University of Cebu – Pri

Senior High School Department

J. Alcantara St., Cebu City

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________

ORAL DEFENSE AND RESEARCH PAPER EVALUATION

Research Title: THE SOCIAL MEDIA USAGE OF STUDENTS AND THEIR STUDY HABITS
Group Facilitator: Denise Marie O. Ruiz Grade, Strand and Section: 12 STEM 8A - Benevolence

PART I. Individual Rating

Directions:
Please put a check ( ) on what best describes the individual presentation and quality of response to questions by each member of the group.
Authors CRITERIA Total

Individual Presentation Quality of Response to Individual Score

Questions (Critical Thinking)

5 10 15 20 25 5 10 15 20 25

1. Estudillo, Kate Russel

2. Bagano, Gillian Joy

3. Canete, Ethel D.

4. Alvez, Regine Grace

5. Ruiz, Denise Marie O.

6. Arcilla, Kristine Jill

7. Quindao, Nina Therese

8.

9.

10.

PART II. Manuscript Rating

Directions: Please rate each subsection of the manuscript based on the criteria given below.
CRITERIA Evaluators Authors

Points Corrections/Suggestions Compliance Indicate Page

Nos.

Chapter 1 (8 points) (What improvements can Put a check

be made?) if already
complied

● Rationale strongly argues and justifies the

importance of the conduct of the study providing
sufficient contextual background of the chosen topic.
● Theoretical and conceptual framework is clearly
articulated and supported with a schema.
● Main and specific objectives are lucid,
understandable and consistent in use of terms and
concepts.
● Research or statistical hypotheses based on the
stated objectives.
● Beneficiaries of the study and its benefits are
appropriate and clearly provided with SMART
objectives.
● Scope and Delimitation set defined boundaries and
coverage.
● Definition of terms are either conceptually or
operationally defined appropriately.

Chapter 2 (8 points)

● The study is sufficient and justified in terms of

existing literature.
● The selected literature and studies are appropriately
discussed, sufficiently covered and recent (2014 or
later) in relation to the research topic.
● Strengths and weaknesses of previous researches
are clearly shown and critically assessed in relation
to the study
● Opposing and alternative views on the research
topic, approach, strategy, and design are
appropriately considered.
● Inadequate testing, related, parallel and
contradictory pieces of evidence or conclusions from
previous research/literature are clearly shown.
● Referencing style (APA) is correct and there is no
evidence of plagiarism. The subsequent
bibliography/reference list is correct and appropriate.

Chapter 3 (8 points)

● The research design is clearly stated and fully

described.
● The statement of the research locale is plain, simple
and gives a clear background of the research
setting.
● Thoroughly described how research respondents
were chosen, sample size estimation and sampling
techniques adopted.
● Research instrument used is fully described (must
be attached on the appendices).
● Fully describes the data collection methods
employed, highlighting and specific assumption or
requirement for using them and whether these were
met.
● Clearly and adequately describes the data analysis
methods used and justifies their use in the study.
● Highlights any specific assumption or requirement
for use of the analysis methods including the
statistical analysis, presentation, and discussion.

Chapter 4 (10 points)

● The discussion of findings and analysis are

methodologically sound, appropriate. complete, and
accurate as the main meat/substance of the study.
● All the stated research specific objectives are clearly
and appropriately addressed, answered and
explained.
● The findings are clearly interpreted and their
implications are substantially provided and
comprehensively discussed.
● Research or statistical hypothesis are addressed
and discussed.
● Summary tables and charts are fully and
appropriately titled, described, discussed to reflect
salient findings, patterns, and trends which reinforce
the answers to the stated research objectives.
● Discussions of findings and results are interlinked
with the literature reviews to show affirmation,
parallelism or contradictory results or related
previous studies in the discipline.

Chapter 5 (8 points)

● The conclusions are relevant and appropriate to the

research area and the research objectives.
● The researcher has clearly and adequately shown
how the conclusions are supported by findings,
analysis, and discussion of results.
● The conclusions are fully justified given the
conducted research.
● The conclusions are not mixed, combined or
crowded with finding statements, analysis of results,
implications and other unnecessary sentences.
● The recommendation should be based on the
findings and conclusion of the study.
● Recommendations may be specific or general or
both. They may include suggestions for further
studies.
● Recommendations should be in non-technical
language.
● Recommendations should be feasible, workable,
doable, and adaptable.

References and Appendices (8 points)

● Reference citations are complete.

● Referencing style is correctly observed and followed.

● Appendices are complete which include at least the

transmittal letter, informed consent, and research
instrument..

TOTAL POINTS (50 points) Complied Not-complied

Scoring system:

46-50 Very Good to excellent paper. The paper is considered very meritorious.
36-45 Good paper. The paper is most likely to be approved subject to minor revision and
improvement.
30-35 Fair paper. The paper is not deemed to be meritorious and needs major revision and
improvement.
<30 Poor paper. The paper is not acceptable.

EVALUATOR(S):

Ms. DIOGELINA B. MASONG

Research Adviser
________________________________ ________________________________
Member Member

MS. PHOEBE T. ANGA

Chairman