Professional Documents
Culture Documents
2018 Real or Fake Resources For Teaching College
2018 Real or Fake Resources For Teaching College
To cite this article: Ann T. Musgrove, Jillian R. Powers, Lauri C. Rebar & Glenn J. Musgrove
(2018): Real or fake? Resources for teaching college students how to identify fake news, College &
Undergraduate Libraries, DOI: 10.1080/10691316.2018.1480444
Introduction
The validity of news and its associated sources has always been of the utmost
importance. The discovery of the truth has become more challenging as more
sources, often digital, have become available. Even adults with experience
with the interpretation of the facts can easily be led into the trap of fake
news. College students may be particularly vulnerable to fake news as they
are frequently getting information online via social media. University librar-
ians and faculty can help them to build solid information literacy skills to last
a lifetime. Solutions to help build critical thinking skills to combat fake news
take a multifaceted approach. This article offers tools to help teach critical
thinking skills needed to discover the real story. Some tools for these skills
include exploring the psychological heuristics behind the easy acceptance of
fake news, and the use of strong information literacy skills created by the
Association of College and Research Libraries (ACRL), and a list of websites
that were created to check the facts that includes lessons and worksheets.
Background
The term “Fake News” has become a mainstream, commonly used term by
individuals on all sides of the political spectrum, including the current
CONTACT Ann T. Musgrove musgrove@fau.edu Department of Teaching and Learning, Florida Atlantic
University, Boca Raton, FL 33431-0992, USA.
Published with license by Taylor & Francis ß 2018 Ann T. Musgrove, Jillian R. Powers, Lauri C. Rebar, and Glenn J. Musgrove.
2 A. T. MUSGROVE ET AL.
President of the USA, Donald Trump. A quick search for the term “Fake
News” on Twitter will yield a high number of results from many global
sources, highlighting the universal use of this term. Social media has
changed the information landscape from one of newspapers and magazines
to tweets and posts of happenings with no documentation or clue as to the
trustworthiness of the source. Psychological studies demonstrate how indi-
viduals can easily think that fake news is the truth. Just as it has been used
in the past, critical thinking is at the core of discerning fact from fiction.
The combination of understanding the psychological background in believ-
ing misinformation, teaching critical thinking skills, and instructing univer-
sity students in information literacy skills provides a way to combat the
phenomenon of fake news.
Center for American Progress (23). The results of the study indicated that
students struggled in evaluating the tweet. Only a few students recognized
that it was based on a poll by a professional polling firm. Fewer than a
third of the students surveyed were able to explain how the political agenda
of the organizations commissioning the survey or posting the tweet might
influence its content. Further, more than half of students did not click on
the link provided within the tweet. The researchers concluded that
“students need further instruction in how best to navigate social media
content, particularly when that content comes from a source with a clear
political agenda” (24).
70% of Reddit users, 66% of Facebook users, and 59% of Twitter users
get news from these platforms.
Facebook had the greatest reach of the social networking platforms
examined in the study, as 67% of American adults are users of
the platform.
This suggests that the two-thirds of adult Facebook users who get news
there amounts to 44% of the general population.
Social media can be the source of fake news but can also provide the
solution. Just as quickly as false information is spread, users often correct
4 A. T. MUSGROVE ET AL.
gives up-to-date news on the Framework, tweets, videos, and links to the
Framework listserv and RSS feed to the WordPress site (2017).
Within the ACRL Sandbox (2017) and WordPress sites (2017), contribu-
tors share assignments and activities that they have created and used suc-
cessfully with students, with handouts, rubrics, and other essential
materials available for others to recreate these experiences in their own
classrooms. The malleable concepts contained in the frames allow for their
presentation with a wide range of approaches. They can be used to build
upon one another, leading students in a natural progression of personal
and academic growth in information evaluation and giving them tools and
strategies to become engaged participants in critical thinking and scholar-
ship. Other materials within these sites have been created especially for use
with faculty, so they too can be knowledgeable about the concepts and be
partners with librarians in the pursuit of student information literacy
(ACRL Framework for Information Literacy Sandbox 2017).
Another valuable resource for academic librarians is the Community of
Online Research Assignments, or CORA (Loyola Marymount University
Library 2017), hosted by Loyola Marymount University Library. This open
access site includes searchable assignments, using filters for information lit-
eracy concepts, discipline, ability level, keyword search, and whether the
assignment is applicable for a group or individuals. In addition to searching
for the ACRL Framework concepts that have been associated with each
assignment, CORA includes searchable IL concepts from The Society of
College, National and University Libraries (Society of College, National and
University Libraries (SCONUL) Working Group on Information Literacy
2011) and The Australian and New Zealand Institute for Information
Literacy (ANZIIL) (Bundy 2004). A blog and Teaching Toolkit are add-
itional components of the CORA website, showcasing rubrics, databases,
projects, presentations, and websites of interest to faculty and librarians.
If the Washington Post breaks a big story on some political scandal, they
not only need it to be true, lest they lose credibility, but they will have their
byline on the story, so you know the Washington Post was the source that
broke the story. When students have identified how to determine which
news sources are reliable and other credible sources of information, they
can develop sustainable methods of doing their own fact-checking.
Recommendations
Librarians and college faculty members are in a unique situation by the val-
idation of their position in the education environment to help students of
all ages to develop information literacy and critical thinking skills. A good
starting point is to teach students to verify the facts by questioning the
source and potential motives. Students should be skeptical of information
and be familiar with the common psychological strategies used to propa-
gate fake news.
It is also suggested that college librarians and faculty teach students to
check questionable material with online fact checkers such as Snopes,
FactCheck, Hoax-Slayer, or some other reputable fact-checking site (see
Appendix A). In doing so, students should be taught to consider the source
of the information.
College librarians and faculty also need to teach their students to be cog-
nizant of the source of information. If the story has no source, that should
cast immediate suspicion. For example, if the story is from the “San
Antonio Ledger,” the student can quickly search and determine that the SA
Ledger DID once exist as a newspaper but has not been published since
1859 (Federal Writers’ Project, Texas. 1938). If the source of the news story
is The New York Times, the student should recognize that it is a much
stronger authority because it is a newspaper that is currently published.
COLLEGE & UNDERGRADUATE LIBRARIES 11
Finally, librarians and faculty can teach college students to use the
resources available from the ACRL including the Framework, the Sandbox,
along with other similar sites like CORA, ANZIIL, or SCONUL to facilitate
gathering materials and strategies that have been tried and then shared
with the library community. With the wealth of news reported on social
media, there is an ample supply of rumors to check using the CRAAP test
or other worksheets or rubrics. The bottom line regarding the evaluation of
the truth of a news story is not in the story itself, but rather in the verisim-
ilitude of the given source.
Conclusion
The incidence of fake news has become a major problem in the current
landscape of online news sources. Research indicates that students’ abilities
to discern between real and fake news is frequently not very good. As more
people get their news from social media websites, it is important that those
social media websites also be part of the solution to the fake news problem
by illuminating unsubstantiated content. Psychological variables can help
students to understand why fake news is so easy to believe. The ACRL
Framework is proposed as a way of teaching information literacy as well as
the Information Literacy Sandbox and many LibGuides on this topic. Other
techniques for teaching information literacy include the CRAAP worksheet
as well as many reliable, fact checking websites. The source of the informa-
tion is always a good starting place to evaluate the validity of the story. An
extensive appendix is included to provide tools to teach students the skills
of information literacy.
References
Annenberg Public Policy Center of the University of Pennsylvania. 2017. “FactCheck.org.”
Accessed March 4, 2017. http://www.factcheck.org
Ashbrook, Tom. 2017. “Fake News Bots are Here.” Accessed August 9, 2017. http://www.
wbur.org/onpoint/2017/08/09/fake-news-bots-are-here
Association of College and Research Libraries. 2016. “Framework for Information Literacy
for Higher Education.” Accessed January 11, 2016. http://www.ala.org/acrl/sites/ala.org.
acrl/files/content/issues/infolit/Framework_ILHE.pdf
Association of College and Research Libraries. 2017. “ACRL Framework for Information
Literacy Sandbox.” Accessed March 4, 2017. http://sandbox.acrl.org/resources
Association of College and Research Libraries. 2017. “Framework for Information Literacy
for Higher Education.” Accessed March 4, 2017. http://acrl.ala.org/framework/
Barthel, Michael, Amy Mitchell, and Jesse Holcomb. 2016. “Many Americans believe Fake
News is Sowing Confusion.” Pew Research Center. Accessed December 15, 2016. http://
assets.pewresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/13/2016/12/14154753/PJ_2016.12.15_fake-
news_FINAL.pdf
12 A. T. MUSGROVE ET AL.
Bundy, Alan. ed. 2004. Australian and New Zealand Information Literacy (ANZIIL)
Framework: Principles, Standards and Practice. 2nd ed. Adelaide: Australian and New
Zealand Institute for Information Literacy. http://www.utas.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/
0003/79068/anz-info-lit-policy.pdf
Evans, Jonathan St. B. T. ed. 1990. Bias in Human Reasoning: Causes and Consequences.
Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
Federal Writers’ Project, Texas. “San Antonio”. 1938. “HathiTrust, EBSCOhost.” Accessed
April 22, 2018.
Global Digital Citizen Foundation. 2015. “The Ultimate Cheatsheet for Critical Thinking.”
Accessed December 12, 2016. https://i1.wp.com/globaldigitalcitizen.org/wp-content/
uploads/2016/12/ultimate-critical-thinking-worksheet.jpg?ssl ¼1
Gottfried, Jeffrey, and Elisa Shearer. 2016. “News Use Across Social Media Platforms 2016.”
Pew Research Center. Accessed May 26, 2016. http://assets.pewresearch.org/wp-content/
uploads/sites/13/2016/05/PJ_2016.05.26_social-media-and-news_FINAL-1.pdf
International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions (IFLA). 2017. “How to
Spot Fake News.” Infographic. Accessed March 4, 2018. https://www.ifla.org/publications/
node/11174
Jacoby, Larry L., Colleen Kelley, Judith Brown, and Jennifer Jasechko. 1989. “Becoming
Famous Overnight: Limits on the Ability to Avoid Unconscious Influences of the Past.”
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 56 (3):326–328.
Johnson, Marcia K., Shahin Hashtroudi, and D. Stephen Lindsay. 1993. “Source
Monitoring.” Psychological Bulletin 114 (1):3–28.
Know Your Meme. 2017. “Florida Man.” Accessed March 4, 2017. http://knowyourmeme.
com/memes/florida-man
Koltonski, Ed. 2017. “Online Satirical News.” LibGuide. Accessed June 26, 2018. https://
libguides.library.kent.edu/satiricalnews
Loyola Marymount University Library. 2017. “Community of Online Research Assignments
(CORA).” Accessed March 4, 2017. https://www.projectcora.org/
Meriam Library. 2010. “Evaluating Information – Applying the CRAAP Test.” Chico, CA:
California State University. Accessed September 17, 2010. https://www.csuchico.edu/lins/
handouts/eval_websites.pdf
Nickerson, Raymond S. 1998. “Confirmation Bias: A Ubiquitous Phenomenon in Many
Guises.” Review of General Psychology, 2 (2):175.
Northcutt, Wendy “Darwin”. 2017. “Darwin Awards.” Accessed March 4, 2017. http://www.
darwinawards.com
Novotny, Eric. 2017. “’FakeNews.” LibGuide. Accessed March 4, 2017. http://guides.
libraries.psu.edu/fakenews
Powers, Jillian, Ann Musgrove, and Lauri Rebar. 2017. “Creative Applications of LibGuides
to Teach Undergraduate Students Information Literacy Skills.” Proceedings of Society for
Information Technology & Teacher Education (SITE) International Conference, March
2017, 2017, 1407–1413. Chesapeake, VA: Association for the Advancement of
Computing in Education (AACE). http://www.learntechlib.org/p/177424/
Poynter Institute. 2017. “International Fact-Checking Network Fact-Checkers’ Code of
Principles.” http://www.poynter.org/fact-checkers-code-of-principles/
Prensky, Marc. 2001. “Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants Part 1.” On the Horizon 9
(5):1–6.
Savransky, Rebecca. 2017. “Trump: Many Leaks are ’Fabricated Lies’ Made up by ’Fake
News’ Media.” The Hill. Accessed May 28, 2017. http://thehill.com/homenews/adminis-
tration/335453-trump-many-leaks-are-fabricated-lies-made-up-by-fake-news-media
COLLEGE & UNDERGRADUATE LIBRARIES 13
Schulten, Katherine. 2015. “Skills and Strategies j Fake News vs. Real News: Determining
the Reliability of Sources.” New York Times. Accessed October 2, 2015. https://learning.
blogs.nytimes.com/2015/10/02/skills-and-strategies-fake-news-vs-real-news-determining-the-
reliability-of-sources/
Silverman, Craig. 2013. “Since Twitter hasn’t Built a Correction Feature, Here are 3
Things Journalists can do Instead.” Poynter, May 29, 2013. http://www.poynter.org/2013/
since-twitter-hasnt-built-a-correction-feature-here-are-3-things-journalists-can-do-instead/
214484/
Society of College, National and University Libraries (SCONUL) Working Group on
Information Literacy. 2011. “The SCONUL Seven Pillars of Information Literacy: Core
model- for Higher Education.” Accessed April 2011. https://www.sconul.ac.uk/sites/
default/files/documents/coremodel.pdf
Society of Professional Journalists. 2014. “SPJ Code of Ethics.” https://www.spj.org/ethics-
code.asp
Tampa Bay Times. 2017. “Politifact.” Accessed March 4, 2018. http://www.politifact.com/
truth-o-meter/
Tversky, Amos, and Daniel Kahneman. 1974. “Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics
and Biases.” Science 185 (4157):1124–1131.
US Department of Transportation, Bureau of Transportation Statistics. 2017. “2017
Pocket Guide to Transportation.” 20th ed. May 2017. https://www.bts.gov/sites/bts.dot.
gov/files/docs/browse-statistical-products-and-data/bts-publications/202411/pocketguide
2017revised.pdf
Wiggins, Grant P. and Jay McTighe. 2005. Understanding by Design. Alexandria, VA:
Association of Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Wineburg, Sam, Sarah McGrew, Joel Breakstone, and Teresa Ortega. 2016. “Evaluating
Information: The Cornerstone of Civic Online Reasoning.” Stanford Digital Repository.
http://purl.stanford.edu/fv751yt5934
Additional resources
Infographics
International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions (IFLA). 2017. “How to
spot fake news.” Last updated August 13. https://www.ifla.org/publications/node/11174
Based on FactCheck.org’s article How to Spot Fake News from 2016, this infographic con-
tains eight simple steps. Downloadable in multiple formats and available in translations.
Global Digital Citizen Foundation. 2015. “The ultimate cheatsheet for critical thinking.”
https://i1.wp.com/globaldigitalcitizen.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/ultimate-critical-think-
ing-worksheet.jpg?ssl¼1
An easy-to-use infographic combining the typical “Who, What, Where, When, Why, How”
questions to ask upon discovery of new information or to use in discussion with others.
Mitchell, Amy, Jeffrey Gottfried, Jocelyn Kiley, and Katerina Eva Matsa. 2014. “Political
Polarization & Media Habits: From Fox News to Facebook, how liberals and conserva-
tives keep up with politics. Trust levels of news sources by ideological group.” Table.
Pew Research Center: Journalism & Media, October 21. http://www.journalism.org/2014/
10/21/political-polarization-media-habits/pj_14-10-21_mediapolarization-01/
COLLEGE & UNDERGRADUATE LIBRARIES 15
This is just one table from another Pew Research Center report. You might compare
this with the News Quality Bias Chart by Otero, listed below.
Otero, Vanessa. 2016. “News Quality.” Blog. http://www.allgeneralizationsarefalse.com/wp-
content/uploads/2016/12/News-Quality.V4.jpg
The chart from this blog post went viral shortly after it was posted. The author wrote
another blog post with an updated chart, “The Chart, Second Edition: what makes a
news source “good?”” at http://www.allgeneralizationsarefalse.com/the-chart-second-edi-
tion/#comment-8048
Center for Media Literacy. 2009. “CML’s five key questions and core concepts (Q/Tips) for con-
sumers and producers.” http://www.medialit.org/questionstips-qtips
The main Chart from the CML website is a Media Deconstruction/Construction
Framework (free download), available in several languages.
Center for News Literacy. 2017. “Digital Resource Center.” http://drc.centerfornewsliteracy.org/
Created by Stony Brook University, this resource includes lessons, a course pack, exam-
ples, training suggestions and more, including reference to other free courses and TED
talks on the topic.
Loyola Marymount University Library. 2017. “Community of Online Research Assignments
(CORA).” https://www.projectcora.org/
This open access site features assignments, teaching toolkit resources, blogs and a host
of resources for librarians and faculty.
Higgins, Eliot. 2015. “Searching the Earth: Essential geolocation tools for verification.” First
Draft, July 24, 2015. https://medium.com/1st-draft/searching-the-earth-essential-geoloca-
tion-tools-for-verification-89d960bb8fba
Basic information on tools and methods available to verify locations (geolocation),
including Google Earth, Yandex Maps, Yomapic, and EchoSec.
Kirschenbaum, Michele. 2017a. “10 ways to spot a fake news article.” Easy Bib Blog Posts,
January 4, 2017. http://www.easybib.com/guides/10-ways-to-spot-a-fake-news-article/
Similar to the CRAAP test, this short blog post briefly lists and discusses what to look
for to help determine if information you are reading is accurate and reliable.
Kirschenbaum, Michele. 2017b. “How savvy are your students? 7 fake websites to really test
their evaluation skills.” Easy Bib Blog Posts, January 10, 2017. http://www.easybib.com/
guides/7-fake-websites-to-test-students/
Need a list of some fake websites to use with your students? This blog post lists seven
fake websites and discusses both the lures and giveaways of these sites.
LeBlanc, Robert E., and Barabara Quintiliano. 2015. “Recycling C.R.A.P.: Reframing A
Popular Research Mnemonic for Library Instruction.” Pennsylvania Libraries: Research
& Practice 3 (2):115–121. http://palrap.pitt.edu/ojs/index.php/palrap/article/view/105
As an alternative to using C.R.A.P. or C.R.A.A.P. to teach website evaluation or library
instruction, consider using C.R.A.V.E. for info lit. Details are in this article.
Meriam Library, California State University, Chico. 2010. “Evaluating Information –
Applying the CRAAP test.” Chico, CA: California State University, September 17, 2010.
https://www.csuchico.edu/lins/handouts/eval_websites.pdf
CRAAP, prepared by Cal State, Chico, has been used by many and has been changed by
many. Use this original handout from 2010 or try new charts, tables, and adaptations.
NewseumED. n.d. Accessed November 8, 2017. https://newseumed.org/
Educational programs and lesson plans, primary sources, case studies, and other tools
focusing on media literacy and first amendment rights.
Powers, Jillian, Ann Musgrove, and Lauri Rebar. 2017. “Creative Applications of LibGuides
to Teach Undergraduate Students Information Literacy Skills.” In Proceedings of Society
for Information Technology & Teacher Education (SITE) International Conference,
2017, 1407–1413. March 2017. Chesapeake, VA: Association for the Advancement of
Computing in Education (AACE). http://www.learntechlib.org/p/177424/
Written by two academic education professors and a librarian, this article explores the
use of LibGuides to teach information literacy skills to undergraduate college students.
This article was also the basis of a presentation at the 2017 SITE Conference and a pos-
ter session presentation at the Florida Library Association Conference 2017.
18 A. T. MUSGROVE ET AL.
Schulten, Katherine. 2015. “Skills and strategies j Fake news vs. real news: Determining the
reliability of sources.” New York Times, October 2, 2015. https://learning.blogs.nytimes.
com/2015/10/02/skills-and-strategies-fake-news-vs-real-news-determining-the-reliability-
of-sources/
Essentially an assignment in itself, the article combines a video and lesson plan from TEDEd,
resources from Edutopia, the Center for News Literacy and NewseumEd and an excellent
explanation of how to use this News Engagement Day (2015) resource. Also see their 2017
lesson, Evaluating sources in a “post-truth” world: Ideas for teaching and learning about
fake news located at https://www.nytimes.com/2017/01/19/learning/lesson-plans/evaluating-
sources-in-a-post-truth-world-ideas-for-teaching-and-learning-about-fake-news.html.
Silverman, Craig. ed. n.d.-a “Verification Handbook: An Ultimate Guideline on Digital
Age Sourcing for Emergency Coverage.” http://verificationhandbook.com/downloads/
verification.handbook.pdf
A resource for journalists and aid responders, giving guidelines and best practices on
how to assess and verify social media reports.
Silverman, Craig. n.d.-b “Verification Handbook for Investigative Reporting: A Guide to
Online Search and Research Techniques for Using UGC and Open Source Information
in Investigations.” http://verificationhandbook.com/book2/
In addition to step-by-step how-to information, this site contains several case studies
that can be used to show the results and relevance of investigating information.
Silverman, Craig. n.d.-c “Verification Handbook: Additional Materials: Additional Materials
to Verifying Digital Content for Emergency Coverage.” http://verificationhandbook.com/
additionalmaterial/
Focusing on verification and fact checking, this online book gives definitions, method-
ology, and examples to types of online fake media.
The University of Hong Kong, & The State University of New York (SUNY). 2017. “Making
Sense of the News: News Literacy Lessons for Digital Citizens.” Massive open online course
(MOOC). Accessed from Coursera site https://www.coursera.org/learn/news-literacy
A massive open online course, or MOOC, this 6-week for-free or free auditable class is
built to teach “how to evaluate the quality of news and journalism in order to judge the
reliability of information and make informed judgment.”
Whois Lookup. n.d. Accessed November 8, 2017. http://whois.domaintools.com/
This tool allows you to investigate the domain behind a website.