Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Pharmacology For Rehabilitation Professionals e Book 2nd Edition Ebook PDF
Pharmacology For Rehabilitation Professionals e Book 2nd Edition Ebook PDF
Pharmacology For Rehabilitation Professionals e Book 2nd Edition Ebook PDF
The second edition of Pharmacology for Rehabilitation In addition to the new chapters, all original chapters
Professionals presents basic pharmacological principles have been updated with the newest drug information with
along with the mechanism of action and side effects of emphasis on marketed drugs as opposed to those in the
major drug categories seen in rehabilitative practice. pipeline. The discussion activities have also been expanded
Similar to the first edition, the chapters are organized with new cases and questions that will spur some debate
using the systems approach. Each section begins with and promote integration into practice. Boxes have been
the pathophysiology and continues with a discussion of inserted providing generic and brand names of drugs along
the drug groups used for treatment. Most sections end with special comments for easy reference, and many fig-
with a discussion about how drugs affect rehabilitation ures have been redrawn. Specifically the cardiovascular
and how therapeutic interventions may affect drug pharmacology chapters and the diabetes section have been
effectiveness. Drug-exercise interactions, when known, expanded and further debate has been provided on the
are discussed. The chapters conclude with discussion affects of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents on the
activities that help the student learn the material and cardiac system and even the role that diuretics and
apply it to practice. The title has been changed to re-  blockers may have in increasing the risk of diabetes.
flect the inclusion of coverage of other rehabilitation The chapter, “Exploring Drug-Exercise Interaction”
professionals. (chapter 28) follows the model presented in the first edi-
New to this edition are chapters on vitamins and min- tion by specifically reviewing exercise-drug implications
erals (including their interactions with drugs), comple- for cardiovascular disease, pulmonary disease, and diabe-
mentary and alternative agents, drugs used to facilitate tes, discussing red flags particularly related to drug treat-
wound healing, and drugs of abuse and doping ment and exercise, and presenting sample exercise pre-
agents. In particular the chapter on alternative medicine scriptions. Additionally the chapters on chemotherapeutic
(chapter 26), provides an in-depth review of the support- drugs and antimicrobials/antiviral agents have been
ing evidence, or lack thereof, of the supplements com- expanded. There is further discussion on monoclonal anti-
monly used by patients with cardiovascular disease and bodies in the prescription of exercise while cycling on
women undergoing menopause. The chapter on wound chemotherapy. Treatment sections for HIV disease and
healing (chapter 25), specifically discusses venous stasis hepatitis have also been expanded to reflect the newest
ulcers, and arterial and diabetic ulcers. Cleansing agents, drug regimens.
antimicrobials for wounds, and enzymatic agents are The book continues to be written on a level commen-
discussed as are pressure dressings. The chapter on abuse surate with rehabilitation education, while offering a mix
(chapter 27) reviews the physiological effects of alcohol, of basic and clinical science following the knowledge re-
heroin, marijuana, and hallucinogenic agents and the quirements of a Doctorate in Physical Therapy. The web-
pharmacological management of these addictions. An site companion to the book offers answers to many of the
extensive review of methadone treatment has been added discussion activities, sample test questions, image library,
to the chapter on pain. updates, and links to supplemental resources.
vii
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
I wish to acknowledge the continuing efforts of the staff chapters. Additionally I would like to thank my col-
at Elsevier who managed to keep calm when the author leagues at the University of Medicine & Dentistry whose
did not always display proper decorum. A special thanks scholarship continues to amaze me and provides me with
also goes to my contributing authors who brought everlasting goals.
expert knowledge and practical experience to their Barbara Gladson
viii
CONTENTS
SECTION ONE
Principles of pharmacology
1. Introduction 2
Barbara Gladson
SECTION TWO
Autonomic and Cardiovascular Pharmacology
5. Drugs Acting on the Autonomic Nervous System 48
Barbara Gladson
6. Antihypertensive Agents 66
Barbara Gladson
8. Drug Therapy for Congestive Heart Failure and Cardiac Arrhythmias 109
Barbara Gladson
9. Drug Therapy for Pulmonary Disorders 125
Barbara Gladson
ix
x CONTENTS
SECTION THREE
Pain Control
10. Anesthetic Agents 142
Barbara Gladson
SECTION FOUR
Endocrine Pharmacology
13. Selective Topics in Endocrine Pharmacology 191
Barbara Gladson
SECTION FIVE
Neurologic Pharmacology
15. Drugs for Epilepsy and Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder 249
Barbara Gladson
SECTION SIX
Anti-Infective and Anti-Cancer Agents
20. Antimicrobial Agents 334
Wolfgang Vogel
21. Antiviral Agents and Selected Drugs for Fungal Infections 353
Barbara Gladson and Wolfgang Vogel
SECTION SEVEN
Special Topics in Pharmacology
23. Drugs for Gastrointestinal Disorders 412
Barbara Gladson
27. Drugs of Abuse: Anabolic Steroids and Other Doping Agents 478
Wolfgang Vogel
1
CHAPTER
1
Introduction
Barbara Gladson
WHAT IS PHARMACOLOGY?
Pharmacogenomics examines how our genetic makeup
Pharmacology is defined as the study of how chemical produces unexpected and peculiar reactions to drugs and
substances affect living tissue, and it includes the moni- helps direct therapeutics according to a person’s geno-
toring of how these agents bind to receptors to enhance type.5,6 The science of pharmacogenomics has its roots
or inhibit normal function.1,2 The study of pharmacol- as far back as 1948 when it was descovered that some
ogy may be divided into two main areas: pharmaco- patients suffered fatal reactions to the local anesthetic
therapeutics (also known as medical pharmacology) and drug procaine. It was later discovered that these indi-
toxicology. Pharmacotherapeutics is the use of chemical viduals had a genetic alteration that produced a low af-
agents to prevent, diagnose, and cure disease, whereas finity between the drug and its metabolizing enzyme. We
toxicology is the study of the negative effects of chemi- now know that there are many variations in both gene
cals on living things, including cells, plants, animals, and sequence and expression that alter responses to drugs
humans. Pharmacology is separate from pharmacy, and that these variabilities appear more common in cer-
which refers to the mixing and dispensing of drugs, as tain races and ethnicities. It has been accepted that ge-
well as to clinical functions, including monitoring drug netic variations exist in drug receptors, ion channels, and
prescriptions for appropriateness and monitoring pa- other drug targets. And, in fact, genetic tests are avail-
tients for adverse drug interactions.3 able that help identify if a patient will respond to certain
Pharmacotherapeutics may be further divided into medications or not.7 Tests can help determine whether a
two domains: pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. woman with breast cancer would respond to either of
When we think of the word kinetics, we think of mathe- the breast cancer drugs tamoxifen and trastuzumab
matical formulas and rates. When the word kinetics is (Herceptin) and if a patient with a coagulation disorder
applied to pharmacology, it refers to the study of how would receive adequate anticoagulation from the drug
fast and how much of a drug is absorbed into the body, warfarin. From a clinical perspective, genetics is why
how it is distributed to the various organs, and how it is Asians and Hispanics diagnosed with schizophrenia
ultimately metabolized and excreted by the body. Com- have significantly higher serum drug levels than white
puting the concentration of drug absorbed or excreted is individuals, which results in a greater incidence of extra-
part of a pharmacokinetic study. pyramidal symptoms, and why angiotensin-converting
Pharmacodynamics describes what the drug does to enzymes are less effective in blacks than in whites.8 The
the body and its beneficial or adverse effects at the cel- recognition of these genetic polymorphisms has led to
lular or organ level. Pharmacodynamic studies identify the development and marketing of pharmacodiagnostic
the mechanism of action and compare effects of different tests to help determine which drug to choose for an in-
drugs for potency and efficacy. Pharmacodynamic prin- dividual patient.9
ciples are often presented in a graphic form called a Pharmacoepidemiology is concerned with the effec-
dose-response curve.2 This curve demonstrates the effect tiveness of a drug in large populations compared with
of increasing drug doses on a particular response (see that in individuals.10 This discipline utilizes all the tools
Figures 2-10 and 2-11). The dose-response curve helps for studying epidemics and chronic diseases to evaluate
explain the nature of the drug-receptor interaction and the use and effectiveness of medicines. Particular empha-
is useful for comparing drugs in similar categories for sis is placed on determining the frequency of adverse
strength and effectiveness (see Chapter 2). drug reactions by adopting a systematic approach after
Although this schema for describing the basis of phar- spontaneous postmarketing reporting. The true value of
macology is simple and easily understood, it should, in pharmacoepidemiology is that it provides information
fact, be expanded to include not only the traditional about drug effectiveness and safety.
areas of pharmacology driven by a systems approach but Pharmacoeconomics is the area of pharmacology that
also some new specialty areas such as pharmacogenom- quantifies in dollar amounts the cost versus benefit of
ics, pharmacoepidemiology, and pharmacoeconomics.4 therapeutics.11 Pharmacoeconomic studies have been
2 Copyright © 2011, Elsevier Inc.
CHAPTER 1 Introduction 3
balancing the need of the pharmaceutical companies to The chemists recruited have knowledge of the structure
show a profit with the need of patients to have easy ac- of the insulin receptor and develop chemical compounds
cess to safe medications, especially nonprofitable drugs that bind to the receptor. These compounds are then
or “orphan drugs” (drugs for rare diseases). The regula- passed along to the pharmacologist for drug screening. A
tory process is designed to ensure drug safety and variety of biological assays are used to test the com-
efficacy by a detailed review of all research studies, both pounds at the molecular and cellular levels as well as at
preclinical and clinical, to scrutinize product labeling to the organ and animal levels. The tissues selected for test-
prevent fraud and to make sure directions are accurate ing are those influenced by insulin, and the animals cho-
and easily understood by patients, and to ensure quality sen for testing are those that have insulin receptors simi-
in the manufacturing process.22 In the United States, the lar to those of humans. An evaluation of cardiovascular
FDA is charged with this responsibility, but in Europe and renal functions are performed on healthy animals for
and the rest of the world, there are both centralized and safety. Specifically, acute and chronic toxicity tests are
decentralized procedural methods for drug approval. In performed; as well, the drug’s effect on reproduction and
the European Union, the European Medicines Evalua- its mutagenic and carcinogenic potentials are evaluated.
tion Agency (EMEA), has replaced the previously indi- Efficacy testing is conducted on animals bred to become
vidual country approval process.23 Individual countries diabetic. Additional testing on the respiratory, gastroin-
still have the authority to grant national licenses, but testinal, reproductive, and central nervous systems is
there is a significant “harmonization of practice” at the performed. These experiments constitute the preclinical
global level. Harmonization of regulations was more testing phase, usually lasting 2 to 6 years.26 At the end of
formally accepted in 1990 with the establishment of the this phase, representatives from Drug Company X take
International Conference on Harmonisation of Techni- the data on their lead compound to the FDA and seek
cal Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals approval to begin testing the oral insulin in humans. If
for Human Use (ICH).24 The ICH is a group of pharma- the compound is believed to be safe for humans, a Notice
ceutical regulators and companies from Europe, the of Claimed Investigational Exemption for a New Drug
United States, and Japan that produce guidance docu- (IND) is filed with the FDA. Human testing begins once
ments addressing how clinical trial data obtained in one the FDA approves the investigational new drug (IND)
country might be used to support the regulatory applica- and consists of four phases as described below.
tion in another country so that trials need not be dupli- Phase 1 is the safety assessment study. In this study,
cated. There are, however, exceptions to harmonization. the oral insulin is given to a small number of healthy
The Japanese Pharmaceutical Affairs Bureau requires volunteers (about 25 to 50), and a safety profile is estab-
most prescription drugs to be first studied in Japan prior lished.27 These studies are conducted to identify any toxic
to regulatory approval. The reason for this tighter con- effects and to begin to establish a safe dosage range.
trol is due to differences in the metabolism and body size Pharmacokinetic studies are also performed. If the drug
of Japanese individuals compared with those of individ- is thought to have significant toxic effects, testing will be
uals who originate from the United States or Europe. conducted on volunteer patients with the disease being
Although some centralized control over drug regula- targeted instead of on healthy control subjects. This is
tion is exercised, individual countries have their own often the case for AIDS drugs or drugs designed for resis-
rules regarding possession and prescription of drugs, and tant types of cancers. This phase lasts up to 2 years.
these rules vary greatly. In some countries, patients can Phase 2 is the drug effectiveness study.27 In this phase,
obtain drugs without a prescription, whereas in others a small number of patients (approximately 200) who
purchase of drugs by individuals is tightly controlled. In have the targeted disease receive the new drug. The study
addition, vitamins, dietary supplements, and herbal rem- design is usually single-blinded, and the new drug is
edies are not regulated as drugs in the United States and compared with a placebo (a nonactive compound) or
many other countries, so manufacturers of these items with an older active agent with known safety and
do not have to abide by the strict regulations for safety, efficacy. Therefore a phase 2 study using the above ex-
purity, and efficacy governing prescription drugs.25 ample would compare glucose levels in patients admin-
stered the gold standard, that is, injectable insulin, with
those in patients taking the experimental version. The
Drug Development questions that would be addressed by this study include:
The first step in the drug development process is the de- Is the experimental drug safe for patients with diabetes,
termination of a target market by the drug company. For and is it more effective than the injectable form of the
example, let us say that Drug Company X decides that drug in lowering blood glucose levels? This phase may
there is a need for an oral form of insulin. Insulin is com- last for another 1 to 2 years but the duration can vary,
monly delivered by means of a subcutaneous injection, a depending on the specific endpoint being studied. In our
form of drug delivery that is less desirable to patients. example, lowered blood glucose level is the endpoint,
First, the drug company enlists some chemists to perform but the study might track the time to development of
research on and provide support to the new proposal. cardiovascular complications or other secondary sequela
CHAPTER 1 Introduction 5
of the disease, such as retinal damage, which would ex- drug prescription should be viewed as a therapeutic ex-
tend the length of the study. periment and that we are all subjects in drug studies.
Phase 3 is a much larger study, including many more The time it takes to bring a drug to market is long, as
subjects with diabetes than in the previous phase just the clinical phases (phases 1 to 3) take, on average,
(5000 to 10,000 subjects or more).28 In addition, the 8.6 years and the entire process may take between
duration of the study is usually extended, perhaps up to 10 and 15 years in the United States.30,31 In 2001, the
as long as 3 to 6 years. Investigators and study sites for total cost from molecule to marketing was estimated to
these trials are chosen from all over the world. Safety and be $802 million, and there is no evidence that this cost
effectiveness are again studied but on a much larger scale. has been reduced.30 It is a labor-intensive process that
Phase 3 trials tend to be double-blinded randomized con- does not always lead to success. One of the major bottle-
trolled trials (RCTs) that are either parallel or crossover necks in the process is subject recruitment. Trials are
in design. Parallel designs test at least two therapies at the often delayed or abandoned due to poor enrollment of
same time, but each patient group is assigned only one subjects. Eighty-six percent of studies conducted in the
drug. In studies with crossover designs, patients act as United States do not recruit the required number of sub-
their own control subjects by receiving therapies in se- jects in a timely manner.32 In addition, the United States
quence. Some patients may receive Drug A first and then ranks behind Asia, Western Europe, Eastern Europe, and
Drug B, and other patients may receive Drug B first and South America in the number of subjects recruited into
then Drug A. Phase 3 studies tend to be performed in trials per month.33 Between 2003 and 2006, the average
larger tertiary care centers by experts in the targeted dis- trial time increased by 74%, compared with data col-
ease. Again, in our example of oral insulin, test sites lected between 1999 and 2003.34 This delay has led to a
would be set up around the country and in Europe and growing number of trials being conducted abroad.35
Japan, preferably at centers for the study of diabetes. Due to the tremendous costs and time involved in
These centers receive funding from the pharmaceutical drug discovery, pharmaceutical companies maintain
company to recruit and pay subjects, set up data collec- some exclusivity on their products through patents. Pat-
tion systems, and obtain any other supplies or equipment ents are filed usually around the end of the preclinical
needed to support the research. Clinical researchers from studies and are in place for 20 years.28 However, since
the drug company will closely monitor all the data to the clinical phases take time, the patent owner has only
make sure that the oral insulin is effective and safe a limited amount of time to market the drug before the
throughout phase 3. generic forms begin to appear in pharmacies. The drug
If phase 3 studies are successful, the drug company companies therefore fight hard to extend their patents by
files a New Drug Application (NDA) with the FDA.28 As coming up with new uses for their drugs to balance out
part of this application, the company submits all pre- the lengthy review process and the cost of failed
clinical and clinical data on the oral insulin. The FDA compounds.
then reviews the materials, and if the drug seems to be When the patent expires, any company may produce
effective and without significant adverse effects, the FDA and sell the drug as a generic without having to pay any
gives permission to the company to market the oral fees to the original company, but the licensed trade name
insulin to the public. given to the drug remains the property of the original
Phase 4 begins when the drug is approved for public drug maker. In the case of a lengthy FDA review process,
use. It is called the postmarketing surveillance phase and the patent may be extended for up to 5 years.
is a much larger study than any previously performed.29 Although the FDA approves drugs for specific indica-
This phase constitutes monitoring the drug for safety in tions, which then become listed on the package insert, it
large numbers of patients under real-life conditions. Dur- does not limit the use of drugs to these described condi-
ing this phase, members of the public who have diabetes tions. Physicians have the final say on how a drug may
become study subjects without their knowledge. If many be used. Prescribing a drug for off-label or unapproved
adverse drug reactions are discovered during this phase, uses is common and legally permitted.
and if they present significant health risks, the drug may
be recalled. Technically, phase 4 has infinite duration
Orphan Drugs and Treatment
because the drug company will continue monitoring for
Investigational New Drugs
any problems throughout the marketing process. How-
ever, even though the drug has been released for public Because drug development is an extremely expensive and
consumption after phase 3, it is prudent to wait until it lengthy process, drugs for rare diseases, the so-called
has been on the market for at least 2 years before using “orphan drugs,” tend not to be researched or marketed
it. It is responsible health care to prescribe an older drug by drug companies. Therefore, in 1983, the Orphan Drug
with a proven track record first and then to switch to a Act was passed to provide research grants for the study of
newer drug after all the adverse drug reactions (ADRs) diseases affecting fewer than 200,000 patients in the
have been identified. This process underscores the atti- United States.19 This Act provides special financial incen-
tude among many health care professionals that every tives to companies to help offset their development costs.
6 CHAPTER 1 Introduction
However, lack of profit is not the only reason that orphan incomplete understanding of pathophysiology, we can
drugs are rarely studied. These drugs present some hope that in the future further study in this area will lead
scientific dilemmas because it is difficult to establish safety to more effective drugs.
and effectiveness in small numbers of patients. In addi- Another problem with the drug discovery process, in
tion, many rare diseases occur in children, and investiga- the case of many diseases, is the lack of animal models
tors prefer not to include children in early clinical trials. for drug screening.37 Even though there are animals that
The FDA has also provided guidelines to streamline can grow specific tumors, animals that are bred to have
the development of certain drugs for life-threatening diabetes, and even animal models for epilepsy, animal
conditions such as AIDS and certain cancers.36 These models are lacking for many other illnesses. Again, men-
drugs receive Treatment Investigational New Drugs tal illness is a good example because no animal model
(IND) status, allowing them special priority throughout exists for the testing of different compounds.
the review procedure. This status also allows patients Reluctance to include women and children in clinical
outside the ongoing studies to be treated with investiga- trials, largely because of differences in pharmacokinetics
tional drugs. Treatment IND status is issued for a drug and pharmacodynamics in these populations, represents
designed to treat serious life-threatening illnesses when another impediment to clinical trials. One solution to
no other acceptable alternative is available in the mar- this has been the establishment of the Office of Women’s
ket. The drug must already be involved in a clinical trial, Health within the FDA in 1994.40 This office has pro-
and the pharmaceutical company must show that it is moted the development and approval of drugs for dis-
proceeding with the normal steps involved in the drug eases affecting women. In addition, this office is dedi-
approval process. If a physician wants to prescribe a cated to identifying how drugs affect women because
drug that is in clinical study but lacks the treatment IND traditionally most clinical trials have been conducted
status, the drug may still be obtained for a patient under only on men. Governmental groups have attempted to
a “compassionate use” clause. provide incentives to the pharmaceutical industry to in-
clude more minorities and women into clinical trials.
The National Institutes of Health (NIH) Revitalization
Barriers to Drug Development Act of 1993 (Public Law 103-43) requires that all studies
Many barriers to development of new drugs exist, par- funded by the NIH include representations of women
ticularly for diseases that progress over time, such as and minority groups.41 However, despite this legislation,
multiple sclerosis and Parkinson’s disease. Foremost several populations remain under-represented in clinical
among the barriers, of course, is the issue of funding. This trials.42-45 Minorities and women are still less likely to
barrier affects studies of rare diseases much more than enroll in studies compared with white males, particularly
studies of the more common diseases; but the discovery of in cancer and HIV clinical trials. In the future, the U.S.
new drugs even for common illnesses is risky and quite House of Representatives is expected to consider legisla-
expensive. Drug researchers suggest that charity organiza- tion that would extend patent rights to companies that
tions and government support programs continue to be run clinical trials that are ethically and racially focused.46
emphasized as funding sources.37 Additional barriers include the lack of experienced prin-
Another barrier to development is the fact that many cipal investigators, and lack of coordinated data collec-
diseases lack specific markers of identification or there is tion systems, greater protocol complexity.47,48
lack of consensus regarding clinical trial endpoints, which Drug development is a labor-intensive, expensive,
makes it difficult to document treatment progress. Ex- risky, and time-consuming process. Although this proc-
amples include Alzheimer’s disease and some mental ill- ess is widely accepted and adhered to, there is growing
nesses such as bipolar disorder and schizophrenia. Mental discussion regarding alternative methods to prove drug
illness tends to be a multifactorial condition demonstrat- safety and efficacy.49 Improved postmarketing surveil-
ing impairments in language, memory, motor planning, lance, which involves a coordinated data collection sys-
and cognitive domains.38 Functional testing in all these tem from around the world, has been suggested to detect
areas is necessary to prove that a medication is effective. unanticipated events, both positive and negative, that
Even when markers have been identified, researchers in could lead to greater accuracy in identifying treatment
the field do not always agree on the level of significance options.50,51 The use of meta-analyses for analyzing
that these markers provide in terms of documenting im- many trials simultaneously has also been suggested as a
provement. For example, manufacturers of arthritis drugs way of improving therapy. In some cases, a meta-analy-
may claim that their drugs are effective by showing a re- sis of multiple small trials can be used to identify a drug
duction in the signs and symptoms of rheumatoid arthritis effect not previously recognized by individual trials.
(e.g., redness, swollen joints), but others may insist that Pharmacoeconomics, which consists of studies that deter-
effectiveness claims be based on a slowing of disease pro- mine the cost/benefit ratio of drugs, is likely to become a
gression as determined by radiography.39 Because the growing field as research dollars continue to shrink.
lack of a specific drug target or marker is a result of our Pharmacoeconomic studies examine overall outcome in
CHAPTER 1 Introduction 7
clinical practice and are used to inform changes in prac- 6. The Signa or Sig, which gives directions to the pa-
tice. These suggestions are not likely to become standard tient, including how often to take the drug, how
operating procedures in the drug delivery process yet, much drug to take, and additional instructions such
but the FDA has instituted a number of changes that will as “shake well” or “take with food.” Signa is Latin
ultimately benefit patients. Approvals of drugs via the for “label.” The patient instructions are usually writ-
“fast-track” and greater inclusion of women in clinical ten with Latin abbreviations.
trials represent two recent changes in the drug discovery 7. Refill information.
process. In addition, the FDA has begun using outside 8. Prescriber’s signature.
help, groups of clinical specialists in a variety of fields, 9. Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) number,
in evaluating studies to hasten the review process. Fur- which is required for controlled substances, as well as
ther changes focused on streamlining the process and for insurance claims processing.
improving data collection are expected as time goes on. In the past, many adverse drug events have occurred
due to prescribing errors. Quickly scribbled prescriptions
that omit important information are illegible or contain
ELEMENTS OF A PRESCRIPTION the wrong dose or dose units and can be disastrous. A
The prescription is an order written by a licensed practitio- misplaced decimal point is not uncommon and can lead to
ner (e.g., physician, dentist, veterinarian, or podiatrist, a 10-fold difference in dose, which is why, for example,
and, in some states, the physician assistant and nurse “.1 mg” should always be preceded by a zero, “0.1 mg”.
practitioner) to instruct the pharmacist to provide a specific Another recommendation is to avoid using the abbrevi-
medication needed by a patient. The elements contained in ated form of micrograms, “g” since this can be read as
the prescription include the following52 (Figure 1–1): “mg” which would produce a 1000-fold error. U for Units
1. The prescribing physician’s name, credentials, address, should also not be used since it may be mistaken as a zero,
and telephone number. and QD, QOD, and qd can all be mistaken for one an-
2. The date the prescription was written and the other, so these instructions should be written out as
patient’s full name and address. “daily” and “every other day.” Box 1–1 lists acceptable
3. Rx, called the superscription, which tells how the abbreviations.
drug is to be administered to the patient (e.g., orally
or by injection). Rx is an abbreviation of the Latin
CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES
word for “recipe” and “receive thou.”
4. Inscription, which includes the drug name (either Controlled substances are drugs classified according to
brand or generic), dose, and quantity to dispense. their potential for abuse. They are regulated under the
5. Subscription, which gives directions to the pharma- Controlled Substances Act (CSA), which classifies these
cist regarding the mixing instructions (compound- compounds into schedules (levels) from I to V.52 This
ing), IF NEEDED. law, which was enacted in 1971, also makes provisions
for research into drug abuse and treatment programs for
dependency. This Act, along with assistance from the
Don Dose, MD DEA, controls the manufacture, distribution, and dis-
65 South Lake Drive
Capsule, Ca 07008 pensing of drugs that have the potential to be abused.
(282) 233-2748
FOR: DATE:
ADDRESS:
Schedule I
Rx Schedule I drugs are available only for research. They
Drug Name, Strength (Metric Units), have the highest abuse potential, leading to dependence
& Quantity without any acceptable medical indication. Some exam-
ples include heroin, LSD (lysergic acid diethylamide),
and mescaline. Special approval is necessary before any
SIG: (how drug is taken, e.g. at meals or 2 tab BID)
of these agents can be used.
REFILL______
OR
UNTIL_______ Schedule II
Schedule II drugs also have a high abuse potential with
Warning: ,MD
the likelihood of physical and psychological dependence,
but unlike schedule I drugs, they have accepted medical
DEA#
State License # uses. Drugs classified at this level include stimulants such
as amphetamines; opioids, including morphine, fentanyl,
FIGURE 1-1 Sample drug prescription. and oxycodone; and some barbiturates. Automatic refills
8 CHAPTER 1 Introduction
listed in the official drug compendia, The United States enzyme inhibitors. The last method for categorizing
Pharmacopeia, and stays with the compound, no matter drugs is a classification based on either the chemical
how many trade names it accumulates. The generic names makeup or the source for the drug. Plant material pro-
are also the only names recognized for use in scientific jour- vides a good natural source for many compounds. Atro-
nals, although these names, too, can vary from one country pine is named after the plant species Atropa. Penicillin is
to another; for example, acetaminophen in the United part of a group of compounds described as -lactam
States is known as paracetamol in the United Kingdom. antibiotics because they contain a -lactam ring, a four-
The trade name or brand name is the name given to the member nitrogen-containing carbon structure.
drug by the pharmaceutical company and is copyrighted The system that is currently in place for classifying
to that company. In recent years, there has been a push for and naming drugs is imprecise, confusing, and implies
trendy names that the public will recognize. An example that all drugs within the same classification group act in
is the drug Singulair. Singulair, taken from the word a similar manner.56 In light of the potential for mistakes
“single,” is supposed to remind the public that it has when trade or proprietary names are used and the inac-
once-a-day dosing and is thus a more desirable drug than curacies implied in using functional categories for nam-
one that must be administered several times a day. These ing, there is a push toward using the official or generic
names, although they are helpful in steering the public names of drugs when speaking to patients and health
toward a particular drug, actually add more confusion to care professionals or when writing prescriptions. How-
the system of naming and increase the possibility that ever, pharmaceutical companies continue to market their
someone might make a mistake when writing a prescrip- drugs with trendy trade names.
tion. Once a patent expires, other pharmaceutical compa-
nies have a right to market the drug and assign their own
ACTIVITIES 1
trade names. Because there may be several trade names
given to one generic drug, use of trade names should be 1. This chapter has reviewed the phases of clinical drug
avoided while writing prescriptions. development. Outline some elements that must be
taken into consideration to ensure that this is an
ethical process.
Drug Classification 2. Discuss the key questions that should be answered
Drugs are often classified into specific categories. These concerning a drug during the development process.
categories do not represent a universally accepted sys- 3. Look-alike/sound-alike drugs are responsible for
tem, and one drug may be placed into a variety of differ- many medication errors.
ent classes.55 The classes do, however, provide a useful A. Name a few sound-alike drugs, and give their
framework for studying pharmacology. Drugs may be indications.
classified according to the body system being treated, for B. Discuss some strategies that can be used to reduce
example, cardiovascular drugs, pulmonary drugs, and look-alike and sound-alike medication errors.
gastrointestinal drugs. Drugs may also be classified ac- 4. Describe the following drugs using the pharmaco-
cording to their pharmacotherapeutic actions, or the therapeutic, pharmacologic, and molecular categories
overall pharmacologic actions of the drugs on specific of drug naming:
disease processes. Examples of drugs classified in this Propranolol
manner are antidepressants and antihypertensives. A Prazosin
mistake that is often made when medicines are delin- Captopril
eated in this manner is the assumption that all the drugs Losartan
classified under the same heading act in the same man- Nifedipine
ner. However, this is not always true. Diuretics and cal- Hydrochlorothiazide
cium channel blockers are both antihypertensives, but
they have very different mechanisms of action.
Drugs may also be categorized according to their
REFERENCES
pharmacological actions, for example, arterial vasodila- 1. Katzung BG: Introduction. In Katzung BG, editor: Basic &
tors. Some of these drugs act directly on smooth muscle clinical pharmacology, New York, 2007, McGraw-Hill.
and others act by blocking specific receptors. The result 2. Sutter MC, Walker MJ: Introduction. In Page CP et al, editors:
Integrated Pharmacology, Philadelphia, 2006, Mosby.
is the same (dilation of the arterioles), but their mecha- 3. Carmichael JM, O’Connell MB, Devine B, et al: Collaborative
nisms of action are different. A fourth way in which drug therapy management by pharmacists. Pharmacotherapy,
drugs may be classified is according to their molecular 17(5):1050–1061, 1997.
actions. Molecular action is described by identifying the 4. Rang HP Dale MM, Ritter, JM: What is pharmacology? In
molecular target of the drug. These targets consist of Rang HP Dale MM, Ritter, JM, editors: Pharmacology, New
York, 2007, Churchill Livingstone.
receptors for hormones, enzymes, ion channels, and cell 5. Kalow W: Historical Aspects of Pharmacogenetics. In Kalow
membrane transporters. Examples include calcium chan- W, Meyer UA, Tyndale RF, editors: Pharmacogenomics, Boca
nel blockers, beta blockers, and angiotensin-converting Raton, Fl, 2005, Taylor & Francis.
10 CHAPTER 1 Introduction
6. Fargher EA, Eddy C, Newman W, Qasim F, et al: Patients’ and 28. Rang HP, Dale MM, Ritter JM: Drug discovery and develop-
healthcare professionals’ views on pharmacogenetic testing ment. In Rang HP, Dale MM, Ritter JM: Rand & Dale’s
and its future delivery in the NHS. Pharmacogenomics, 8(11): pharmacology, New York, 2007, Churchill Livingstone.
1511–1519, 2007. 29. Fontanarosa PB, Rennie D, DeAngelis C: Postmarketing
7. Pollack A: Patient’s DNA may be signal to tailor medication, surveillance—Lack of vigilance, lack of trust. JAMA, 2004,
New York, 2008, The New York Times. 292(1): 2647–2650.
8. Tate SK, Goldsstein DB:Will tomorrow’s medicines work for 30. Kaitin KI et al: Tufts CSDD Outlook 2009. 2009, Tufts
everyone? Nat Genet, 36(11): S34–S41, 2004. Center for the Study of Drug Development.
9. Jorgensen JT: From blockbuster medicine to personalized 31. Christel MD: Patient recruitment. In R & D Directions, 2008,
medicine. Personalized Med, 5(1): 55–63, 2008. PharmaLive, pp 1–13.
10. Strom BL: What is pharmacoepidemiology? In Strom BL, 32. Getz KA, Wenger J, Campo RA, et al: Assessing the impact
Kimmel SE, editors: Textbook of pharmacoepidemiology, of protocol design changes on clinical trial performance.
Hoboken, NJ, 2006, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Am J Ther, 15(5): 450–457, 2008.
11. Hennessy S: Basic principles of clinical pharmacology relevant 33. Getz K: Overview of the global clinical trial landscape. In
to pharmacoepidemiology studies. In Strom BL, Kimmel SE, Global R & D Congress. Philadelphia, 2007, Cambridge
editors: Textbook of pharmacoepidemiology, Hoboken, NJ, Healthtech Institute.
2006, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. 34. Getz K: First things first. In Focus On, 2008, Informa UK Ltd.
12. Koivisto VA, Felig P: Effects of leg exercise on insulin III-IV.
absorption in diabetic patients. N Engl J Med, 298(2):79–83, 35. Glickman SW, McHutchison JG, Peterson ED, et al: Ethical
1978. and scientific implications of the globalization of clinical
13. Linde B: Dissociation of insulin absorption and blood flow research. N Engl J Med, 360(8): 816–823, 2009.
during massage of a subcutaneous injection site. Diabetes 36. Expanded access and expedited approval of new therapies
Care, 9(6): 570–574, 1986. related to HIV/AIDS (website). www.fda.gov/oashi/aids/
14. Allen GJ, Hartl TL, Duffany S, Smith SF, et al: Cognitive and expanded.html. Accessed May 6, 2009.
motor function after administration of hydrocodone bitartrate 37. Fillit HM, O’Connell AW, Brown WM, et al: Barriers to drug
plus ibuprofen, ibuprofen alone, or placebo in healthy subjects discovery and development for Alzheimer disease. Alzheimer
with exercise-induced muscle damage: A randomized, repeated- Dis Assoc Disord, 16(Supplement 1): S1–S8, 2002.
dose, placebo-controlled study. Psychopharmacology, 166(3): 38. Carpenter WT, Koenig JI: The evolution of drug dvelopment
228–233, 2003. in schizophrenia: Past issues and future opportunities. Neuro-
15. Bower EA, Moore JL, Moss M, et al: The effects of single-dose psychopharmacology, 33: 2061–2079, 2008.
frexofenadine, diphenhydramine, and placebo on cognitive 39. Witter J: Drug development in rheumatoid arthritis. Curr
performance in flight personnel. Aviat Space Environ Med, Opin Rheumatol,14: 276–280, 2002.
74(2): 145–152, 2003. 40. Sheppard A: US Food and Drug Office of Women’s Health:
16. Nagasawa Y, Komori S, Sato M, et al: Effects of hot bath Update. J Am Med Womens Assoc, 54(2): 97–98, 1999.
immersion on autonomic activity and hemodynamics— 41. Freedman LS, et al: Inclusion of women and minorities in
Comparison of the elderly patient and the healthy young. clinical trials and the NIH Revitalization Act of 1993—The
Jpn Circ J, 65: 587–592, 2001. perspective of NIH clinical trialists. Control Clin Trials, 16(5):
17. Allison TG, Maresh CM, Armstrong LE: Cardiovascular 277–285, 1995.
responses in a whirlpool bath at 40 degrees C versus user- 42. Murthy VH, Krumholz HM, Gross CP: Participation in
controlled water temperatures. Mayo Clin Proc, 73(3): cancer clinical trials. JAMA, 291(22): 2720–2727, 2004.
210–215, 1998. 43. Stewart JH, Bertoni AG, Staten JL, Levine EA, Gross CP:
18. Moore T, Cohen MR, Furberg C: Serious adverse drug events Participation in surgical oncology clinical trials: Gender, race/
reported to the Food and Drug Administration, 1998–2005. ethnicity, and age-based disparities. Ann Surg Oncol, 14(12):
Arch Int Med, 167(16): 1752–1759, 2007. 3328–3334, 2007.
19. Food and Drug Administration: History of the FDA (website). 44. Mouton CP, Harris S, Rovi S, Solorzano P, Johnson MS:
www.fda.gov/oc/history/default.htm. Accessed May 5, 2009. Barriers to black women’s participation in cancer clinical tri-
20. Making appropriations for Agriculture, Rural Development, als. J Natl Med Assoc, 89(11): 721–727, 1997.
Food and Drug Administration, and Related Agencies pro- 45. Gifford AL, Cunningham WE, Heslin KC, et al: Participation
grams for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1997, and for in research and access to experimental treatments by HIV-
other purposes, In H.R.3603, 1996. infected patients. N Engl J Med, 346(18): 1373–1382,
21. Gray J: Senate backs bill to require data on drugs for consum- 2002.
ers, New York, 1996, The New York Times, p. 19. 46. Getz K, Faden L: Racial disparities among clinical research
22. Lal R, Kremzner M: Introduction to the new prescription drug investigators. Am J Ther,15: 3–11, 2008.
labeling by the Food and Drug Administration. Am J Health- 47. Sung NS, Crowley WF Jr, Genel M, et al: Central challenges
Syst Pharm, 64(23): 2488–2494, 2007. facing the nation clinical research enterprise. JAMA, 289(10):
23. European Medicines Agency (website). www.emea.europa.eu/ 1278–1287, 2003.
htms/aboutus/emeaoverview.htm. Accessed May 5, 2009. 48. Getz K: First things first, 2008, Informa UK Ltd. 3–4.
24. International Conference on Harmonisation (website). www. 49. Carpenter WT: From clinical trial to prescription. Arch Gen
ich.org/cache/compo/276-254-1.html. Accessed May 6, 2009. Psychiatry, 59: 282–285, 2002.
25. Barrett S: How the Dietary Supplement Health and Education 50. Czarnecki A, Voss S: Safety signals using proportional report-
Act of 1994 weakened the FDA, June 8, 2000 (website). www. ing ratios from company and regulatory authority databases.
quackwatch.org. Accessed May 6, 2009. Drug Inform J, 42(3): 205–209, 2008.
26. Berkowitz BA, Katzung BG: Development & regulation of 51. Oliva A et al: Bioinformatics modernization and the critical
drugs. In Katzung BG, editor: Basic & clinical pharmacology, path to improved benefit-risk assessment of drugs. Drug
New York, 2007, McGraw-Hill. Inform J, 42(3): 273–279, 2008.
27. Machin D: General issues. In Machin D, Day S, Green S, 52. Lofholm PW, Katzung BG: Rational prescribing and prescrip-
editors: Textbook of clinical trials, Hoboken, NJ, 2004, tion writing. In Katzung BG, editor: Basic and clinical phar-
John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. macology, New York, 2007, McGraw Hill.
CHAPTER 1 Introduction 11
53. Roach SS, Ford SM: General principles of pharmacology. 55. Berman A: Reducing medication errors through naming,
In Introductory clinical pharmacology, Philadelphia, 2008, labeling, and packaging. J Med Syst, 28(1): 9–29, 2004.
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. 56. Santell JP, Cousins DD: Medication errors related to product
54. Kwo EC, Kamat P, Steinman MA: Physician use of brand names. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf, 31(11): 649–654,
versus generic drug names in 1993–1994 and 2003–2004. 2005.
Ann Pharmacother, 43(3): 459–468, 2009.
CHAPTER
2
Pharmacodynamics:
Mechanism of Action
Barbara Gladson
Pore
ACh ACh
Exterior
Membrane ACh
Cytosol ACh
Ions Ions
R R E R/E
or or
Nucleus
Hyperpolarization R
Change Second messengers Protein
or
in excitability phosphorylation
depolarization Gene
transcription
Gene transcription
Ca2+ Protein Other
release phosphorylation
Protein synthesis Protein synthesis
Time scale
Milliseconds Seconds Hours Hours
Examples
Nicotinic Muscarinic Cytokine Estrogen
ACh receptor ACh receptor receptors receptor
of receptors. These concepts of specificity and selectivity antagonist is strictly defined as a ligand that binds to the
are important because the more specific and selective a receptor but does not cause the usual conformational
drug is, the more targeted the therapeutic approach can change in the receptor. It simply blocks the channel, thus
be. In addition, selective drugs tend to have fewer adverse preventing the flow of ions into or out of the cell.
effects than do nonselective drugs. Antagonists may be divided into two categories: com-
petitive antagonist and noncompetitive antagonist.27 The
competitive antagonist binds at the same site as the ago-
Agonists and Antagonists nist, but it can be displaced by the agonist as its concen-
The strength of binding of a drug to a receptor can be tration increases. Thus it is also known as a reversible
illustrated both quantitatively and qualitatively. In drug antagonist. A noncompetitive antagonist cannot be re-
binding experiments, a radioactive ligand is used to mea- versed by additional agonist, since it blocks receptors
sure binding affinity. In these experiments, varying con- permanently. A noncompetitive angtagonist also can bind
centrations of the radioactive drug are incubated with the to other locations on the receptor, but its end result is to
tissue containing the receptor of interest. The tissue is diminish or block completely the effect of the agonist.
then removed and analyzed for its radioactivity. A bind- Another drug–receptor interaction can be described
ing curve that shows the relationship between concentra- by the action of a partial agonist. The partial agonist is
tion and the amount of drug bound is then created.26 a drug that might demonstrate both agonist and antago-
If two drugs are incubated with the receptor of interest, nist properties toward a receptor. At low concentrations
they may compete for occupation in the same receptor. In it will trigger a response, but at high concentrations it
this case, each drug will reduce the binding affinity of the will compete with the natural ligand by physically pre-
other drug. The first drug may be called the agonist in venting access of that ligand to its receptor; therefore
that it binds to the receptor and produces a change that only a partial or submaximal response will be attained.
triggers a response. When all the receptors are occupied
by the agonist, a maximum response is seen. When
Dose-Response Curves
a second drug is added, it may compete for receptor
occupation with the first drug by blocking its access to The relationship among agonists, partial agonists, and
the receptor which also blocks the response. In this case, antagonists can be illustrated graphically. When a drug
the second drug is labeled as the antagonist. However, an is administered to a patient, a certain response will
16 CHAPTER 2 Pharmacodynamics: Mechanism of Action
occur. As the target cells become exposed to increasing is, the lower is the concentration needed to produce a
concentrations of the drug, increasing numbers of recep- certain response. When dose–response curves for two
tors become activated, and the magnitude of the drugs are compared, the one with the lower Kd is the
response increases.28 If the dose of the drug is continu- more potent drug (Figure 2–7).
ously increased, the response grows until there is a The log–dose-response curve can also be used to
maximal response. At this point, further increases in display the concepts of competitive and noncompeti-
drug concentration produces no further response. Phar- tive antagonists and partial agonists (Figure 2–8).
macologists demonstrate this “drug receptor theory” Competitive antagonists compete with the agonists for
with a dose-response curve (Figure 2–6). available receptors and make the agonists look less
In the dose-response curve, by convention, the dose potent (shift of the log–dose-response curve to the
is plotted on the x-axis and the response is plotted on right) (see Figure 2–8). Noncompetitive antagonists
the y-axis. These curves resemble rectangular hyper- cannot be displaced from the receptor and will block
bolas. The plateau portion of this curve represents agonist effects permanently, thus reducing the Emax.
the Emax, or the maximum response, that can occur Log–dose-response curves for the partial agonist look
despite infinite concentrations. The Emax is also a similar to those for the noncompetitive antagonist in
measure of drug efficacy or strength of the response. If that the Emax is lowered.
two drugs that occupy the same proportion of recep-
tors are compared, the drug with the higher Emax
represents the one with greater efficacy, that is, greater
Other Forms of Antagonism
maximal response. Full agonists produce a maximal In addition to competitive and noncompetitive antago-
response, but partial agonists produce only a submaxi- nism, there are other ways to diminish or completely
mal response. eliminate a drug’s effect. Chemical antagonism occurs
Because drugs produce responses over a wide range when two substances are mixed together in solution, and
of doses, dose-response curves are usually transformed the result is a diminished effect of one or both agents.1 The
into log–dose-response curves by determining the loga- most common example of this is the use of antacids to
rithm of the dose (see Figure 2–6). The new curve then neutralize acid and increase gastric pH. Another example
approximates a sigmoid curve. The Emax is still obvi- is the use of chelators that form complexes with metal ions
ous on the sigmoid curve, and the linear portion of this and maintain them in an inactive form. Chelation therapy
curve makes it easy to determine other parameters such is used to treat heavy metal poisoning.
as the Kd or the median effective dose (ED50). The Kd Physiologic antagonism refers to the administration
is the dose that produces one half of the expected of two different drugs that have opposite effects. Diuret-
maximum, Emax, or the dose that produces 50% of the ics are drugs that reduce blood pressure by forcing the
expected response. For the purposes of this book, Kd50 excretion of sodium causing a diuresis. Nonsteroidal
and ED50 can be viewed as representing the same anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) reduce pain in in-
concept. flamed joints but also increase sodium reabsorption
The Kd50 and ED50 are measures of potency. Potency through the kidney tubules. Therefore administration of
is a measure of binding affinity. The more potent a drug an NSAID will make a diuretic less effective.29
80 80
% of Maximum Effect
% of Maximum Effect
60 60
40 40
20 20
EC50 EC50
0 0
0 200 400 600 800 1 10 100 1000 10,000
A [Drug] B [Drug]
FIGURE 2-6 Dose-effect curves plotted using a linear (A) or logarithmic (B) scale for drug dose concentration on the x-axis.
CHAPTER 2 Pharmacodynamics: Mechanism of Action 17
DRUG SAFETY
Emax
Response A B Data obtained from studies examining dose-response
relationships may be manipulated to reflect how drugs
1/2 Emax affect populations in terms of efficacy and safety. Pooling
C drug responses across many subjects and evaluating the
final outcomes in terms of effectiveness help determine
Y
how safe a drug is expected to be. Quantal dose-
0
X response curves for effectiveness and for toxic effects are
10 100 1000 10000 used to determine a therapeutic and safety index.
Dose mg/kg (log scale)
FIGURE 2-7 Graded dose-response curves for three drugs differ-
ing in affinity and maximal efficacies. The doses indicated by X and
Quantal Dose-Response Curves
Y represent the dose of drug required to cause 50% of that drug’s Dose-response curves represent graded responses to a
maximal effect. Drug A is about 10 times more potent than Drug B.
Drug A and Drug B have greater efficacies than Drug C. (Redrawn
drug taken by a single subject or by many subjects from
from Flynn EJ: Pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic principles of a single population. A quantal dose-response curve is
pharmacology, J Neurol Phys Ther, 27:94, 2003.) a variation on the dose-response curve that is used to
examine discrete outcomes (patient is either cured or not
cured) instead of a gradation of responses.26 These curves
Another type of antagonism is referred to as pharma- are used to assess outcomes in heterogeneous populations
cokinetic antagonism. This occurs when an agent in- and also help assess the safety of drugs. Typically, two
creases or induces the activity of an enzyme used to curves are established. The first is used to examine the
metabolize another drug. Phenobarbital induces the beneficial effects of the drug and the second to examine
activity of an enzyme involved in the metabolism of the toxic or lethal effects of the drug. An example is a
many drugs including itself.30 Long-term administration drug that is used to treat migraines. Increasing doses of
induces its own metabolism, thus leading to drug toler- the drug are given until all subjects have been cured of
ance (see Chapter 3). their headache (in our example n 100 patients). For
Changes in receptors may also be viewed as another each dose, the number of subjects cured by the drug is
type of drug antagonism.31 Receptors that are directly recorded. Dosing begins at 1 mg/kg which cures only one
coupled to an ion channel can undergo desensitization. subject. Increasing the dose to 2 mg/kg may cure an ad-
This desensitized state is characterized by a change in the ditional 12 subjects. By the time the dose is increased to
shape of the receptor without either opening or closing 3 mg/kg, roughly half the patients are cured. And when
of the channel. This may occur rapidly for ion channels, the dose is increased to as high as 5 mg/kg, all 100 sub-
or more slowly for a G-protein–linked receptor through jects are free of headaches (Figure 2–9). Plotting these
uncoupling with its second messengers. And lastly, an data as a frequency curve yields a bell-shaped curve. This
internalization or loss of receptors may occur following bell-shaped curve can then be replotted as a cumulative
prolonged exposure to an agonist, possibly due to percentage responding (y-axis) versus dose (x-axis). The
“internalization” of the receptor. second curve is determined by repeating the experiment,
100 100
Agonist
80
% of Maximum Effect
Agonist +
% of Maximum Effect
80 Agonist
Competitive
60 Antagonist
60
40 Partial Agonist
Agonist +
40 Non-competitive
20
Antagonist
Antagonist 20
0
0
1 10 100 1000 1 10 100 1000
A [Drug] B [Drug]
FIGURE 2-8 A, Dose-effect curves describing the types of pharmacologic effects produced when a drug interacts with its receptor. An
agonist produces the maximum stimulatory effect, a partial agonist produces less than the maximum stimulator effect, and an antagonist
elicits no effect, but inhibits the effect of an agonist. B, Dose-effect curves for the combination of an agonist and antagonist. A competitive
antagonist reduces the potency of the agonist but not the maximum effect. A noncompetitive agonist reduces the efficacy (maximum effect)
but does not alter the potency of the agonist. (From Atkinson AJ, Abernethy DR, et al: Principles of clinical pharmacology, 2e, Burlington, MA,
Academic Press, 2007.)
18 CHAPTER 2 Pharmacodynamics: Mechanism of Action
14
2 1 1 2
12
Number of Responding
0.0
1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0
Dose (mg/kg)
FIGURE 2-9 A quantal dose-response curve after administering increasing amounts of a drug to 100 subjects.
but this time with greater drug concentrations. The out- patient. Pharmacologists may also determine the toxic
come in this case is an unwanted effect, possibly death dose at 50% (TD50), the dose that produces adverse
(theoretically only). The ED50 is determined for the first effects as opposed to lethal effects in half the population,
curve, but for the curve representing unwanted effects, the so that the doses producing adverse effects are known.
lethal dose that kills 50% of the subjects taking the drug
(LD50) is determined. The bell-shaped curves are trans-
Therapeutic Index
formed into sigmoid curves and then graphed together on
the same x- and y-axes, and the ED50 and LD50 are com- The therapeutic index (TI) describes the distance
pared (Figure 2–10). If the two curves are far apart from between a quantal dose-response curve for a desired ef-
each other, then the drug is considered relatively safe. This fect and a quantal dose-response curve for the undesired
means that a much greater amount of the drug would drug effect.32 It is calculated as the ratio of the LD50
have to be taken to kill the patient than that to help the to the ED50. The greater this value, the less lethal is the
drug. Some drugs have very low TIs (e.g., lithium and
digoxin). Patients taking drugs with low TIs, less than
100
2.5, must be monitored for adverse reactions. Because it
90 is likely that adverse events will occur, instead of some
Therapeutic Toxic
80 observable or toxic event, a “defined target plasma
Cumulative % of Patients
Effect Effect
concentration” is used to determine proper dosing. An
Experiencing Effect
70
additional parameter, called the safety margin, is calcu-
60
lated as the ratio of the LD01 (dose that kills 1% of the
50
subjects) to the ED99 (dose that is effective in 99% of the
40 subjects). The safety margin is a more conservative mea-
30 sure of safety than the TI.
20 These measures of safety have some specific limita-
ED50 ED99 TD1 TD50 tions. First, patient response to medications is highly indi-
10
vidual. The TI does not take into consideration other
0
80 100 200 300 drugs that a patient may be taking that could lead to
Dose a drug-to-drug interaction. Second, it is not always easy
FIGURE 2-10 Cumulative quantal dose-effect curves for a drug’s to determine a measure of effectiveness. Patients and the
therapeutic and toxic effects. The ED50 and the ED99 are the doses medical community may not share the same definition of
required to produce the drug’s therapeutic effect in 50% and 99% what is effective. Patients may want complete cessation of
of the population, respectively. The TD1 and TD50 are the doses that their migraine headaches, whereas physicians may inter-
cause the toxic effect in 1% and 50% of the population respec-
tively. (From Atkinson AJ, Abernethy DR, Daniels CE,editors: Princi- pret the drug as being successful if a patient is able to re-
ples of clinical pharmacology, 2e, Burlington, MA, Academic Press, turn to work even if some discomfort is still present.
2007.) Third, data from toxicity studies come from experiments
CHAPTER 2 Pharmacodynamics: Mechanism of Action 19
with animals, and thus the findings cannot be readily ap- 2. Carmody JJ: Some scientific reflections on possible mechanisms
plied to the human population. Some social and economic of general anaesthesia.(Clinical report), Anaesth Intensive Care,
37(2):175(15), 2009.
factors also diminish the significance of the TI. Patient 3. Gadsby DC: Ion channels versus ion pumps: The principal
compliance issues such as failure to take prescribed medi- difference, in principle, Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol, 10(5):
cations as specified and borrowing or taking friends’ 344–352, 2009.
drugs that are expired or issued at different doses are 4. Swartz KJ: Sensing voltage across lipid membranes. Nature,
factors that may render a drug dangerous but which is 456(7224): 891–897, 2008.
5. Verkman AS, Galietta LJV: Chloride channels as drug targets,
otherwise presumed safe. Nat Rev Drug Discov, 8(2):153–171, 2009.
New methods are now being explored to help quan- 6. Zareba W, Cygankiewicz I: Long QT syndrome and short QT
tify the benefits and risks associated with drug use. One syndrome, Prog Cardiovasc Dis, 51(3):264–278, 2008.
method is called the number-needed-to-treat (NNT). 7. Milligan G, et al: Novel pharmacological applications of
This method calculates the number of patients who must G-protein-coupled receptor—G protein fusions, Curr Opin
Pharmacol, 7(5):521–526, 2007.
be exposed to a drug for one patient to experience the 8. Yeagle PL, Albert AD: G-protein coupled receptor structure.
desired effect. It is hoped that this method will take into Biochemica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Biomembranes,
consideration individual variations among patients and 1768(4):808–824, 2007.
provide a more realistic measure of drug safety, at least 9. David P, Yongsheng L, Krassimira A, Demarg G, Meehan TP,
one that can be more easily explained to patients. Fanelli F, Narayan P: Structure-function relationships of the
luteinizing hormone receptor, Ann N Y Acad Sci, 1061 (Testicu-
lar Cell Dynamics and Endocrine Signaling):41–54, 2005.
ACTIVITIES 2 10. Filardo EJ, Thomas P: GPR30: A seven-transmembrane-
spanning estrogen receptor that triggers EGF release, Trends
Constructing a Quantal Dose-response Curve Endocrinol Metab, 16(8):362–367, 2005.
1. Groups of mice will receive varying doses of a drug 11. Ma WW, Adjei AA: Novel agents on the horizon for cancer
therapy, CA Cancer J Clin, 59(2):111–137, 2009.
used to lower heart rate. Some of the mice will have 12. McEwan IJ: Nuclear receptors: One big family, Methods Mol
some bradycardia, and some will have excessive bra- Biol, 505:3–18, 2009.
dycardia leading to death. Refer to the table and plot 13. Novac N, Heinzel T: Nuclear receptors: Overview and classi-
the percentage responding at each dose level for its fication, Current Drug Targets—Inflammation & Allergy,
therapeutic effect and its lethal effect and calculate the 3(4):335–346, 2004.
14. Funder JW, Mihailidou AS: Aldosterone and mineralocorti-
therapeutic index. Discuss whether the drug is safe. coid receptors: Clinical studies and basic biology, Mol Cell
Describe a situation in which the therapeutic index Endocrinol, 301(1-2):2–6, 2009.
may be misleading. 15. Jones JI, Clemmons DR: Insulin-like growth factors and their
binding proteins: Biological actions, Endocr Rev, 16(1):3–34,
1995.
Dose (mg/kg) Bradycardia Death 16. Pollak M: Insulin and insulin-like growth factor signalling in
1 0% 0% neoplasia, Nat Rev Cancer, 8(12):915–928, 2008.
2 3% 0% 17. Belinsky MG, Rink L, Cai KQ, et al: The insulin-like
3 13% 0% growth factor system as a potential therapeutic target in gas-
4 45% 3% trointestinal stromal tumors, Cell Cycle, 19:2949–2955,
5 80% 23% 2008.
6 100% 68% 18. Gralow J, Ozols RF, Bajorin DF, et al. Clinical cancer advances
7 100% 100% 2007: Major research advances in cancer treatment, preven-
8 100% 100% tion, and screening—a report from the American Society of
Clinical Oncology, J Clin Oncol, 26(2):313–325, 2008.
19. Stockmans G, et al. Triple-negative breast cancer. Current
2. Discuss the difference between a medication’s mecha- Opinion in Oncology, 20:614–620, 2008.
20. Herbst RS, Heymach JV, Lippman SM: Lung cancer. N Engl
nism of action and its therapeutic effect. J Med, 359(13):1367–1380, 2008.
3. If a patient must take a drug with a low therapeutic 21. Ecelbarger CA, Tiwari S: Sodium transporters in the distal
index, what must happen to ensure that the patient nephron and disease implications, Curr Hypertension Rep,
does not experience a toxic event? 8:158–165, 2006.
4. What cognitive, behavioral, and physical factors in a 22. Newman RA, Yang P, Pawlus AD, Block KI: Cardiac glycosides
as novel cancer therapeutic agents. Mol Interv, 8(1):36–49,
patient could reduce a drug’s therapeutic index and 2008.
reduce the safety of the agent? 23. Martyn JAJ, Eriksson L: M.J.F.L.I.E., Basic principles of
neuromuscular transmission, Anaesthesia, 64(s1):1–9, 2009.
24. Rang HP, et al: Antibacterial drugs. In Rang HP, Dale MM,
Ritter JM, Flower R, editors: Rang and Dale’s pharmacology,
REFERENCES Philadelphia, 2007, Churchill Livingstone.
25. Rang HP, et al: Noradrenergic transmission. In Rang HP, Dale
1. Page C, Curtis, MJ, Sutter, MC, Walker, MJ, Hoffman, BB MM, Ritter JM, Flower R, editors: Rang and Dale’s pharma-
et al: The general mechanisms of drug action. In Clive PP, cology, Philadelphia, 2007, Churchill Livingstone.
Brian H, Michael C, Michael W, editors: Integrated pharmacol- 26. Lowe ES, Balis FM: Dose-effect and concentration-effect anal-
ogy, Philadelphia, 2006, Mosby. ysis. In Atkinson AJ. Jr, Daniels CE, Dedrick RL, Grudzinskas
20 CHAPTER 2 Pharmacodynamics: Mechanism of Action
CV, Markey SP, editors:: Principles of clinical pharmacology, 30. Sueyoshi T, Negishi M: Phenobarbital response elements of
New York, 2007, Academic Press. cytochrome P450 genes and nuclear receptors, Ann Rev Phar-
27. Vauquelin GI, Van Liefde I, Birzbier BB, Vanderheyden P: macol Toxicol, 41:123-143, 2001.
New insights in insurmountable antagonism, Fundam Clin 31. Rang HP, et al: How drugs act: General principles. In
Pharmacol, 16(4):263–272, 2002. Rang HP, Dale MM, Ritter JM, Flower R, editors: Rang and
28. Tallarida RJ: Interactions between drugs and occupied recep- Dale’s pharmacology, Philadelphia, 2007, Churchill Living-
tors, Pharmacol Ther, 113(1):197–209, 2007. stone.
29. Gurwitz JH, Everitt DE, Monane M, et al: The impact of 32. Bennett PN, Brown MJ: General pharmacology. In Bennett PN,
ibuprofen on the efficacy of antihypertensive treatment with Brown MJ, editors: Clinical pharmacology, New York, 2008,
hydrochlorothiazide in elderly persons, J Gerontol: A: Biol Sci Churchill Livingstone.
Med Sci, 51(2):M74–M79, 1996.
CHAPTER
3
Pharmacokinetics and Drug
Dosing
Barbara Gladson
Diffusion
Diffusion through
through aqueous
lipid channel Carrier
Extracellular
Membrane
Intracellular
FIGURE 3-1 Routes by which drugs can pass through cell membranes.
I see increasing reason to believe that the view formed some time
back as to the origin of the Makonde bush is the correct one. I have
no doubt that it is not a natural product, but the result of human
occupation. Those parts of the high country where man—as a very
slight amount of practice enables the eye to perceive at once—has not
yet penetrated with axe and hoe, are still occupied by a splendid
timber forest quite able to sustain a comparison with our mixed
forests in Germany. But wherever man has once built his hut or tilled
his field, this horrible bush springs up. Every phase of this process
may be seen in the course of a couple of hours’ walk along the main
road. From the bush to right or left, one hears the sound of the axe—
not from one spot only, but from several directions at once. A few
steps further on, we can see what is taking place. The brush has been
cut down and piled up in heaps to the height of a yard or more,
between which the trunks of the large trees stand up like the last
pillars of a magnificent ruined building. These, too, present a
melancholy spectacle: the destructive Makonde have ringed them—
cut a broad strip of bark all round to ensure their dying off—and also
piled up pyramids of brush round them. Father and son, mother and
son-in-law, are chopping away perseveringly in the background—too
busy, almost, to look round at the white stranger, who usually excites
so much interest. If you pass by the same place a week later, the piles
of brushwood have disappeared and a thick layer of ashes has taken
the place of the green forest. The large trees stretch their
smouldering trunks and branches in dumb accusation to heaven—if
they have not already fallen and been more or less reduced to ashes,
perhaps only showing as a white stripe on the dark ground.
This work of destruction is carried out by the Makonde alike on the
virgin forest and on the bush which has sprung up on sites already
cultivated and deserted. In the second case they are saved the trouble
of burning the large trees, these being entirely absent in the
secondary bush.
After burning this piece of forest ground and loosening it with the
hoe, the native sows his corn and plants his vegetables. All over the
country, he goes in for bed-culture, which requires, and, in fact,
receives, the most careful attention. Weeds are nowhere tolerated in
the south of German East Africa. The crops may fail on the plains,
where droughts are frequent, but never on the plateau with its
abundant rains and heavy dews. Its fortunate inhabitants even have
the satisfaction of seeing the proud Wayao and Wamakua working
for them as labourers, driven by hunger to serve where they were
accustomed to rule.
But the light, sandy soil is soon exhausted, and would yield no
harvest the second year if cultivated twice running. This fact has
been familiar to the native for ages; consequently he provides in
time, and, while his crop is growing, prepares the next plot with axe
and firebrand. Next year he plants this with his various crops and
lets the first piece lie fallow. For a short time it remains waste and
desolate; then nature steps in to repair the destruction wrought by
man; a thousand new growths spring out of the exhausted soil, and
even the old stumps put forth fresh shoots. Next year the new growth
is up to one’s knees, and in a few years more it is that terrible,
impenetrable bush, which maintains its position till the black
occupier of the land has made the round of all the available sites and
come back to his starting point.
The Makonde are, body and soul, so to speak, one with this bush.
According to my Yao informants, indeed, their name means nothing
else but “bush people.” Their own tradition says that they have been
settled up here for a very long time, but to my surprise they laid great
stress on an original immigration. Their old homes were in the
south-east, near Mikindani and the mouth of the Rovuma, whence
their peaceful forefathers were driven by the continual raids of the
Sakalavas from Madagascar and the warlike Shirazis[47] of the coast,
to take refuge on the almost inaccessible plateau. I have studied
African ethnology for twenty years, but the fact that changes of
population in this apparently quiet and peaceable corner of the earth
could have been occasioned by outside enterprises taking place on
the high seas, was completely new to me. It is, no doubt, however,
correct.
The charming tribal legend of the Makonde—besides informing us
of other interesting matters—explains why they have to live in the
thickest of the bush and a long way from the edge of the plateau,
instead of making their permanent homes beside the purling brooks
and springs of the low country.
“The place where the tribe originated is Mahuta, on the southern
side of the plateau towards the Rovuma, where of old time there was
nothing but thick bush. Out of this bush came a man who never
washed himself or shaved his head, and who ate and drank but little.
He went out and made a human figure from the wood of a tree
growing in the open country, which he took home to his abode in the
bush and there set it upright. In the night this image came to life and
was a woman. The man and woman went down together to the
Rovuma to wash themselves. Here the woman gave birth to a still-
born child. They left that place and passed over the high land into the
valley of the Mbemkuru, where the woman had another child, which
was also born dead. Then they returned to the high bush country of
Mahuta, where the third child was born, which lived and grew up. In
course of time, the couple had many more children, and called
themselves Wamatanda. These were the ancestral stock of the
Makonde, also called Wamakonde,[48] i.e., aborigines. Their
forefather, the man from the bush, gave his children the command to
bury their dead upright, in memory of the mother of their race who
was cut out of wood and awoke to life when standing upright. He also
warned them against settling in the valleys and near large streams,
for sickness and death dwelt there. They were to make it a rule to
have their huts at least an hour’s walk from the nearest watering-
place; then their children would thrive and escape illness.”
The explanation of the name Makonde given by my informants is
somewhat different from that contained in the above legend, which I
extract from a little book (small, but packed with information), by
Pater Adams, entitled Lindi und sein Hinterland. Otherwise, my
results agree exactly with the statements of the legend. Washing?
Hapana—there is no such thing. Why should they do so? As it is, the
supply of water scarcely suffices for cooking and drinking; other
people do not wash, so why should the Makonde distinguish himself
by such needless eccentricity? As for shaving the head, the short,
woolly crop scarcely needs it,[49] so the second ancestral precept is
likewise easy enough to follow. Beyond this, however, there is
nothing ridiculous in the ancestor’s advice. I have obtained from
various local artists a fairly large number of figures carved in wood,
ranging from fifteen to twenty-three inches in height, and
representing women belonging to the great group of the Mavia,
Makonde, and Matambwe tribes. The carving is remarkably well
done and renders the female type with great accuracy, especially the
keloid ornamentation, to be described later on. As to the object and
meaning of their works the sculptors either could or (more probably)
would tell me nothing, and I was forced to content myself with the
scanty information vouchsafed by one man, who said that the figures
were merely intended to represent the nembo—the artificial
deformations of pelele, ear-discs, and keloids. The legend recorded
by Pater Adams places these figures in a new light. They must surely
be more than mere dolls; and we may even venture to assume that
they are—though the majority of present-day Makonde are probably
unaware of the fact—representations of the tribal ancestress.
The references in the legend to the descent from Mahuta to the
Rovuma, and to a journey across the highlands into the Mbekuru
valley, undoubtedly indicate the previous history of the tribe, the
travels of the ancestral pair typifying the migrations of their
descendants. The descent to the neighbouring Rovuma valley, with
its extraordinary fertility and great abundance of game, is intelligible
at a glance—but the crossing of the Lukuledi depression, the ascent
to the Rondo Plateau and the descent to the Mbemkuru, also lie
within the bounds of probability, for all these districts have exactly
the same character as the extreme south. Now, however, comes a
point of especial interest for our bacteriological age. The primitive
Makonde did not enjoy their lives in the marshy river-valleys.
Disease raged among them, and many died. It was only after they
had returned to their original home near Mahuta, that the health
conditions of these people improved. We are very apt to think of the
African as a stupid person whose ignorance of nature is only equalled
by his fear of it, and who looks on all mishaps as caused by evil
spirits and malignant natural powers. It is much more correct to
assume in this case that the people very early learnt to distinguish
districts infested with malaria from those where it is absent.
This knowledge is crystallized in the
ancestral warning against settling in the
valleys and near the great waters, the
dwelling-places of disease and death. At the
same time, for security against the hostile
Mavia south of the Rovuma, it was enacted
that every settlement must be not less than a
certain distance from the southern edge of the
plateau. Such in fact is their mode of life at the
present day. It is not such a bad one, and
certainly they are both safer and more
comfortable than the Makua, the recent
intruders from the south, who have made USUAL METHOD OF
good their footing on the western edge of the CLOSING HUT-DOOR
plateau, extending over a fairly wide belt of
country. Neither Makua nor Makonde show in their dwellings
anything of the size and comeliness of the Yao houses in the plain,
especially at Masasi, Chingulungulu and Zuza’s. Jumbe Chauro, a
Makonde hamlet not far from Newala, on the road to Mahuta, is the
most important settlement of the tribe I have yet seen, and has fairly
spacious huts. But how slovenly is their construction compared with
the palatial residences of the elephant-hunters living in the plain.
The roofs are still more untidy than in the general run of huts during
the dry season, the walls show here and there the scanty beginnings
or the lamentable remains of the mud plastering, and the interior is a
veritable dog-kennel; dirt, dust and disorder everywhere. A few huts
only show any attempt at division into rooms, and this consists
merely of very roughly-made bamboo partitions. In one point alone
have I noticed any indication of progress—in the method of fastening
the door. Houses all over the south are secured in a simple but
ingenious manner. The door consists of a set of stout pieces of wood
or bamboo, tied with bark-string to two cross-pieces, and moving in
two grooves round one of the door-posts, so as to open inwards. If
the owner wishes to leave home, he takes two logs as thick as a man’s
upper arm and about a yard long. One of these is placed obliquely
against the middle of the door from the inside, so as to form an angle
of from 60° to 75° with the ground. He then places the second piece
horizontally across the first, pressing it downward with all his might.
It is kept in place by two strong posts planted in the ground a few
inches inside the door. This fastening is absolutely safe, but of course
cannot be applied to both doors at once, otherwise how could the
owner leave or enter his house? I have not yet succeeded in finding
out how the back door is fastened.