Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Week 3 Reflections
Week 3 Reflections
Vaibhavi Awasthi
Caste System in India: Leaders and the Fading Representation of their Values
Caste evolved as Varna System in the Early Vedic Period, to compartmentalize occupations
into mainly four domains- Brahmins (Educators), Kshatriyas (Warriors), Vaishyas (Traders &
Businessperson) & Shudras (Artisans, Labourers or Servants). A fifth and alienated group
was that of the untouchables or the Dalits. Even though leaders like Mahatma Gandhi and
B.R. Ambedkar fought for the rights of Dalits before and after India got its Independence, the
privilege precedes the present rights of Indian citizens. The Indian Constitution provides for
all sorts of equality among its citizen regardless of their sex, caste, religion, race, colour,
language, etc. It has laid special provision for the upliftment of the lowest strata of the Indian
society, both in terms of social and economic backwardness. Reservation system in India is a
part of the corrective policy measures which were taken to ensure equity in representation of
the less privileged citizens in education and employment. With decades of having such
corrective measures in place, Indian society still struggles with caste-based oppression. A
pregnant Dalit woman got killed in Uttar Pradesh for drinking water from the community
well. Another Dalit man was murdered for having the audacity to keep a moustache for his
wedding. Even Dalit kids have never been spared from caste-based violence. Students like
Rohit Vemula have to contemplate whether to win everyday battles of societal exclusion or to
In almost every village & city in India (6.5 Lacs villages and 4000 cities), at least one statue
of both Mahatma Gandhi and B.R. Ambedkar can be found. We have roads and societies
named after these two men who were one of the greatest advocates of equality and justice.
While both the policies and the social environment acknowledges and encourages to establish
a dominance ridden state, the question is why people would still prefer to choose violence
and discrimination, given how fast paced our economy has become where most people
3
struggle to earn their livelihood. Is it because leaders like Gandhi and Ambedkar were
ineffective in ensuring that even laws if kept in place would restore the sanctity of an equal
society? Is it easy for people to look at their leaders, reflect on their history yet repeat the
same instances which dehumanized a major part of the population? If yes, why is it
convenient for people to carry on with such hypocrisy while taking pride over their leaders
who in the first place condemned such actions. Is this discrimination a result of fear of giving
away the privileges and the power by the elite minority? If yes, why is this fear bigger than
the deterrence of law which encompasses stringent anti-discrimination clauses. Did the
leaders take this fear of losing privileges by the elites for granted and placed blind faith in the
good conscience of their people, only to end up being a hollow representation of values in the