Week 02 - Evolution and Life Cycle

You might also like

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 13

Technology in Business (MGT-111)

BBA Program, Session 2K22


Fall’23

Technological Evolution & Life Cycle


(Week 02)
Evolution patterns of Technology Development

A process that begins with basic scientific discoveries and ends with
commercial products that are adopted by a wide range of customers

Better
New Product
products
technology introduced
adopted by
invented to market
more people
Technology Refine the
evolves and technology and
performance develop new
improves generations of
products

MGT-111; BBA; NBS 2


Drivers of technological evolution

• Paradigms where researchers seek answers based on prior knowledge


• Social, economic, and political forces
• Technology trajectories - paths of improvement of a technology on
some performance dimension
• Paradigm shifts necessary to create new opportunities

Incremental Change Radical Change

• Most technological • Some technological


innovation is innovation is radical
incremental • Involves fundamentally
• Involves small new ways of solving a
improvements to problem
existing technologies

Can you think of examples of incremental and radical technological changes?


MGT-111; BBA; NBS 3
Technology S-Curve

• Graphical representations of the development of a new technology


• Compare some measure of performance with some measure of effort
• The relationship between effort and performance is typically S-shaped:
– Initially performance improvements per unit of effort are small
– Once key drivers of performance are identified rapid improvement follows
– Diminishing returns as physical limits reached

MGT-111; BBA; NBS 4


Technological Improvements & Shifting S-Curves

• Happens when an existing


technology reaches the point of
diminishing returns
• A new technology is often
developed to challenge the
existing technology
• Tends to be incremental, building
on prior developments, and
taking place within an existing
paradigm
• Initially, the new technology is
usually inferior to existing
technology on key dimensions
• But the new technology has
greater potential for performance
improvement

Who Shifts the S-Curve; New Entrants or Established Firms?


MGT-111; BBA; NBS 5
Stacked S-curve: Spreadsheets

MGT-111; BBA; NBS 6


Map any technological innovation over stacked S-
curve.
Also discuss the reasons that caused maturity/plateau/
decline in the technology.

Group Assignment

MGT-111; BBA; NBS 7


Using Technology S-Curves as a Management Tool

• Incumbents can predict when to invest in a radical new technology


• Limitations
– the inability to identify when to switch technologies
– the failure to incorporate all of the factors that matter to the
decision to switch
– the need for adopters of the new technology to focus on niche
markets before tackling the mainstream of the market
– the existence of alternative ways respond to the introduction of
new technology

How do you tell where you are on the curve?


• Keep track of your past efforts and the results that they yielded.
• If most of your efforts are not delivering any improvement but sometimes yield a
significant jump in performance, then you are doing research.
• If you can routinely predict what efforts will yield results, then you’re doing development
and are in the middle two-thirds of the curve.
• If you had been making progress reliably, but it’s now slowed down considerably despite
continued investment, then you are probably hitting limits.

MGT-111; BBA; NBS 8


Abernathy-Utterback 3 Phases of Innovation

• Technology evolves through three


phases of innovation
• The development of a radical
innovation leads to a fluid phase,
During this time many firms
enter and compete on the basis of
different product designs
• Eventually, the firms in the
industry converge on a dominant
design, which results in
Transitional phase. Here all
players try to optimize processes
with innovation to improve the
quality and reduce the cost of
their products and services.
• In the last phase Specific phase,
there is reduction in number of
players with incremental
innovation
• After a while, the cycle repeats Product innovation
itself. when technological innovation involves the creation of new goods
and services sold to customers

Process innovation
when technological innovation involves problem solving that
improves the method of creating or delivering a product or service

MGT-111; BBA; NBS 9


Self reading-Modified Models

Tushman’s Competence-Enhancing /Destroying


Innovation
Barra’s Reverse Product Cycle Theory Radical new technology does not always undermine the
capabilities of incumbent firms
Model for service industries Competence-enhancing if it makes use of existing knowledge,
Stage 1: Adopt a technology from a goods industry to make skills, abilities structure, design, production processes and
services more efficient plant and equipment
Stage 2: Use the technology to make the service more effective Competence-destroying if it undermines existing skills,
Stage 3: Use the technology to create new services (radical structures, etc.
change) Established firms are able to transition to a radical technology
when that technology is competence-enhancing but fail to do
so when it is competence-destroying

Christensen’s Value Networks & Disruptive


Innovation
Henderson and Clark’s Architectural Innovation
For new firms: target a new or underserved segment of the
A modular innovation is one that changes the components from market with a disruptive innovation
which the innovation is created, but not the linkages between For incumbent firms: make sure core technology conforms to the
those components features of the dominant design because deviation from the
An architectural innovation is one that changes the linkages dominant design will make it harder for you to satisfy customers
between the components, but leaves the components themselves once that design has emerged
intact. As an incumbent firm, develop a new company to exploit the
disruptive technology, rather than ignoring it, or trying to develop
the technology within the confines of your existing organization

MGT-111; BBA; NBS 10


Read more about the taxonomy of architectural
innovation and why incumbent firms fail in the
face of architectural innovation?

Reading Assignment

Henderson and Clark’s Taxonomy of Innovations

MGT-111; BBA; NBS 11


• Read through Chapter 3 from Shane (2009) and
Schilling (2020)

• Prepare the Case: Apple Watch (B): Would you


Bet on it? (HBS)

Preparation for Next


Week

MGT-111; BBA; NBS 12


Discuss, Prepare and Present main takeaways from
the Articles
1. Disruptive technologies: Catching the wave
Group Discussions (HBR).
2. Is Tesla Really a Disruptor? (HBR)

MGT-111; BBA; NBS 13

You might also like