Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 6 views

    POLS 7150 Assessment Rubrics

    Uploaded by

    chanchunsumbrian
    The document provides rubrics for assessing student work on a case study paper, presentation, and reflective journal for a course on ethics and public affairs. For each assessment type, criteria are outlined for excellent, good, satisfactory, pass, and fail performance in areas such as relevance, argument, depth of discussion, organization, research, coherence, communication, and personal reflection. Requirements for higher grades include more accurate and in-depth discussion, stronger arguments, varied sources, polished presentation, and evidence of personal growth. Lower grades are assigned for plagiarism, disorganization, poor writing, and lack of reflection.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    POLS 7150 Assessment Rubrics

    Uploaded by

    chanchunsumbrian
    6 views2 pages
    The document provides rubrics for assessing student work on a case study paper, presentation, and reflective journal for a course on ethics and public affairs. For each assessment type, criteria are outlined for excellent, good, satisfactory, pass, and fail performance in areas such as relevance, argument, depth of discussion, organization, research, coherence, communication, and personal reflection. Requirements for higher grades include more accurate and in-depth discussion, stronger arguments, varied sources, polished presentation, and evidence of personal growth. Lower grades are assigned for plagiarism, disorganization, poor writing, and lack of reflection.

    Original Description:

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The document provides rubrics for assessing student work on a case study paper, presentation, and reflective journal for a course on ethics and public affairs. For each assessment type, criteria are outlined for excellent, good, satisfactory, pass, and fail performance in areas such as relevance, argument, depth of discussion, organization, research, coherence, communication, and personal reflection. Requirements for higher grades include more accurate and in-depth discussion, stronger arguments, varied sources, polished presentation, and evidence of personal growth. Lower grades are assigned for plagiarism, disorganization, poor writing, and lack of reflection.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf or txt
    6 views2 pages

    POLS 7150 Assessment Rubrics

    Uploaded by

    chanchunsumbrian
    The document provides rubrics for assessing student work on a case study paper, presentation, and reflective journal for a course on ethics and public affairs. For each assessment type, criteria are outlined for excellent, good, satisfactory, pass, and fail performance in areas such as relevance, argument, depth of discussion, organization, research, coherence, communication, and personal reflection. Requirements for higher grades include more accurate and in-depth discussion, stronger arguments, varied sources, polished presentation, and evidence of personal growth. Lower grades are assigned for plagiarism, disorganization, poor writing, and lack of reflection.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf or txt
    of 2

    POLS7150 Ethics and Public Affairs Assessment Rubrics

    Case Study Paper


    Criteria Excellent Good Satisfactory Pass Fail
    A/A- B+/B/B- C+/C/C- D F
    Relevance The paper presents a morally The paper presents a morally The paper presents a morally The paper presents a morally Plagiarism or non-submission.
    controversial public policy with controversial public policy with controversial public policy with uncontroversial public policy with
    clear background information and partial background information and partial background information; the limited background information;
    significance; the author significance; the author author understands the selected the author understands the selected
    understands the selected case and understands the selected case and case and its moral implications case poorly.
    its moral implications accurately its moral implications somewhat only partially and some important
    and addresses them fully. accurately but address only some aspects are omitted.
    aspects of them.

    Argument The paper is driven by a clearly The paper is driven by a defensible The paper contains a defensible The paper does not have an
    stated, defensible argument. The argument, but it may not be stated argument which is not sufficiently argument, and the main conclusion
    author does a superb job of clearly and consistently. defended, and the main conclusion is not clearly stated.
    defending her arguments against is not adequately argued for.
    possible objections.
    Depth of In-depth discussion & elaboration In-depth discussion & elaboration The writer has omitted pertinent Cursory discussion in all the
    discussion in all sections of the paper. in most sections of the paper. content or content runs-on sections of the paper or brief
    excessively. Quotations from discussion in only a few sections.
    others outweigh the writer’s own
    ideas excessively.
    Organization and Paper is clearly organized and has Paper is clearly organized, but Paper is somewhat organized and Paper is poorly organized, full of
    Writing few or no grammar or spelling might benefit from more careful has many grammar or spelling grammar or spelling errors.
    errors. Scholarly ideas are cited attention to transitional sentences; errors. Scholarly ideas are cited Scholarly ideas are cited
    correctly using a recognized style has some grammar or spelling incorrectly. incorrectly.
    guide. errors. Scholarly ideas are cited
    correctly using a recognized style
    guide.
    POLS7150 Ethics and Public Affairs Assessment Rubrics

    Presentation
    Criteria Excellent Good Satisfactory Pass Fail
    A/A- B+/B/B- C+/C/C- D F
    Research Information presented is Information presented is mostly Information presented is Information is mostly unreliable Presentation is irrelevant to any
    accurate and from credible accurate with only a few minor acceptably accurate; more than and/or inaccurate; most of the moral problem; or failure to
    sources; resources are varied errors; resources are reasonably one resource may be resources are questionable. attend the student seminar.
    and appropriate. good but not varied enough. questionable; no variation in
    resources.

    Organization and Coherence Presentation is coherent and Presentation is coherent Presentation is Presentation lacks coherence,
    well-organized; the audience can for the most part, but acceptably coherent, and is poorly organized.
    easily follow the flow of the missing some elements but missing a few
    argument. important elements

    Effective Communication Presentation is polished, with Presentation is polished for the Presentation is acceptably Presentation is hardly polished;
    effective slides; and is fluent in most part, with some effective polished, with somewhat slides are largely ineffective; the
    the delivery, maintains an slides; and is largely fluent in readable slides; and some delivery is hard to follow.
    effective pace and eye contact; delivery; maintains a reasonable interruptions in delivery.
    excellent time management. pace and eye contact; good time
    management.

    Reflective Journal
    Criteria Excellent Fail
    A/A- F
    Personal Reflections Shows personal reflections as a student Plagiarism or non-submission.
    engaging in learning; expresses personal
    beliefs and attitudes towards a certain topic;
    demonstrates evidence of adjustment in own
    attitudes and beliefs because of learning.
    Quality of Writing Writing is free of most
    errors in grammar or
    usage so that the reader is
    minimally distracted from
    the content.

    You might also like