Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Conductivity of A Solution - Andy Connelly
Conductivity of A Solution - Andy Connelly
science, food, technicians, etc. – this site is no longer maintained. Home Food Science Technicians
About Statistics
Science Laboratory
Techniques
Comment Reblog Subscribe
Conductivity of a solution
« Previous / Next » Andy Connelly / July 14, 2017 / Laboratory Techniques, Science
Introduction
Conductivity of a solution appears a very simple measurement. Probe goes in, number comes
out. Simple? However, whether that number has any meaning requires slightly more careful
handling. In order to get reliable data, there are certain ideas that need to be taken into
account.
Conductivity
Conductivity is an important measurement for many applications [1,2]. When done properly it
is a quick and easy way to measure the purity of water. However, there are some key ideas
that must be understood before starting to make conductivity measurements.
In a metal wire it is electrons that are the charged particles moving through the material, in a
solution it is ions. Examples of these ions are shown in Figure 1.
In general the more ions present in a solution the greater the conductivity; however, not all
additions to aqueous solutions reliably form ions ( e.g. sugar and alcohol). Further,
conductivity only increases with concentration up to a maximum value, after which, the
conductivity may actually decrease with increasing concentration [8].
The stability and purity of the sample, and how it is handled, can a ect the accuracy of the
sample reading. Low-level samples can be easily e ected by contamination, CO2 absorption,
and degassing [3].
Resistivity
For some solutions, such as pure water, the conductivity is so low that it is sometimes easier
to use resistivity and resistance as the measure.
See Figure 2 for comparison of conductivity and resistivitiy. These values range from ultra
clean water with a conductivity of 0.055 μS/cm to 30 wt% nitric acid with a conductivity of
861,000 μS/cm.
Figure 2: Electrical conductivity of common solutions. Conductivity ranges of probe constants will
vary between manufactures and probe types.
Concentration: Some species ionize more completely in water (e.g. NaCl & HCl) than
others do [5]. This means that their solutions are more conductive as a result. Each acid,
base, or salt has its own characteristic curve for concentration vs. conductivity. A
calibration is required with solutions of known composition and concentration.
TDS: There are lots of assumptions when calculating a TDS value from a conductivity
value [5]. In general, a conversion factor is used which will vary depending on the nature
of the solution. These conversion factors can be calibrated, usually using NaCl solutions.
If a NaCl solution is used that makes the assumption that the main ions present are Na+
and Cl-. See [1] for more information.
There are two main temperature correction algorithms in common use [4,5,6]:
Neither of these are perfect, and so ideally all your solutions would be measured at the same,
reference temperature. However, that is clearly not always possible. Errors in temperature
measurement will also contribute to issues in compensation and so it is vital to let your
conductivity probe and solution come into thermal equilibrium.
Table 1: Examples of conductivity temperature coe cients for various solutions [5].
The linear temperature correction is widely used. It is based on the observation that the
conductivity of an electrolyte changes by the same percentage for every °C change in
temperature. A single temperature coe cient can only be used with reasonable
accuracy over a small range of 30° or 40°C. The most accurate way is to calculate a
coe cient speci cally for the sample temperature for your solution. Tabulated values can
vary for the same solution depending on source.
To calculate a coe cient one method is described below (see [5] or [8] for more details):
Measuring conductivity
Measuring conductivity can be achieved in a variety of ways. The most common method is
using a conductivity probe as seen in Figure 1. These use two or more platinum electrodes
and measure the conductivity directly.
The other main method used for measuring conductivity is the toroidal “inductive” method.
More information can be found on this in references [2] & [5].
In the simplest arrangement of a platinum electrode type probe (a 2-electrode cell), a voltage
is applied to two at plates immersed in the solution, and the resulting current is measured
and then conductivity, G, can then be calculated using inverted Ohm’s law [5]. Where R is the
resistance, V = voltage and I = current:
and
In principle a DC voltage could be used. However, a DC voltage would soon deplete the ions
near the plates, causing polarization, and a higher than actual resistance to be measured. As
such, an AC voltage is generally used to avoid this problem (see ref. [3] for more details).
A more advanced conductivity cell uses four electrodes (see Figure 2). These probes use an
alternating current through the outer electrodes and measures the voltage across the inner
electrodes [5]. The four electrode system gives a lower current and so has less charge
transfer at the metal-liquid interface. This allows a much wider dynamic range to be
measured than a two-electrode sensor. Such measurements are volume dependent and the
outer sheath of the probe ensures that the volume of sample solution remains constant for
all analysis.
Conductivity cell
Figure 3 shows the set up of a basic conductivity probe with two square platinum electrodes.
The speci c design of the probe will vary depending on the range of conductivities to be
measured. The area of the electrodes and the distance between them de nes this range.
These values are encapsulated in the Cell Constant, K.
Cell constant
The cell constant (K) is de ned as the ratio of the distance between the electrodes (d) to the
electrode area (A). However, the fringe- eld e ect (AF) alters the electrode area, therefore:
For solutions with low conductivity the electrodes can be placed closer together or made
larger so that the cell constant is less than one. This has the e ect of raising the
conductance to produce a value more easily interpreted by the meter. The reverse also
applies, in high conductivity solutions, the electrodes are placed farther apart or made
smaller to reduce the conductance of the sample.
The ideal K value for a probe varies with the range of conductances being measured.
Typically, a cell with K = 0.1 cm–1 is chosen for pure water measurements, while for
environmental water and industrial solutions. Cells with up to K = 10 cm–1 are better for very
high conductivity samples (see Figure 1).
In theory, the cell constant can be applied directly out of the box without calibration.
Unfortunately, the fringe eld, and other e ects, can result in the cell constant varying as
much as 10% from the nominal cell constant; it may also vary over time. This means that the
cell constant has to be calculated using a standard solution with a known conductivity (see
below).
Choice of probe
The key decision in choosing a probe is the cell constant. Di erent cell constants will cover
di erent ranges of conductance. Details of this are given above. Otherwise, the choice
depends on issues including [5]:
Some probes have a coating of platinum black on the surface of some platinum electrodes to
create a more e ective surface area for conductivity measurements. If a probe is treated
badly the platinum may require replatinization.
Storage
Conductivity probes should be rinsed in deionised water between measurements. The probe
can be stored in the deionised water between measurements; however, for overnight
storage, or longer term storage, the probe should be rinsed and stored dry. The probe can be
dried carefully using appropriate tissue.
Calibration frequency depends on the type of conductivity cell and application. It does not
generally need to be done as regularly as for pH measurements using a pH probe.
Summary
Conductivity is a useful value in many applications. The conductivity probe is a useful way of
measuring this value so long a few important ideas are taken into account [see 5 for more
details]:
. The correct probe should be chosen for the conductivity range of interest.
. The probe must be calibrated
. Conductivity is temperature-dependent, so time must be allowed for the conductivity
sensor to equilibrate to the same temperature as the sample.
. The temperature of solution should be measured
. The appropriate temperature correction applied
If these ve factors are taken into account then your conductivity measurements will be
quick easy and more importantly, reliable.
[1] http://www.fondriest.com/environmental-measurements/parameters/water-
quality/conductivity-salinity-tds/ (accessed June 2017)
[2] THEORY AND APPLICATION OF CONDUCTIVITY, Application Data Sheet ADS 43-018/rev.D
January 2010
[3] Shreiner R.H. & Pratt K.W. Primary Standards and Standard Reference Materials for
Electrolytic Conductivity. NIST Special Publication 260-142, 2004.
[6] Barron, J.J. & Ashton C., The e ect of Temperature on conductivity measurement, TSP-07
Issue 3
Share this:
Twitter Facebook
« Previous Next »
Uncertainty A blank look at… blanks
3 Comments
Good but can u describe the curves and have some worked out example
Reply
Reply
Leave a Reply
Write a Comment...
Reply
Recent Posts
Search …
Conductivity of a solution
Uncertainty
Catagories
Travel Uncategorized