Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Essentials of Management and Leadership in Public Health Essential Public Health 1st Edition Ebook PDF
Essentials of Management and Leadership in Public Health Essential Public Health 1st Edition Ebook PDF
Leonard H. Friedman
• Introduction
• Learning Objectives
• Teams
Importance of Teams in Public Health
Types of Groups and Teams
Improving Team Effectiveness
Team Characteristics
Nature of the Task
Environmental Context
• Organization Design
Principles of Organization Design
Factors Influencing the Choice of Organzational Form
Forms of Organization Design
• Governing Board Relationships
Roles and Responsibilities
Governing Board Composition
Managing Your Relationship with the Governing
Board
• Conclusion
Leonard H. Friedman
• Introduction
• Learning Objectives
• Topic Presentation
• Environmental Assessment
External Environmental Analysis
Internal Environmental Analysis and Value Creation
• Strategic Choice
Mission, Vision, and Values
Strategic Alternatives
Strategy and Organizational Culture
Douglas G. Anderson
• Introduction
• Learning Objectives
• Conflict Resolution
The Causes of Conflict
Techniques for Conflict Resolution
• Negotiation
The Concept of Negotiation
Negotiation Planning—Developing Preferences and
Alternatives
Negotiation Strategy—Emphasis on Relationships
Versus Issues
Negotiation Execution—Tactics
• Conclusion
• Closing Thoughts and Further Readings 65
Kurt Darr
• Introduction
• Learning Objectives
• Background
• Healthcare Ethics
Relationship of Law to Ethics
The Manager’s Personal Ethic
Organizational Philosophy and Values
Linking Theory and Action
Summary
• Ethics in Practice
Codes of Ethics that Affect Public Health Management
Summary
• Professionalism in Public Health
Ethical Issues in Public Health Management
Conflicts of Interest
• Conclusion
Philip Aspden
• Introduction
• Learning Objectives
• Public Health Information System Applications
Reporting Systems
Registries
Surveys
Electronic Knowledge Sources
Networks for Linking Public Health Professionals
• Public Health Information System: The Needed Skill Sets
Using Databases: Medical Data Confidentiality and
Privacy Legislation
Accessing the Data
Understanding Public Health Data Standards
Analysis Tools
Searching Electronic Knowledge Sources
Building and Managing Information Systems: Project
Life Cycle
Information Technology Projects Are Challenging
Implementing Syndrome Surveillance Systems
Implementing Registries
• Conclusion
Leonard H. Friedman
• Introduction
• Learning Objectives
• Leadership Principles
• Leadership Roles and Power
• Theories of Leadership
Trait Perspective
Behavior Perspective
Contingency Perspectives
• Alternative Leadership Perspectives
Evidence-Based Leadership
Servant Leadership
Transformational Leadership
Emotional Intelligence and Leadership
• Conclusion
• Closing Thoughts and Further Readings
Index
The Essential Public Health Series
Education
Master of Arts (Sociology), Boston College, 1970
Doctor of Philosophy (Medical Sociology), University of Florida, 1977
Leonard H. Friedman, PhD, MPH
Leonard H. Friedman is a Professor in the Department of Health Services
Management and Leadership, and Director of the Master of Health
Services Administration program. Dr. Friedman also holds a faculty
appointment in the Department of Health Policy.
Dr. Leonard Friedman is an expert on the mechanisms of organizational
change and strategic decision-making in health service organizations. He
joined SPHHS in 2008 from Oregon State University, where he was
professor in the Department of Public Health and coordinator of the
school’s health management and policy programs.
In his years in academia, Dr. Friedman’s scholarly interests have
evolved from the mechanisms by which hospitals decide to adopt certain
technological innovations in clinical settings, to the underperformance of
integrated health systems, to developing a model of organizational change
practices. Dr. Friedman’s research interests in health care management
centers around strategic management, organizational theory and behavior,
and decision making in complex and uncertain environments.
Professor Friedman has taught classes in healthcare management,
organizational theory and behavior in health care, health-care law and
regulation, and strategic management and leadership in healthcare
organizations. As part of his dedication to the field, Dr. Friedman has
chaired the Health Care Management Division of the Academy of
Management and is a member of the governing council at the Institute for
Healthcare Improvement’s Health Professions Education Collaborative. He
has also been board chair of the Association of University Programs in
Health Administration.
He received both his Bachelor of Arts degree and his Master of Public
Health degree from California State University, Northridge. He was
awarded both his Master of Public Administration degree and a Doctor of
Philosophy in Public Administration from the University of Southern
California, 1991.
Preface
This book is a composite of the best ideas and concepts garnered from the
various specialties that comprise management and leadership in public
health. The editors of this text posit that it takes many hands, skills, and
talents to enable a person to evolve into an effective and respected leader
and manager. As such, the editors sought authors who shared this
perspective and invited these area experts to be chapter authors. The
breadth of topics and expertise of the authors clearly exemplify the ideals
and purpose of this book. The topics and writers also reflect the diversity
and training of the faculty of our department of health services
management and leadership. Taken as a whole, these various specialties
and professionals come together such that “WE ARE ALL PUBLIC
HEALTH MANAGEMENT.”
Peter Drucker was for many people the best-known and most highly
respected management thinker of the 20th century. In 1989, writing in the
Harvard Business Review, he observed: “Nonprofits need management
even more than business does, precisely because they lack the discipline of
the bottom line.” This implied focus on an organization’s desire to
improve the human condition suggests a lack of concern with profitability
and economic stability that directs publicly traded corporations. We
believe that Professor Drucker would have applied the same logic to
public health organizations. This is the objective of this book—to provide
the readers with the information and perspective needed to become
exceptional managers and leaders. Public health organizations include (but
are not limited to) county and state health departments, community
service agencies, and other nongovernmental organizations. All of these
require managers who possess the skill and ability to guide the highly
trained professional staff, support personnel, and generous volunteers
through turbulent and uncertain environments.
Public health organizations are similar to their counterparts in the
private sector where staff members who are very successful at the jobs for
which they have specifically been educated are frequently recognized for
their good work by being promoted into a management role. The
assumption is that persons who are successful in the job for which they
were originally hired will be equally successful in managing and leading
others. We note an incongruity here that seems to permeate virtually every
organizational form. While formal education (and even licensure) is
needed for most public health jobs, management roles require nothing
other than common sense, familiarity with the organization’s policies and
procedures manual, an orientation to specific rules and regulations, and in
certain enlightened organizations, an off-site weekend-long intensive
seminar on personnel management. We believe the idea that management
requires no particular education, preparation, or talent is at best naïve and
at worst dangerous to the health and well-being of the organization and the
clients served.
We have worked to craft a textbook in management and leadership in
public health with one assumption and two goals in mind. Our assumption
is that management and leadership are two sides of the same coin. Both
activities are action oriented and are ultimately about getting things done.
The difference is perspective. We concur that Warren Bennis was right
when he said that managers do things right and leaders do the right things
(Bennis and Nanus, 1985). The first of our goals is to give the readers the
basic tools they will need to become effective managers and leaders in
their organization. There are a set of theories and skills that come together
to form the foundation of the tool kit of management and leadership. This
book explicitly sets out to help new managers identify the important tools
they will need in this role, or in the case of more experienced managers,
develop their abilities to better use those tools. The second goal of this
book is to help light a spark in the reader to learn more about management
and leadership. One book, no matter how well-written, is a necessary but
not sufficient condition. There is so much more that can be read and
learned. In fact, universities have courses as well as undergraduate and
graduate degree programs dedicated to management and leadership. We
hope that you will take this book as the first step in your journey to
develop a deeper and more profound understanding of the many talents
and skills management and leadership require.
One final thought cycles back to our assumption about management and
leadership. Reading about this is not enough. Getting better in these roles
requires you to actually get out and participate in managerial and
leadership roles. In this way, you will know whether you have the innate
talent and ability to be truly successful as a manager and leader.
Communities around the world depend on well-managed and skillfully led
public health organizations to provide needed services in a safe, efficient,
and effective manner. We appreciate your taking the first step on this
important journey. We encourage your diligence and, most importantly, we
look forward to being witnesses to your success at leading and managing
public health programs and services in the years ahead.
Robert E. Burke, PhD
Co-editors
Contributors
Douglas Anderson, MHA, FACMPE
Beginning in 2004, Mr. Anderson has been a faculty member in the
Department of Health Services Management and Leadership in the School
of Public Health and Health Services at The George Washington
University. His teaching responsibilities include Physician Practice
Management, Introduction to Economics and Management Principles in
Healthcare, and Healthcare Policy Analysis.
For the past 30 years, Professor Anderson successfully managed and
directed physician group medical practices and has written and presented
in this area of health policy. His work experience includes functioning as
the Chief Executive Officer of a multi-site orthopaedic group practice, the
CEO of a multi-site, multi-state ophthalmology group practice, the Chief
Operating Officer of a multi-state, multi-specialty medical group practice,
and the COO of a multi-site primary care practice. He also established a
Medical Services Organization for an integrated health delivery system
operating in a three-state region, and provided development resources to
affiliated medical practices and individual physicians.
Professor Anderson provides consultative services to medical groups,
and is an active member in the Medical Group Management Association.
A respected and gifted speaker, he is known for giving presentations on
medical practice management at the local, state, and national level. He
achieved life member status as a Fellow in the American College of
Medical Practice Executives.
Professor Anderson has a BA in Psychology from the University of
North Carolina at Chapel Hill and a Masters in Health Administration
from Duke University. At this time, he is pursuing a PhD in Public Policy
from George Mason University, with a concentration in health policy. His
research interests focus on the policy implications of the organizational
structure of medical group practice organizations.
Sara Rosenbaum, JD
Sara Rosenbaum is Chair of the Department of Health Policy and Harold
and Jane Hirsh Professor of Health Law and Policy. She also holds an
appointment as Professor of Health Care Sciences at The George
Washington University’s School of Medicine and Law.
As a scholar, educator, and national leader, Professor Rosenbaum has
dedicated her career to promoting more equitable and effective healthcare
policies in this country, particularly in the areas of Medicaid and
Medicare, managed care, employee health benefits, maternal and child
health, community health centers, and civil rights in healthcare systems.
Her commitment to strengthening access to care for low-income, minority,
and medically underserved populations has had a transforming effect on
the lives of many Americans, particularly children.
Professor Rosenbaum’s research focuses on the many ways in which the
law intersects with the nation’s healthcare and public health systems, with
a particular emphasis on civil rights, quality of care, insurance coverage,
and managed care. She is coauthor of Law and the American Health Care
System, a widely used health law textbook.
As a noted scholar, public officials, the media, and healthcare
organizations regularly seek Professor Rosenbaum’s expertise. She serves
on the board of numerous national organizations.
Ms. Rosenbaum received her Bachelor of Arts from Wesleyan
University and her Juris Doctor from Boston University School of Law.
CHAPTER 1
Introduction
Robert E. Burke
For the student pursuing studies in public health, the role of management
and the reason for studying management is unclear if not counterintuitive.
It is one of the many goals for this text that students who study public
health management will obtain the insight that management principles
apply to all aspects of human endeavor. While it is leadership that creates
the vision, it is management that makes the vision happen. For reasons
that baffle that authors of this text, there are people who dedicate
themselves to the “greater good” (including public health), but
misunderstand management and the need for using tested and valid
management principles. To these uninformed, management is seen
negatively. It is perceived only as a way in which corporations use some
magic models of efficiency that result in increased productivity and
greater profit for investors. Some believe that management has no benefit
for the recipients of public health programs nor for the professionals who
staff these programs. It has been the authors’ experience that many public
health students want to finish their public health education and then obtain
critical public health jobs as soon as they have completed their bachelor’s
or master’s degrees (if not sooner). These public health workers are eager
to be the next epidemiologist; to work to test the quality of air and water;
or to design, implement, and evaluate the next health education programs
that will better the outcomes of a population. Public health students want
to enter the job force to create better, more comprehensive health
promotion and health awareness programs. They are eager to become the
next talented community health professionals who are advocates for
population-based medicine. These are all noble goals, but they are not
complete. What is missing are knowledge, understanding, and application
of public health management.
It is the contention of the editors and authors of this text, however, that
management—good management—is integral to all public health
activities, and without management, public health activities are far less
effective and may even be impossible. The authors further contend that
many times management courses as taught in schools of public health are
aimed at teaching how to operate and manage the day-to-day operations of
a public health program. These may be strong practical courses, but they
do not provide an overall management perspective, nor do they
demonstrate how leadership will enable the public health professional to
ensure that public health goals and objectives are successfully achieved.
As such, the student never understands the importance of management in
and of itself and how this noble academic pursuit fits into the world of
public health. This is the goal of this text.
These ideas and concepts of the authors of this text have been validated
by the Council on Education for Public Health (CEPH). CEPH has
expressed the importance of management to public health, and has
determined that management, as a component of health policy and
management, is one of the five core competencies areas for public health.
The management competencies that a public health professional must have
are listed in Tables 1-1 and 1-2.
Except for the policy competencies (D.3 and D.4), each of these
competencies is addressed. The leadership cross-cutting competencies are
also contained throughout the different chapters in this book.
WHAT IS MANAGEMENT?
The authors of this text all share the view that management is not one
concept or idea. Good management as practiced by public health
professionals is a compilation of concepts from many different
professions and professionals. In fact, management could be considered
one of the first cross-cutting academic disciplines. As presented in this
text, management ideas, thought development, and action are steeped in
sociology, psychology, social psychology, behavioral sciences, economics,
management theory, statistics, and finance.
The authors of this text represent these disciplines and share the beliefs
that all management is cross-cutting and that management is a necessary
correlate of and for public health. Each of the authors is an experienced
manager in the private and/or public sector. Each has received education
and training in management, but the authors have different academic
backgrounds. The authors include a medical sociologist, an economist,
attorneys, health systems managers, a fund-raising specialist, a health
services researcher, and a health systems information specialist. These
authors are all “doers.” In addition to academic appointments, they have
held senior health services management jobs in the public and private
sectors. Each is unique in the contribution he or she is making to public
health management.
The primary goal of this text is to harness the public health manament
experience of the authors so that this book is replete with several different
and, at times, unique management perspectives. The student should learn
that good management involves the implementation of problem-solving
methods that may vary with each and every program, process, or situation.
Because all public health is done with teamwork, the secondary goal is to
teach future managers that to successfully write and co-author a chapter or
paper, interdisciplinary teamwork is both desired and needed. This
blending of ideas and backgrounds adds to the richness of the ideas and
thoughts.
The third goal of this book is to present the value that all good efforts
need to be successfully managed and that public health is no different.
Working with the management ideas and perspectives presented in this
book will enable public health professionals to more efficiently and
effectively carry out the vision and mission of public health, which are
defined by the American Public Health Association as follows:
Vision: Healthy People in Healthy Communities
Mission: Promote Physical and Mental Health and Prevent Disease, Injury, and
Disability
PUBLIC HEALTH
Prevents epidemics and the spread of disease.
Protects against environmental hazards.
Prevents injuries.
Promotes and encourages healthy behaviors.
Responds to disasters and assists communities in recovery.
Ensures the quality and accessibility of health services.
As Figure 1-1 shows, the inner core connecting all the functions of
public health is systems management. Management is the operational glue
that keeps all components of public health together and enables its
workers to meet the vision and mission of public health.
FIGURE 1-1
I see increasing reason to believe that the view formed some time
back as to the origin of the Makonde bush is the correct one. I have
no doubt that it is not a natural product, but the result of human
occupation. Those parts of the high country where man—as a very
slight amount of practice enables the eye to perceive at once—has not
yet penetrated with axe and hoe, are still occupied by a splendid
timber forest quite able to sustain a comparison with our mixed
forests in Germany. But wherever man has once built his hut or tilled
his field, this horrible bush springs up. Every phase of this process
may be seen in the course of a couple of hours’ walk along the main
road. From the bush to right or left, one hears the sound of the axe—
not from one spot only, but from several directions at once. A few
steps further on, we can see what is taking place. The brush has been
cut down and piled up in heaps to the height of a yard or more,
between which the trunks of the large trees stand up like the last
pillars of a magnificent ruined building. These, too, present a
melancholy spectacle: the destructive Makonde have ringed them—
cut a broad strip of bark all round to ensure their dying off—and also
piled up pyramids of brush round them. Father and son, mother and
son-in-law, are chopping away perseveringly in the background—too
busy, almost, to look round at the white stranger, who usually excites
so much interest. If you pass by the same place a week later, the piles
of brushwood have disappeared and a thick layer of ashes has taken
the place of the green forest. The large trees stretch their
smouldering trunks and branches in dumb accusation to heaven—if
they have not already fallen and been more or less reduced to ashes,
perhaps only showing as a white stripe on the dark ground.
This work of destruction is carried out by the Makonde alike on the
virgin forest and on the bush which has sprung up on sites already
cultivated and deserted. In the second case they are saved the trouble
of burning the large trees, these being entirely absent in the
secondary bush.
After burning this piece of forest ground and loosening it with the
hoe, the native sows his corn and plants his vegetables. All over the
country, he goes in for bed-culture, which requires, and, in fact,
receives, the most careful attention. Weeds are nowhere tolerated in
the south of German East Africa. The crops may fail on the plains,
where droughts are frequent, but never on the plateau with its
abundant rains and heavy dews. Its fortunate inhabitants even have
the satisfaction of seeing the proud Wayao and Wamakua working
for them as labourers, driven by hunger to serve where they were
accustomed to rule.
But the light, sandy soil is soon exhausted, and would yield no
harvest the second year if cultivated twice running. This fact has
been familiar to the native for ages; consequently he provides in
time, and, while his crop is growing, prepares the next plot with axe
and firebrand. Next year he plants this with his various crops and
lets the first piece lie fallow. For a short time it remains waste and
desolate; then nature steps in to repair the destruction wrought by
man; a thousand new growths spring out of the exhausted soil, and
even the old stumps put forth fresh shoots. Next year the new growth
is up to one’s knees, and in a few years more it is that terrible,
impenetrable bush, which maintains its position till the black
occupier of the land has made the round of all the available sites and
come back to his starting point.
The Makonde are, body and soul, so to speak, one with this bush.
According to my Yao informants, indeed, their name means nothing
else but “bush people.” Their own tradition says that they have been
settled up here for a very long time, but to my surprise they laid great
stress on an original immigration. Their old homes were in the
south-east, near Mikindani and the mouth of the Rovuma, whence
their peaceful forefathers were driven by the continual raids of the
Sakalavas from Madagascar and the warlike Shirazis[47] of the coast,
to take refuge on the almost inaccessible plateau. I have studied
African ethnology for twenty years, but the fact that changes of
population in this apparently quiet and peaceable corner of the earth
could have been occasioned by outside enterprises taking place on
the high seas, was completely new to me. It is, no doubt, however,
correct.
The charming tribal legend of the Makonde—besides informing us
of other interesting matters—explains why they have to live in the
thickest of the bush and a long way from the edge of the plateau,
instead of making their permanent homes beside the purling brooks
and springs of the low country.
“The place where the tribe originated is Mahuta, on the southern
side of the plateau towards the Rovuma, where of old time there was
nothing but thick bush. Out of this bush came a man who never
washed himself or shaved his head, and who ate and drank but little.
He went out and made a human figure from the wood of a tree
growing in the open country, which he took home to his abode in the
bush and there set it upright. In the night this image came to life and
was a woman. The man and woman went down together to the
Rovuma to wash themselves. Here the woman gave birth to a still-
born child. They left that place and passed over the high land into the
valley of the Mbemkuru, where the woman had another child, which
was also born dead. Then they returned to the high bush country of
Mahuta, where the third child was born, which lived and grew up. In
course of time, the couple had many more children, and called
themselves Wamatanda. These were the ancestral stock of the
Makonde, also called Wamakonde,[48] i.e., aborigines. Their
forefather, the man from the bush, gave his children the command to
bury their dead upright, in memory of the mother of their race who
was cut out of wood and awoke to life when standing upright. He also
warned them against settling in the valleys and near large streams,
for sickness and death dwelt there. They were to make it a rule to
have their huts at least an hour’s walk from the nearest watering-
place; then their children would thrive and escape illness.”
The explanation of the name Makonde given by my informants is
somewhat different from that contained in the above legend, which I
extract from a little book (small, but packed with information), by
Pater Adams, entitled Lindi und sein Hinterland. Otherwise, my
results agree exactly with the statements of the legend. Washing?
Hapana—there is no such thing. Why should they do so? As it is, the
supply of water scarcely suffices for cooking and drinking; other
people do not wash, so why should the Makonde distinguish himself
by such needless eccentricity? As for shaving the head, the short,
woolly crop scarcely needs it,[49] so the second ancestral precept is
likewise easy enough to follow. Beyond this, however, there is
nothing ridiculous in the ancestor’s advice. I have obtained from
various local artists a fairly large number of figures carved in wood,
ranging from fifteen to twenty-three inches in height, and
representing women belonging to the great group of the Mavia,
Makonde, and Matambwe tribes. The carving is remarkably well
done and renders the female type with great accuracy, especially the
keloid ornamentation, to be described later on. As to the object and
meaning of their works the sculptors either could or (more probably)
would tell me nothing, and I was forced to content myself with the
scanty information vouchsafed by one man, who said that the figures
were merely intended to represent the nembo—the artificial
deformations of pelele, ear-discs, and keloids. The legend recorded
by Pater Adams places these figures in a new light. They must surely
be more than mere dolls; and we may even venture to assume that
they are—though the majority of present-day Makonde are probably
unaware of the fact—representations of the tribal ancestress.
The references in the legend to the descent from Mahuta to the
Rovuma, and to a journey across the highlands into the Mbekuru
valley, undoubtedly indicate the previous history of the tribe, the
travels of the ancestral pair typifying the migrations of their
descendants. The descent to the neighbouring Rovuma valley, with
its extraordinary fertility and great abundance of game, is intelligible
at a glance—but the crossing of the Lukuledi depression, the ascent
to the Rondo Plateau and the descent to the Mbemkuru, also lie
within the bounds of probability, for all these districts have exactly
the same character as the extreme south. Now, however, comes a
point of especial interest for our bacteriological age. The primitive
Makonde did not enjoy their lives in the marshy river-valleys.
Disease raged among them, and many died. It was only after they
had returned to their original home near Mahuta, that the health
conditions of these people improved. We are very apt to think of the
African as a stupid person whose ignorance of nature is only equalled
by his fear of it, and who looks on all mishaps as caused by evil
spirits and malignant natural powers. It is much more correct to
assume in this case that the people very early learnt to distinguish
districts infested with malaria from those where it is absent.
This knowledge is crystallized in the
ancestral warning against settling in the
valleys and near the great waters, the
dwelling-places of disease and death. At the
same time, for security against the hostile
Mavia south of the Rovuma, it was enacted
that every settlement must be not less than a
certain distance from the southern edge of the
plateau. Such in fact is their mode of life at the
present day. It is not such a bad one, and
certainly they are both safer and more
comfortable than the Makua, the recent
intruders from the south, who have made USUAL METHOD OF
good their footing on the western edge of the CLOSING HUT-DOOR
plateau, extending over a fairly wide belt of
country. Neither Makua nor Makonde show in their dwellings
anything of the size and comeliness of the Yao houses in the plain,
especially at Masasi, Chingulungulu and Zuza’s. Jumbe Chauro, a
Makonde hamlet not far from Newala, on the road to Mahuta, is the
most important settlement of the tribe I have yet seen, and has fairly
spacious huts. But how slovenly is their construction compared with
the palatial residences of the elephant-hunters living in the plain.
The roofs are still more untidy than in the general run of huts during
the dry season, the walls show here and there the scanty beginnings
or the lamentable remains of the mud plastering, and the interior is a
veritable dog-kennel; dirt, dust and disorder everywhere. A few huts
only show any attempt at division into rooms, and this consists
merely of very roughly-made bamboo partitions. In one point alone
have I noticed any indication of progress—in the method of fastening
the door. Houses all over the south are secured in a simple but
ingenious manner. The door consists of a set of stout pieces of wood
or bamboo, tied with bark-string to two cross-pieces, and moving in
two grooves round one of the door-posts, so as to open inwards. If
the owner wishes to leave home, he takes two logs as thick as a man’s
upper arm and about a yard long. One of these is placed obliquely
against the middle of the door from the inside, so as to form an angle
of from 60° to 75° with the ground. He then places the second piece
horizontally across the first, pressing it downward with all his might.
It is kept in place by two strong posts planted in the ground a few
inches inside the door. This fastening is absolutely safe, but of course
cannot be applied to both doors at once, otherwise how could the
owner leave or enter his house? I have not yet succeeded in finding
out how the back door is fastened.