Hadoop and Spark are two essential big data tools. Hadoop is better suited for batch processing while Spark supports real-time processing. Hadoop has drawbacks including complexity, scalability issues, and processing delays. Spark uses more memory than Hadoop and has a steeper learning curve. Between Hadoop versions 1.0 and 2.0, version 2.0 improved resource management and scalability through the introduction of YARN.
Hadoop and Spark are two essential big data tools. Hadoop is better suited for batch processing while Spark supports real-time processing. Hadoop has drawbacks including complexity, scalability issues, and processing delays. Spark uses more memory than Hadoop and has a steeper learning curve. Between Hadoop versions 1.0 and 2.0, version 2.0 improved resource management and scalability through the introduction of YARN.
Hadoop and Spark are two essential big data tools. Hadoop is better suited for batch processing while Spark supports real-time processing. Hadoop has drawbacks including complexity, scalability issues, and processing delays. Spark uses more memory than Hadoop and has a steeper learning curve. Between Hadoop versions 1.0 and 2.0, version 2.0 improved resource management and scalability through the introduction of YARN.
1. Hadoop's drawbacks We find four fundamental shortcomings with Hadoop when we examine the key distinctions between Hadoop and Spark: a. Real-time Processing Challenges: Since Hadoop mainly enables batch processing, real- time or near-real-time data processing situations are not well suited for it (Altexsoft, 2021). b. Complexity and Scalability Problems: Setting up and running Hadoop may be difficult, and attaining great performance may need a large number of nodes, which raises costs and complicates maintenance (Altexsoft, 2021). c. Processing delay: Due to its batch-oriented architecture, Hadoop may introduce high processing delay, making it unsuitable for applications needing quick answers (Altexsoft, 2021). Hadoop is more dependent on disk storage than memory-based systems like Spark, which might result in slower data processing (Altexsoft, 2021). 2. Apache Spark's shortcomings In the same line, let's examine Apache Spark's drawbacks as they were noted in the article: Spark tends to use more memory than Hadoop, which presents problems for applications with constrained memory resources (Altexsoft, 2021). A higher learning curve in Spark makes it hard for users who are not accustomed with distributed data processing (Altexsoft, 2021). Concerns about stability and dependability Spark users have sometimes reported stability and reliability difficulties, demanding further work to assure robustness. "Hadoop vs. Spark: An In-Depth Comparison of Big Data Frameworks" 3. Changes in Hadoop Versions: Between Hadoop 1.0 and Hadoop 2.0, there were notable advancements in the technology: Hadoop 2.0, often known as Hadoop 2.0, solved a significant flaw in Hadoop 1.0, the single point of failure. Many noteworthy improvements were included in this new edition, but Hadoop YARN (Yet Another Resource Negotiator) stands out. The flexibility and effectiveness of resource management were considerably increased by YARN by separating it from the process scheduling capabilities of the MapReduce component. Hadoop 2.0 improved as a result, becoming more capable of handling workloads other than MapReduce and more scalable (Lawton, 2022). References: Altexsoft. (2021). Hadoop vs. Spark: Main Big Data Tools Explained. Retrieved from https://www.altexsoft.com/blog/hadoop-vs-spark/ Lawton, G. (2022). Hadoop vs. Spark: An in-depth big data framework comparison. Retrieved from https://www.techtarget.com/searchdatamanagement/feature/Hadoop- vs-Spark-Comparing-the-two-big-data-frameworks
HADOOP and PYTHON For BEGINNERS - 2 BOOKS in 1 - Learn Coding Fast! HADOOP and PYTHON Crash Course, A QuickStart Guide, Tutorial Book by Program Examples, in Easy Steps!