STS Lesson 1 Reviewer

You might also like

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 3

STAS MID LESSON 1 to an end and a human activity, because he

believed that this kind of confusing and there are


THE HUMAN PERSON FLOURISHING questions to it that we easily overlook.
 He called it the instrumental and anthropological
IN TERMS OF SCIENCE AND
definition of technology or simply means by
which the human ends are realized.
SELECTED VIEWS ON TECHNOLOGY
THE INSTRUMENTAL DEFINITION OF
ARISTOTELIANISM
TECHNOLOGY
 This views technology as basically a means to
an end.  According to Heidegger, the instrumental
 To Aristotle, technology is the organizing of definition of technology encourages us to view
techniques in order to meet the demand that is technology from different periods of time as not
being posed by humans. This may seem0 that having fundamental differences.
technology is primarily concerned with the  He explained while technology is geared
product. towards meeting a human need, still there is a
difference between older handicraft technologies
TECHNOLOGICAL PESSIMISM with modern technology. The instrumental
definition of technology
Jacques Ellul (1912-1994)  As it is, “a sawmill on a secluded valley of the
Black Forest is a primitive means compared with
 French philosopher hydroelectric plant on the Rhine River”-
 Holds that technology is progressive and Heidegger 1977
beneficial in many ways, it is also doubtful in  Heidegger also argued that “technology is by no
many ways. means technological” and should not be seen as
 Technological optimism believes that technology merely neutral.
is the answer to all man’s problems.
ARISTOTLE’S FOUR CAUSES
According to Ellul’s pessimistic arguments are:
 Heidegger further studied Aristotle’s Four
1. technological progress has a price Causes and illustrated it using a silver chalice
2. technological progress creates more problems which he said owes its make up from the four
3. technological progress creates damaging effects causes:
4. technological progress creates unpredictable
devastating effects 1. Causa Materialis or the Material Cause (-silver)
2. Causa Formalis or the Formal Cause (-form or
TECHNOLOGICAL PESSIMISM shape)
3. Cuasa Finalis or the Final Cause (-the purpose)
 This view is strongly supported by technologists 4. Causa Efficiens or the Efficient Cause (-agent:
and engineers and also by ordinary people who silversmith) Aristotle’s four causes
believe that technology can alleviate all the
difficulties and provide solutions for problems HEIDEGGER’S TECHNOLOGY AS A WAY OF
that may come. REVEALING
 The extreme version of this philosophy is
technocratism which holds technology as the  Heidegger believed that the genuine substance or
supreme authority on everything. the real essence of technology is found in
 Technology is beneficial in many ways but can enframing. To further illustrate this, he gave
also be harmful in many ways. some examples through contrasting ancient and
modern technology.
EXISTENTIALISM
1. he talked about the ancient windmill
 The main concern of this view is the existence or 2. he talked about peasant planting seeds only
the mode of being of someone or something 3. he talked about wooden bridge that is built to
which is governed by the norm of authenticity. join riverbanks.
 This view basically investigate the meaning of
existence or being and is always faced with the THE MODE OF REVEALING IN MODERN
selection must make with which the existent will TECHNOLOGY
commit himself to.
 Martin Heidegger, a philosopher is one of the  Unlock and Expose: It carries the idea that
most known supporters of this philosophy. nature will not reveal itself unless challenge is
set upon it.
MARTIN HEIDEGGER (1889-1996) ON SCIENCE  the hydroelectric plant causes the Rhine to
AND TECHNOLOGY produce hydraulic pressure which in turn causes
the turbines to work that eventually electricity is
 A well-known German philosopher examined produced. ENFRAMING
the two usual definitions of technology: means  Gathering of the setting-upon challenges to
bring the concealed to unconcealment.
 Also shows the essence of modern technology. essence of a thing is considered to be what the
 Basically putting in order whatever is presented thing is.”
to the man who sets upon the unconcealed but it  Heidegger examines two definitions of
is a two-way relationship: technology. Firstly, he offers that “Technology is
 man cannot set himself upon unconcealment a means to an end”(Instrumental definition).
without unconcealment’s call and the Secondly, he proposes that “Technology is a
unconcealed will not go into unconcealment human activity (Anthropological definition).
without the man responding to its call.
The Question Concerning Technology
THE DANGER OF THE NONSTOP REVEALING
1. Heidegger begins by portraying his investigation
 Revealing opens up a relationship between man of technology as the building of a path.
and the world but an opening up of something 2. He examines the common understanding of
means a closing down of something which technology as a neutral instrument under the
means as something is revealed, another is control of humans.
concealed.- ( the rise of a cause-effect He proposes to get to the true sense via the
understanding of reality closes off an correct sense
understanding of God as something mysterious 3. He analyses the notion of instrumentality to
and holy) reach the truth or the essence of technology- it is
 Another danger is when man falls into a traced to causality.
misinterpretation of that which is presented to 4. Technology is a very particular kind of revealing
him. That is when he sees himself in the object to, and the description articulates the key terms
before him rather than seeing the object itself. of Heidegger’s philosophy of technology:
Modern technology challenges-forth nature to
THE SOCIETY IN THE FACE OF SCIENCE AND yield treasures to humans; technology sets-upon
TECHNOLOGY (positions and orders) the yields of nature so that
they are available and of humans, becoming part
 When one looks around him now, he will see of the standing reserve.
that man tends to find his happiness in the works 5. He discusses the relation of modern science to
of modern technology. the essence of technology-
 Heidegger argued that this can be prevented if He claims for the sciences the aggressive
man will not allow himself to be overwhelmed approach to nature that goes well with
with the enframing that he was set upon, but he technology, but poorly with science.
pause for a while and reflect on the value of 6. The enframing of technology is destiny.
what is presented anthropological. Destiny is neither an inevitable fate that
descends on humanity nor the result of human
PHILOSOPHY- The study of general and fundamental willing.
problems concerning matters such as existence, Disclosure of destiny and human freedom are
knowledge, values, reason, mind and language. one and the same.
7. There is a twofold danger to destiny.
Branches of Philosophy One is the danger that human being reduces
itself to standing reserve and in so appearing to
1. Natural Philosophy have taken total control encounters nothing any
2. Moral Philosophy more.
3. Metaphysical philosophy The other is the danger that the disclosure of the
enframing forecloses every other dispensation
MARTIN HEIDEGGER (1889-1976) and conceals that too is a disclosure.
8. Still the enframing is a disclosure. It involves
 German philosopher whose work is associated human being, therefore harbors the possibility of
with phenomology and existentialism. saving power.
 His ideas have exerted influence on the
Doctrine of causality
development of contemporary European
philosophy.
1. Causa materialis- the material, the matter out
 His best-known work is Being and Time (1927).
of which an object is made.
He gave a very impressive analysis of human
2. Causa formalis-the form, the shape into which
existence, the prominence of the important
the material enters.
themes of existentialism like care, anxiety, guilt
3. Causa efficiens- which brings about the effect
and above all death is brought out here.
that is finished
 He begins “The Question Concerning 4. Causa finalis- end
Technology” by examining the relationship
between human and technology, a relationship Bringing Forth- making something
Heidegger calls a free relationship. If this
relationship is free, it opens our human existence
 The bringing forth-poesis-which underlies
to the essence of technology”. This essence of
causality is a bringing out of concealment.
technology, however, has nothing to do with
 The revealing is what the Greeks call truth-
technology. Rather, as Heidegger suggests, ‘The
Aletheia- means unhiddedness or disclosure.
 Technology brings forth as well , and it is a
revealing.
 This is seen in the way the Greeks understood
techne, which encompasses not only craft, but
other acts of the mind and poetry.
 Heidegger characterizes modern technology as a
challenging forth- very aggressive in its activity.
 With modern technology, revealing never comes
to an end.
 The revealing always happens on our own terms
as everything is on demand.
 He also described modern technology as the age
of switches, standing reserve and stockpiling for
its own sake.

Example:
1. Volcanic eruption- challenging forth
2. Coral bleaching-challenging forth
3. Planting trees- bringing forth
4. Mining- challenging forth
5. Farming- bringing forth
Questioning as the Piety of Thought

 Piety means obedience and submission.


 One builds a way towards knowing the truth
who he/ she is as a being in this world.
 Thus we shall never experience our relationship
to the essence of technology so long as we
merely represent and pursue the technological,
put up with it, or evade it. Everywhere we
remain unfree and chained to technology,
whether we passionately affirm or deny it. But
we are delivered over to it in the worst possible
way when we regard it as something neutral; for
this conception of it, to which today we
particularly like to pay homage, makes us utterly
blind to the essence of technology (1977,p1)
 ENFRAMING: WAY OF REVEALING IN
MODERN TECHNOLOGY
Calculative thinking
 One orders and puts a system to nature so it can
be understood better and controlled
Meditative thinking
 One lets nature reveal itself to him/ her without
forcing it.

1. Technology as a Mode of Revealing


2. Technology as Poesis: Applicable to Modern
Technology
3. Questioning as the Piety of Thought
4. Enframing: A way of Revealing in Modern
Technology
5. Human Person Swallowed by Technology
6. Art as a Way out of Enframing

You might also like