a result of grave
striking out of certain irregularities or illegalities occurring
allegations during the course of the proceedings
Absence of jurisdiction on the part of
 A decision relating to the 
the court
party upon whom the  Interest in the cause, bias, malice or
onus of proof lies corruption of the presiding officer

You might also like