Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Composite and Conventional Members Comparison - Thesis - Part2
Composite and Conventional Members Comparison - Thesis - Part2
Comparison”
01– Roofing;
08 – Vapour control
Condensation
Air can hold moisture - the warmer the air, the more moisture it can hold. If moist air is
cooled by contact with cold surfaces, such as walls, windows or mirrors, the moisture
condenses into water droplets (condensation).
Disadvantage of putting Metal Deck directly on Rafter is, there will be condensationdue
to moisture. For outside area this issue will be resolved due to sun light, but for inside, it
will have issue because of Air Conditioning.
For initial period after construction, Condensation will not create much problem.
This problem will start may be after 2~3 years when actual properties of wood takes
place.
(Hidden Connections and Discreet Detailing to Conceal the true Structural Support
Provided by the Steel)
The building structure considered here in study must be designed to withstand all
the forces that may be imposed on it during the service life span of the structure. The
directions of the forces applied on the structure are shown in next sections. Actual loading
on the structure may vary from machine to machine. However, the type of loads acting on
the turbine foundation may generally be defined as shown in the following subsections.
LITERATURE REVIEW
2.0 General
Many researchers have been carried out on composite construction. Some of these are
carried out individually on composite columns. Different compositions of materials are
considered while considering composite elements structure, for example RCC + Steel,
Timber + Steel etc. While some of these are carried out on whole high rise buildings, and
some on other miscellaneous structures. Here few of them are enumerated as below;
The present work consists of comparison among RCC, Steel and Steel concrete
composite (G+30) Storey commercial building structure. The commercial building
considered is situated in earthquake zone IV. For modeling of Composite, Steel and
R.C.C. structures, ETABS software is used and the results are compared. Equivalent
Static Method of Analysis is used.
As the results show the Steel option is better than R.C.C. But the Composite option
for high rise building is best suited among all three options. The reduction in the dead
weight of Composite framed structure is 30 % with respect to R.C.C. framed structure.
Axial forces in column have been reduced. Bending moments in secondary beams also
reduced. As the sizes of the steel members reduces about 25 % in main beams and about
60 % in secondary beams.
The slenderness effect of the member is taken into account by using the Moment
Magnification Method. The proposed procedure was compared with test results of 12
square and three L-shaped reinforced concrete columns subjected to short-term axial load
and biaxial bending, and also some experimental results available in the literature for
composite columns compared with the theoretical results obtained by the proposed
procedure and a good degree of accuracy was obtained.
The theoretical and experimental results show that the compressive strength of
concrete and its corresponding compressive strain are the most effective parameters on
the ultimate strength capacity of column members. The shape of the concrete stress–strain
relationship has little effect on the ultimate strength capacity of the column members.
In this study, to address the global the environmental issues, the urgent need of
using timber in the building structure field to contribute towards reforestation. In the
building structure field, direct use of wood as structural timber in large buildings is not
possible as it’s too weak for the same. Hence, development of new structural system
using timber steel composite is studied here and categorized based on performances.
The studying the contact joint for structural steel –Timber composite structure the
frame joints with different load bearing capacities were categorized. Here considered that
bending strength of composite structure reaches maximum when timber fails/ fractures
under ultimate tensile stress. The following fig 2.3 shows one of the composite structure
frame system considered.
In this project, the aforementioned requirements are explored and the ability of the
hybrid system to perform was evaluated. The potential environmental benefits were
investigated, and a comparative study was performed to gauge the relative performances
of the timber and concrete systems. The comparative study looked at how the amount of
steel required in the frame, the loads to foundations, the cost, and the environmental
impact changed when making the substitution for a range of situations.
The analysis for costs found that using timber would be a more expensive option,
mostly due to the relative cost of the slabs themselves (roughly four times the cost of
concrete for a given floor area).
The analysis for the above found that use of timber steel composite leads to
economic and ecologic benefits as the construction height optimization. The earthquake
resistance can be improved and the assembling can be executed more efficiently. Steel
reinforced timber structures are light, fast and clean.
In the first case study, research regarding hybrid structural systems and
connections for multistoried laminated veneer lumber (timber) buildings located in
earthquake prone areas was carried out. According to research prefabricated structural
timber elements were joined using unbonded post-tensioning tendons so that the opening
and closing of an existing gap accommodates seismic demand during an earthquake.
In the second case study, descriptive study regarding the hybrid timber-steel retail
structure-Sainsbury’s Dartmouth was carried out. Different challenges faced during
design stages were noted.
The present study is an effort to investigate the viability of using Steel and Carbon
fiber reinforced polymer as reinforcements in glued laminated timber beams. This study
specifically focuses on the investigation of different configurations to come up with an
optimum reinforcement arrangement which maximizes the stiffness/strength properties of
timber beams. This divided in three different ways to investigate the properties of timber
beams.
Second FE model is prepared which find out the interfacial shear stresses in the
glue line between timber and steel/ fibre reinforcement. Also, it predicts the de-lamination
possibility due to adhesive failure in shear.
Third full scaled timber steel beams were prepared based on the results of analysis
and tested in bending for analytical results verification.
This study article investigates to set the standards for designing of flitch beam as
this was the time when flitch plates are used only to reinforce the wooden beams. In the
beginning of that era flitch beams were not used for any new construction, as efficient use
of steel in the composite section was not done. During that period it’s beginning of
common practice to use flitch section of timber beams as it’s difficult to get and use large
sections of timber for houses. Based on the experiences of the concerned engineers,
Timber design handbook and AISC code of steel construction author has proposed
simplified procedure to design the flitch beam which will help in standardization.
Through use of standardize procedure for design and analysis, it’s helpful to
optimize the flitch beam sizing. This also helps to set the standards for designing of flitch
beam and make efficient use of steel in the composite section was not done.
With reference to studies enlisted above from many researchers, here are the findings
as below;
METHODOLOGY
The design has to provide detailed knowledge of the static and dynamic behavior
of the structure and of the load transfer mechanisms (e.g. from the roof to beams, beams
to columns, columns to base raft/foundation and further to the substructure / soil). It has
also to provide a deeper understanding of the governing forces and environmental effects
for studies of the light framed structures.
(ii) After all time-dependent displacement (i.e. creep deformation, ucreep) has taken place;
this is called the final deformation: ufin.
Deformation is calculated in two different ways, depending on the creep behaviour of
the structure:
1. Structures comprising members, components and connections having the same
creep behaviour:-
Creep behaviour in timber and wood-related products is a function of several factors,
and to simplify the design process the assumption is made in EC5 that when subjected to
a permanent load over the lifetime of a building, the instantaneous deflection (uinst) and
the creep deflection (ucreep) are related as follows,
Where,
kdef = a deformation factor whose value is dependent on the type of material being
stressed as well as its moisture content.
Values for the factor have been derived for timber and wood-based materials at defined
environmental conditions when subjected to constant loading at the SLS over the design
life, and are given in EC5, Table 3.2. The environmental conditions are referred to as
service class 1, 2 or 3 and values for kdef for timber and some wood-related products at
these conditions are given in Table 2.10.
For structures or members complying with the above conditions the final deformation,
ufin, can then be written as,