Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Emergency Public Health Preparedness and Response 1st Edition Ebook PDF Version
Emergency Public Health Preparedness and Response 1st Edition Ebook PDF Version
Contents vii
15 Bombing Events
G. Bobby Kapur
285
16 Biological Agents
L. Kristian Arnold
305
19 Earthquakes 379
Christopher N. Mills
22 Hazardous Materials
Terry Mulligan
447
viii Contents
Index 545
58707_FM_Kapur.qxd:Achorn Int'l 9/22/10 4:45 PM Page ix
Preface
A fter the SARS outbreak in 2003, Hurricane Katrina in 2005, and the Haitian
earthquake in 2010, public health professionals, first responders, and medical
providers questioned the effectiveness of preparedness and response activities for
these large-scale emergencies, and almost everyone asked, “Is this the best we can
do?” Recent domestic and international events have revealed the complex issues that
arise from public health emergencies such as natural disasters, infectious disease epi-
demics, and terrorist events. Although international organizations, countries, or local
governments may possess the emergency supplies and personnel for a region in crisis,
on many occasions they are unable to deliver this assistance in a timely or coordinated
manner. During an emergency, public health professionals face specific challenges: to
conduct rapid needs assessments for matching resources with actual needs on the
ground, to make critical decisions based on limited data, and to implement monitor-
ing and surveillance techniques for tracking the results of the assistance. Recognizing
these challenges and responding to public health crises with the appropriate knowl-
edge and skills will increase the effectiveness of interventions made by public health
and healthcare infrastructures.
The public health crises of the 21st century have demonstrated the need for enor-
mous coordination among multiple entities for good outcomes. Historically, these
preparedness and response activities have mostly been within the domain of local,
state, and national government agencies. However, the private sector and nongovern-
mental organizations (NGOs) are playing larger roles in recent crises for multiple
reasons. Often, the government may be limited in the immediate resources available
to respond to an emergency or these agencies may not be able to provide assistance
rapidly, and the private sector and NGOs may be able to deliver aid quickly through
– ix –
58707_FM_Kapur.qxd:Achorn Int'l 9/22/10 4:45 PM Page x
x Preface
well-established formal and informal networks. In addition, as was seen in the 2010
Haitian earthquake, the government facilities may be disrupted or destroyed during
the event, and other organizations are needed to fill the void left by the lack of gov-
ernment capacity. Once the government, private sector, and NGOs enter the emer-
gency setting, communication and clarity of responsibilities are fundamental for
stabilizing the affected community and for beginning relief efforts.
Although multiple books have been written on the topic of disaster medicine, this
is the first book in the growing field of emergency public health. Unlike disaster med-
icine that focuses primarily on the medical treatment of specific conditions that occur
during disasters, emergency public health encompasses the broad components of pre-
paredness, response, and mitigation through a public health perspective for communi-
ties and nations that are at risk for large-scale emergencies. In addition, emergency
public health explores the interactions and contributions of multiple sectors such as
the government, non-governmental organizations, private enterprises, and individuals
before, during, and after a public health emergency.
Most of the contributing authors in this book are emergency medicine physicians
with public health degrees. These experts combine their public health and clinical ex-
periences to give the reader a balance of both theory and practice on how to prepare
and respond to public health emergencies. The book is divided into eight sections to
address the breadth and depth of emergency public health:
The chapters are structured to provide the reader with a systematic and case-based
approach to the topics. Each chapter begins with a detailed case study and then fol-
lows with historical perspectives to learn fom prior experiences. The chapter then
provides valuable information on specific preparedness, response, and mitigation in-
terventions. The chapter then reviews the case study to offer a detailed analysis. Each
chapter concludes with a list of important on-line resources.
The primary objectives of this book are simple: to help improve how we prepare
and respond to public health crises and to decrease the morbidity, mortality, and suf-
58707_FM_Kapur.qxd:Achorn Int'l 9/22/10 4:45 PM Page xi
Preface xi
G. BOBBY KAPUR
Houston, Texas
JEFFREY P. SMITH
Washington, DC
58707_FM_Kapur.qxd:Achorn Int'l 9/22/10 4:45 PM Page xii
58707_FM_Kapur.qxd:Achorn Int'l 9/22/10 4:45 PM Page xiii
Foreword:
What Is Emergency Public Health?
T he concept of emergency public health, while not new, is being defined and de-
scribed in greater detail than in the past. In this book, the authors have focused
on the nature of public health emergencies, as well as the role that various sectors
have in responding to them. They describe tools that are common to public health,
and identify some of the issues that are faced in preparing for and responding to pub-
lic health emergencies. Defining emergency public health through the use of these
examples provides a basis for understanding the concepts that are critical to the field—
prevention, preparation, intervention, and recovery—as well as the critical need to take
a multidisciplinary approach to public health emergencies.
In an environment in which we discuss public health emergencies, we need to
discuss emergency public health as a specialty area within public health, much as en-
vironmental health, infectious disease, or injury prevention and control can be seen
as public health specialty areas, and to provide a basis for its practice and research.
Core competencies in emergency public health, currently under development, will
take an all-hazard approach, and will cover the spectrum of prevention, protection,
response and recovery, and will provide a foundation for advanced competencies in
the specialty area of emergency public health. This multidisciplinary field will draw
from the core values of the disciplines that contribute to it, and, at a minimum may
serve the common mission of many of the disciplines: to improve health within the
population. In addition, emergency public health can enhance the effectiveness with
which health knowledge and technologies are applied in addressing public health
emergencies. A core value of promoting equity in health will allow the field to de-
crease disparities in preventing, preparing for, intervening in, and recovering from
public health emergencies.
– xiii –
58707_FM_Kapur.qxd:Achorn Int'l 9/22/10 4:45 PM Page xiv
xiv Foreword
For those who ask the question, “Why now? And why a new field of public
health?” many of the answers are contained in the following chapters. The continued
development of the science and practice of emergency public health through educa-
tion, research and multidisciplinary collaboration is critical to ensuring health secu-
rity, to responding to public health emergencies, and to ensuring that populations
have access to prevention of, preparation for, intervention in and recovery from pub-
lic health emergencies.
Contributors
– xv –
58707_FM_Kapur.qxd:Achorn Int'l 9/22/10 4:45 PM Page xvi
xvi Contributors
Contributors xvii
G. Bobby Kapur, MD, MPH, is the Associate Chief for Educational Affairs for the
Section of Emergency Medicine at Baylor College of Medicine (BCM). Dr. Kapur de-
veloped and launched the new emergency medicine residency training program at BCM
that began in July 2010, and he currently serves as the director of the residency pro-
gram. Dr. Kapur also serves as the Director of Educational Affairs for the Emergency
Center at Ben Taub General Hospital in Houston, Texas.
From 2005 to 2009, Dr. Kapur was the Director of the International Emergency
Medicine and Global Public Health Fellowship Program for the Department of Emer-
gency Medicine at The George Washington University. During this time, Dr. Kapur
designed and taught one of the nation’s first courses in emergency public health for law
enforcement officials from local and national agencies. In addition, he developed and
implemented emergency medicine and public health training programs for interna-
tional physicians, nurses and primary healthcare workers.
Dr. Kapur’s research has focused on the preparedness and response to terrorist
bombing events. Collaborating with the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and
Explosives (ATF), he authored one of the most comprehensive assessments of bomb-
ing events in the United States, analyzing 20 years of ATF bombing data, and he has
recently published a pre-hospital care algorithm for the management of bombing
victims.
Dr. Kapur’s projects have included establishing emergency medicine training
programs in Beijing, New Delhi, and Kolkata. Dr. Kapur also provided leadership and
oversight for a three-year program with the Emergency Medicine Association of
Turkey to train nearly 2,500 physicians across Turkey in evidence-based medicine. He
– xix –
58707_FM_Kapur.qxd:Achorn Int'l 9/22/10 4:45 PM Page xx
has also worked with partners globally on the development of emergency public health
systems with an emphasis on low-cost, high-yield strategies.
Dr. Kapur has served as the Chair of the Section of International Emergency
Medicine for the American College of Emergency Physicians and as Chair of the Com-
mittee of International Emergency Medicine for the Society of Academic Emergency
Medicine.
Dr. Kapur earned his Bachelor of Arts degree in English Literature and Policy
Studies from Rice University, his Doctor of Medicine degree with a concentration in
medical ethics from Baylor College of Medicine, and his Master of Public Health in
Global Health from Harvard University. Dr. Kapur completed his Emergency Medi-
cine residency training at Yale University and his International Emergency Medicine
fellowship at Harvard University and Brigham and Women’s Hospital.
Jeffrey P. Smith, MD, MPH, earned his Doctor of Medicine degree from the Uni-
versity of Maryland, and his Master of Public Health degree from The George Wash-
ington University. In additon to serving as Co-Director of the Ronald Reagan Institute
of Emergency Medicine at The George Washington University, Dr. Smith has also
taught courses in emergency medicine.
58707_CH01_Kapur.qxd:Achorn Int'l 9/15/10 11:33 PM Page 1
Introduction
58707_CH01_Kapur.qxd:Achorn Int'l 9/15/10 11:33 PM Page 2
58707_CH01_Kapur.qxd:Achorn Int'l 9/15/10 11:33 PM Page 3
CHAPTER 1
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
88
90
92
94
96
98
00
02
04
06
08
19
19
19
19
19
19
20
20
20
20
20
–3–
58707_CH01_Kapur.qxd:Achorn Int'l 9/15/10 11:33 PM Page 4
100
90
80
70
60
Percent
50
40
30
20
10
0
1950 1965 1980 1995 2010 2025 2040
Year
FIGURE 1-2 Current and Projected Percentage of Global Population Living in Urban Areas
1950–2050
Source: Data from UN World Urbanization Prospects: The 2007 Revision Population Database. http://
esa.un.org/unup/index.asp?panel=1
• Multiple sectors
• Public health tools applied during emergencies
• Resilience analysis
• Systemization of efforts
Historical Perspectives 5
scale crises will affect all sectors of the community, including the government, private
sector, nongovernmental organizations ( NGOs), and civilians.3 Each of these sectors
will collectively provide and utilize resources during a crisis, and, therefore, each
of these sectors will possess a collective responsibility in a community’s resilience to
public health emergencies. By increasing the systemized surveillance, assessments,
coordination, and communication among sectors and among levels of government
jurisdictions, communities can achieve greater levels of protection from collapse in
the event of a public health emergency.
A fundamental aspect of public health emergencies is their unpredictability. Even
though they are unpredictable in terms of when and where they will strike, all public
health emergencies progress through predictable stages: preparedness, response, and
mitigation. Nevertheless, communities cannot prepare for every possible public
health scenario that may occur. For this reason, communities must always maintain a
range of preparedness regardless of the type of incident that may occur. Given the dif-
ficulty of preparing and responding to a large number and variability of potential
public health emergencies, an “all hazards” approach can help protect a population
by having available a continuous and minimum level of personnel, resources, and
training that can address a broad scope of hazards.4 Furthermore, the uncertainty
regarding the timing and location of an incident will require communities to have
baseline levels of capabilities to be able to respond effectively to public health crises.4
Finally, to ensure mitigation, a community will need to apply lessons learned from
prior events within the community and from other regions to implement measures to
reduce vulnerability and decrease risks from future events.
HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVES
The past decade has seen a greater awareness for expanded and improved public
health infrastructure to respond to increasing threats. In November 2000, the U.S.
Congress passed the Public Health Threats and Emergencies Act of 2000 (P.L.
106-505), which was the first law to direct large amounts of resources toward public
health preparedness for bioterrorism and other communicable disease outbreaks. The
legislation authorized $540 million in fiscal year 2001 to improve public health agen-
cies’ response capabilities and capacities. The objective was to elevate state and local
capacity and to meet the following goals:5
• Authorize increased funds for state and local planning and implementation of
these capacity-building goals
In June 2002, the U.S. Congress passed the Public Health Security and Bioterrorism
Preparedness and Response Act (P.L. 107-188) in response to the September 11, 2001,
terrorist attacks and the anthrax attacks that occurred later in 2001. This legislation
authorized even greater funding and provided new measures for the following purposes:5
Although the IHR advanced public health efforts at the national and global levels for
communicable diseases, it remains a limited instrument and does not adopt an “all
hazards” approach.
Public Health
Resilience ⫹ Systemization
Security
ture plays a critical role in ensuring a population’s resilience to all hazards. In addition,
specific systems criteria can determine whether a community will be able to provide
protection to its residents from public health emergencies. The combination of
resilience and systemization will lead to public health security for a population (see
Figure 1-3).
Systemization
Although multiple actors provide capacity for public health emergencies, their re-
sources and personnel alone cannot ensure public health security. Specific systems
criteria must be established to unify the multisector and multijurisdictional capabili-
ties that are deployed before, during, and after a large-scale crisis. The key systems
components are summarized here:
58707_CH01_Kapur.qxd:Achorn Int'l 9/15/10 11:33 PM Page 9
Conclusion 9
• Unified planning
• Coordination
• Communications
• Knowledge sharing
• Surveillance
• Resource distribution
With this systemization of the actors and their capabilities, the available capacity can
be more effectively and more quickly implemented during a sudden, large-scale event.
Unified planning allows sectors and government agencies the ability to plan and
train together prior to an actual event. These interagency and multisector efforts
offer various entities an opportunity to become familiar with one another’s personnel
and to become aware of all available resources. While conducting unified planning,
the multiple actors can also develop plans on improved coordination among the
responders. In 2005, Hurricane Katrina demonstrated that large-scale public health
emergencies require enormous logistical planning and coordination to achieve effec-
tive results. The U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) found that there was
inadequate delineation of responsibilities across agencies and jurisdictions to ensure
effective outcomes.10 In addition, resources were not shared and distributed among
agencies that would have allowed for greater efficiency and more timely delivery of
goods and services to the communities that were devastated by the storm.
Communications become vital for both knowledge sharing and surveillance. If
different sectors or agencies have access to varying levels of information, then the
public health infrastructure is at risk for a systemic breakdown. The September 11,
2001, terrorist attacks revealed the potential systems failures that may occur if the
sectors do not possess shared communications. The New York Police Department
( NYPD) and the New York Fire Department ( NYFD) used separate radio communi-
cations channels. When it became evident that the World Trade Center towers were
going to collapse, the NYPD officers in the helicopters who had knowledge of the
threat posed by structural instability were not able to communicate evacuation
information to the NYFD fire fighters in the buildings.11 Hundreds of NYFD fire
fighters lost their lives because of this lack of systemized communication and inability
to share knowledge across jurisdictions.
CONCLUSION
Whether due to natural, deliberate, or accidental causes, public health emergencies
continue to increase in the United States and other countries. As the global popula-
tion becomes more urbanized, larger numbers of people living in densely populated
58707_CH01_Kapur.qxd:Achorn Int'l 9/15/10 11:33 PM Page 10
“mega-cities” are exposed to public health hazards. If such an event does occur,
the magnitude of its impact is likely to be enormous simply because of the large
number of individuals exposed to the threat. Although recent U.S. and international
laws have attempted to strengthen the public health infrastructure, these efforts have
focused specifically on communicable disease threats and bioterrorism. A broader
and more extensive public health security framework that includes resilience and sys-
temization will assist federal, state, and local public health professionals, policy
makers, responders, and public officials in protecting communities from public
health emergencies. Collective multisector efforts will lead to collective public health
security for populations.
NOTES
1. Uitto J. The geography of disaster vulnerability in megacities: A theoretical framework.
Applied Geography. 1998;18(1):7–16.
2. Weichselgartner J. Disaster mitigation: The concept of vulnerability revisited. Disaster
Prevention and Management. 2001;10(2):85–95.
3. Pan American Sanitary Bureau. Health and hemispheric security. Washington, DC: Pan
American Health Organization; 2002.
4. Health Action in Crises Section of the WHO. Risk reduction and emergency preparedness:
WHO six-year strategy for the health sector and community capacity development. Geneva,
Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2007.
5. Frist B. Public health and national security: The critical role of increased federal support.
Health Affairs. Nov./Dec. 2002;21(6):117–130.
6. Rodier G, Greenspan AL, Hughes JM, Heymann DL. Global public health security.
Emerging Infectious Diseases. 2007;13(10):1447–1452.
7. McEntire DA, Fuller C, Johnston CW, Weber R. A comparison of disaster paradigms:
The search for a holistic policy guide. Public Administration Review. 2002;62(3):267–281.
8. Pearce L. Disaster management and community planning, and public participation: How
to achieve sustainable hazard mitigation. Natural Hazards. 2003;28:211–228.
9. Mason B. Community disaster resilience. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2006.
10. Woods WT. Hurricane Katrina: Planning for and management of federal disaster recovery con-
tracts. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Accountability Office; April 10, 2006.
11. Dwyer J, Flynn K, Fessenden F. Fatal confusion: A troubled emergency response; 9/11
exposed deadly flaws in rescue plan. New York Times. July 7, 2002. Retrieved May 26, 2010,
from www.nytimes.com /2002/07/07/nyregion /07EMER.html
58707_CH02_Kapur.qxd:Achorn Int'l 9/15/10 11:35 PM Page 11
SECTION 1
CHAPTER 2
INTRODUCTION
The public health community, ranging from local, state, and federal levels of govern-
ment, responds to a multitude of emergency events, both natural and human-made.
Public health emergencies in recent memory have encompassed such natural inci-
dents as disease outbreaks—for example, the H1N1 flu outbreak in 2009, the emer-
gence of West Nile virus in the eastern United States in 1999, and the severe acute
respiratory syndrome (SARS) outbreak in Asia in 2003—or environmental catastro-
phes like that seen during Hurricane Katrina in 2005. Human-made incidents that
present public health emergencies can be either intentional (e.g., the Japanese subway
Sarin incident of 1995) or unintentional (e.g., the massive power blackout in the
northeastern United States in 2003).
While local and state officials deal with most public health emergencies initially,
federal involvement is almost certain when the crisis is severe in scope. Legal
authority for intervention in public health emergencies is left to the states and their
localities under the Tenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. However, federal
involvement in the day-to-day function of public health can be established through
the Commerce Clause of the Constitution. Under these auspices, the federal govern-
ment can engage in regulation of food security through the U.S. Department of
Agriculture, air and water purity through the Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA), pharmaceutical safety through the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and
many other spheres of influence.
– 13 –
58707_CH02_Kapur.qxd:Achorn Int'l 9/15/10 11:35 PM Page 14
Case Study
The immediate phase of any acute public health emergency (from the sentinel
event up to the first 2 hours) requires first responders from the local commu-
nity.2 Consider, for instance, the attacks on the World Trade Center on Sep-
tember 11, 2001. The first few minutes of the crisis were marked by an
overwhelming number of calls to the local 911 system. Immediate emergency
response began with private firms and individuals already present within One
World Trade Center (the North Tower). The first organized leadership on scene
was the Fire Department of New York (FDNY) Battalion Chief, who arrived
within 6 minutes of the crash of the first aircraft.3 During the immediate phase,
local incident command systems assumed authority for the developing crisis.
The intermediate phase (first 2 to 12 hours) of the response to a public
health emergency remains the purview of local and perhaps state officials.4
Toward the end of this phase, emergency response priorities should shift toward
accepting and coordinating federal assistance. In the hours after the World
Trade Center collapse, emergency response personnel from the Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the U.S. Department of Health and
Human Services (DHHS) arrived on the scene, to the welcome relief of local
officials.5
The third phase of an acute public health emergency is termed the extended
phase and represents all events after 12 hours.6 If the emergency is not con-
tained and the emergency response concluding, preparations for extended fed-
eral operations occur at this time. Clearly, a large federal effort continued for
months following the tragedy at the World Trade Center. Made immediately
available was assistance from the CDC.7 CDC personnel assisted with injury
and disease surveillance, capacity assessment, emergency coordination, and pro-
vision of supplies. Later, the EPA undertook a significant public health action by
declaring that air and water quality were suitable for individuals to return to
New York’s Financial District.8 Many federal agencies may share a role during
this extended phase of an emergency response.
Each of these phases involves federal, state, and local agencies in various
roles and responsibilities. This chapter provides an overview of components of
these roles by jurisdiction in responding to a public health emergency.
Another random document with
no related content on Scribd:
DANCE ON STILTS AT THE GIRLS’ UNYAGO, NIUCHI
I see increasing reason to believe that the view formed some time
back as to the origin of the Makonde bush is the correct one. I have
no doubt that it is not a natural product, but the result of human
occupation. Those parts of the high country where man—as a very
slight amount of practice enables the eye to perceive at once—has not
yet penetrated with axe and hoe, are still occupied by a splendid
timber forest quite able to sustain a comparison with our mixed
forests in Germany. But wherever man has once built his hut or tilled
his field, this horrible bush springs up. Every phase of this process
may be seen in the course of a couple of hours’ walk along the main
road. From the bush to right or left, one hears the sound of the axe—
not from one spot only, but from several directions at once. A few
steps further on, we can see what is taking place. The brush has been
cut down and piled up in heaps to the height of a yard or more,
between which the trunks of the large trees stand up like the last
pillars of a magnificent ruined building. These, too, present a
melancholy spectacle: the destructive Makonde have ringed them—
cut a broad strip of bark all round to ensure their dying off—and also
piled up pyramids of brush round them. Father and son, mother and
son-in-law, are chopping away perseveringly in the background—too
busy, almost, to look round at the white stranger, who usually excites
so much interest. If you pass by the same place a week later, the piles
of brushwood have disappeared and a thick layer of ashes has taken
the place of the green forest. The large trees stretch their
smouldering trunks and branches in dumb accusation to heaven—if
they have not already fallen and been more or less reduced to ashes,
perhaps only showing as a white stripe on the dark ground.
This work of destruction is carried out by the Makonde alike on the
virgin forest and on the bush which has sprung up on sites already
cultivated and deserted. In the second case they are saved the trouble
of burning the large trees, these being entirely absent in the
secondary bush.
After burning this piece of forest ground and loosening it with the
hoe, the native sows his corn and plants his vegetables. All over the
country, he goes in for bed-culture, which requires, and, in fact,
receives, the most careful attention. Weeds are nowhere tolerated in
the south of German East Africa. The crops may fail on the plains,
where droughts are frequent, but never on the plateau with its
abundant rains and heavy dews. Its fortunate inhabitants even have
the satisfaction of seeing the proud Wayao and Wamakua working
for them as labourers, driven by hunger to serve where they were
accustomed to rule.
But the light, sandy soil is soon exhausted, and would yield no
harvest the second year if cultivated twice running. This fact has
been familiar to the native for ages; consequently he provides in
time, and, while his crop is growing, prepares the next plot with axe
and firebrand. Next year he plants this with his various crops and
lets the first piece lie fallow. For a short time it remains waste and
desolate; then nature steps in to repair the destruction wrought by
man; a thousand new growths spring out of the exhausted soil, and
even the old stumps put forth fresh shoots. Next year the new growth
is up to one’s knees, and in a few years more it is that terrible,
impenetrable bush, which maintains its position till the black
occupier of the land has made the round of all the available sites and
come back to his starting point.
The Makonde are, body and soul, so to speak, one with this bush.
According to my Yao informants, indeed, their name means nothing
else but “bush people.” Their own tradition says that they have been
settled up here for a very long time, but to my surprise they laid great
stress on an original immigration. Their old homes were in the
south-east, near Mikindani and the mouth of the Rovuma, whence
their peaceful forefathers were driven by the continual raids of the
Sakalavas from Madagascar and the warlike Shirazis[47] of the coast,
to take refuge on the almost inaccessible plateau. I have studied
African ethnology for twenty years, but the fact that changes of
population in this apparently quiet and peaceable corner of the earth
could have been occasioned by outside enterprises taking place on
the high seas, was completely new to me. It is, no doubt, however,
correct.
The charming tribal legend of the Makonde—besides informing us
of other interesting matters—explains why they have to live in the
thickest of the bush and a long way from the edge of the plateau,
instead of making their permanent homes beside the purling brooks
and springs of the low country.
“The place where the tribe originated is Mahuta, on the southern
side of the plateau towards the Rovuma, where of old time there was
nothing but thick bush. Out of this bush came a man who never
washed himself or shaved his head, and who ate and drank but little.
He went out and made a human figure from the wood of a tree
growing in the open country, which he took home to his abode in the
bush and there set it upright. In the night this image came to life and
was a woman. The man and woman went down together to the
Rovuma to wash themselves. Here the woman gave birth to a still-
born child. They left that place and passed over the high land into the
valley of the Mbemkuru, where the woman had another child, which
was also born dead. Then they returned to the high bush country of
Mahuta, where the third child was born, which lived and grew up. In
course of time, the couple had many more children, and called
themselves Wamatanda. These were the ancestral stock of the
Makonde, also called Wamakonde,[48] i.e., aborigines. Their
forefather, the man from the bush, gave his children the command to
bury their dead upright, in memory of the mother of their race who
was cut out of wood and awoke to life when standing upright. He also
warned them against settling in the valleys and near large streams,
for sickness and death dwelt there. They were to make it a rule to
have their huts at least an hour’s walk from the nearest watering-
place; then their children would thrive and escape illness.”
The explanation of the name Makonde given by my informants is
somewhat different from that contained in the above legend, which I
extract from a little book (small, but packed with information), by
Pater Adams, entitled Lindi und sein Hinterland. Otherwise, my
results agree exactly with the statements of the legend. Washing?
Hapana—there is no such thing. Why should they do so? As it is, the
supply of water scarcely suffices for cooking and drinking; other
people do not wash, so why should the Makonde distinguish himself
by such needless eccentricity? As for shaving the head, the short,
woolly crop scarcely needs it,[49] so the second ancestral precept is
likewise easy enough to follow. Beyond this, however, there is
nothing ridiculous in the ancestor’s advice. I have obtained from
various local artists a fairly large number of figures carved in wood,
ranging from fifteen to twenty-three inches in height, and
representing women belonging to the great group of the Mavia,
Makonde, and Matambwe tribes. The carving is remarkably well
done and renders the female type with great accuracy, especially the
keloid ornamentation, to be described later on. As to the object and
meaning of their works the sculptors either could or (more probably)
would tell me nothing, and I was forced to content myself with the
scanty information vouchsafed by one man, who said that the figures
were merely intended to represent the nembo—the artificial
deformations of pelele, ear-discs, and keloids. The legend recorded
by Pater Adams places these figures in a new light. They must surely
be more than mere dolls; and we may even venture to assume that
they are—though the majority of present-day Makonde are probably
unaware of the fact—representations of the tribal ancestress.
The references in the legend to the descent from Mahuta to the
Rovuma, and to a journey across the highlands into the Mbekuru
valley, undoubtedly indicate the previous history of the tribe, the
travels of the ancestral pair typifying the migrations of their
descendants. The descent to the neighbouring Rovuma valley, with
its extraordinary fertility and great abundance of game, is intelligible
at a glance—but the crossing of the Lukuledi depression, the ascent
to the Rondo Plateau and the descent to the Mbemkuru, also lie
within the bounds of probability, for all these districts have exactly
the same character as the extreme south. Now, however, comes a
point of especial interest for our bacteriological age. The primitive
Makonde did not enjoy their lives in the marshy river-valleys.
Disease raged among them, and many died. It was only after they
had returned to their original home near Mahuta, that the health
conditions of these people improved. We are very apt to think of the
African as a stupid person whose ignorance of nature is only equalled
by his fear of it, and who looks on all mishaps as caused by evil
spirits and malignant natural powers. It is much more correct to
assume in this case that the people very early learnt to distinguish
districts infested with malaria from those where it is absent.
This knowledge is crystallized in the
ancestral warning against settling in the
valleys and near the great waters, the
dwelling-places of disease and death. At the
same time, for security against the hostile
Mavia south of the Rovuma, it was enacted
that every settlement must be not less than a
certain distance from the southern edge of the
plateau. Such in fact is their mode of life at the
present day. It is not such a bad one, and
certainly they are both safer and more
comfortable than the Makua, the recent
intruders from the south, who have made USUAL METHOD OF
good their footing on the western edge of the CLOSING HUT-DOOR
plateau, extending over a fairly wide belt of
country. Neither Makua nor Makonde show in their dwellings
anything of the size and comeliness of the Yao houses in the plain,
especially at Masasi, Chingulungulu and Zuza’s. Jumbe Chauro, a
Makonde hamlet not far from Newala, on the road to Mahuta, is the
most important settlement of the tribe I have yet seen, and has fairly
spacious huts. But how slovenly is their construction compared with
the palatial residences of the elephant-hunters living in the plain.
The roofs are still more untidy than in the general run of huts during
the dry season, the walls show here and there the scanty beginnings
or the lamentable remains of the mud plastering, and the interior is a
veritable dog-kennel; dirt, dust and disorder everywhere. A few huts
only show any attempt at division into rooms, and this consists
merely of very roughly-made bamboo partitions. In one point alone
have I noticed any indication of progress—in the method of fastening
the door. Houses all over the south are secured in a simple but
ingenious manner. The door consists of a set of stout pieces of wood
or bamboo, tied with bark-string to two cross-pieces, and moving in
two grooves round one of the door-posts, so as to open inwards. If
the owner wishes to leave home, he takes two logs as thick as a man’s
upper arm and about a yard long. One of these is placed obliquely
against the middle of the door from the inside, so as to form an angle
of from 60° to 75° with the ground. He then places the second piece
horizontally across the first, pressing it downward with all his might.
It is kept in place by two strong posts planted in the ground a few
inches inside the door. This fastening is absolutely safe, but of course
cannot be applied to both doors at once, otherwise how could the
owner leave or enter his house? I have not yet succeeded in finding
out how the back door is fastened.