Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Deposition by Thermal Evaporation of Thin Films of Titanium and Zirconium For Tritium Targets
Deposition by Thermal Evaporation of Thin Films of Titanium and Zirconium For Tritium Targets
Deposition by thermal evaporation of thin films of titanium and zirconium for tritium targets
This content has been downloaded from IOPscience. Please scroll down to see the full text.
(http://iopscience.iop.org/0508-3443/10/2/306)
View the table of contents for this issue, or go to the journal homepage for more
Download details:
IP Address: 131.91.169.193
This content was downloaded on 06/09/2015 at 09:19
When tritium is bombarded with protons or deuterons a deposited was determined by weight. Electron diffraction
Source of neutrons is obtained. In order to achieve a compact studies of the deposits were carried out using target blanks
source of tritium, it is preferably absorbed in a metal which of 1 cm diameter, reducing rings being fitted into the target
has a high affinity for the gas, such as titaniilm or zirconium. support to accommodate them.
ways in which such targets may be prepared have been
described by Graves, Roderigues, Goldblatt and Meyer.(’)
Since the bombarding particles can penetrate only a very
limited thickness of the target material, tritium absorbed to
a greater depth is ineffective. Thus thin films of metals
with a high afinity for tritium deposited on some other
non-absorbent metal achieve the object with the maximum
of economy of tritium. The production of targets by the
thermal evaporation of thin films of zirconium has been
described by Arrol, Wilson and Evans,(’) and by Lillie and
Conner.(j)
The apparatus and method is extended here, with certain
modificatiom, to include titanium as well as zirconium.
The principal causes for failure of the targets is discussed in
detail.
EXPERIMENTAL DETAILS
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
mically the motion of the water across the disk as the distri-
radius of disk shank (cm)
Y =
butions of radial and circumferential velocities are unknown.
N = w/2n = disk speed (revis)
The vertical velocity profile will also be a function of the
a; w = tension in brake band (g) liquid velocity, of the air drag on the free surface and probably
E = Young's modulus (g/cm2)
of the disk surface texture inasmuch as slipping may occur.
I = second moment of area (cm4)
I, L = cantilever free length (cm) It would seem, however, a fair first assumption that for low
flow rates the liquid is flung with a ve!ocity equal to the
y, Y = cantilever deflexion (cm)
Q = flow rate of test liquid (cm3/s) circumferential velocity of the disk rim. If this be allowed
p = density (g/cm3) +
Liquid energy = (nDN)' ergs/g (2)
p = pressure (gicm?) and the efficiency of atomisation might be defined as
p = viscosity (poise)
7 = nozzle efficiency Efficiency = 1 2 a j ( ~ D N ) ~ d (3)
y = isentropic index for air The uncertainty associated with the assumption underlying
n = number of droplets equation ( 2 ) couid be avoided if it were possible to measure
Sibscripts directly the power absorbed by the disk as it assumes its
1 = Reservoir conditions of air liquid load. Atternpts have been made by other workers to
2 = Expanded conditions of air estimate the atomising efficiency by measuring the total
power input to an electric motor driving the atomiser, but
this is clearly unsatisfactory as the power measured includes
1NTRODUCTION the normal friction and motor losses. The power required
in any atomising device the energy usefully employed is for atomisation is small and may be only a minor fraction of
[hat which reappears as new surface created. Neglecting, the total; and it is not possible to separate the effects with
therefore, any energy associated with the production of any accuracy.
electrostatic charges, the useful energy may be regarded as To measure the atomising power directly the method which
the product of the surface tension and the extension in area, suggests as promising is to Observe the speed
i.e. reduction consequent upon application of the atomising load
Useful energy = 6a/d ergs/cm3 and then to employ a suitable brake on the disk when dry to
(1)
accomplish the same speed reduction; the brake being capable
The efficiency of an atomisation process may be defined of measuring at the same time the power required. There
'0 several ways, but fundamentally should be considered to are, however, two major difficulties to be overcome, (a) the
be the ratio of the energy in the newly created surface to the speed reduction is extremely small for normal atomising
imparted to the liquid by the atomising device employed loads and has to be measured accurately for subsequent
VOL. 10, FEBRUARY 1959 93 BRITISH JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSICS