Professional Documents
Culture Documents
5 Network Analysis Applied To Patent Data - JM
5 Network Analysis Applied To Patent Data - JM
5 Network Analysis Applied To Patent Data - JM
Jasmine Mondolo
j.mondolo@staff.univpm.it
Network analysis applied to patent data*
There are two main types of network based on patent data:
*Note: the contents of this module are mainly based on Chapters 8 and 9 of the book “Patent Analytics” by Kim et al. (2021)
Patent citation networks
Snapshot of the patent citation network of Apple’s US design patent D627,778 (iPhone 4, 2010); the design patents
linked through thick arrows are the patents related to the Samsung–Apple “design war” (p.75)
The construction of a patent citation network
It typically starts from the identification of a focal patent (or a set of focal patents),
to which patents are added going both backward and forward N times (we build
the egocentric network of degree/depth N of that patent) (p.77)
A practical application: Dyson’s patent citation network
1. Data collection and cleaning
Various primary and secondary sources of patent data (in this example, WIPS
database) the authors searched for the applicant’s name, Dyson Technology
Limited, among the utility and design patents filed with the USPTO after some
data cleaning, 624 granted patents (focal patents to which the patents linked
through their forward and backward citations are added)
A practical application: Dyson’s patent citation network
2. Data mapping
Preparation of a node spreadsheet (ID + additional info) and an edge
spreadsheet (source, target, type, weight+ additional info) to be imported in
Gephi
A practical application: Dyson’s patent citation network
3. Network analysis (+network visualization)
Selection of a software (Gephi), uploading of the node and the edge
spreadsheets, selection of a layout, (application of some filters/partitioning
etc), visualization and calculation of some network measures
“hairball effect”
Visualization obtained using the force-based layout Force Atlas 2
A practical application: Dyson’s patent citation network
Overview of Dyson’s patent citation network
• 624 patents (432 utility patents and 192 design patents) were granted to
Dyson in the US as of February 1, 2018 (date of the data collection)
• Six product categories were identified (i.e., vacuum cleaner, fan, motor,
robot vacuum, hairdryer, and hand dryer):
A practical application: Dyson’s patent citation network
Overview of Dyson’s patent citation network
A practical application: Dyson’s patent citation network
Overview of Dyson’s patent citation network
• The analysis of Dyson’s patent citation network helps assess how Dyson’s
product innovations grow and relate to each other the visualization and
the data suggest for instance that robot vacuum innovation has evolved by
borrowing or improving many designs and technologies derived from the
vacuum cleaner cluster, and that the fan cluster was initially influenced by
the hand-dryer cluster
(p. 120)
• We can also focus on a specific patent to better understand the innovations
from which it was prompted/inspired and the subsequent innovations that
patent has prompted/inspired
A practical application: Dyson’s patent citation network
The egocentric network of two Dyson’s patents
The bladeless fan design represented a big forward leap in fan design, and relevantly
influenced subsequent innovations
a) Egocentric network of patent US D602,143 (the first design patent granted to a bladeless fan, in 2008); b) Egocentric
network of US patent D715,995 (a design patent granted to a hairdryer in 2014); caution due to time-lag effects (getting
citations takes time) (p. 64)
Co-inventor networks
• To see how/to what extent the global collaboration network changed over
time/after a relevant event (e.g., the economic recession, the Covid-19
pandemic)
Co-inventor networks
Example of two co-inventor networks: Apple (a) and Google (b) -p.140-
Data collected over a ten-year period; 5,232 inventors and 10,975 registered patents
(Apple) vs 8,888 inventors and 12,386 registered patents (Google) 4.2 inventors per
patent (Apple) vs 2.8 (Google)
• Concentration tendency (Apple) vs evenly distributed pattern (Google)> more
«horizontal environment» + presence of ringlike membranes that refer to independent
activities at the periphery
Note: these visualizations have been produced by Periscopic (a US company specialized in data analysis and visualization)
Co-inventor networks
Zoom on the central part of the networks, which include the founders of the
two companies (Steve Jobs, 347 patents; Sergey Brin and Larry Page, 27
patents in total)
Variations of these two main types of networks
Example: main path of e-payment technologies (built by Lai et al. 2023 using Pajek)
Gephi
Note: It requires Java-version 11, which, in the last releases, is already embedded into the
installation
• Network basics
• Network structure
• Some economic applications (in particular to international trade and to a high-
tech sector)