Professional Documents
Culture Documents
J Jmatprotec 2004 04 139
J Jmatprotec 2004 04 139
Abstract
As known, incremental forming is a flexible and innovative sheet metal forming process which allows complex shape shells forming
without the need for any die.
For these reasons, incremental forming is nowadays suggested for rapid prototyping and customised products.
The present paper is focused on material formability in incremental forming and, in particular, on the evaluation and compensation of
elastic springback. The latter significantly modifies the imposed shape.
For this purpose, a deeper assessment of the process was developed following three different approaches. First of all, a wide experimental
investigation on the influence of some relevant process parameters was developed. At the same time, an explicit FEM analysis of incremental
forming process was carried out in order to verify its effectiveness and, as a consequence, its ability to be used as a design tool. Furthermore,
the obtained parts were analysed by a reverse engineering technique and the measured geometry was numerically compared with the desired
one, with the aim to quantify the geometrical discrepancies.
In this way, an integrated numerical/experimental procedure is proposed in order to limit the shape defects between the obtained geometry
and the desired one.
© 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
0924-0136/$ – see front matter © 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2004.04.139
502 G. Ambrogio et al. / Journal of Materials Processing Technology 153–154 (2004) 501–507
Table 2
MRSE (mm)
obtained in correspondence of the intersection between process parameters are accurately chosen: as shown in
the oblique walls and the major base of the pyramid. Such Table 2 a sharper product is obtained if the smaller punch
a defect strongly depends on the absence of any support diameter is adopted and the tool path pitch is reduced
that may reduce the sheet bending. In fact, the problem is (test 3). The latter choose increases, of course, the pro-
almost completely resolved by using a proper counter-die cess time length, since a higher number of concentric
at the edge. Anyway this solution moves the process to- spires, i.e. a longer path, has to be executed.
ward a more complicated one, modifying the basic prin- 4. If the bent zone is not taken into account, the average
ciple on which the incremental forming is based, i.e. the error is about 1 mm from the ideal surface compared to a
simplicity. height of 50 mm on a length of about 160 mm. Then, the
2. The actual geometry presents some interesting errors also error is of course not negligible for many applications,
along the oblique walls. In particular, a sort of distor- even if in some cases it may be quietly accepted. Thus a
tion is obtained, generating a curvature on the expected
straight sides. This phenomenon is due to the elastic
FEM
springback whose effect is lower in correspondence of Scanner 3D
the edges, where the geometrical stiffness is higher then
in other areas.
3. Although it is not possible to exactly reproduce the de-
sired geometry, the errors entity may be reduced if the Fig. 8. Comparison between FEM and experimental geometry: test no. 1.
506 G. Ambrogio et al. / Journal of Materials Processing Technology 153–154 (2004) 501–507
more accurate set-up of the process is strongly required. For sake of simplicity, a conical shape was investigated and
In fact, many general mechanical applications require a the results coming from two different geometric paths were
tolerance in the coupling of the order of 10−1 mm. compared in terms of the mesh profile geometry. The ob-
tained results are shown in Fig. 10: definitively, an improve-
Furthermore, the FEM results have been compared with
ment was obtained, in fact a final profile much closer to the
the actual geometry of the obtained parts in order to test the
desired one was reached.
effectiveness of the numerical simulation. In Fig. 8, a com-
Of course several decisional variables may be chosen in
parison is reported with reference to two profiles, namely the
order to evaluate the correcting operation and, then, several
FEM and the actual one, obtained along a symmetry plane
operative strategies may be performed.
of the part (test 1).
Anyway, even implementing a very simple correcting
A very good overlapping was observed between the FEM
strategy, a significant improvement in terms of product
results and the experimental ones, with reference to the
precision was obtained giving a preliminary proof that the
whole experimental campaign; this confirms that the numer-
one-point incremental forming may also be regarded as
ical simulation may be considered a suitable design tool as
a precise forming process, despite its high simplicity and
far as the incremental forming processes are regarded.
cheapness.
As discussed, shape errors in incremental forming opera-
tions characterised by a single point punch are due to the lack
of a counter-die or, more in general, by the absence of a guide 6. Conclusions
for the deforming sheet metal. On the other hand probably
the most important characteristic of the considered forming In this paper, the dimensional accuracy of the incremental
process is the absence of rigid dies; in this way the intro- forming operations was accurately discussed and analysed
duction of a rigid die would make the process more expen- by using and effective experimental technique, highlighting
sive strongly reducing its potential. In the present research, very relevant discrepancies between the designed surfaces
a simple procedure is proposed to reduce the geometrical and the obtained ones.
errors affecting the final geometry of the investigated part. This shape may be satisfactory predicted by using the
In particular, two different geometric paths were introduced modern FE codes.
in the numerical simulation with the aim to obtain a final One of the most promising way in order to assess incre-
deformed mesh closer to the desired geometry. The first one mental forming also as a net-shape forming process seems
reproduces the traditional path in which the punch moves to be the design of optimised trajectories that result in more
tangentially to the desired surface; in the second path the tool precise profiles. A preliminary study was presented in this
trajectory is modified introducing an increased initial slope work.
which is reconjuncted to the former one as shown in Fig. 9b.
In this way, the shape error, due to the bending mechanics, Acknowledgements
occurring close to the clamping zone, is strongly reduced.
This research was supported by the grant of the Italian
Ministry for Education, University, and Research (MIUR).
Not optimised
Optimised
Desired References
[2] H. Amino, Y. Lu, S. Ozawa, K. Fukuda, T. Maki, Dieless NC [5] T.J. Kim, D.Y. Yang, Improvement of formability for the incremental
forming of automotive service panels, in: Proceedings of the Con- sheet metal forming process, Int. J. Mech. Sci. 42 (2000) 1271–1286.
ference on Advanced Techniques of Plasticity, 2002, pp. 1015– [6] N. Alberti, L. Cannizzaro, L. Fratini, F. Micari, An explicit model for
1020. the analysis of bulk metal forming processes, Trans. NAMRI/SME
[3] L. Filice, L. Fratini, F. Micari, Analysis of material forma- (1994) 11–16.
bility in incremental forming, Ann. CIRP 51 (1) (2002) 199– [7] N. Rebelo, J.C. Nagtegaal, L.M. Taylor, R. Passmann, Comparison
202. of implicit and explicit finite element methods in the simulation of
[4] G. Ambrogio, L. Filice, L. Fratini, F. Micari, Some relevant correla- metal forming processes, in: Proceedings of the Numiform, 1992, pp.
tions between process parameters and process performance in incre- 99–108.
mental forming of metal sheets, in: Proceedings of the VI ESAFORM [8] T. Varady, R. Martin, J. Cox, Reverse engineering of geometric
Conference, 2003, pp. 175–178. models—an introduction, Comput.-Aided Des. 29 (4) (1997) 255–268.