Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Public Economics 14th Finance Commission Bullet Docx Google Docs
Public Economics 14th Finance Commission Bullet Docx Google Docs
Terms of Reference and the matters that shall be taken into consideration by
the Fourteenth Finance Commission in making the recommendations are as under:
● the distribution between the Union and the States of the net proceeds of
taxes which are to be, or may be, divided between them under Chapter I,
Part XII of the Constitution and the allocation between the States of the
respective shares of such proceeds;
● the principles which should govern the grants-in-aid of the revenues of the
States out of the Consolidated Fund of India and the sums to be paid to the
States which are in need of assistance by way of grants-in-aid of their
revenues under article 275 of the Constitution for purposes other than
those specified in the provisos to clause (1) of that article, and
● the measures needed to augment the Consolidated Fund of a State to
supplement the resources of the Panchayats and Municipalities in the State
on the basis of the recommendations made by the Finance Commission of
the State.
Vertical Balance
● The approach to vertical devolution was governed by three factors; namely
● the spirit of constitutional provisions;
● the concerns about the fiscal space expressed by the states and the
union; and
● the need for clarity on the respective functional and expenditure
responsibilities of the union and states.
As already mentioned, the 14th Finance Commission took the view that there was no
scope to reduce the fiscal space available for discharging its responsibilities in
the Union List of the Constitution. Against this background, the 14th Finance
Commission took a consolidated view of the aggregate transfers from the union
and states while recognizing that the tax devolution should be the primary
route of transfer of resources to states since it is formula-based and, thus,
conducive to sound fiscal federalism. It was also recognized that to the extent
the formula based transfers do not meet the needs of the specific states, they
need to be supplemented by grants-in-aid on an assured basis and in a fair
manner.
Horizontal Balance
● In regard to horizontal balance, the 14th Finance Commission was guided by the
broad criteria of the earlier finance commissions, namely,
● population and income to reflect needs;
● area and infrastructure distance to indicate, cost disabilities; and
● fiscal indicators relating to tax and fiscal discipline to assess resources.
There are three notable features of the criteria used by the 14th Finance
Commission. In recent years, the TOR of the finance commission required use
of the population in 1971, whenever population was utilized as a factor for
determination of devolution of taxes and grants-in-aid. The TOR of the 14th
Finance Commission, however, added that demographic changes that have
taken place subsequent to 1971 could also be considered.
Grants-in-Aid
● Previous Finance Commissions have enunciated four main considerations
governing grants-in-aid to the states;
● to meet their residuary budgetary needs after taking the devolution of taxes
into account;
● to facilitate the upgradation of standards of administrative and social
services, and
● to ensure minimum expenditures on such services across the country.
Grants-in-aid have been recommended in the past to meet the special needs,
burdens and obligations of the states and also to address the specific sectors
of national importance.
● A separate grant was given to the states for maintaining the ecology and
environment for promoting sustainable development. They have generally
been recommended for augmenting expenditures, rather than for
substituting what a state government was already spending.
● The 14th Finance Commission departed, to some extent, from previous practice,
and adopted four principles: First, the devolution of taxes from the divisible pool
should, as in the past; be based upon an appropriate formula which should, to
a large extent, offset revenue and cost disabilities. Second, the assessment of
expenditures should build in additional expenditures in the case of those states
with a per capita expenditure significantly below the all-state average. The
assessment of revenues should build in the scope for additional revenue
mobilization based on the current tax-GSDP ratio relative to the all-state
average. This will enable fiscally-disadvantaged states to upgrade their services
without earmarking or specifying sectors. Third, if the assessed expenditure
need of a state, after taking into account the enabling resources for
augmentation, exceeds the sum of revenue capacity and devolved taxes, then
the state concerned will be eligible to receive a general purpose grant-in-aid to
fill the gap. Fourth, grants-in-aid for state specific projects or schemes will not
be considered, as these are best identified, prioritized and financed by the
respective states. Fifth, promotion of sustainable development is mainstreamed
by taking the area under forest cover as a factor in tax devolution itself.
● The Commission shall review the state of the finances, deficit and debt
levels of the Union and the States, keeping in view, in particular, the fiscal
consolidation roadmap recommended by the Thirteenth Finance Commission,
and suggest measures for maintaining a stable and sustainable fiscal
environment consistent with equitable growth including suggestions to amend
the Fiscal Responsibility Budget Management Acts currently in force and while
doing so, the Commission may consider the effect of the receipts and
expenditure in the form of grants for creation of capital assets on the deficits;
and the Commission shall also consider the recommend incentives and
disincentives for States for observing the obligations laid down in the Fiscal
Responsibility Budget Management Acts.
● The Commission shall indicate the basis on which it has arrived at its findings
and make available the State-wise estimates of receipts and expenditure.
● The Commission shall make its report available by the 31st October, 2014,
covering a period of five years commencing on the 1st April, 2015.
***********