RESULTS and

DISCUSSION

Likert Mean Interpretation

Strongly Agree 3.26 - 4.0

Agree 2.51 - 3.25
Disagree 1.76 - 2.50
Strongly Disagree 1.0 - 1.75
Table 1

Evaluation of CAST in Terms of Accessibility

Statements Weighted Mean Remarks

1. The directions are clear. 4 Strongly Agree

2. Teachers can exit the attendance system at 4 Strongly Agree

any time.
3. The attendance system is reliable and free 3.75 Strongly Agree
of disruption by system errors.
Average 3.92 Strongly Agree

Table 2

Evaluation of the Automated CAST in Terms of Accessibility

Statements Weighted Mean Remarks

1. The directions are clear. 4 Strongly Agree

2. Teachers can exit the attendance system at 4 Strongly Agree

any time.
3. The attendance system is reliable and free 3.75 Strongly Agree
of disruption by system errors.
Average 3.92 Strongly Agree

Tables 1 and 2 present the evaluation of the system in terms of its accessibility. In
both tables, the first statements obtained a weighted mean of 4 which means strongly
agree, the second statements got a weighted mean of 4 which means strongly agree, and
the third statements gained a weighted mean of 3.75 which means strongly agree. The
average of 3.92 means that the evaluators strongly agree that the automated and non-
automated attendance systems are accessible. As there were some suggestions, the
researchers did some modifications to the manual and to the system to let other users
navigate the attendance system easier.

The practice of making a software made by an individual that is usable by as many

people as possible is called accessibility. Traditionally, the accessibility of software is only
for people with disabilities. However, the accessibility of this benefits other sets of people
too (MDN, 2021).
Full Name:

Statements 4 3 2 1

Accessibility

The directions are clear.

Teachers can exit the attendance system any time.

The attendance system is reliable and free of

disruption by system errors.

Design

There is a consistent link in each activity.

The attendance system is appealing to the eyes.

Content

The content is accurate and factual.

The content is free of errors.

Technical Quality and Interactivity

Graphics are used well.

Feedback and prompts are appropriate.

Creativity/Originality

The attendance system is distinguishable from

other common Microsoft Excel-based attendance.

Security

A teacher cannot access another teacher's CAST.

Functionality

The attendance system enhances the productivity

of the daily processes.
Efficiency

The attendance system is better than the manual

way of getting the attendance of the students.

Recommendation on the attendance system

Approve Disapprove
Comments:

__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________

Suggestions:

__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________