Professional Documents
Culture Documents
24CV000110 590
24CV000110 590
File No.
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Z4GVPR04d 590 ourt OF Justice
Mecklenburg County District Court Division-Small Claims
COMPLAINT 1. The defendant is a resident of the county named above.
FOR MONEY OWED
2. The defendant owes me the amount listed for the following reason:
SHELBY NC 28150
(check one below)
County Telephone No. Date From Which Interest Due interest Rate
Cleveland 704-661-1773 On An Account (attach a copy of the account)
VERSUS For Goods Sold And Delivered Between
Beginning Date Ending Date Interest Rate
CHARLOTTE NC 28210
For a Worthless Check (attach a copy of the check)
County Telephone No.
Other: (specify)
CHARLOTTE NC 28270 See Attached AOC-CVM-200 Addendum for "Reason Other" Description -
Mecklenburg 980-428-3811
Name And Address Of Plaintiff's Attorney
(Over)
Cleveland 704-661-1773
This is a very straightforward and basic breach of contract matter in which Defendant knows he (it) breached and is in the wrong. Sink Law PLLC (Plaintiff) and
Vogel Law Firm PLLC (Defendant) have a valid and binding written contract that Defendant breached on or around December 28, 2022 when Defendant willfully
withheld monies due to Plaintiff monies that Plaintiff was and continues to be owed in its entirety. In short, and per the contract between the Parties, Plaintiff and
--
Defendant split the monthly income from their shared client New Hanover County Board of Education 50/50 (see enclosed contract) on a monthly basis. For
services rendered throughout the month of October 2023, Plaintiff was owed 50% of the entire invoice. The simple math is as follows: the entire invoice from
Vogel Law Firm PLLC to the New Hanover County Board of Education was $27,558.50. Half of said figure is $13,779.25. Defendant paid Plaintiff only $6,000 --
Defendant thereby breached the contract by withholding $7,779.25 from and still due Plaintiff. Jonathan Andrew Vogel is the sole member of the Vogel Law Firm
PLLC and is acting willfully, unilaterally, and deceitfully in his individual capacity, which is why Plaintiff lists him as a party in his individual capacity as well
--
Defendant's actions serve as the basis by which Defendant's corporate veil has been pierced.