PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILI

CODEOF Section 36-44. Whatnotto

do?
-

AND ACCOUNTABILITY -

false or unverified
Disseminate
structured with values statements or claims, or otherwise
and integrity commitany other actofdisintor-
what'sNew? *
mation;
New Lawyers Oath
/
-

-maintain social media accounts

1988 CPR LPRA For the purpose circumventing
of
·
society
·

Independence propriety ↓
the provisions CPRA;
of

Legal Profession propriety competence G

·
· ·

with
communicate an officer of
·
court ·
Fidelity Diligence
·clients ·

Equality ·
Accountability any court, tribunal, or other government
-

canon 1 propriety agency through social media to

influence
-
saction 3 by Revised mostly aligned to
age.
with
tredigital latter's performance of
the official
-

section 4. The of
emojis part language?May a lawyer duties.

befoundguity
abusive or offensive languageare Section 17. May lawyer engage a social media
ofusing
-

pageFor purpose ofattractingno one

the
o
yes, itispossible. Emojis conveys feelings,
-

they speak this itis a part ofour language. -a

postniographical data, contact
may only
Itis also a language in digital age. details,field ofpractice or services
-> In some cases in the US, itis accepted as
offered.
evidence. -

section 19. Subjudice is a latin term which

-> cases in Peansylvania and Ohio (elecoms)
letters to matters under or before
in
everything context, he conscious
he take
judge or
matters under
->
a or court
use worlds
our
with
of
judicial consideration. In essences
lawyer still bounded by CPRA even online?
A subjudice astrict comments and
Yes, the changes in CORAstarted reports
on disclosures pertaining pending
-a
to
thatwas made online
judicial proceedings.
-

responsible use ofsocial media

may a lawyer repose to be
-
->

show cause order againstan official ofpast

administration interviewed by redid regarding a

- Belo-Henares vs Atty. Grevavra NO.11394

pending before any court,
case
-> OCAvs Judge Atillo, Jr. N0.455-21-108 tribunal agency?Is this action in
-o L90 vs Atty. causing, A.C NO. 13453 anidane withCPRA?
-
a 1stshow cause
againstPAO chiefDr. Answer:Yes. CPRA prohibitsuch
ABSA (07-11-13)
<

an interview wherever the expected

-> and show cause againstPA chiefDr. Aosta response oflawyer during interview
107-25-23) and show cause complies with tends to:
theprovision under section 22. -cause pu-judgment
a
- a DA
is not law firm butitis mandated -

sway public perceptions

as to

provide legal the

less
service
impede, obstruct, or
to
to infivens
portinate. the decision of
such court,
-

saction 3644. When a larger answers a xinal or other government

legal avery posted on social media, agencies or which tends to
does that already create lawyer and Farnish the
COUsfribunal's
author relationship?
-> correlated with
canon sations
integrity
defines client-lawyer relationship -impute improper
againonst
which motives
v it depends on circumstances
the any its
of members.
·

Safion 5. Is a larger still bound by the

IDRAeven as he deals with his Section 3233 How can langer who

Family? are also reachers of law

-> Yes, still bounded even if
itdeals the me against
comply with
family,
with conflict interest under
of
CDRA?
section 12.
lawyer duty bound toreport
Is Mustdisclose antilict of
-

a -·

illegal acts ofhis or her client? interesttothe school and

will this notviolatethe
lawyer- affected
parties.
clientconfidentiality?

-
a shall immediately report the
to

appropriate authority, inforce th

count/government agency about
He dro
bound
duty to reportillegal
~

acts
- a
violate
shall notbe deemed to
lawyer-clientconfidentiality
-

or
acarepitnotpassjudgement
resolved.

sation 16. Whatis the a larger

recourse of
when a life Innatening situation
-

occur in relation to
is likely to
a cast he or she is handling?
-> mustreport the
to authorities.
-a
court will never abandon a
butstill
member of judiciary,
withoutprejudice totheoutine
Ofthe
Last.

section 21. Does giving gifts the

to adverse
counsel violdle canon it, suction 21
of CPRAon prohibition against gift-
and donations? And
lawyers
giving
prohibited from giving gifts, regateand
④>
Yes itviolates canon I, section 11
when one to adverse
give gifts
council. Even ifthey are in relationship
and
regardless mode or occasion.
of

Notallowed especially to court

->

penael, judge or anyone involved in

dispensation ofjustice.