13 December 2023

*AUE-BD-63-394639-M*
AUE-BD-63-394639-M

Mohammad Kamal AHMED

Barma Coloni, Dowlat Shah Road,Ali Ahmed
House, Ward No 07, Amin Jute Mills
Bayjid Bostami CHATTOGRAM (CHITTAGONG) 4211
BANGLADESH

In reply quote:
Client name Mohammad Kamal AHMED
Date of birth 10 November 1986
Date of visa application 01 December 2023
Application ID 85677275
Transaction reference number EGP0II0MZQ
File number BCC2023/6962277
Visa application charge receipt number 9029580526

Transmission method Email sent to kamalahmed59033@gmail.com

Dear Mohammad Kamal AHMED

Notification of refusal of application for a Visitor (class FA) Visitor (Tourist) (subclass
600) visa

Refused applicant
I wish to advise you that the application for this visa has been refused on 13 December 2023
for the following applicant:

Client name Mohammad Kamal AHMED

Date of birth 10 November 1986

The applicant did not satisfy the provisions of the Migration Regulations 1994.

The attached decision record provides detailed information about this decision as it applies to
this applicant.

Review rights
There is no right of merits review for this decision.

Receiving this letter

As this letter was sent to you by email, you are taken to have received it at the end of the day
it was transmitted.

Department of Home Affairs

WEBSITE: www.homeaffairs.gov.au
 -2-

Questions about this decision

We cannot consider your visa application any further.

Visa application charge

The visa application charge which has already been paid can only be refunded in limited
circumstances, regardless of the application outcome.

A receipt for your payment is available through your ImmiAccount.

Yours sincerely

Neha
Position number: 60033739
Department of Home Affairs

Department of Home Affairs

WEBSITE: www.homeaffairs.gov.au
 DECISION RECORD

Application details
Visa class Visitor (class FA) Visitor (Tourist) (subclass
600)
Stream (main applicant only) Tourist
Date of visa application 01 December 2023
Transaction reference number EGP0II0MZQ
Application ID 85677275
File number BCC2023/6962277
Visa application charge receipt number 9029580526

Client name Mohammad Kamal AHMED

Date of birth 10 November 1986
Client ID 24426868720
Visa subclass stream Tourist

The applicant's claims

The applicant has applied for the grant of a Visitor visa (subclass 600) to visit Australia for a
temporary stay.

Information and evidence considered

I am a delegated decision maker under section 65 of the Migration Act 1958. In reaching my
decision, I have considered the following:
● relevant legislation contained in the Migration Act and Migration Regulations 1994
● information contained in the Department's Procedural Instructions
● documents and information provided by the applicant(s)
● relevant information held on Departmental files.

Findings
On the basis of all the information available to me, including the documents and information
the applicant provided, I find that the criteria for the grant of a Visitor (Tourist) visa in the
Tourist stream are not satisfied.

Reasons
I have assessed the application and the reasons for my decision are detailed below.

An application for a Visitor (Tourist) visa in the Tourist stream has been made by the
applicant.

Department of Home Affairs

WEBSITE: www.homeaffairs.gov.au
 -2-

A visa cannot be granted unless the relevant criteria specified in the Migration Act and the
Migration Regulations are satisfied.

In this case, I am not satisfied that clause 600.211 in Schedule 2 of the Migration
Regulations is satisfied. This clause provides that:

600.211
The applicant genuinely intends to stay temporarily in Australia for the purpose for which the visa is
granted, having regard to:
(a) whether the applicant has complied substantially with the conditions to which the last
substantive visa, or any subsequent bridging visa, held by the applicant was subject; and
(b) whether the applicant intends to comply with the conditions to which the Subclass 600
visa would be subject; and
(c) any other relevant matter.

In assessing whether or not the applicant genuinely intends to stay temporarily in Australia,
I have taken into account information provided in the application, the applicant's immigration
history and compliance with previous visas. I have also taken into consideration any
supporting documents as well as the applicant's personal circumstances, commitments, and
incentive to return to their country of residence.

Under policy when considering “any other relevant matter”, decision makers may take
into account a wide range of considerations to determine whether an applicant genuinely
intends a temporary stay in Australia. This may include, but is not limited to, the applicant’s
employment, economic and family circumstances, their credibility, the claimed purpose and
period of stay, and the applicant’s previous travel history.

My decision is based on the following factors

The applicant claims to travel to Australia for visiting family.

In assessing these criteria, I have taken into account the information provided by the
applicant in their visa application form and the supporting documents. I find that the
information provided is not sufficient to satisfy me of their genuine temporary stay intention,
and the applicant has not demonstrated that they have sufficiently strong commitments in
Bangladesh that would be an incentive for them to return to Bangladesh.

I have considered their economic circumstances and find that their claimed income cannot
be considered significant in the context of overall economic/employment conditions
and cost of living in Bangladesh. As such, it cannot be considered a strong incentive to
return Bangladesh at the end of their proposed stay in Australia. More specifically, I have
considered there employment claims with Associated Builders and Corporation Limited
and find that their claimed income cannot be considered significant in the context of overall
economic/employment conditions and cost of living in Bangladesh. As such, it cannot be
considered a strong incentive to return to Bangladesh at the end of their proposed stay in
Australia.

After considering the information provided, I am not satisfied that the applicant genuinely
intends to stay temporarily in Australia for the purposes set out above.

Department of Home Affairs

WEBSITE: www.homeaffairs.gov.au
 -3-

Therefore, I am not satisfied that the applicant meets the relevant criteria in clause 600.211
in Schedule 2 of the Migration Regulations.

Decision
As clause 600.211 is not satisfied, I find the criteria for the grant of a Visitor (Tourist) visa in
the Tourist stream are not satisfied. Therefore, I refuse the application by the applicant for a
Visitor (Tourist) visa in the Tourist stream.

Yours sincerely

Neha
Position Number: 60033739
Department of Home Affairs

13 December 2023

Department of Home Affairs

WEBSITE: www.homeaffairs.gov.au
 -4-

Department of Home Affairs

WEBSITE: www.homeaffairs.gov.au