WORK MOTIVATION SCALE 1

Work Motivation Scale

Vidhi Tiwari

Department of Psychology, Christ University

Organizational Behavior

Dr. Sneha Saha

November 17,

2023
WORK MOTIVATION SCALE 2

Work Motivation Scale

Work motivation is a complex assembly encompassing the internal and outside forces

that force, direct, and sustain a man or woman's engagement in painting-related obligations and

activities. It addresses the fundamental question: "Why do human beings work?" Understanding

painting motivation is crucial for agencies and leaders looking to optimize employee overall

performance, decorate productivity, and create an effective work environment. Numerous

theories have been developed to explain and conceptualize painting motivation. Notable among

those are Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs, Herzberg's Two-Factor Theory, and Expectancy

Theory. Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs posits that individuals are prompted to satisfy a hierarchy

of needs, from simple physiological wishes to higher-order desires (Maslow, 1943). Herzberg's

Two-Factor Theory distinguishes between "hygiene elements" (related to dissatisfaction) and

"motivators" (related to satisfaction and motivation) (Herzberg, 1959). Expectancy Theory

argues that individuals make picks primarily based on the predicted consequences of their

movements, thinking about the attempt-to-performance ratio and the performance-to-reward

ratio (Vroom, 1964). These theories provide exclusive views on work motivation, highlighting

the multitude of things that can have an impact on a character's motivation in a place of job

placement. Work motivation may be labeled into overarching types: intrinsic and extrinsic

motivation. Intrinsic motivation arises from an individual's internal force and is fueled by

personal satisfaction, enjoyment, and inherent hobbies in a project. It is characterized by actual

ardor and the intrinsic rewards a man or woman derives from their work. In assessment,

extrinsic motivation is precipitated through outside elements, inclusive of tangible rewards,

popularity, or the fear of punishment. It entails appearing in paintings and sports to attain a

specific result or keep away from poor effects.

WORK MOTIVATION SCALE 3

Balancing intrinsic and extrinsic motivation is important to expertise and influencing a

man or woman's average overall performance and satisfaction.

Work motivation is motivated by using a variety of factors, which include feedback and

recognition, rewards, job layout, autonomy, and so forth. While the techniques for enhancing

motivation range, a few common examples include education and development, worker

popularity packages, and growing supportive and tough work surroundings.

Employee motivation at work is seen to be a crucial catalyst for an organization's

success since it encourages productive performance. Employers rely on their employees'

performance to meet their organization's goals. Yet, even when they are skilled, people who

lack motivation perform badly. Therefore, rather than merely turning up at work, employers

want their staff to work with a whole drive. As it explains the reasons behind individual

behavior in companies, work motivation is still a key component of organizational psychology.

Thus, research on the elements that promote motivation at work can help develop the

theoretical foundations of the individual and the actual social situations that maximize people's

well-being and productivity.

Decades of studies have attempted to elucidate the mechanisms that trigger behavior

connected to one's job. Since motivation explains why people act in certain ways, it is the main

component examined in this aspect. The fundamental psychological requirements have served

as a crucial justification for the variations in each person's motivation for their job. Humans'

inherent resources and intrinsic psychological nutrition are regarded as psychological

requirements. They have a strong, clear significance for work performance and are closely

related to individual behavior. Various wants are necessary components of an individual's

WORK MOTIVATION SCALE 4

functioning since meeting them brings happiness. Apart from the antecedents at the human

level, job motivation may also be influenced by the social situation. Interaction and social

interchange among people highlight the significance of job motivation as something to be

studied with consideration of contextual factors.

Numerous work incentive models have been established by literature. The need

hierarchy hypothesis developed by Maslow in 1954 is one of the main theories. It postulates

that humans have a range of wants that must be met, including physiologic, safety and security,

belongingness, esteem, and self-actualization. Furthermore, the intrinsic difficulty of the task

and the availability of opportunities for reinforcement and recognition are the two key factors

that impact work motivation, according to Herzberg's (1966) motivation-hygiene theory. More

modern models also surfaced. For example, four pairs of motivational types—positive-negative,

intrinsic-extrinsic, cognitive-affective, and economic-moral-spiritual—have been identified by

Nicolescu and Verboncu (2008). Furthermore, Ryan and Deci concentrated on extrinsic and

intrinsic motivation.

The self-determination theory and similar ideas have been studied in the past as

approaches to organizational behavior and job motivation. The Van den Broeck et al. (2010)

study placed a strong emphasis on understanding relatedness, competence, and autonomy in the

workplace. By analyzing the impacts of these three elements on work motivation and the

moderating effects of social situations, this research advances the comprehensive knowledge of

intrinsic work motivation.

Method
WORK MOTIVATION SCALE 5

This research adopts a single-case quantitative study design to investigate work

motivation in organizational behavior. The case study focuses on a single participant, XYZ,

who is currently employed at The Times of India. The Work Extrinsic and Intrinsic Motivation

Scale (WEIMS) is used to facilitate an in-depth examination of XYZ's work motivation levels.

XYZ was selected purposively based on his willingness to participate and the relevance of his

role to the research question. The primary data collection method involves administering the

WEIMS questionnaire to XYZ. The WEIMS is a standardized instrument that is widely used

in the field to assess intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. It consists of a set of statements that

XYZ. will rate based on his experiences at The Times of India.

This study's approach takes into account moderators, dependent factors, and

independent variables at various levels. In order to test their theories, the authors employed a

hierarchical linear model (HLM). According to its definition, hierarchical least squares (HLS)

regression is a sophisticated kind of regression that is utilized to examine variation in the

dependent variables when the independent variables have different degrees of hierarchy. This

method maintains an acceptable level of analysis while assessing how higher-level results

affect lower-level ones. HLM has been used in a number of cross-level investigations.

The data collection process will proceed as follows: XYZ. will be provided with a

consent form that details the purpose of the research, his voluntary participation, and

confidentiality. His signature on the consent form indicates his willingness to take part. XYZ.

will then complete the WEIMS questionnaire, which contains items related to intrinsic and

extrinsic motivation in his work at The Times of India. The questionnaire will be administered

at XYZ's convenience and preference. The data collected from the WEIMS questionnaire will

be analyzed using appropriate statistical techniques. This analysis will provide insights into
WORK MOTIVATION SCALE 6

XYZ's levels of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in the context of his work at The Times of

India.

Analysis and Results

The participant's average ratings for questions related to intrinsic motivation (process

enjoyment, alignment with career goals, and finding their work intrinsically enjoyable)

generally reflect a positive outlook. These ratings predominantly exceed the scale midpoint (of

3) and lean towards the higher end, indicating that the participant tends to agree with

statements related to intrinsic motivation and common process pride. This suggests that the

participant finds their work to be enjoyable, enjoys the responsibilities assigned to them, and

feels content and fulfilled in their role at The Times of India. Furthermore, the participant

perceives that their work aligns with their career dreams and aspirations, indicating a sense of

purpose and satisfaction in their professional journey.

Conversely, questions associated with extrinsic motivation (external rewards,

recognition, and financial incentives) reveal a somewhat different attitude. While the

participant acknowledges that external rewards and recognition play a role in motivating them,

the average ratings in this category are not as high as those for intrinsic motivation. This

shows that while external factors like financial incentives and recognition from supervisors

and colleagues have some influence, they are not the primary drivers of motivation for this

individual.

Questions related to organizational factors and the work environment (organizational

support, work-life balance, and the conduciveness of the work environment to productivity and

process satisfaction) reveal a few interesting insights. These scores display a range of
WORK MOTIVATION SCALE 7

responses, indicating that the participant may have mixed feelings about certain aspects of

their work environment and organizational support. The scores for questions on organizational

support (questions 10 and 11) suggest that the participant believes the organization provides

adequate support and values employee well-being. However, the lower ratings on questions

related to the work environment (questions 12 and 15) may indicate that the participant has

reservations about the conduciveness of their work environment to productivity and process

satisfaction. Additionally, the ratings for work-life balance (questions 13 and 14) are

significantly higher. This indicates that the participant feels that they have a healthy work-life

balance, which is often seen as a crucial element in job satisfaction.

The high standard deviations for several questions, particularly those related to the work

environment, organizational support, and extrinsic motivation, are noteworthy. This variability

implies that the participant's responses in these areas may be variable or influenced by different

factors. It is important to note that individual stories and perceptions of the work environment

can be highly subjective and may change over time. The participant may have both positive and

negative experiences in these areas, which contribute to the variability of their responses. The

analysis highlights potential areas for further investigation and improvement within the

organization. The participant's relatively low scores on questions associated with the work

environment and organizational support suggest that these factors may need attention.

Addressing concerns or uncertainties in these areas could contribute to enhancing overall job

satisfaction and motivation.

Conclusion

The analysis of the WEIMS responses provides a nuanced understanding of the

participant's work motivation and job satisfaction at The Times of India. The participant
WORK MOTIVATION SCALE 8

demonstrates a strong sense of intrinsic motivation, alignment with career goals, and personal

success in their role. Extrinsic motivators, such as external rewards and recognition, also play

a role but are not as prominent. The participant's perceptions of the work environment and

organizational support show variability, indicating that there may be both positive and negative

experiences in those areas. These findings underscore the importance of considering individual

perspectives and experiences when addressing work motivation and job satisfaction in the

organization.
WORK MOTIVATION SCALE 9

References

Frey, B. S. (1997). On the relationship between intrinsic and extrinsic work motivation.

International Journal of Industrial Organization, 15(4), 427–439.

https://doi.org/10.1016/s0167-7187(96)01028-4

Latham, G. P., & Pinder, C. C. (2005). Work Motivation theory and research at the dawn

of the Twenty-First Century. Annual Review of Psychology, 56(1), 485–516.

https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.142105

Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (1990). Work motivation and satisfaction: light at the end

of the tunnel. Psychological Science, 1(4), 240–246.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1990.tb00207.x

Steers, R. M., Mowday, R. T., & Shapiro, D. L. (2004). The Future of Work Motivation

Theory.

Academy of Management Review, 29(3), 379–387. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2004.13670978

Tremblay, M. A., Blanchard, C. M., Taylor, S., Pelletier, L. G., & Villeneuve, M. (2009).

Work Extrinsic and Intrinsic Motivation Scale: Its value for organizational psychology research.

Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 41(4), 213–226.

https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015167
WORK MOTIVATION SCALE 10