Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Fundamentals of Hiv Medicine 2019 1st Edition
Fundamentals of Hiv Medicine 2019 1st Edition
Fundamentals of Hiv Medicine 2019 1st Edition
Edition
Visit to download the full and correct content document:
https://ebookmass.com/product/fundamentals-of-hiv-medicine-2019-1st-edition/
FACULT Y
vii
Eva Clark, MD, PhD, DTM&H Margaret Hoffman-Terry, MD, FACP, AAHIVS
Baylor College of Medicine Milton S. Hershey Medical Center
Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine
Jennifer Cocohoba, PharmD, BCPS, AAHIVP
Lehigh Valley Hospital
University of California, San Francisco, School of Pharmacy
University of California, San Francisco, Women’s HIV Jennifer Husson, MD, MPH
Program University of Maryland School of Medicine
Dagan Coppock, MD Nikyati Jakharia, MD
Drexel University College of Medicine University of Maryland
Vishal Dahya, MD Boris D. Juelg, MD, PhD
Florida State University College of Medicine Massachusetts General Hospital
Elizabeth David, MD Joseph S. Kass, MD, JD, FAAN
Baylor College of Medicine Baylor College of Medicine
Trew Deckard, PA-C, MHS, AAHIVS Jeffrey T. Kirchner, DO, FAAFP, AAHIVS
Medical Practice of Dr. Steven M. Pounders Penn Medicine/LGHP Comprehensive Care
Lancaster General Hospital
Alejandro Delgado, MD
Einstein Medical Center Philadelphia David E. Koren, PharmD
Temple University School of Pharmacy
Paul W. DenOuden, MD, AAHIVS
Temple University Hospital
Multnomah County Health Department
Carolyn Kramer, MD, MHS
Madeline B. Deutsch, MD, MPH
Sidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson
University of California, San Francisco
University
Quentin Doperalski, MD
Doris Kung, DO
University of California, San Francisco
Baylor College of Medicine
Richard Dunham, PhD
Eurides Lopes, MD
GlaxoSmithKline
Loma Linda University Healthcare
HIV Cure Center, University of North Carolina at
Chapel Hill Adrian Majid, MD
Weill Cornell Medicine
James P. Dunn, MD
New York-Presbyterian Hospital
Wills Eye Hospital
Sidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson Poonam Mathur, DO, MPH
University University of Maryland Medical Center
Derek M. Fine, MD Jessica A. Meisner, MD, MS
Johns Hopkins Hospital University of Pennsylvania Health System
Anna Forbes, MSS Steven Menez, MD
American Academy of HIV Medicine Johns Hopkins School of Medicine
Rajesh Gandhi, MD Ana Monczor, MD
Massachusetts General Hospital McGovern Medical School at University of Texas at Houston
Harvard Medical School
Kudakwashe Mutyambizi, MD
Taylor K. Gill, PharmD, BCPS, AAHIVP MD Anderson Cancer Center
Ascension Via Christi Hospital The University of Texas Medical School at Houston
Michelle K. Haas, MD Puja H. Nambiar, MD
Denver Public Health Assistant Professor, Department of Medicine/Infectious
University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus Diseases
Louisiana State University Health
Dennis J. Hartigan-O’Connor, MD, PhD
University of California, Davis Naiel Nassar, MD, FACP
University of California, San Francisco
Rodrigo Hasbun, MD, MPH
McGovern Medical School at University of Texas at Houston Karin Nielsen-Saines, MD, MPH
David Geffen School of Medicine
Emily L. Heil, PharmD, BCIDP, BCPS, AAHIVP University of California, Los Angeles
University of Maryland School of Pharmacy
viii • FAC U LT Y
Karen Nunez-Wallace, MD Baylor College of Medicine
Baylor College of Medicine
Kalpana D. Shere-Wolfe, MD
Babafemi Onabanjo, MD, AAHIVS University of Maryland Medical System
Family Health Center of Worcester
Elizabeth M. Sherman, PharmD, AAHIVP
Edgar T. Overton, MD Nova Southeastern University
University of Alabama School of Medicine
William R. Short, MD, MPH, AAHIVS
Bruce J. Packett II University of Pennsylvania
American Academy of HIV Medicine
Daniel J. Skiest, MD, FACP, FIDSA
Neha Sheth Pandit, PharmD, AAHIVP, BCPS Baystate Health Professor of Medicine
University of Maryland School of Pharmacy University of Massachusetts Medical School-Baystate
Rachel A. Prosser, PhD, APRN, CNP, FAANP, AAHIVS Anthony C. Speights, MD, FACOG, AAHIVS
Hennepin County Medical Center Florida State University College of Medicine
University of Minnesota School of Nursing
Sally Spencer Long, ANP C
Metropolitan University School of Nursing
Bay State Medical Center
Centurion
RAAN Gary F. Spinner, PA, MPH, AAHIVS
Positive Healthcare LLC Southwest Community Health Center
Christian B. Ramers, MD, MPH, AAHIVS Rohit Talwani, MD
Family Health Centers of San Diego University of Maryland Medical Center
University of San Diego School of Medicine
San Diego State University School of Public Health Zelalem Temesgen, MD, FIDSA
Mayo Clinic
Brandon H. Samson, PharmD, MPW
Vaniam Group LLC Karen J. Vigil, MD
McGovern Medical School at University of Texas at Houston
Aroonsiri Sangarlangkarn, MD, MPH
HIV Netherlands Australia Thailand Research Sana Waheed, MD
Collaboration Clinic University of Wisconsin Hospitals and Clinics
Thai Red Cross Rakel Beall Wilkins, MD
Jason J. Schafer, PharmD, MPH, BCPS Magellan Health
AQ-ID, BCIDP, AAHIVP Amanda L. Willig, PhD, RD
Jefferson College of Pharmacy The University of Alabama at Birmingham
Thomas Jefferson University
Daniel Wlodarczyk, MD
Hans P. Schlecht, MD, MMSc University of California, San Francisco
Baystate Health San Francisco General Hospital
Jeffrey T. Schouten, MD San Francisco Department of Public Health
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center David A. Wohl, MD
James D. Scott, PharmD, Med, APh, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
FCCP, FASHP, AAHIVP NC AIDS Training and Education Center
Western University of Health Sciences College of Pharmacy Hojoon You, MD
Rajagopal V. Sekhar, MD Einstein Medical Center Philadelphia
Baylor College of Medicine Barry Zevin, MD
Lydia J. Sharp, MD San Francisco Department of Public Health
FAC U LT Y • ix
JOINT ACCREDITATION STATEMENT
In support of improving patient care, this activity has been planned and implemented by the
Postgraduate Institute for Medicine and American Academy of HIV Medicine. The Postgraduate
Institute for Medicine is jointly accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical
Education (ACCME), the Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education (ACPE), and the
American Nurses Credentialing Center (ANCC) to provide continuing education for the healthcare
team.
x
PHYSICIAN CONTINUING MEDICAL EDUCATION
The Postgraduate Institute for Medicine designates these en- 1 Credit(s)™. Physicians should claim only the credit com-
during materials for a maximum of 43.75 AMA PRA Category mensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.
xi
CONTINUING PHAR MACY EDUCATION
The Postgraduate Institute for Medicine designates these con- Pharmacists should check their NABP account to ensure
tinuing education activities for 43.75 contact hour(s) (4.375 credit has been submitted; it must be submitted within
CEUs) of the Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education. 60 days of completion of activity.
xii
CONTINUING NUR SING EDUCATION
The maximum number of hours awarded for these Continuing for a total of 10 contact hours of pharmacotherapy credit for
Nursing Education activities is 40.7 contact hours; designated Advanced Practice Registered Nurses.
xiii
CONTENTS
Disclosure of Conflicts of Interes xix Pharmacists –0.75 contact hours (0.075 CEUs)
Method of Participation and Request for Credit xxii ACPE UAN: JA4008162-9999-19-656-H02-P;
Knowledge
Disclosure of Unlabeled Use xxiii
7. HIV Testing and Counseling 67
1. Epidemiology and the Spread of HIV 1 Physicians –maximum of 0.75 AMA PRA Category 1
Physicians –maximum of 0.1.0 AMA PRA Category 1 Credits™
Credits™ Nurses –0.6 contact hours
Nurses –1.0 contact hours Pharmacists –0.75 contact hours (0.075 CEUs)
Pharmacists –1.0 contact hours (0.10 CEUs) ACPE UAN: JA4008162-9999-19-657-H02-P;
ACPE UAN: JA4008162-9999-651-H02-P; Knowledge
Knowledge 8. Laboratory Testing Strategies Detection and Diagnosis 73
2. The Origin, Evolution, and Epidemiology of HIV-1 Physicians –maximum of 0.75 AMA PRA Category 1
and HIV-2 15 Credits™
Physicians –maximum of 0.75 AMA PRA Category 1 Nurses –0.6 contact hours
Credits™ Pharmacists –0.75 contact hours (0.075 CEUs)
Nurses –0.6 contact hours ACPE UAN: JA4008162-9999-19-658-H02-P;
Pharmacists –0.75 contact hours (0.075 CEUs) Knowledge
ACPE UAN: JA4008162-9999-652-H02-P; 9. The Medical History and Physical Examination of the
Knowledge Patient with HIV 83
3. Mechanisms of HIV Transmission 21 Physicians –maximum of 0.5 AMA PRA Category 1
Physicians –maximum of 0.75 AMA PRA Category 1 Credits™
Credits™ Nurses –0.5 contact hours
Nurses –0.6 contact hours Pharmacists –0.5 contact hours (0.05 CEUs)
Pharmacists –0.75 contact hours (0.075 CEUs) ACPE UAN: JA4008162-9999-19-659-H02-P;
ACPE UAN: JA4008162-9999-653-H02-P; Knowledge
Knowledge 10. Initial Laboratory Evaluation and Risk Stratification of
4. HIV Transmission Prevention 25 the Patient with HIV 87
Physicians –maximum of 1.0 AMA PRA Category 1 Physicians –maximum of 0.25 AMA PRA Category 1
Credits™ Credits™
Nurses –1.0 contact hours, 0.1 pharmacotherapy for APRN Nurses –0.2 contact hours
Pharmacists –1.0 contact hours (0.10 CEUs) Pharmacists –0.25 contact hours (0.025 CEUs)
ACPE UAN: JA4008162-9999-19-654-H02-P; ACPE UAN: JA4008162-9999-19-660-H02-P;
Knowledge Knowledge
5. Immunology 49 11. Recognition of Acute and Advanced HIV Infection 91
Physicians –maximum of 0.75 AMA PRA Category 1 Physicians –maximum of 0.75 AMA PRA Category 1
Credits™ Credits™
Nurses –0.7 contact hours, 0.2 pharmacotherapy for APRN Nurses –0.7 contact hours, 0.3 pharmacotherapy
Pharmacists –0.75 contact hours (0.075 CEUs) for APRN
ACPE UAN: JA4008162-9999-19-655-H02-P; Pharmacists –0.75 contact hours (0.075 CEUs)
Knowledge ACPE UAN: JA4008162-9999-19-661-H02-P; Knowledge
6. HIV Cure Strategies 59 12. Health Maintenance 97
Physicians –maximum of 0.75 AMA PRA Category 1 Physicians –maximum of 1.25 AMA PRA Category 1
Credits™ Credits™
Nurses –0.7 contact hours, 0.5 pharmacotherapy for Nurses –1.2 contact hours, 0.1 pharmacotherapy
APRN for APRN
xv
Pharmacists –1.25 contact hours (0.125 CEUs) Pharmacists –1.0 contact hours (0.10 CEUs)
ACPE UAN: JA4008162-9999-19-662-H02-P; ACPE UAN: JA4008162-9999-19-669-H02-P;
Knowledge Knowledge
13. Issues in Specific Patient Populations 115 20. Principles of Applied Clinical Pharmacokinetics
Physicians –maximum of 2.25 AMA PRA and Pharmacodynamics in Antiretroviral Therapy 219
Category 1 Credits™ Physicians –maximum of 0.75 AMA PRA
Nurses –2.1 contact hours, 0.4 pharmacotherapy for APRN Category 1 Credits™
Pharmacists –2.25 contact hours (0.225 CEUs) Nurses –0.7 contact hours, 0.3 pharmacotherapy
ACPE UAN: JA4008162-9999-19-663-H02-P; for APRN
Knowledge Pharmacists –0.75 contact hours (0.075 CEUs)
14. Complementary and Alternative Medicine/Integrative ACPE UAN: JA4008162-9999-19-670-H02-P;
Medicine Approaches 157 Knowledge
Physicians –maximum of 1.0 AMA PRA Category 1 21. Classes of Antiretrovirals 225
Credits™ Physicians –maximum of 0.75 AMA PRA Category 1
Nurses –1.0 contact hours, 0.6 pharmacotherapy Credits™
for APRN Nurses –0.6 contact hours, 0.6pharmacotherapy
Pharmacists –1.0 contact hours (0.10 CEUs) for APRN
ACPE UAN: JA4008162-9999-19-664-H02-P; Pharmacists –0.75 contact hours (0.075 CEUs)
Knowledge ACPE UAN: JA4008162-9999-19-671-H02-P;
15. HIV Care Coordination 175 Knowledge
Physicians –maximum of 0.75 AMA PRA Category 1 22. Initiation of Antiretroviral Therapy: What to Start With 239
Credits™ Physicians –maximum of 0.5 AMA PRA Category 1
Nurses –0.7 contact hours Credits™
Pharmacists –0.75 contact hours (0.075 CEUs) Nurses –0.5 contact hours, 0.1 pharmacotherapy
ACPE UAN: JA4008162-9999-19-665-H02-P; for APRN
Knowledge Pharmacists –0.5 contact hours (0.05 CEUs)
16. The Pharmacist’s Role in Caring for HIV-Positive ACPE UAN: JA4008162-9999-19-672-H02-P;
Individuals 183 Knowledge
Physicians –maximum of 0.75 AMA PRA Category 1 23. HIV-1 Resistance to Antiretroviral Drugs 245
Credits™ Physicians –maximum of 0.5 AMA PRA Category 1
Nurses –0.7 contact hours Credits™
Pharmacists –0.75 contact hours (0.075 CEUs) Nurses –0.5 contact hours
ACPE UAN: JA4008162-9999-19-666-H02-P; Pharmacists –0.5 contact hours (0.05 CEUs)
Knowledge ACPE UAN: JA4008162-9999-19-673-H02-P;
17. The Role of the Physician Assistant and the Nurse Knowledge
Practitioner in Caring for Persons Living with HIV 189 24. Managing the Patient with Multidrug-Resistant HIV 257
Physicians –maximum of 1.0 AMA PRA Category 1 Physicians –maximum of 0.5 AMA PRA Category 1
Credits™ Credits™
Nurses –1.0 contact hours Nurses –0.5 contact hours, 0.4 pharmacotherapy
Pharmacists –1.0 contact hours (0.10 CEUs) for APRN
ACPE UAN: JA4008162-9999-19-667-H02-P; Pharmacists –0.5 contact hours (0.05 CEUs)
Knowledge ACPE UAN: JA4008162-9999-19-674-H02-P;
18. Hospice and Palliative Care in Advanced HIV Disease 199 Knowledge
Physicians –maximum of 0.75 AMA PRA Category 1 25. Future Antiretrovirals, Immune-Based Strategies, and
Credits™ Therapeutic Vaccines 261
Nurses –0.7 contact hours, 0.2 pharmacotherapy Physicians –maximum of 0.5 AMA PRA Category 1
for APRN Credits™
Pharmacists –0.75 contact hours (0.075 CEUs) Nurses –0.5 contact hours, 0.2 pharmacotherapy
ACPE UAN: JA4008162-9999-19-668-H02-P; for APRN
Knowledge Pharmacists –0.5 contact hours (0.05 CEUs)
19. HIV Virology 205 ACPE UAN: JA4008162-9999-19-675-H02-P;
Physicians –maximum of 1.0 AMA PRA Category 1 Knowledge
Credits™ 26. Solid Organ Transplantation in Persons Living with HIV 275
Nurses –1.0 contact hours, 0.4 pharmacotherapy Physicians –maximum of 0.75 AMA PRA Category 1
for APRN Credits™
xvi • C ontents
Nurses –0.6 contact hours Nurses –1.0 contact hours, 0.3 pharmacotherapy for APRN
Pharmacists –0.75 contact hours (0.075 CEUs) Pharmacists –1.0 contact hours (0.10 CEUs)
ACPE UAN: JA4008162-9999-19-676-H02-P; Knowledge ACPE UAN: JA4008162-9999-19-683-H02-P;
27. Antiretroviral Therapy in Pregnant Women 281 Knowledge
Physicians –maximum of 0.5 AMA PRA 34. Malignancies in HIV 337
Category 1 Credits™ Physicians –maximum of 1.5 AMA PRA Category 1
Nurses –0.5 contact hours, 0.1 pharmacotherapy Credits™
for APRN Nurses –1.5 contact hours, 0.3 pharmacotherapy
Pharmacists –0.5 contact hours (0.05 CEUs) for APRN
ACPE UAN: JA4008162-9999-19-677-H02-P; Pharmacists –1.5 contact hours (0.15 CEUs)
Knowledge ACPE UAN: JA4008162-9999-19-684-H02-P;
28. Antiretroviral Therapy for Children and Newborns 287 Knowledge
Physicians –maximum of 0.75 AMA PRA Category 1 35. Dermatologic Complications 379
Credits™ Physicians –maximum of 1.0 AMA PRA Category 1
Nurses –0.7 contact hours Credits™
Pharmacists –0.75 contact hours (0.075 CEUs) Nurses –1.0 contact hours, 0.4 pharmacotherapy
ACPE UAN: JA4008162-9999-19-678-H02-P; for APRN
Knowledge Pharmacists –1.0 contact hours (0.10 CEUs)
29. Immunosuppressants and Antiretroviral Therapy ACPE UAN: JA4008162-9999-19-685-H02-P;
in HIV-Positive Transplant Patients 297 Knowledge
Physicians –maximum of 0.75 AMA PRA Category 1 36. Endocrine and Metabolic Disorders 391
Credits™ Physicians –maximum of 0.75 AMA PRA Category 1
Nurses –0.6 contact hours, 0.3 pharmacotherapy Credits™
for APRN Nurses –0.7 contact hours, 0.1 pharmacotherapy
Pharmacists –0.75 contact hours (0.075 CEUs) for APRN
ACPE UAN: JA4008162-9999-19-679-H02-P; Pharmacists –0.75 contact hours (0.075 CEUs)
Knowledge ACPE UAN: JA4008162-9999-19-686-H02-P;
30. Understanding and Managing Antineoplastic and Knowledge
Antiretroviral Therapy 301 37. Nonopportunistic Infections: Respiratory
Physicians –maximum of 0.5 AMA PRA Category 1 Complications 399
Credits™ Physicians –maximum of 0.75 AMA PRA Category 1
Nurses –0.5 contact hours Credits™
Pharmacists –0.5 contact hours (0.05 CEUs) Nurses –0.7 contact hours, 0.1 pharmacotherapy
ACPE UAN: JA4008162-9999-19-680-H02-P; for APRN
Knowledge Pharmacists –0.75 contact hours (0.075 CEUs)
31. Substance Abuse in HIV Populations 309 ACPE UAN: JA4008162-9999-19-687-H02-P;
Physicians –maximum of 1.0 AMA PRA Category 1 Knowledge
Credits™ 38. Psychiatric Illness and Treatment in HIV Populations 403
Nurses –1.0 contact hours, 0.6 pharmacotherapy Physicians –maximum of 1.0 AMA PRA Category 1
for APRN Credits™
Pharmacists –1.0 contact hours (0.10 CEUs) Nurses –1.0 contact hours, 0.3 pharmacotherapy
ACPE UAN: JA4008162-9999-19-681-H02-P; for APRN
Knowledge Pharmacists –1.0 contact hours (0.10 CEUs)
32. Understanding the Use of Antiretrovirals in the Aging ACPE UAN: JA4008162-9999-19-688-H02-P;
Patient 317 Knowledge
Physicians –maximum of 0.75 AMA PRA Category 1 39. Neurological Effects of HIV Infection 413
Credits™ Physicians –maximum of 1.25 AMA PRA Category 1
Nurses –0.7 contact hours, 0.6 pharmacotherapy Credits™
for APRN Nurses –1.2 contact hours, 0.3 pharmacotherapy
Pharmacists –0.75 contact hours (0.075 CEUs) for APRN
ACPE UAN: JA4008162-9999-19-682-H02-P; Pharmacists –1.25 contact hours (0.125 CEUs)
Knowledge ACPE UAN: JA4008162-9999-19-689-H02-P;
33. Opportunistic Infections 323 Knowledge
Physicians –maximum of 1.0 AMA PRA Category 1
Credits™
C ontents • xvii
40. HIV and Hepatitis Coinfection 433 Pharmacists –1.0 contact hours (0.10 CEUs)
Physicians –maximum of 1.25 AMA PRA Category 1 ACPE UAN: JA4008162-9999-19-696-H02-P;
Credits™ Application
Nurses –1.2 contact hours, 0.6 pharmacotherapy for APRN 47. HIV-Associated Lipodystrophy and Lipoatrophy 505
Pharmacists –1.25 contact hours (0.125 CEUs) Physicians –maximum of 0.75 AMA PRA
ACPE UAN: JA4008162-9999-19-690-H02-P; Knowledge Category 1 Credits™
41. Ocular Complications 447 Nurses –0.6 contact hours
Physicians –maximum of 0.75 AMA PRA Pharmacists –0.75 contact hours (0.075 CEUs)
Category 1 Credits™ ACPE UAN: JA4008162-9999-19-697-H02-P;
Nurses –0.7 contact hours, 0.1 pharmacotherapy Knowledge
for APRN 48. Immune Reconstitution Inflammatory Syndrome (IRIS) 513
Pharmacists –0.75 contact hours (0.075 CEUs) Physicians –maximum of 0.75 AMA PRA
ACPE UAN: JA4008162-9999-19-691-H02-P; Category 1 Credits™
Knowledge Nurses –0.6 contact hours
42. Cardiovascular Disease 453 Pharmacists –0.75 contact hours (0.075 CEUs)
Physicians –maximum of 1.0 AMA PRA Category 1 ACPE UAN: JA4008162-9999-19-698-H02-P;
Credits™ Knowledge
Nurses –1.0 contact hours, 0.4 pharmacotherapy 49. US Healthcare Systems, HIV Programs, and Coverage
for APRN Policy Issues 519
Pharmacists –1.0 contact hours (0.10 CEUs) Physicians –maximum of 0.75 AMA PRA Category 1
ACPE UAN: JA4008162-9999-19-692-H02-P; Credits™
Knowledge Nurses –0.6 contact hours
43. Renal Complications 469 Pharmacists –0.75 contact hours (0.075 CEUs)
Physicians –maximum of 1.0 AMA PRA Category 1 ACPE UAN: JA4008162-9999-19-699-H02-P;
Credits™ Knowledge
Nurses –1.0 contact hours, 0.5 pharmacotherapy 50. Legal Issues 525
for APRN Physicians –maximum of 1.0 AMA PRA Category 1
Pharmacists –1.0 contact hours (0.10 CEUs) Credits™
ACPE UAN: JA4008162-9999-19-693-H02-P; Nurses –0.8 contact hours
Knowledge Pharmacists –1.0 contact hours (0.10 CEUs)
44. Body Composition Changes, Frailty, and ACPE UAN: JA4008162-9999-19-700-H02-P;
Musculoskeletal Complications of HIV 481 Knowledge
Physicians –maximum of 0.75 AMA PRA Category 1 51. Research Design and Analysis 541
Credits™ Physicians –maximum of 0.75 AMA PRA
Nurses –0.7 contact hours, 0.1 pharmacotherapy Category 1 Credits™
for APRN Nurses –0.6 contact hours
Pharmacists –0.75 contact hours (0.075 CEUs) Pharmacists –0.75 contact hours (0.075 CEUs)
ACPE UAN: JA4008162-9999-19-694-H02-P; ACPE UAN: JA4008162-9999-19-701-H02-P;
Knowledge Knowledge
45. Sexually Transmitted Diseases 487 52. Ethical Conduct of Clinical Trials, Institutional
Physicians –maximum of 0.75 AMA PRA Category 1 Review Boards, Informed Consent, and Financial
Credits™ Conflicts of Interest 545
Nurses –0.7 contact hours, 0.1 pharmacotherapy Physicians –maximum of 0.75 AMA PRA Category 1
for APRN Credits™
Pharmacists –0.75 contact hours (0.075 CEUs) Nurses –0.6 contact hours
ACPE UAN: JA4008162-9999-19-695-H02-P; Pharmacists –0.75 contact hours (0.075 CEUs)
Knowledge ACPE UAN: JA4008162-9999-19-702-H02-P;
46. HIV and Bone Health 493 Knowledge
Physicians –maximum of 1.0 AMA PRA Category 1
Credits™ Index 549
Nurses –1.0 contact hours, 0.2 pharmacotherapy
for APRN
xviii • C ontents
DISCLOSURE OF CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
The Postgraduate Institute for Medicine (PIM) requires activities and related materials that promote improvements or
instructors, planners, managers, and other individuals who are quality in healthcare and not a specific proprietary business
in a position to control the content of this activity to disclose interest of a commercial interest.
any real or apparent conflict of interest (COI) they may have The faculty reported the following financial relationships
as related to the content of this activity. All identified COIs are or relationships to products or devices they or their spouses/
thoroughly vetted and resolved according to PIM policy. PIM life partners have with commercial interests related to the con-
is committed to providing its learners with high-quality CME tent of this CME activity:
xix
Trew Deckard Fees for non-CME/CE services received directly from a commercial interest
or their agents (e.g., speakers bureau): Gilead Sciences, Janssen
Alejandro Delgado Nothing to disclose
Paul DenOuden Nothing to disclose
Madeline Deutsch Contracted research: Gilead
Quentin Doperalski Nothing to disclose
Richard Dunham Nothing to disclose
James Dunn Fees for non-CME/CE services received directly from a commercial interest
or their agents (e.g., speakers bureau): AbbVie
Derek Fine Nothing to disclose
Anna Forbes Nothing to disclose
Rajesh Gandhi Consulting fees: Merck, Gilead
Research support: Gilead, Theratechnologies, ViiV, Janssen
Taylor Gill Nothing to disclose
Michelle Haas Nothing to disclose
Dennis Hartigan-O’Connor Nothing to disclose
W. David Hardy Consulting fees: Gilead, Merck, ViiV/GSK
Contracted research: Amgen, Gilead, Janssen, Merck, ViiV/GSK
Rodrigo Hasbun Consulting fees: Gilead
Fees for non-CME/CE services received directly from a commercial interest
or their agents (e.g., speakers bureau): Biofire
Contracted research: Biofire
Emily Heil Nothing to disclose
Margaret Hoffman-Terry Consulting fees: Gilead, ViiV
Fees for non-CME/CE services received directly from a commercial interest
or their agents (e.g., speakers bureau): Gilead
Contracted research: ViiV
Jennifer Husson Contracted research: Merck, Sharpe, Dome Inc., Intercept Pharmaceuticals
Niyati Jakharia Nothing to disclose
Boris Juelg Research support: Gilead Sciences
Joseph Kass Contracted research: Alzheimer’s Disease Clinical Trial supported by
Biogen, Takeda, Roche/Genentech, Novartis
Jeff Kirchner Nothing to disclose
David Koren Consulting fees: Gilead Sciences, ViiV Healthcare
Contracted research: Gilead Sciences
Carolyn Kramer** Nothing to disclose
Doris Kung Nothing to disclose
Eurides Lopes Nothing to disclose
Adrian Majid Nothing to disclose
Poonam Mathur Nothing to disclose
Jessica Meisner Nothing to disclose
Steven Menez Nothing to disclose
Ana Monczor Nothing to disclose
Kudakwashe Mutyambizi Maloney Nothing to disclose
Puja Nambiar Nothing to disclose
Naiel Nassar Nothing to disclose
Karin Nielsen-Saines Nothing to disclose
Karen Nunez-Wallace Nothing to disclose
Babafemi Onabanjo Nothing to disclose
Edgar Overton Consulting fees: ViiV Healthcare, Merck, Thera Technologies
Bruce Packett Nothing to disclose
Rachel Prosser Consulting fees: Gilead
Contracted research: Gilead, ViiV, GSK
The planners and managers reported the following finan- The PIM planners and managers have nothing to disclose.
cial relationships or relationships to products or devices they
The AAHIVM planners and managers have nothing to
or their spouses/life partners have with commercial interests
disclose.
related to the content of this CME activity:
There are no fees for participating and receiving CME/ made available immediately. Processing credit requests online
CE credit for this activity. During the period May 1, 2019 will reduce the amount of paper used by nearly 100,000 sheets
through May 1, 2020, participants must read the learning per year.
objectives and faculty disclosures and study the educational
activity. For pharmacists: Upon successfully completing the posttest
PIM supports Green CME by offering your Request for with a score of 75% or better and the activity evaluation form,
Credit online. If you wish to receive acknowledgment for transcript information will be sent to the NABP CPE Monitor
completing these activities, please complete the posttest and Service. Pharmacists should check their NABP account to en-
evaluation on www.cmeuniversity.com. On the navigation sure credit has been submitted; it must be submitted within
menu, click on “Find Post-test/Evaluation by Course” and 60 days of completion of activity.
search by course ID 13528. Upon registering and successfully
completing the posttest with a score of 75% or better and the Media
activity evaluation for each activity, your certificate will be Printed Textbook
xxii
DISCLOSURE OF UNL ABELED USE
xxiii
1.
EPIDEMIOLOGY AND THE SPREAD OF HIV
Philip Bolduc, Benjamin Alfred, and Babafemi Onabanjo
O VE RVI EW O F WO R L DW I D E PA N D E M I C O VE RVI EW O F G L O B A L PA N D E M I C
1
2017 1.8 million
Globally
–18%
36.9 million New diagnoses annually
People living with HIV relative to 2010
+14%
Relative to 2010 0.9 million
–34%
Deaths annually
relative to 2010
Figure 1.1 Global HIV epidemic since 2010—prevalence, incidence and mortality trends. SOURCE: UNAIDS/WHO estimates, 2017.
higher for transgender women compared to other adults in their HIV status in 2017 compared with ~50% of those living
the general population (UNAIDS, 2018). with HIV in 2014. Despite these significant achievements in
The importance of each of these populations varies by re- the global HIV response, there is still much work to be done.
gion and within countries. For example, in southern Africa, The 2017 global HIV testing and care continuum (Figure 1.4)
age-
disparate intergenerational sexual relationships and demonstrates that more than half of the world’s people living
transactional sex place adolescent girls and young women at with HIV are still not on antiretroviral treatment and that
extremely high risk for HIV; in Eastern Europe and Central significant gaps remain to reach the UNAIDS 90-90-90 goal
Asia, most new HIV infections are associated with people by 2020 (90% of infected persons will be diagnosed, 90% of
who inject drugs; and in the Latin American and Caribbean those will be on treatment, and 90% of those will be virally
regions, the largest proportion of new HIV infections is suppressed).
among MSM. These six key populations and their sexual part-
ners account for 47% of new HIV infections globally, but with HIV DIVER SIT Y
wide geographic differences: just 16% in eastern and southern
Africa but an incredible 95% in Eastern Europe, central Asia, There are two major types of HIV, designated HIV-1 and
the Middle East, and North Africa (UNAIDS, 2018). HIV-2. Each has a similar but distinct genome with a ge-
As of 2017, 21.7 million people living with HIV were netic difference of approximately 60%. The vast majority of
accessing ART, an increase of 2.3 million since 2016 and clinical cases are caused by HIV-1, with HIV-2 comprising
13.7 million from 2010. Additionally, in 2017, 80% of pregnant only 1–2 million of the 36.9 million HIV cases living in 2016
women living with HIV had access to antiretrovirals to prevent (Campbell-Yesufu, 2011). HIV-2 is found almost exclusively
mother-to-child transmission (UNAIDS, 2018). With better in persons from or living in West Africa and is transmitted at
access to testing, 75% of all people living with HIV knew lower rates than HIV-1. It appears to have a longer incubation
35 000 000
30 000 000
25 000 000
20 000 000
15 000 000
10 000 000
5 000 000
0
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Figure 1.2 Increase in people receiving ART over time. SOURCE: UNAIDS/WHO estimates, 2017. WHO HIV Update 2018. Available at http://www.who.int/hiv/data/en/. Accessed
August 13, 2018.
period, produce lower plasma viral load, and lead to AIDS in that most antiretroviral agents appear to be equally effective
fewer patients (Apetrei, 2004). HIV-1 is classified into three regardless of the viral subtype. Certain subtypes may be less
genetically related subtypes based on the coding sequence of sensitive to or have a greater propensity to develop resistance
the envelope gene. Group M (Main) is the most common, and to antiretroviral drugs or classes of these drugs (Spira, 2003;
groups O (Outlier) and N (Not-M, Not-O or New) remain Gomes, 2002; Wainberg, 2004). A study from Thailand
rare (Apetrei, 2004). Group M has at least 11 subtypes, or found that discordant viral load results were obtained in per-
clades, designated A–K . sons with non-B subtypes (Hackett, 2004).
HIV subtype (i.e., group) variability may eventually in- There is limited clinical trial information on the effect of
fluence how ART is used, although studies to date suggest ART for HIV-2 infection. An in vitro study found that al-
though the HIV-2 isolates tested were susceptible to the an-
tiviral activities of nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors
40
and most protease inhibitors, they were highly resistant to
non- nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs)
90%
30 90%
(Witvrouw, 2004). Older studies of patients infected with
90%
HIV-2 receiving ART found mutations in HIV-2 reverse tran-
75% scriptase and protease genes associated with HIV-1 drug resist-
Millions
Figure 1.5 Rates of adults and adolescents living with diagnosed HIV infections, year-end 2015 (United States and 6 Dependent Areas). N = 988,955, Total Rate = 364.3. CDC HIV/AIDS Resource Library Slide Sets.
Available at http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/library/slidesets/index.html. Accessed August 14, 2018.
100
90 86
80
70 63
Percentage (%)
60 51
49
50
40
30
20
10
0
Diagnosed Receipt of care Retained in care Viral suppression
Figure 1.6 Persons living with diagnosed or undiagnosed HIV infection HIV care continuum outcomes, 2015 (United States). CDC HIV/AIDS Resource Library
Slide Sets. Available at http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/library/slidesets/index.html Accessed August 14, 2018.
WH AT ’S N EW ?
Nineteen percent of HIV diagnoses in 2015 in the United
8,800 (23%) States were among women, which represents a decrease from
among 2013 (24%). With widespread utilization of ART, transmis-
heterosexuals
sion of HIV from mother to child has decreased to less than
1% in the United States.
26,200 (68%)
among gay and
bisexual men K EY P O I N TS
• High-risk heterosexual contact remains the most common
risk factor for HIV acquisition among adult women.
• The CDC recommends opt-out testing for all pregnant
women in the first trimester and repeat testing in the third
Estimated New HIV Infections in the United States by
Figure 1.7
trimester for women at risk for infection. Adolescent HIV
Transmission Category, 2015. SOURCE: CDC, 2017. transmission mirrors adult patterns, with large majorities
30 25–34 years
Diagnoses, Rate
20 45–54 years
15 13–24 years
10
≥55 years
5
0
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Year of diagnosis
Figure 1.8 Rates of Diagnoses of HIV Infection among Adults and Adolescents by Age at Diagnosis, 2010–2015 (United States). SOURCE: CDC, 2017. CDC
HIV In the United States At A Glance. Available at https://www.cdc.gov/hiv/statistics/overview/ataglance.html. Accessed August 15, 2018. CDC HIV/AIDS Resource Library Slide Sets. Available at http://www.cdc.gov/
hiv/library/slidesets/index.html Accessed August 14, 2018.
of males infected via same-sex contact and females via Factors that increase a woman’s risk of acquiring HIV in-
heterosexual contact. clude not knowing her partner’s risk factors for HIV infec-
tion, having a lack of HIV knowledge, and having a decreased
awareness of risk (CDC, 2011). Women’s relationships with
their partners play a pivotal role as well: in relationships in
WO M E N
which women are physically abused, vulnerability to HIV is
Worldwide in 2016, women continue to account for more increased because they may not insist on condom use due to
than half (51%) of all HIV-infected persons and 43% of fear of being harmed. Women with a history of sexual abuse
new infections largely through heterosexual transmis- are more likely to engage in high-risk sexual activity and use
sion (American Foundation for AIDS Research [amfAR], drugs compared to women without such behaviors. This
2017). In sub-Saharan Africa, three of four new infections includes exchanging sexual activities for drugs and money as
are among girls aged 15–19 years, and young women aged well as having difficulty refusing unwanted sex.
15–24 years are twice as likely as men to be living with HIV The most common mode of transmission for women
(UNAIDS, 2018). However, in the United States, women is high- risk heterosexual contact (84– 88% across various
represented only 19% of HIV diagnoses in 2015, down groups), followed by injection drug use. These rates, current
from 24% in 2013, comprising an estimated 7,529 newly through 2016, may change with the deepening national opioid
diagnosed infections. This disparity is due to the preponder- crisis and outbreaks of HIV transmission among needle-
ance of male-to-male HIV transmission in the United States. sharing networks (CDC, 2016).
Of these new diagnoses, approximately 4,271 were stage 3 Sexual HIV transmission occurs through unprotected vag-
(AIDS) classifications, a number that has been declining inal or anal sex, with receptive anal sex posing the highest risk
since 1996, but remains stubbornly fixed around one-quarter and insertive vaginal sex the lowest. Oral sex is a theoretical
of all HIV diagnoses among women, highlighting the need to risk if there are breaks in the oral and genital mucosa through
improve testing to find patients before progression to AIDS. which blood or genital secretions may pass. Similarly, sexu-
HIV incidence among US women continues to be highest in ally transmitted infections that disrupt genital mucosa and
the South, followed by the industrial states of the Northeast. stimulate a local immune response increase the likelihood
Louisiana, with a rate of 15.3 infections per 100,000 popula- of acquiring or transmitting HIV. Because gonorrhea and
tion, is hardest hit, with a rate nearly three times the national syphilis in particular have a higher rate in women of color
average. compared to white women, this likely plays a role in their
From 2007 through 2015, black/ African American heightened risk of HIV acquisition. Socioeconomic status
women accounted for the majority of new HIV diagnoses in also plays a role in HIV risk. In states with higher rates of pov-
US females (59% vs. 17% white). The seropositivity rate of erty and limited access to healthcare, women are more likely
these women (26.2 per 100,000 persons) was 15 times higher to use drugs and exchange sex for drugs or money. These risk
than that of white females (1.7/100k) and 5 times higher than factors have been shown to increase risk of HIV, directly or
that of Hispanic females (5.3/100k). Although black/African indirectly (CDC, 2017).
American women comprised only 13% of the female popula-
tion, they accounted for 61% of diagnoses of HIV infection CHILDREN
among women. Hispanic/Latino women made up 16% of
the female population and accounted for 16% of diagnoses. The reduction of mother-to-child HIV transmission in the
White women encompassed 63% of the US female popu- United States is a major success of the antiretroviral era. Although
lation and yet accounted for only 19% of HIV diagnoses in the CDC does not publish a similar graph showing perinatal
women overall (CDC, 2016). HIV transmission rates over time, Figure 1.9 shows the dramatic
600
500
400
300
200
100 Aged ≥13 years
0
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
00
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
14
15
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
Year of classification
Figure 1.9 Stage 3 (AIDS) classifications among persons with perinatally acquired HIV infection, 1985—2015 (United States and 6 Dependent
Areas). SOURCE: CDC, 2017.
decline in perinatal AIDS diagnoses. In 1992, an estimated 952 children’s mothers were tested for HIV during their preg-
pediatric HIV transmissions were reported in the United States. nancy (Figure 1.11). Vertical transmission cannot be prevented
By 2004, the number declined to 177. In 2011, there were only if the mother’s HIV status is not known, thus highlighting the
53 reported perinatal infections, but this has since stabilized to importance of screening all pregnant women for HIV at least
around 100 infections per year through 2016 (CDC, 2017). The once during pregnancy.
overall rate of perinatal HIV infections reported by the CDC for HIV disproportionately affects black/African American
2015 was 1.5 per 100,000 live births, surpassing the CDC’s goal children. While accounting for 64% of diagnoses, they
of 5.1 by the end of 2015 (CDC, 2017). comprised only 14% of the population of US children in
The recent persistence of the number of transmissions 2016, whereas Hispanic (26% of population, 13% of HIV
in the face of declining rates is due to an increasing number diagnoses) and white (50% of population, 13% of HIV
of pregnancies among HIV- positive women as the pow- diagnoses) children are infected far less often than their popu-
erful role of ART in preventing both horizontal and vertical lation percentages (CDC, 2016).
transmission has been promoted among persons living with
HIV. However, it bears noting that of all HIV diagnoses in
A D O L E S C E N TS
children younger than age 13 years during 2010–2015, only
30% tested positive during their first year of life (Figure 1.10), Adolescents aged 13–24, along with 25-to 34-year-old
which is closely linked to data showing that only 20% of these young adults, account for the only two age groups in which
350
300
250
Diagnoses, No.
200
150
100
50
0
0–5 6–11 12–1718–23 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Age in months Age in years
Figure 1.10 Diagnoses of HIV infection among children aged <13 Years, by age at diagnosis, 2010—2015 (United States and 6 Dependent
Areas). N = 1,179. CDC, 2017.
At birth 5% 1%
Unknown 22% 1%
0 20 40 60 80 0 20 40 60 80
Diagnosis, % Diagnosis, %
Time of maternal HIV testing among children with diagnosed perinatally acquired HIV infection and children exposed to HIV, birth year
Figure 1.11
2010-2014 (United States and Puerto Rico). SOURCE: CDC, 2016. SOURCE: CDC HIV/AIDS Resource Library Slide Sets. Available at https://www.cdc.gov/hiv/pdf/library/slidesets/cdc-hiv-
surveillance-women-2016.pdf. Accessed August 02, 2018.
HIV incidence is rising in the United States, being driven In 2016, females comprised 16% of the HIV diagnoses
in particular by infections among black and Latino MSM in adolescents (13–19 years) and 11% in young adults (20–
youth. Of all adolescents and young adults aged 13–24 years 24 years) compared to 21% of adults older than 24 years. The
diagnosed with HIV infection, the CDC reported in 2015 mode of HIV transmission varies between sexes in this age
that 54% were black/African Americans, again far outpacing group, as it does in adults: whereas 84% of adolescent and
their percentage of the general population. Another striking young adult females are infected through heterosexual con-
disparity for black/African American children is that their tact, more than 90% of males contract HIV through male-to-
percentage of all children with AIDS increases dramati- male sexual contact (CDC, 2016).
cally with decreasing age, as seen moving right to left in
Figure 1.12.
Transmission rates through male same- sex contact RECOMMENDED READING
increased from 72% to 92.7% of all transmission from 2009 to
2016 in the adolescent and young adult population, whereas Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. HIV surveillance re-
port: Diagnoses of HIV infection and AIDS in the United States
heterosexual infections decreased from 20% to 3%. Infections and dependent areas. 2016. Vol. 28. Available at https://www.
from injection drug use decreased among adolescents over this cdc.gov/hiv/pdf/library/reports/surveillance/cdc-hiv-surveillance-
period from 4% to 1% (CDC, 2016). report-2016-vol-28.pdf.
Asiana 1% 2% 2%
Multiple races 4% 4% 4%
0 20 40 60 80 0 20 40 60 80 0 20 40 60 80
Classifications, % Classifications, % Classifications, %
Stage 3 (AIDS) Classifications among persons aged 13 years and older with diagnosed HIV infection, by race/ethnicity and age group,
Figure 1.12
2016 (United States and 6 Dependent Areas). SOURCE: CDC, 2017. SOURCE: CDC HIV/AIDS Resource Library Slide Sets. Available at https://www.cdc.gov/hiv/pdf/library/slidesets/cdc-hiv-
surveillance-women-2016.pdf. Accessed August 02, 2018
5
Multiple races
4
Classification, %
100
3
90 2
80 1 Asian
American Indian/Alaska Native
70 0 Native Hawaiian/other Pacific Islander
1985
1986
1987
1988
1989
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
Classification, %
60
Year of classification
50 Black/African American
40
White
30
Hispanic/Latinoa
20
10
0
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
00
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
14
15
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
Year of classification
Figure 1.13Percentages of stage 3 (AIDS) classifications among adults and adolescents with diagnosed HIV infection, by race/ethnicity and year of
classification, 1985-2015 (United States and 6 Dependent Areas). SOURCE: CDC, 2017. CDC HIV/AIDS Resource Library Slide Sets. Available https://www.cdc.gov/hiv/pdf/library/
slidesets/cdc-hiv-surveillance-race-ethnicity-2016.pdf. Accessed August 3, 2018.
I see increasing reason to believe that the view formed some time
back as to the origin of the Makonde bush is the correct one. I have
no doubt that it is not a natural product, but the result of human
occupation. Those parts of the high country where man—as a very
slight amount of practice enables the eye to perceive at once—has not
yet penetrated with axe and hoe, are still occupied by a splendid
timber forest quite able to sustain a comparison with our mixed
forests in Germany. But wherever man has once built his hut or tilled
his field, this horrible bush springs up. Every phase of this process
may be seen in the course of a couple of hours’ walk along the main
road. From the bush to right or left, one hears the sound of the axe—
not from one spot only, but from several directions at once. A few
steps further on, we can see what is taking place. The brush has been
cut down and piled up in heaps to the height of a yard or more,
between which the trunks of the large trees stand up like the last
pillars of a magnificent ruined building. These, too, present a
melancholy spectacle: the destructive Makonde have ringed them—
cut a broad strip of bark all round to ensure their dying off—and also
piled up pyramids of brush round them. Father and son, mother and
son-in-law, are chopping away perseveringly in the background—too
busy, almost, to look round at the white stranger, who usually excites
so much interest. If you pass by the same place a week later, the piles
of brushwood have disappeared and a thick layer of ashes has taken
the place of the green forest. The large trees stretch their
smouldering trunks and branches in dumb accusation to heaven—if
they have not already fallen and been more or less reduced to ashes,
perhaps only showing as a white stripe on the dark ground.
This work of destruction is carried out by the Makonde alike on the
virgin forest and on the bush which has sprung up on sites already
cultivated and deserted. In the second case they are saved the trouble
of burning the large trees, these being entirely absent in the
secondary bush.
After burning this piece of forest ground and loosening it with the
hoe, the native sows his corn and plants his vegetables. All over the
country, he goes in for bed-culture, which requires, and, in fact,
receives, the most careful attention. Weeds are nowhere tolerated in
the south of German East Africa. The crops may fail on the plains,
where droughts are frequent, but never on the plateau with its
abundant rains and heavy dews. Its fortunate inhabitants even have
the satisfaction of seeing the proud Wayao and Wamakua working
for them as labourers, driven by hunger to serve where they were
accustomed to rule.
But the light, sandy soil is soon exhausted, and would yield no
harvest the second year if cultivated twice running. This fact has
been familiar to the native for ages; consequently he provides in
time, and, while his crop is growing, prepares the next plot with axe
and firebrand. Next year he plants this with his various crops and
lets the first piece lie fallow. For a short time it remains waste and
desolate; then nature steps in to repair the destruction wrought by
man; a thousand new growths spring out of the exhausted soil, and
even the old stumps put forth fresh shoots. Next year the new growth
is up to one’s knees, and in a few years more it is that terrible,
impenetrable bush, which maintains its position till the black
occupier of the land has made the round of all the available sites and
come back to his starting point.
The Makonde are, body and soul, so to speak, one with this bush.
According to my Yao informants, indeed, their name means nothing
else but “bush people.” Their own tradition says that they have been
settled up here for a very long time, but to my surprise they laid great
stress on an original immigration. Their old homes were in the
south-east, near Mikindani and the mouth of the Rovuma, whence
their peaceful forefathers were driven by the continual raids of the
Sakalavas from Madagascar and the warlike Shirazis[47] of the coast,
to take refuge on the almost inaccessible plateau. I have studied
African ethnology for twenty years, but the fact that changes of
population in this apparently quiet and peaceable corner of the earth
could have been occasioned by outside enterprises taking place on
the high seas, was completely new to me. It is, no doubt, however,
correct.
The charming tribal legend of the Makonde—besides informing us
of other interesting matters—explains why they have to live in the
thickest of the bush and a long way from the edge of the plateau,
instead of making their permanent homes beside the purling brooks
and springs of the low country.
“The place where the tribe originated is Mahuta, on the southern
side of the plateau towards the Rovuma, where of old time there was
nothing but thick bush. Out of this bush came a man who never
washed himself or shaved his head, and who ate and drank but little.
He went out and made a human figure from the wood of a tree
growing in the open country, which he took home to his abode in the
bush and there set it upright. In the night this image came to life and
was a woman. The man and woman went down together to the
Rovuma to wash themselves. Here the woman gave birth to a still-
born child. They left that place and passed over the high land into the
valley of the Mbemkuru, where the woman had another child, which
was also born dead. Then they returned to the high bush country of
Mahuta, where the third child was born, which lived and grew up. In
course of time, the couple had many more children, and called
themselves Wamatanda. These were the ancestral stock of the
Makonde, also called Wamakonde,[48] i.e., aborigines. Their
forefather, the man from the bush, gave his children the command to
bury their dead upright, in memory of the mother of their race who
was cut out of wood and awoke to life when standing upright. He also
warned them against settling in the valleys and near large streams,
for sickness and death dwelt there. They were to make it a rule to
have their huts at least an hour’s walk from the nearest watering-
place; then their children would thrive and escape illness.”
The explanation of the name Makonde given by my informants is
somewhat different from that contained in the above legend, which I
extract from a little book (small, but packed with information), by
Pater Adams, entitled Lindi und sein Hinterland. Otherwise, my
results agree exactly with the statements of the legend. Washing?
Hapana—there is no such thing. Why should they do so? As it is, the
supply of water scarcely suffices for cooking and drinking; other
people do not wash, so why should the Makonde distinguish himself
by such needless eccentricity? As for shaving the head, the short,
woolly crop scarcely needs it,[49] so the second ancestral precept is
likewise easy enough to follow. Beyond this, however, there is
nothing ridiculous in the ancestor’s advice. I have obtained from
various local artists a fairly large number of figures carved in wood,
ranging from fifteen to twenty-three inches in height, and
representing women belonging to the great group of the Mavia,
Makonde, and Matambwe tribes. The carving is remarkably well
done and renders the female type with great accuracy, especially the
keloid ornamentation, to be described later on. As to the object and
meaning of their works the sculptors either could or (more probably)
would tell me nothing, and I was forced to content myself with the
scanty information vouchsafed by one man, who said that the figures
were merely intended to represent the nembo—the artificial
deformations of pelele, ear-discs, and keloids. The legend recorded
by Pater Adams places these figures in a new light. They must surely
be more than mere dolls; and we may even venture to assume that
they are—though the majority of present-day Makonde are probably
unaware of the fact—representations of the tribal ancestress.
The references in the legend to the descent from Mahuta to the
Rovuma, and to a journey across the highlands into the Mbekuru
valley, undoubtedly indicate the previous history of the tribe, the
travels of the ancestral pair typifying the migrations of their
descendants. The descent to the neighbouring Rovuma valley, with
its extraordinary fertility and great abundance of game, is intelligible
at a glance—but the crossing of the Lukuledi depression, the ascent
to the Rondo Plateau and the descent to the Mbemkuru, also lie
within the bounds of probability, for all these districts have exactly
the same character as the extreme south. Now, however, comes a
point of especial interest for our bacteriological age. The primitive
Makonde did not enjoy their lives in the marshy river-valleys.
Disease raged among them, and many died. It was only after they
had returned to their original home near Mahuta, that the health
conditions of these people improved. We are very apt to think of the
African as a stupid person whose ignorance of nature is only equalled
by his fear of it, and who looks on all mishaps as caused by evil
spirits and malignant natural powers. It is much more correct to
assume in this case that the people very early learnt to distinguish
districts infested with malaria from those where it is absent.
This knowledge is crystallized in the
ancestral warning against settling in the
valleys and near the great waters, the
dwelling-places of disease and death. At the
same time, for security against the hostile
Mavia south of the Rovuma, it was enacted
that every settlement must be not less than a
certain distance from the southern edge of the
plateau. Such in fact is their mode of life at the
present day. It is not such a bad one, and
certainly they are both safer and more
comfortable than the Makua, the recent
intruders from the south, who have made USUAL METHOD OF
good their footing on the western edge of the CLOSING HUT-DOOR
plateau, extending over a fairly wide belt of
country. Neither Makua nor Makonde show in their dwellings
anything of the size and comeliness of the Yao houses in the plain,
especially at Masasi, Chingulungulu and Zuza’s. Jumbe Chauro, a
Makonde hamlet not far from Newala, on the road to Mahuta, is the
most important settlement of the tribe I have yet seen, and has fairly
spacious huts. But how slovenly is their construction compared with
the palatial residences of the elephant-hunters living in the plain.
The roofs are still more untidy than in the general run of huts during
the dry season, the walls show here and there the scanty beginnings
or the lamentable remains of the mud plastering, and the interior is a
veritable dog-kennel; dirt, dust and disorder everywhere. A few huts
only show any attempt at division into rooms, and this consists
merely of very roughly-made bamboo partitions. In one point alone
have I noticed any indication of progress—in the method of fastening
the door. Houses all over the south are secured in a simple but
ingenious manner. The door consists of a set of stout pieces of wood
or bamboo, tied with bark-string to two cross-pieces, and moving in
two grooves round one of the door-posts, so as to open inwards. If
the owner wishes to leave home, he takes two logs as thick as a man’s
upper arm and about a yard long. One of these is placed obliquely
against the middle of the door from the inside, so as to form an angle
of from 60° to 75° with the ground. He then places the second piece
horizontally across the first, pressing it downward with all his might.
It is kept in place by two strong posts planted in the ground a few
inches inside the door. This fastening is absolutely safe, but of course
cannot be applied to both doors at once, otherwise how could the
owner leave or enter his house? I have not yet succeeded in finding
out how the back door is fastened.