Professional Documents
Culture Documents
OEMO 94 08 and 94 11
OEMO 94 08 and 94 11
ila6tf
T'U Delft
VAKGROEP OEMO
R.F. van Kuilenburg
stnr : 485375
slo*/
T U Delft
Vakgroep OEMO
I. List of contents
List of contents page 1
page 3
Seiliger Process
2.1 Seiliger Process page 4
2.2 parameters of the seiliger process page 6
2.3 parameter b page 7
2.4 power page 8
2.5 conclusion page
Turbocharging
3.1 mechanical driven page it 3
3.2 exhaust driven, page
Engine dimensions
6.1 width page 24
6.2 heigth page 26
6.3 length page 28
6.4 mass page 30
References page 36
Appendix
Engine database
Submarine engine database
- Additional figures
1
MG
TU Delft
Vakgroep OEMO
II. List of symbols and constants
compression ratioi
p density kg/m3
ip pressure (absoluut)i Pa (105 Pa = Il bar),
p pressure ratio
energy (amount of heat); 'Ni,,
pm,. mean effective pressure Bar
I amount of fuel injected ikg/s
tis isentropic efficiency
ix air excess factor
im mass kg
(Prn massflow kg/s
Rpm maximum pressure bar
fix efficiency
slipfactor
iu velocity rris
be specific fuel consumption kg/kWh
X specific air consumption kg/kWh
Cp, specific heat (air) J/kgK
stoichiometrische lucht/brandstof ratio
T temperature
ratio of specific heats -
Ftc, heat of combustion 1107kg
NJ' lossfactor -
W power
volume m3
(13V volumef low m3/s
R gasconstant J/kgK
g gravitation& acceleration m/S2
Ps standard pressure Pa
2
410-
T U Delft
Vakgroep OEMO
1.0 Preface
The dieselengine of a submarine must perform under extreme conditions. The engines placed in submarines
deliver significant less power then there counterparts placed on normal ships. There are two main reasons for
the powerderating.
Often the engines placed in submarines operate at lower engine speed.
2.. The submarine environment is such that the engine gets air at lower than normal atmospheric pressure.
Also a high backpressure ,due to running the engines under water, is encountered.
These conditions in submarines force the engine manufactures to change the engines, for example valve
overlap has to be minimized to prevent backf low in the cylinders.
In order to minimize the dimensions of an engine, often a turbocharger is placed on the engine. Although both
the engine and the turbocharger are optimized for the conditions which occur in a submarine, still a derating is
inevitable. In the following text a model will be explained that can predict the dimensions of a dieselengine
(length, width, height, mass) using two parameters;
Power
Engine speed
The model is based on three different parts
ill, A theoretical part based on the "seiliger diagram" to calculate the influence of the environmental condi
tions on the powerrating and the efficiency. In the model the seiligerdiagram is only directly used for the
calculating of the efficiency.
2 A compressor model, for both mechanical and exhaustgas powered compressors, will be examined to
calculate the power drop due to pressure variations at the inlet and outlet of the engine.
3 A set of equations that connect the dimensions of a dieselengine and the available parameters.
In the model a static situation is assumed. The engine working as a generator with fixed engine speed and the
pressure at the inlet and outlet constant.
The theoretical model of the dieselprocess and the description of the main parameters will be described in
chapter two. The turbochargers will be described in the chapter three and four. In chapter five the model for the
exhaustpipe will be examined. The dimensional relations are explained in chapter five point five. The statistical
model of the dieselengine is described in chapter six. Finally in chapter seven a proposal is made for the model
"Subdiesel".
I wish to thank the following persons from here for their advice and help :
S.F. Sipkema, ir C G J M. van der Nat, E. pel ing 0. van Lent,
,
3'
041
TU Delft
Vakgroep OEMO
2 Seilinger process
2.1 seilingerprocess
In this chapter the seiliger model of the combustion process will be used to calculate the pm, as a function of
basic engine parameters. It is shown that on the basis of the available data the results from the seiliger
process show a large deviation of the real data. This makes the seiliger diagram unusable for use in the model.
The relevant parameters which influence the power drop due to submarine conditions are isolated. These
parameters will be used in the following chapters to calculate the engine derating. The expectation is that the
seiliger diagram although not giving good results correctly shows the trends.
3
p( max)
p(vul) 8 r 1
p(omg) 6
Vs V
assumptions figure 1, seiliger diagram
V
= --
cl T2
6 Win(1-2) = cv (T2 - Ti)
V2
4
Ahoy
TU Delft
Vakgroep OEMO
d
r'3 V3
=a qin(2-3) = Cl/ T1 Ek 1(a - 1) WHY
P2 V2 -
3-4 Heat supply with constant pressure
P4 C V5 E
qin-out W0u1(4-5) - Cv T1(e'lab - ab"
Ps ) V4 b 5
T1-4 =
5-6 Opening of the exhaust valve, pressure drops to level of exhaust receiver. cloui(s_i) = c,T,(a
ab" - 1
11th,seiliger =1 K-1r/
ra 1) + Ka(b-1)1
Pi VI Wth
Pth
Vs
E 1 [ -1
Pth =E-1
JD I K-1
i(a - 1) + Ka(b - 1)1 - lab" - 111
5
TU Delft
Vakgroep OEMO
2.2 Parameters of the seihgerprocess
There are two basic parameters of the seiligerprocess which determine the shape of the combustiondiagram.
These are the a parameter and the b parameter, together with the engine dimensions (such as cylindervolume
and compression ratio) they determine they whole process completely. The reason to choose the a and la
parameters for classifying the process is that certain engineering choices can directly incorporated in the
parameters (such as maximum pressure). In this chapter the change of these parameters is examined for
submarine conditions in order to find the derating of the engine. It is clear that one can never find the precise
derating, there are just too many parameters that can be adjusted. The engine manufacturers often have very
different solutions which makes it difficult to predict the engine derating just from global data. What can be
predicted is the way different manufacturers have (probably) chosen to come to an optimum submarine en-
gine.
P2
with P2 = Pi.EA
leads to a = P max
The calculating of the a parameter in this report is based on the following considerations
The number of possible variations between maximum cylinder pressure (print), compression ratio () and the
inletpressure (p1) is too large, thus a simplification is necessary.
The submarine engine has to run under both normal conditions and submarine conditions. The most impor-
tant running condition is the running under water. lids logic that the engine is optimally tuned for that condition,
If the engine is running at normal atmospheric conditions then the ratio between maximum pressure and inlet
pressure has to drop because otherwise the maximum pressure will be to high. This change in ratio can be
achieved by different injection timing
The only problem is that the process shape can change very considerably when the inletpressure changes.
If the inletpressure is too low, there is a chance that the maximum pressure cannot be reached with the
maximum amount of fuel that can be burnt in cylinder.
The above means that we have three choices for calculating the a parameter (and power) when the inletpressure
varies :
1'. Maintain a constant a parameter = pmax is dependent of pin
2. Maintain a constant pmax = a varies with pri
.3. A combination of point one and two, for certain p a constant pmax is maintained and for other p, a constant
a parameter is maintained
6
T U Delft
Vakgroep OEMO
2.3 b parameter.
The b parameter can be derived in three ways, the Way that is most meaningful is through the air excessfactor.
The b parameter can also be calculated with :
The maximum temperature in the cylinder (T3)
2. The ending pressure p5 (when the exhaustvalve opens).
The disadvantage of these parameters is the short time period in which they occur. The maximum temperature,
for example occurs only during a very short period and is hardly a constraint for the process. The ending
pressure falls to the exhaust pressure as soon as the exhaustvalve opens.
Another reason is that the maximum temperature and the ending pressure are not clear parameters. the air-
excessfactor is a more logic choice.
1 Ho
b=1 +
Ka T
Stapersma [1994]
The b parameter depends on a, A. and T1, %all other parameters are engine dependent and are independent
of the inletpressure.
T1 is also taken constant; in many cases an intercooler will be applied between compressor and inletvalve,
which ensures a constant inlettemperature.
The air excess (A.) factor must be held above a certain value in order to avoid smoke forming and ensure
complete combustion. The air excess factor is taken to be a constant, this is a choice made to minimize the
number of parameters which influence the engine derating. In practice the engine manufacturer decides
whether the air excess factor remains constant or not
The a parameter is discussed in the paragraph before.
The flow factor cannot be determined exactly without extensive numerical calculations. According to Stapersma,
[1994] the flow factor can be taken 0,85-0.90 under submarine conditions and close to one under normal
atmospheric pressure. The problem is that the change of the flow factor against the change of the inletpressure
and backpressure is not known. If we assume a constant backpressure (see chapter charging ) then a linear
dependence is assumed.
7
T U Delft
Vakgroep OEMO
2.4power
In this chapter the relation between the seiligerdiagram and the environmental conditions is explained.
It is clear that the seiligerprocess is only accurate if all the parameters are exactly known, in this report this is
not the case. In this chapter a hypothetical engine is considered, only kwalitative effects are generated.
The relevant parameters for the mean effective pressure turn out to be the inletpressure, a-parameter and
b-parameter.
We define two main parameters pin and the flow-factor. Furthermore we define a number of scenarios, that
.
represent the different engineering choices and process that can happen during the environmental changes.
pmax = constant, flow-factor varies
a=constant, flowfactor varies
point one and two but with constant flow-factor
The formulas of the seiliger process are given by :
Stapersma [1994]
ab" -1 risr., Ho
11 th,seiliger = 1
1
_ [(a - + Ka(b -1)1 b=1 + 1)1 a= Pmax
tc-a (A.,ae"-li Co EA'
p1
E \
P tri = [(a- 1) +K-a -(b - Pme = 17m.17td.77c.1lN.qdAll
E-1 K
8
it*
TU Delft
Vakgroep OEMO
. All the parameters were the same for all the calculated engines.
The calculations are done to investigate the influence that the different parameters have on the engine effi-
ciency and engine power.
The inletpressure is varied between one bar and five bar, these are values that can occur in a charged subma-
rine. The flow-factor is arbitrary varied between 1 (five bar inletpressure) and 0.8 (one bar inletpressure).
On the next pages the following different scenarios are investigated
a parameter with constant Pmax
a parameter constant (reference worst case)
constant flow-factor
.A factor that arise from the figures is that the power delivered according to the seiligerprocess is much too low
in comparision with real engines For example the MTU1163 has the following properties
pin = 5,1 bar
pme = 29,4 bar
pmax = 180 bar
Ho = 42000
efficiency =041
The calculation with I = 1,1 gives a much better result but as the pme of seiliger process is already too large,
the mechanical losses decrease the pme with 20%. Then the result deviates even more
The seiligerprocess gives a pme that is too low. The tuning of the seiligerpocess is very difficult becase the
different parameters influence each other. The tunable parameters are :
flow-factor
compression ratio
air-excess factor
inlettemperature
Ho
pmax
From these parameters the inlettemperature, pmax and Ho are more or less fixed. This leaves three param-
eters
flow-factor
compression ratio
airexcess-factor
To find the correct combination of parameters is very difficult. The conclusion is that for a simple model the
seiliger process is too complicated and gives very little extra information. The seiliger process is useful for
trend .analysis to investigate the influence of differenent environmental conditions
In the following pages a analysis of the influence of the different choices is made using the seiliger process,
wich targets at an algorithm for calculating the powerdrop due to the submarine conditions.
9
TU Delft
Vakgroep OEMO
flowfactor.is varying
2500 Q06
0.64
2Q00
5,03
0,03 0.54
2 3 5 2 a 4 5
pin (bar) pin bar
25.00 Qffl
Q64
20,c0
QI32
15,03
.o p max = cambial
caste
0E0 a = censtal
a =ccnsiart 67.
10.03
QS3
500
0,ffi
QCO
0.54
2 3 4 5 2 3 4 5
pin (bar) pin bar
The constant a parameter is calculated with inletpressure 5 bar and maximum pressure p, bar. For the
tables see appendix table A.
The influence of the choice on the a parameter is small for power delivered by the engine but the effect on the
efficiency is relative large.
From table A follows that the b parameter for Pmax = constant is less then one for low inletpressures, this is in
reality not acceptable. To get a b parameter that is higher then one the maximum pressure has to be lowered.
The flow factor has only a marginal effect on the power, the basic characteristics remain unchanged. The
constant flow factor has a effect on the efficiency, this drops from 0.56 to 0.54 at the worst conditions. The
conclusion is therefore that the flow-factor has little effect on the power of the engine (calculated with the
seiligerprocess) with changing inletpressures. On the next page this will be closer examined.
10
Acky
TU Delft
Vakgroep OEMO
From the literature the following formula can be derived
H
pi 0.0427 Ai Pi
X L,,,
0,02 1,00
0.01
10,0/ 0,80
0,60
pmax = constant
a = constant
flow factor
0,40
-0;02
-0,02
0,20
-003
-0,03 0,00
increasing pressure
Fortunately the seiliger process gives a direct connection between flowfactor and engine power. The only
thing that is left is to determine the power drop (with constant flow factor this time) as the inletpressur changes.
The effiency is very dependent of the choice of the a parameter. If a=constant then the effiency is 0,54 and
independent of the inletpressure. If pmax=constant the effiency varies between 0,64 and 0,54, if all other I
losses are taken into account then the effiency varies between 0,51 and 0,41. wich are normal values for this
kind of engines. In the model the efficiency will be a constant, eventually the efficiency can be made depen-
dent of the inletpressure but this has little effect. The reason is that the efficiency is very sensitive to engineer-
ling choices which are unknown at this moment. It is the same problem as with the calculation of the mean
effective pressure.
11
ITU Delft
Vakgroep OEMO
power-pin
25,00 if- variabel,
pmax=constant
if= vanabel, a =
20,00 constant
ff=1,
pmax=constant
15,00
If = 1, a=constant
FAT
10,00
y = 4,5051x - 1,4138
y
4,091x + 1,8173
= 43161x + 1E-14
0,00
1 2 3 4 5
pin (bar)
Apm, = a AP' +C
2.5 Conclusion
It has been shown that in this particular case the seiligerdiagram is not the right calculating method for the Vie
This has two reasons :
There is not enough data to "tune" the seiliger process correctly.
For the determination of the dimensions of the engine it is enough to know the pme, using the seiliger
process introduces more unknown parameters then the one has in the beginning (pale).
To determine the influence of the environment the seiligerprocess is successfully used to determine the influ-
ence of the inletpressure with different assumptions. It has been shown that the power of the engine is linear
dependent of the flow factor (this in contrary with the opinion of some people). A formulation is derived to
calculate the influence of environmental conditions on the power.
12
of,
TU Delft
Vakgroep OEMO
3 Turbocharging
3.1 mechanical driven turbocharger
In the following chapter a simple model of a mechanical turbocharger is explained. For the final model data
from Pielstick is used. The turbocharger model will be used to explain the characteristics of this data. Only the
two relevant parameters from the previous chapters are used, inletpressure and flow-factor.
The mechanical driven turbochager is directly coupled to the engine(see figures), it has thus a constant speed
(it is assumed that the engine is running at constant speed). This makes the determination of the pressure ratio
very simple. When the engine speed is constant the dimensionless mass flow through the engine is also
constant.
There are now two different parameters. each of wich is not changing when the environmental pressure drops,
therefore (see figure 8) the compressor stays in the same working point. This means that the pressure ratio
stays the same.
I Wo ng point Ank
a: 4
0
.4
Ijallill
CD"
E/3-
r41
n'
lokli n
mooNI
otor
r
2
1
Eirdaki3.6 i,rellativ to desi n value
Y
0.2 0.4 as 0.8 1.0 1.2
mrrjpo, (relative to design value)
The other important parameter of a compressor is the power that is consumed by it.
C ,ir T.
VVcompr = in co-
mpr -1
fl is,compr
stapersma,[1994]
Gives the relation between power and inlet pressure of the compressor per unit air.
The following relation gives the relation between inletpressure and massflow through the compressor. The
volume flow and the inlet temperature remain constant. The massflow is therefore linear depenent of the
inletpressure. pV
m PT
13
TU Delft
Vakgroep OEMO
Combining the two fomulas gives a linear relation between the inletpressure and the powerconsumption of the
compressor. The only problem is powerconsumption of the compressor at iso conditions. P ielstick gives for the
powerconsumption at iso conditions about 1/3 of the normal engine power, for an engine of 1000 kW the
powerconsumption will be 300 kW.
oxhaustdrum'
I I
cooling
000000
A
intake air drum
In practice the mechanically driven turbocharger is oversized to obtain a nominal power at low inletpressures
and high backpressures. The extra inletpressure is at iso inletconditions, blown off to prevent damage to the
dieselengine. This is a waste of energy because the dieselengine is running mostly close to iso conditions and
doesn't need the large compressor.
The following discussion is based on data received from PIELSTICK. Pielstick engines obtain a higher
inletpressure than the pressure needed for 100% power output and good filling of the cylinder. This causes a
slightly higher fuel/air ratio than necessary in normal conditions.
At high backpressures the difference between the inletpressure and the backpressure is becoming so low that
the cylinder is no longer completely filled with clean air due to the bad fill-factor. At a certain moment the
bypass valve is completely closed and the inletpressure will drop linear with the suction pressure. This results
in a drop in power. At lower backpressures the fill-factor is better and the whole process is delayed to lower
inletpressures.
% power pox= 1400 mbar
100
clurton alboaskrep 90
/ 1800 mbar
%magma,' dliftverschre stayue sle;14.71ure Kahn() 80
T
vocr 100% wflflTh,r,) mechanical
1000 mho,- driven turbo
2100 mbar
70 exhaust
driven turbo
60
075 0.80 0.85 0.90 ass 1 PO (bar
14
otitr
TU Delft
Vakgroep OEMO
The pielstick figure shows this effect very well. The 'delayed derating as the backpresssure is lower. This is a
possible explanation for the observed power characteristics. However it depends also on the choices made by
the manufacturer. The lower boundary of the inletpressure ( approximately 0,76 bar dependent on the of type
compressor used) is set by the stalling of the compressor and the minimum pressure which is still safe for the
crew. Stalling of the compressor must always be avoided because it can cause allot of damage to both the
engine and the compressor itself.
The fill-factor acts here as a feedbackloop through which the backpressure influences the process.
Note The engine power is not the generator power. In the PIELSTICK figure only the bruto brake power is
used The engine delivers more energy to the generator under the worst conditions then under the normal
conditions this is due to the less power consumption of the compressor.
Pin 0,
Pcompr compr,iso
Po
Pdes
install (
1- xPin)
Po
with Pumw))
= engine power that must be installed in the submarine (pme)
Pdes
= desired engine power (Pm)
p = inletpressure before compressore (bar)
po normal inlet pressure before compressor (bar)
p,, (bar)
F' - etle, P !kW) power to be
1
1- X P' Installed
(kW)
15
'T'U De ft
Vakgroep OEMO
'V
turbocharger 1
ty.
sealing air
VItn
intake air drum
cooling
turbocharger 2
,
D00000 I I
MN exhaustdrum
I I I I
coolingA
0A1_t__+__t_i
0000
Intake air drum
10
auo 050
16
410,/f4
TU Delft
Vakgroep OEMO
4 exhaustgas driven turbocompressor
The exhaust driven turbocharger is without special preparations not suitable for submarines. As the graphs
show that even at low backpressures the power falls rapidly. In this chapter a simple theoretical model will be
compared with data given by engine manufactures. It appears that the simple model cannot explain the char-
acteristics of real engines.
The following configuration will be considered
figure, 14 ex-
haust charger
configuration
The exhaustgas driven turbocompressor is far more complex than the mechanical driven compressor. The
mechanical driven compressor has a fixed (known) speed, since it is directly coupled to the engine. The
exhaustgas driven compressor has a rotational speed that is determined by a balance between the compres-
sor, engine and the turbine. Also in opposite to the mechanical driven compressor the exhaustgas driven
compressor has no fixed compression ratio. The compression ratio depends on the suction pressure,
outletpressure and the engine performance. These points are the reason that, for a given environment and
engine speed, a matching procedure must be performed to find compression ratios, inletpressures and turbine
speeds of the turbocharger. For every change in environment, an another matching must be performed. This
implies the knowledge of turbine and compressor characteristics, and also of the characteristics of the diesel-
engine. It is clear that this is a very time consuming procedure, and it depends upon the availability of the
characteristics of the different parts.
According to stapersma,[19941 the pressure in the exhaustreceiver can be considered independent of the
backpressure and the inletpressure. Also temperature effects can be neglected. The following calculations are
based upon these assumptions.
This is a very great simplification of the process to avoid iterations.
For the pressure ratio of the turbine and compressor the following formula can be derived Stapersma,[1994]:
r)
ii
frcomp = 1 + Rm 82 nis.comp 77is,turb r 1-
k -1)
= air
A" )6 = exhaustgas
turb
with = temperature ratio c/torng (K)
= mechanical efficiency (-)
82 = lossfactor (-)
= value dependent of turbocharger system (pulse or equal pressure system)
= isentropic efficiency of the compressor
= isentropic efficiency of the turbine
= ratio of specific heats
17
TU Delft
Vakgroep OEMO
When the calculated values and the data given by MTU are compared figure 9 emerges
The MTU data is calculated with the given powerratings instead of inletpressures but the powerrating is linear
coupled to the inletpressure. It is not completely correct but itis good enough for a comparision (ratios are
dimensionless)
3
=1
62 =1
=1
scorn =0.9
slur =0.9
=1.4
Pback
= 2.0 bar
The MTU data has been calculated using the engine power under different environmental conditions.
It is clear that the method of a fixed exhaustdrumpressure is not very accurate
MTU has a very good backpressure performance and almost a behavior of a mechanical turbocharger. The
disadvantage of this good backpressure performance is the very large powerdrop this constitutes. If we com-
pare a normal MTU396 12V engine to a submarine variant, a powerdrop of 50% is visible (see figure 17 and
figure 18 at next page). The efficiency of the engine is not severely affected, the derating must come from less
fuel injection.
For the model the calculation of the power drop is based on MTU supercharging characteristics
It is not very accurate to take only one source for a complete model. but the MTU engines are very good
engines. This means that futher engines from other manufacturers will perform similar to MTU engines.
The behavior of the engines with changing inletpressures as almost the same as the mechanical chargers.
For the model see page 19.
18
.00-f
T Delft
Vakgroep OEMO
`4J
390 ,
_. o- 1430 rrbl
0.20
200
100
.l000
.. 1500 nta
-0- 1893 oto
000 Lwow (1400 rrter)
0,10 1
900
LAD. FOOD*
0,00
(_____ 12001x 106,97
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
860 660 900 920 943 960 980 y. 1 I841x 157 79
nutter engine int cow Reamer
figure, 17 power loss of submarine figure, 18 engine behaviour of a MTU engine un-
engines der submarine conditions
pow, to be
total power drop Intlelfed
19
TU Delft
Vakgroep OEMO
5.0 Diameter of the exhaustgas pipe
Assumptions : 1. completely turbulent flow Re » 2000
stationary situation
cirkel cross diameter
The following configuration will be considered see figure 13 :
The different friction parts are 1. straight pipe, lenght L, Diameter D kw :see figure
two 90 degree bents (sharp) kw :1,30
one ball valve (open) kw : 0.05
entrance loss kw: 0.05
5. exitloss (confined) kw : 1
Pipe roughness E:
Aluminium : 0 (smooth)
Wrougth iron : 0,05
Iron : 0,12
Galvanized iron,steel : 0,15
Cast iron : 0,25
20
TU Delft
Vakgroep OEMO
The speed v can be calculated with
Volumestroom 4V
v=
7CD2 frD2
4
Vp,c,rti
4V
4f IL 12
Dv 2
n
Ap =Ap desired ?
D2 171 2
Re= pvD
I
Retail
It =fcn(Re,
=
D
correction D
The parameter D As during the iteration adjusted until the correct pressure drop is found. At the end of the
linteration the diameter found must be checked to correct values that are too high or too low.
note : the diameter found (is without isolation around the pipe !
211
TU Delft
Vakgroep OEMO
Friction factor for flow in tubes
0.1 ....am
=mom MMENtail SIIIIIECIIII
0.0
1.....0.1...2
......mmmui
MINE111.1
IMUINIMEN NI =L1:011111
MMEINIMInr .......au =Emu
0.0
0.0
11INIMMIRMIIIIII I
lmanual
Itt Omni
MINIMUM
. Iiiirim Nun=
ilmlin NEM
IN
su 'n
MlaillildlIMM7111111111111111111111111111111111111111111
null
mum
=sun
low
Pc
0.0
0.01 1,111
5-
-,i
111111
NW f/2 independent of Re mil,,,,,,
11111 11/11/11
relative
0.0 IIII , i fill111111. 11111 Mil roughness
t5
0.008 ==-2100 ......N.--....111111111110111101=.111
.._-=.,........ NM
.Zi-.7.4=-74Z MMMEIMEMIHOMMIEMMIN 0.05
0.006
- IMMUMUNI/1=1*FitrativmmillIMUNIMINIIMIMIE On
morimmumaior.
laminar /low 11111111W1111114-1"-
7-!-eniirar..iiimmorsi
-1.'""%!ER
-....malmsmr.
MI MOP/
somirammmen
......aunno.
......
',W-airmaii.
smums.
Lee-
0 OA
0
8.01
g.is
0.004
nun
1111111KIIMITM..".;
,.......0...,Talarmarmararn
22
........i..-
MOMS S 004
'8
0.002 111111
m mommiimilikisffilmrtme, 7.1
0.0015 - "2 Inn! Smooth Pipes In MiiiiiitaviiirimPP ---= - roc...2,
0.001 IINIM 111111 Mg! 1
0.0008
0.0006
Re
MO
ms =Bizull
=mum .,..i,a.NMI
l_t_l_
11111111111111E-1-2
....aiii
MINIIIINIIII
Ohal"'MMMEMNIT:=1:1111111101111.MMUUM
ocz'onoT
IIIIIIIMIIIIIIIIIII
MIMMIIMMIIIII111111
102 2 4 6 810 2 4 6 8 10. 2. 4 6 8 10s 2 4 6 8 10° 2 468 104
25 30 40 SO 60 70 85 A
ball valve
K, I 486 206 53 17 5.5 1.6 0.05 R
D.13-5
K. , 0.131fl "
90
T junction -07-
k.,1 13 1.5 1.0 0.4
kink
sharp rounded
pipe entrance
0.5 0.05
22
Ahoy
TU Delft
Vakgroep OEMO
5.5 Dimension relations
In this chapter two important parameters for the determination of the engine dimensions are given, as well as
the formulas for calculating the stroke and bore.
Stapersma,[1994] defines two engine parameters
From these two numbers some scale laws can be derived. With the knowledge of p and cm: the dimensions
of the cylinders can be calculated. Cm can be derived from the data given by the motorfacturers Cm is fairly
constant. The mean effective pressure (Pm) can be calculated through the seiligerdiagram.
After some rewriting the above formulas the following relationships can be found :
stroke
30 cm constants
IS =
diameter
=
1
(Peg c.ii(Pea)
pecm) Z ) Z)
stroke/diameter
r 1 111 Z
N Pe-8
The formulas are tested with some real numbers:, the values calculated and found in the data match good.
The liter power turns out to be a good parameter for analysing the engine dimensions.
23
TU Delft
Vakgroep OEMO
6.0 Engine dimensions
Li width
The data for the following figures comes from a database of 52 engines from 8 different manufactures. The
engines are only divided in different manufactures. Engines with 48,60 or 90 degree V-angle are present,
apparently this makes no difference.
The width is defined in the following war:
The width of the engines can roughly devided into two levels (see figure 16).
2300 mm
1500 mm
These two categories make 72% of the total.
Width
2500
2000
Ii
Ii
500
II
, ,zr M1- CZ:,
,--
CO CD On N Un COCO4 .7
1 N N C.1 N.- 0 CO ( CN
cr
...-- CO CO cr
number of engine
figure, 23 width of engines in mm
v1
23:0
00 a
15:ID
A---g°G-0
ergnespaad(r.pm)
figure, 24 width in mm
24
TU Delft
Vakgroep OEMO
The width is decreasing with increasing engine speed. This can be explained from the fact that for higher
engine speed the dynamical forces also increase. This results in a increase in force levels on the crankshaft.
The auxiliary equipment can be placed inside or outside the V, in that way a constant width is achieved.
To obtain a good formulator the width, the connection between engine power and the engine width is examined in figure
A. The two width levels are clearly visible.
width
2500 BERGEN
gm
ME§ En lig
2000 111
- WA RTSILA
E 1500 E MAN
1000 = MTU
500 PIELSTICK
0 = DEUTZ
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000
power (kW) SULZER
figure, 26 engine width against power
For power ratings below 2000 kW a width of 1500 mm is to be taken for the engine. Fora power range above the 2000 kW
both the 1500 mm level and the 2250 level can be chosen. Also for a engine speed below the 1500 rpm, the width must be
chosen as 2250 mm above the 1500 rpm the width can be chosen 1500 mm.
The engine speed can be used as a check on the width chosen in the power figure.
Example : 1. Power : 3000 kW
2. Speed : 1900 rpm
From the power figure a width of 2250 mm is chosen, checking with the engine speed figure the width is
adjusted to 1500 mm.
PfkV/1
engine power no engine speed no
wulth = 3500 mm
<2000 kw ? < 1500 rpm ?
N /rpm_
yes yes
width = t 500 mm
For the height The total height is taken including turbocharger and auxiliary equipment but not with the exhauSt-
pipe.
Figure 21 shows the height of a diesel engine is declining with the engine speed. The same explanationis
valid here as for the width. Also three different height levels are visible if we plot the height against the engine
power (figure 23). The three heigth levels are 80% of the total.
IHeigth
3500
1
3000 hr
2500
E 2000
fs 1500 ii
.2 1000
500
0
r LC)! 0) N-
C71
LC) 0)
CNI
CO
CO
N-
CO mr
tn a)
V'
CO
le)
f3/4--
Lt)
rLfl C)
4.0 CO' CO
engine number
figure, 28 heigth of engines In mm
hieiEgh
BERGEN
,
E
3500
3000
2500
WARTS ILA
VAN'
Z. 2000
41 1500 mTU
1000
PIELSTICK
.° 500
0
0 DEUTZ
1000 2000 3000
engine (r.p.m.3 El, SULZER
26
sktf
TU Delft
Vakgroep OEMO
Heigth
3500 BERGEN
Mttt $0 OP 132
3000 9 WARTSI LA
2500 Ei 121 MIL 0° IP
0
2000 MAN
ril 1111
1500 MTU
1000
500 RIELST1CK
0 DEUTZ
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000
power (kW) SULZER
yeS ye yel
engine speed' Ye
< 7000 r pm 7
heigth o 3200 mrn
yes
engine speed
h .19111 2700 nlal
< f SOO rprn
heigth = 1800 MM
figure, 30 model for calculating the engine heigth
27
Attf
T U Delft
Vakgroep OEMO
6.3 length
This is the most difficult parameter, the engine length has only a slight dependence on the engine power.
Figure 23 shows a close relation of the length of the different engine types Unfortunately engine manufac-
tures make very different choices in the length of the engine, as can be seen figure 23. Two different slopes
can be identified. One consists of the MTU and PIELSTICK engines and one of the BERGEN and MAN
engines.
length
7000 BERGEN
6000
WARTSILA
lit 5000
4000 Ez MAN
3000 MTU
g 2000
1000 - PIELSTICK
0 DEUTZ
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000
power (kW) SULZER
length
BERGEN
0.8
0.7
=
IIIIIIII
i
WARTSILA
0.6 ;.
c, 0.3 MTh
1 0,2
0,1
C PIELSTICK
0
C DEUTZ
0,00 0,05 0,10 0,15 0,20 0.25
Pliter IL: SULZER
28
II'
soitf
TU Delft
Vakgroep OEMO
length BERGEN
00 0 DELIT7
0..00 0,10 0,20 0,30
Filter El suLaR
figure, 33 length/number of cylinders against Pliter/2
If we look at figure 25, it appears that the length divided by the number of cylinder has a constant value, if Pliter
has a value above the 0,10. Below this value the length per cylinder has a much greater value. This is visible
in figure 23. Length is taken as a linear function of the number of cylinders with some additional constraints.
Length :
There are two different slopes visible in the power-length, see figures 31 and 33.
11. Pliter > 0,10 slope: 400-600mm/cyl
2. Pliter < 0,10 slope: 600-800mm/cyl
1. The (L-0,5*Z*B)/L value must lie between 0,6 and 0,7 with a most likely value of 0,63 (see figure 24)
which gives the following fomula : ZB L = lenght of engine (mm)
L
0,74 Z = number of cylinders
= bore (mm)
Constraints
2 Minimum length = 2000 mm
3. Maximum length = 6000 mm
Immi ZB L between no
L 2000-6000 mm?
0,74 a
yes
V
L determined
29
TU Delft
Vakgroep OEMO
6.4 mass
To get a good comparison: the mass of the dieselengine is divided by the number of cylinders. If we look at the
figure 39, it is clear that the difference between generator sets and propulsion systems is relative small. Engine
manufacturers give only very little information about the engine weight, it is not always clear wether the sup-
porting frame (of the generator set) is included or not.
In figure 35 a dependency is visible between Pliter and the engine weight as we set the weight per kW out to
Pliter. At higher Pliter (higher technology engines), the weight per kW decreases, as expected. This figure has
only one disadvantage, the variation is very small, but to calculate the mass this ratio has to be multiplied by
the number of kilowatts requested. This can easily be a multiplication 1000 or more; in this way a small differ-
ence can grow very large. To minimize this disadvantage the figure 27 was made. The mass per cylinder has
been related to the cylindervolume. The variation is larger but the multiplication factor is less than 20; the
overall result is a variation that is roughly the same as in figure 35.
For the final calculation of the weight both figures are used. For the calculation model see page 32, figure 40..
mass
14.00 13 BERGEN
F 12.00
WARTSILA
-El. 10.00
IN 8.00 MAN
6,00 CI MTU
4,00
2,00 PIELST1CK
0,00 SULZER
0.00 0.05 0,10 0,15 0,20 0.25
DEUTZ
Pliter
figure, 35 mass/power of engine against Plitert2
mass
2000
tt 1800 BERGEN
-=c 1600
1400 WARTSILA
1200
MAN
1000
800 PIELSTICK
600
DEUTZ
400
200 SUI 7PR
0
MTh
5000000 10000000 15000000
cylinder volume
30
Oltf
TUDelft
Vakgroep OEMO
rreSS
figure, 37 determination of the
14W
mean line
12W
4t
0
Reaks1
Polyrcom (R3e431)1
2,00 8
0,C0
OW 010 015 0.20 0,Z
Plilerr2
figure, 38 determination of
ITTES the mean line
16,0E+6
14,0E+6
I tee - 4,
12,0E+6
10,0E+6
8,0E+6
441111 Reeks1
Lineair (Reeks 1)
6,0E+6 0-
4,0E+6 :
y = 6808x + 2E+06
2,0E+6
C00,0E+0
0 5C0 1000 1500 2030
mass/number of cylinders
31
figure, 40 calculation model for the mass determination
power
Pliter yes
tar between 541,6X's190,41 tat 113,908 mass/power
OM and 0.175 ?
no
not valid
Pilfer range
mean value mass 'kg/
number of cyl'
-Om-mast/number of cyf
Cylindervolume
mass/
number of ryl
winner of cylinder,
smf
VU Delft
Vakgroep OEMO
7.0 Proposal for the model "Subdiesel"
iHO
11
). SAC
rPre
Pe
bar
pme
30cm
S-
S/D between no
1,0 and 1,2 7
D4-8-1).(-6) P0N
spe-crs Z Pliter - Ptech
CEO 660000
rnIs yes
V
5 and
determined
cm
cm Ptechpe
- Pliter
62
bar
xmlornam ru,ron total power dna])
056(05048 1.5e19s' 2.5221 2075)
bar
exhaust driven
Pau
PonsLall P (kW/ power to be
11- )(Pk') Installed
Po
mechanical driven
SW
33
TUDelft
Vakgroep OEMO
no engine speed no
engine power width a 1500 mm
p. <I SOO rpm 7
<2000 kW 7
yes yes
I yes
yes
engine speed
< 1000 rpm 7 op heigth = 3200 mm
engine speed
< 1500 rpm heigth 7700 mm
110
Ofheigth = MOO mm
mm ZB IL L between no
L Z000,6000 rmn7
yes
L determined
34
kW
yes
Niter between mass/power
541.6X-190,41x+18,9013
0:1-6 and 0.175
no
not valid
Pliter range
mean value mass fkg)
number of cyi
Cylindervolurne .mass/number of ryl
\\13<:\
mass/
number of ryl
T U Delft
Vakgroep DEMO
8.0 References
der auslegung der Abgasturboladergruppe auf das Betriebsverhalten von aufgeladenen Dieselmotoren" , Fakultat fur
,
Stapersma, 1994
Prof ii. D. Stapersma : "Dieselmotoren B", copieen overheadsheets i52a, Technische Universiteit Delft, Delft
Stapersrna, 1994
Prof ir D. Stapersma persoonlijk gesprek, Delft
Janssen, 1991
L.P.B.M. Janssen ; M.M.C.G. VVarmoeskerken : "Transport phenomena data companion". Technische Universiteit
Delft; DUM, Delft
VVisman, 1990
W.H.Wisman : "Inleiding Thermodynamica", Technische Universiteit Delft; DUM, Delft
Houtman, 1992
ir. C.J. Houtman 'Inleiding Gasturbines", Technische Universiteit Delft, Delft
Cohen, 1993
H. Cohen, G.F.C. Rogers, H.I.1-1 Saravanamuttoo ' Gasturbine Theory"; Longman Scientific &Technical, third edi
tion ; John wiley & Sons, New York
Beyer, Ulrich
ing. U. Beyer : "Technisches Handbuch Dieselmotoren": Veb Verlag Technik, Berlin
36
out(
TU Delft
Vakgroep OEMO
Appendix
37
isp4.
TU Delft
Vakgroep OEMO
Table A.
n na wi ci so n: al .6 ai ci ,e2e, p- n me" g g
asIsi,:zazaistii 122 2 .7 2 P- 7- I -2 Pg 2 2 2 2 2 Et S t tt 2 t
neannnninninnirineinnneinne:ninine4nerie: .7) ei
----- - ninneeninnnnerin S
31)
.s.s.qed,P12);.1817.2.2Agszglg?:-...inisiir,r2g2grnArnIssr.-,222
--.......000,00.s.2,-..i..7.4.-.4:..-cui.t.z..2.---6.;a0cmg;,-;;;;
.II222 22271$32222222GtOtS22222222S3S3S;2222222
cicicicicicicidddciaddcldocicicicio dodo.° 00000n cannon
2,2 2 St ,14 2 2 2 .2 2 2 2
2rOtt
----
g '8 7 2 71'2 2 4 tt? to; 2 2 Z3;2 I!
- g Pt t;
:t
6-6-.snz.grkaz.22.2.2.3.z7D.22a3.2figaiFIgzURRg:141graYA'aitlrn8.8.
dd00000d0000000cidooddood000cc.-.
N. N. N. P. .1 Pt N. ak n etpepp.rnnn1nmrnr,
n to or o co el - err v.. = -
444444 pip* -
38
Att.
'WU Delft
Vakgroep OEMO
39
4*-tf
T U Delft
Vakgroep OEMO
I. Measurement of the engine dimensions
In this section the measurements of the different engine dimensions is described by manufacturer.
Meaning of the different parameters
manufacturer
use
type
width
H heigth
bore (mm)
stroke (mm)
number of cylinders
compression ratio
40
Ott
TU Delft
Vakgroep OEMO
Fabrikant "Type Lenote1 tente2 - 13-L1 Len. te- Breedte Hbogle2 Gewicht
. mm mm mm mm mm mm Kenat)
Bergen Diesel Genset KVG-12 3675 4545 8701 3675 2320 3150 24000
Been Diesel Genset KVG8-12 3675 4545 87011 3675 2320 3150 24000
Bergen Diesel Genset KVG-16 4635 5510 875 4635 2320 3120 31000
Bergen Diesel Genset KVGB-16 4635 5510 675I 4635 2320 3120 31000
Bergen Diesel Genset KVG-18 5115 5990 875 5115 2320 3120 34000
Bergen Diesel Genset KVGt3-18 5115 5990 8751 5115 2320 3120 34000
Wartsila Vasa Genset 8V22 2365 3400 1035! 2365 2165 2360
Wartsila Vasa Genset 12V22 2890 4225 1335; 2890 2085 2665
Wartsila Vasa Genset 16V22 3765 5100 1335! 3765 2085 2665
Wartsila Vasa Genset UD30 V12 S4 2500 I 2000 1580 2000 5800
Wartsila Vasa Genset LI030 V12 S6 2700 I 2200 1580 2000, 5800
Wartsila Vasa Genset UD30 V16 3200 ! 2700 1580 2000 7850
MAN B&W Genset V12 20/27 3400 3600 2001 3400 1510 2600
MAN B&W Genset V14 20/27 3800 3950 150: 3800 1510 2600
MAN B&VV Genset V16 20127 4150 4300 150: 4150 1510 2600
MAN B&W Genset V18 20127 45001 4650 150. 4500 1510 2600
MTU Genset 12V595 1F30. di 3335 2835 1500 2600
MTU Genset 16V595 1130 3930 3430 1500 2600
MTU Genset 8V396 TE34D l'i- 2130 - 1630 1540 1530
MTU Genset 12V396 TE340 2600 'L 2100 1540 1700
MIL, Genset 16V396 TE34D 3060 2560 1540 1750
PIELSTICK Genset 6 PA4V185 VG 1105 1640 [ 535 1105 1450 1865'
PIELSTICK Genset' 8 PA4V185 VG 1405 1940 535' 1405 1450 1865
PIELSTICK Genset 2 PA4V185 VG ' 2005 2540 535' 2005 1450 11365. I
PIELSTICK Genset 6 PA4V185 VG 2605 3140 535 2605 1450 1865
PIELSTICK Genset 8 PA4V185 VG 2905 3440 535 2905 1700 1920'
PIELSTICK Genset 8 PA4V200VG 14051 1925 520 1405 1575 1865'
PIELSTICK Pro 112 PA4V200VG 2005 2525 520 2005 1450 1800
PIELSTICK Propul 16 PA4V200VG 2605 3125 520 2605 1700 1865
PIELS11CK Pro ul 18 PA4V200VG 2905 3425 520 2905 1700 1865
PIELSTICK P 12 PA5V255
I 2940 4060 1120 2940 1980 2620
PIELSTICK Proput 16 PA5V255 3830 5140 1310 3830 2070 2870
PIELSTICK Pro ul 18 PA5V255 42751 5590 1315 4275 2070 2870
Bergen Diesel Pro's 3892! 4762 870 3892 2300 3160 216-c
Bergen Diesel Propul KVMB-12 ' 3892 4762 870 3892 2300 3160 21600
Bergen Diesel Propul KVM-16. 4852 5727 875 4852 2320 3160 26500.
Bergen Diesel Propul KVMB-16 4852 5727 875 4852 2320 3160 26500
Bergen Diesel Propul KVM-18 5332 6207 875 5332 2320 3160 29073
Bergen Diesel Propul KVMB-18 5332 6207 875 5332 2320 3160
Wartsila Vasa Propul 8V22 2017 3052 1035 2017 2164 2600
Wartsila Vasa .r1J 12V22 2797 4132 1335 2797 2088 2620
Wartsila Vasa flu. 16V22 3577 4912 1335 3577 2088 2710
Deutz MVVM Propul TBD 604B V8 1533 1912 379 1533 1389 1875
Deutz MVVM Propul TBD 604B V12 2113 2628 515 2113 1389 2035
Deutz MVVM Propul TBD 604B V16 2613 31281 515 2613 1389 2035
SULZER Pro ul 12V Al25 3170 42101 1040 3170 2370 3150
SULZER Pro ul 16V AT25 4090 5130 1040 4090 2370 3150
MTh Propul 16V396 TB84' 3550 3050 1480 1960
RATU Pro ul 12V396 T894 3040, 25401 1480 1910
MW Pro ul 16V396 T894! 3550 3050 1480 1960
MTU Propui 8V396 7E94 2330 2830 1540 1520
MW Pro I 12V396 TE94 2870 2370 1540 1600
MW Propul 16V396 TE94 3430 2930 1540 1750
.
MTU Propul 12V595 7E60" 335 2835 1500 2570
MTU Propul 12V595 7E60 3930' 3430 1500 2600
I WU Propul 12V595 1E90 339pf 2890 1500 2570
i MTU Pro ul 12V595 1E90 3980 2480 1500
_
2600
Wartsila Vasa Genset 1)025 V12 53 3425 2925 1510 2285
Wartsila Vasa Genset UO25 V12 54 6600.
3425. 2925 1510 2285 6600
Wartsila Vase Genset UD25 V12 55 342C- -- 2925 1510 2285 6600
I
411
11.
T UDeift
Vakgroep OEMO
evAchVZ Ce ich1 Vermo en Pm bar ,Jjnhoud I Toerental inhoud ,houd Irz 5A23 1-05/z 011
! d kW bar Urnin rrom43 'limn
2000 1991 18 758 750 3,32E-.10 1,77E+08 14718750 067
2000 2122 16 758 900: 3,32E+10 1.775+08 14718750 0,67
1938 2650 18 689 750, 3.99E+10 236E+08 14718750 0.64
1938 2825 16 689 900 3,99E+10 2,36E+08 14718750 0,64
1889 2980 18 666 750! 4.34E+10 2,65E+08 14718750 0,62
1889 3180 16 666 900 4,34E+10 265E+08 14718750 0,62
168 10100 1400 19 850 1200 1.74E+10 72948480 9118560 0,74
258 15500 2100 19 704 12004 2.35E+10 1,09E+08 0,69
340 20400 2800 19 638 1200. 2,83E+10 1,46E+08 0,65
483 970 15 417 1500. 7,9E+09 51927750 0,58
483
491
1170
1545
18
18
450
400
1500: 8,53E+09
1500 1,01E+10 69237000
5I927750IE 0,61
0,56-
883 10600 1200 14 600 1000 1,41E+10 1,02E+08 8478000 0,67
1
42
m*;
TU Delft
Vakgroep IOEMO
3,90
200
90 0,06 32 800' 200 1,35
200 270 18 9,0
0,16 1,11
190 210 12 90 10,s .
67-,
10 5 016 67 3.74 190' 1,11
190 210 16 90
185 8 901- 11,7L .75 - -2790 - ---res 11 ,12
165
165 185 12 90, 11.7
.___..
0,16. 58 2,61165
._.. __ -.. ......_ 1,12
165 185 16' 90 112 0.16 --.. 7 2.52 165
.. 112'
1- 185 210 6 .O6 --16.S - -011 46 4,24 . 185 1,14
46 393 185 1,14
185 210 a 90 10,5 0.111 .
46 3- .81 . __
185 1,14
1--- 185 210 12 90, 10,5 '0.9,11 - .:1,14
185 210 16 90 10 5 '0,1t 46 3,61 185 .
1165
41---
-.011 46 3,50 ..-1859
i,i4
200 2101
10. -11i1-
8
121
90
so
10.5
--16,S
10,5
6.11
0,11
45
:15
--
3,89
3,79
-. .-.. _
200
200
.. _
1,05
1:05
i
I
.......
.
250
250
250
oo
300 .
300
_.
12 .
ie-
16
_
.
obi
_
60
60
- -_
.....
-8,i1
/7.5
.. 8.3-.
..0.06
.
0,06
0.66
.
37
34
37.
9.80
1000
9.01.
.250
250,
250,
1,20,
1501
1:20
250
250
220
300
300
240
240
-1
let
Tar
/8,
aal
' -66' -
60
601
7,s.
13--
66
9,6
.16,6s
70.06
._..
0.10
10
.
34
37
46
46
9,73_
5.76_
7.21
7,38_
250
250
210
-220
1,20
_. _
--. -
1,20
.. 1,09
09
/
7- 170
170
195
195
._
-1'
'12
48
-413- -
-11./.-
'Tif. -
012
'0,12 -47
.47 3.71
3:413:
170
-140- - 71-15 '
1.-I5
- --.--. _-.
_
r- -- 715 1 -i-TO '11-2.1,_ 90 10,5; 0,14 515 4,49 190 11,11
43
Fhbrittonl I
Typo I vermopn I therehlal I 1091e
I
breedte boogie ewi0111
1 kW 5.antcy bawd t
gmin 1 mm sIáF
PIELSTICK 1
RIM mm pintaat pex us
8 PA4185 SM ' kg 1
480 ' 1300 2320 mm RIM
PIELSTICK...1 12PA4185 SM 1470 1785 n*ar mbar
960 1300 / 5000 8 165
Pifficriek 3520 1470 210 900
ii 'PX4203-§m . it 1785 9000 12 '
1600
ii 700 1300 185
PIELSTICK . 2320 1470 -1- 210 900 1600
,1785 5500
12PA4200 SM
PIELSTICK rlIPA4200 SM DS '
1050 1300
i , azo 1470 1785 8000
0 185 210 900 1600
1318 ' 1300 12 00
' &75 ., ' 1690 210 900
2/30 9200 12 1600
200 1 210
PAINIAN VALENTA 8 $Z 900 1600
664 1200 ,
PAXMAN VALENTA 12SZ 1012 /97 216
PAXMAN. VALENTA 165Z 1200- _ 12
1350 1200 i 197
PATMAN 3 970 1450 2070 216
VALENTA 18SZ 1520 1200
9000 16 i 197
__
.
216 850 1600
. 18 1
. ., 197 216
HEDEMORA . t
V1213114S1J8 1400 1 3315 1560 1840 12 1 210
FINCA-NTERI I 4. 210 950 600
A210.12 SM t 940 1500 i 3410 ; 1350
FINCANTER1 A210.16 SK4 2635
1410 - 9300 12 1
210
. 1500 1, 6
440 230
1340 2855 950 1600
11400 16 210
MTU '
230 950
8V396 SE 520 1600
1000 2150 '
MTU I 1600 7 2400
12V396 5883 940 1800 3600 8 165
MTU 1
2550 1 1600 185 968
16V396 SE 1040
2650 7800 12 1600
1600 3000 1
165 185 968
MTU ' 12V95658 1600 2800 6800 1600
1270 1350 3310 16 165 185
MTU __;____'
1660 2900 968 1600
161195688 1690 1350 I 4000 12000 12 230
MTU 1 1660_ 230 968
20V956 S6. 2990 14900 16 1600
2l15H 1130 i 4690 1
230 230 968
leao 3085 18300 1600
20 230 230 966 1600
T U Delft
Vakgroep OEMO
heigth
3500 BERGEN
3000
cc K2
WARTSILA
2500
- Li.-
A 2000 - -1 2 MAN
z-
« 1500 MTU
1000
PIELSTICK
500
0 DEUTZ
0,00 0.05 010 0.15 0.20 0.25
74 SULZER
Pliter
heigth
3500 BERGEN
3000 WARTSILA
1 2500
cm
A 2000 MAN
1500 MTU
1000
500 PIELSTICK
0 DEUTZ
00 20 40 60 80 100
2 SULZER
Ptech
46
At;
TUDe ft
Vakgroep OEMO
length
5. 350 El BERGEN
-0 300 ITT1
Li WARTSILA
2 250
200 io MAN'
a
150 R°0 MTU
2 100
g 50 10 PIELSTICK
e.
00 .11 DEUTZ
0'.00 0.05 0,10 0.1'5 0,20 '025
Pliter io SULZER
2
length
7000
6000
total Length
CO, OJ Mtn
GNP
0 CO iN-
number of engine
length,
tn 3000000000
12 2500000000
-5-c, 2000000000
3 1500000000
a 1000000000
o 500000000
.E 00
r(Cr cC%-
;NI C')
CO
Li;
CD co
engine number
47
TU Delft
Vakgroep iOEMO
/41
atur or turbine
abgastleMPer-
aftstioltverbrauCi
4,0
tung (cot stantk
clef/ruck
L""cf. h
9 0,9
,
.
0 200 300 400 500 mmWs 600
Abgasdruck nach turbine
48