Professional Documents
Culture Documents
MSPM PQM Course Outline Revised Fall 23 24092023 115525am
MSPM PQM Course Outline Revised Fall 23 24092023 115525am
Page 1 of 8
Course Learning Outcomes (CLOs) of Project Quality Management
Page 2 of 8
Magazine Articles/ Published Material
Case Studies relevant to Project Management
Grading Policy
Assessment Instruments Percentage
Quizzes + Class performance 15%
Assignments + Project 15%
Mid Term Exam 30%
Final Exam 40%
Grading Plan
Score Grade GPA
< 60 Fail 0.00
60-63 C 2.00
64-67 C+ 2.33
68-70 B- 2.67
71-74 B 3.00
75-79 B+ 3.33
80-84 A- 3.67
85 & Above A 4.00
CGPA < 2.5 1st Letter Probation
CGPA < 2.5 2nd Letter Probation
CGPA < 2.5 3rd Letter Dropped
Page 3 of 8
Week-wise Course Outline
Page 4 of 8
Activities (Critical Thinking)
Case Studies, Roleplays, Movie Learning
Week/ Contents Clips, Assignments, Research Objectives
Session Papers, Presentations. Addressed
3rd Introduction to Quality Pioneers and leaders: Discussion on conceptual questions CLO (1,2),
• Walter Shewhart and Class Activity regarding Quality PLO (1,3)
• W. Edwards Deming Pioneers and Paradigms
• Joseph Juran
• Philip Crosby
• Kaoru Ishikawa
• Genichi Taguchi
Page 5 of 8
Activities (Critical Thinking)
Case Studies, Roleplays, Movie Learning
Week/ Contents Clips, Assignments, Research Objectives
Session Papers, Presentations. Addressed
Page 6 of 8
Activities (Critical Thinking)
Case Studies, Roleplays, Movie Learning
Week/ Contents Clips, Assignments, Research Objectives
Session Papers, Presentations. Addressed
• Affinity diagram
• Nominal group technique
Commonly used tools
• Compliance matrix
• Peer review
13th Demonstration of The Red Bead Experiment (class Quiz 3, class activity, participation CLO (3,4),
participation) exercise PLO (2,4)
Discussion of lessons learned
Introduction of case study based on Red Bead Experiment
data
14th Team Exercise: Apply learning and quality tools in solving Group Activity and Group CLO (4),
problems Discussion, interactive class PLO (1, 2, 3)
discussion
Disablers of quality
• The bottom line
• Reluctance to change
• Offense at improvement suggestions
• Problem-solving versus opportunity-seeking
• Culture
15th Plan Quality-PMBOK Philosophy - Tools for Plan quality Assignment #3 CLO (2,3), PLO
(1, 3, 5)
16th Project Presentation Group and individual presentations PLO (1,2,3,4,5)
17th Final Examination
Page 7 of 8
Guidelines – Final Group Projects
Quality project:
This project is a central component of the course and is to be undertaken by a team of four to five students for an organization of the students’ choice (with
approval of the instructor). Each member of the group shall equally participate. We should target a total of 8 teams/projects for the class. Ideally you are
looking for a situation that has a set of strategic quality challenges or opportunities.
Each team is required to select an entire industry, a firm, or a Business Unit within a company and analyze and assess either the quality strategy or policies
in more generic terms or take a deeper dive look at specific quality decisions that were implemented in the past or are currently being considered. It would
be ideal to have access to the quality team and/or executive management at the chosen organization so as to enrich the background and available data and
propose suggested solutions for the benefit of the company. However, realizing that it might be difficult and not in all cases practical to accomplish, teams
are encouraged to be creative in their data collection and analysis. Please use all available sources (analyst reports, market research studies, expert
interviews, etc.) to assemble qualitative and quantitative data as basis for your discussion and recommendations. There are many quality related situations
and challenges/opportunities that can make for interesting analysis and strategic recommendations. Here are some ideas to start your team brain storming
session:
• Industry wide quality change and innovation
• Quality strategies of an industry or segment leader
• Deming Cycle (The Plan-Do-Check-Act Cycle) with rapidly shortening product or category life
• Segment specific or segmented quality approach
• Quality related decisions for a new product or category launch
• Managing quality process in a multi-channel distribution system
• Use of quality optimization systems and involved software solutions
• Competitive response to aggressive quality level, policy or structure changes
• A complete Quality Audit of a project
The key is to decide on a topic that will allow your team to demonstrate the understanding and application of theoretical quality concepts to real world
situations and challenges and recommend courses of actions and solutions that are based on solid data analysis and insightful observations.
Report Outline:
The following provides a rough outline of the report:
• Description of industry/company and current quality environment
• Definition of quality challenge/opportunity
• Recommended course of action or strategic insight
• Projected/modeled results of recommendation
While potentially difficult depending on the topic/industry selected, it is preferable to have your recommendations supported with financial analyses and
that you can quantify the impact of your recommendations on the bottom-line of the organization. Please remember that effective quality decisions should
always lead to a more profitable enterprise. Each group will be required to present a quality phenomenon or curiosity towards the middle of the course.
Ideally your group will select a topic that you came across in your studies, business experience or just plain daily life that you cannot fully explain or
understand with the concepts and theories discussed in class and that you think might make an interesting topic of discussion for your classmates and the
instructor. Plan on a 5-minute presentation in class followed by a short Q&A.
Page 8 of 8