Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 2

CASE STUDY

Medium Voltage Distribution Automation

Objective:
Implementation of Fault Location, Isolation and Service Restoration (FLISR) and remote
control for underground and overhead Medium Voltage (MV) lines for some European utilities.

Solution:
Ring Main Units (RMU) and Load Break Switches (LBS) were equipped and/or upgraded with
new RTUs capable of collecting V and I measurements from new LPVTs and LPCTs.

Company Overview:  Strict observance of the existing safety


requirements
The customers were two different European utilities
with operations in several other European and non-  Reduction of outage-related regulatory
European countries, one of them is amongst the penalties, with special focus on service
world’s 10 biggest electricity utilities. restoration within 3 minutes.
They both have tens of thousands of secondary  Cost-effectiveness
substations (a.k.a. Distribution Transformer
Stations) on its MV lines ranging from 6kV to 36kV  Adoption of a standardized solution for a
(both underground and overhead) in the European diverse installed base of RMUs
country where these projects took place.  Ease of deployment, operation and
Along its history, the companies have installed a maintenance
variety of RMU models with different switchgear and  Introduction of MV PLC technologies
insulation technologies. This means that they have
a very diverse installed base of RMUs regarding
insulation technology, number of MV lines, Application and Implementation
possibility of motorizing the switchgear etc. while the Some caution is necessary when integrating voltage
newest RMUs that they plan to install should be fully and/or current measurement devices (such as
automated. LPVTs or LPCTs, for instance) in an RMU in order
Following regulatory requirements, the companies to ensure that safety is not affected. This is
realized they had to install devices for smart especially important for voltage measurement in
metering in every secondary substation, so they field-retrofits which should not compromise the
decided to leverage on that to build a truly smart guarantee of the switchgear vendor.
grid by taking the opportunity to also automate the From the point of view of the commissioning, we
MV distribution network. should bear in mind that the whole installation
procedure should be designed for fast and safe
installation and later operation. It is therefore that
Customer Requirements none of the selected devices needed any site
The main requirements for the solution were: calibration and site operations were minimized.
 Maximization of service availability for The solutions can be classified in three groups:
consumers by implementing FLISR  Solutions for the automation and monitoring
schemes and gaining observability of the of GIS RMUs: PLUGSENS LPVTs are used
MV network. in these installations with symmetrical, DIN-

Medium voltage distribution automation | Case study 1


CASE STUDY

C type T-connectors. For current measuring measurement is using conventional MV


ARTECHE offered several options including CTs.
conventional VTs, LPVTs or RGW.PSI split-
core Rogowski coils.
The intelligence for the automation is
The introduction of MV PLC / BPL provided by an adaTECH OSC (overhead
communications was especially challenging switch controller).
in this environment given the space
constraints and the lack of a dedicated MV
connection point. ARTECHE’s PLUGCOM BENEFITS
product family integrates both a voltage
sensor and a capacitive coupler in a single Thanks to the introduction of these ARTECHE
compact device that allows the utility to products, the Distribution System Operators were
overcome these challenges. able to implement Fault Location Isolation and
Service Restoration schemes that enabled them to
The intelligence for the automation of the dramatically reduce OPEX and to benefit from
RMU is provided by ARTECHE’s adaTECH CAPEX savings.
FRC (Feeder Remote Control) device. For
non-motorized RMUs requiring only OPEX reduction was achieved thanks to:
monitoring capabilities, adaTECH FRM is  -35% penalty costs related to outages: non-
used. recovered power 3 minutes after the outage
 Solutions for AIS RMUs: UNDERSENS was approx. 65% before the project and
LPVTs are the most usual choice due to 45% with the new solution
their size and reliability. Current measuring  -25% staff costs
and IEDs do not differ from the GIS
scenario. CAPEX:

 Solutions for the automation of Load Break  Approx. 30% savings thanks to both CAPEX
Switches in Overhead lines: For voltage deferral enabled by extended asset lifetime
measurement either OVERSENS voltage and CAPEX savings thanks to IEDs
sensors or conventional VTs can be used. integrating several functionalities.
The most usual choice for current

Medium voltage distribution automation | Case study 2

You might also like