Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Planning Support Methods Urban and Regional Analysis and Projection
Planning Support Methods Urban and Regional Analysis and Projection
Planning Support Methods Urban and Regional Analysis and Projection
Richard E. Klosterman
University of Akron
Kerry Brooks
Eastern Washington University
Joshua Drucker
University of Illinois at Chicago
Edward Feser
Oregon State University
Henry Renski
University of Massachusetts Amherst
Credits and acknowledgments for material borrowed from other sources, and reproduced with permission, appear on
the appropriate page within the text.
Unit A, Whitacre Mews, 26-34 Stannary Street, London SE11 4AB, United Kingdom
All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form or by any electronic or mechanical means,
including information storage and retrieval systems, without written permission from the publisher, except by a
reviewer who may quote passages in a review.
∞ ™ The paper used in this publication meets the minimum requirements of American National Standard
for Information Sciences—Permanence of Paper for Printed Library Materials, ANSI/NISO Z39.48-1992.
1 Foundations 1
2 Welcome to Decatur 13
5 Cohort-Component Methods 79
iii
Contents
1 Foundations 1
Planning and the Future 2
The Role of Assumptions 3
The Politics of Projecting the Future 3
The Promise of Scenario Planning 5
Planning and the Public 5
Planning for the Public 6
Planning with the Public 7
Planning Support Systems 8
Simple and Complex Models and Methods 9
Beyond Planning Support Systems 10
2 Welcome to Decatur 13
Background Information 13
Location 13
History 13
Population and Housing Information 15
Employment and Occupation Information 17
Land Uses 19
Decatur Block Groups 22
Land Use Information 23
Population Density 23
Racial and Ethnic Composition 25
Household Income 25
Population Pyramids 27
Lorenz Curves 31
Gini Coefficients 33
Geometric Curve 42
Parabolic Curve 45
Gompertz Curve 47
Using Trend Curves 48
Plotting the Observed Data 48
Plotting the Projected Values 51
Defining Growth Limits 51
Combining Projections 52
Evaluating Goodness of Fit Statistics 54
Evaluating the DeKalb County and Decatur Trend Projections 57
5 Cohort-Component Methods 79
Demographic Trends 79
Mortality 79
Fertility 81
Migration 81
Cohort-Component Methods 83
Hamilton-Perry Method 84
Projecting the Female Population 84
Projecting the Male Population 86
Evaluating the Hamilton-Perry Method 89
Mortality Component 90
Life Tables 91
Computing One-Year Life Table Survival Rates 93
Computing Multiple-Year Life Table Survival Rates 94
Fertility Component 95
Computing Age-Specific Fertility Rates 95
Migration Component 97
Residual Net Migration Estimation Methods 98
Gross Migration Methods 105
Contents vii
Figures
2.1 Population Pyramids for Bangladesh, Germany, and the
United States, 2010 29
2.2 Georgia Population Pyramid, 2010 30
2.3 DeKalb County Population Pyramid, 2010 30
2.4 Decatur Population Pyramid, 2010 31
2.5 Sample Lorenz Curves 32
2.6 Household Wealth Lorenz Curves for Decatur, the State of Georgia,
and the United States, 2010 33
3.1 Graphical Projection: DeKalb County Population, 2040 36
3.2 Sample Linear Curves 38
3.3 Alternate Forms of the Linear Curve 41
3.4 Alternate Forms of the Geometric Curve 43
3.5 Alternate Forms of the Parabolic Curve 46
3.6 Alternate Forms of the Gompertz Curve 47
3.7 DeKalb County Population, 1900–2010 49
3.8 Decatur Population, 1900–2010 50
3.9 Parabolic Trend Projections: DeKalb County, 1990–2010 51
3.10 Trend Projections: DeKalb County Population, 1990–2070 52
3.11 Trend Projections: Decatur Population, 1990–2070 57
4.1 Observed Population Share: Decatur and DeKalb County, 2000–2010 65
4.2 Observed and Adjusted-Share-of-Change Projected
Population: Decatur, 2010 and 2040 75
5.1 Age-Adjusted Mortality Rates, United States, 1940–2010 80
5.2 Mortality Rates by Race and Ethnicity: United States, 1980–2010 80
5.3 Total Fertility Rates: United States, 1960–2012 81
5.4 Total Fertility Rates by Race: United States, 1980–2012 82
5.5 Migration by Type: United States, 1980–2012 82
5.6 Age of Migrants: United States, 2012 83
5.7 Population Pyramids: Decatur 2010 and 2040 89
5.8 Estimated Male and Female Net Migration: DeKalb County, 2010–2015 102
5.9 Observed and Projected Population: DeKalb County, 1950–2040 120
5.10 Observed and Projected Population by Age and Sex: Constant Rates
Projection, DeKalb County, 2010 and 2040 121
5.11 Observed and Projected Deaths: DeKalb County, 1995–2040 122
5.12 Observed and Projected Live Births: DeKalb County, 2005–2040 123
5.13 Projected Net Migration: DeKalb County, 2010–2040 123
6.1 Decatur and United States Employment, 2001–2013 131
6.2 Employment by Major Employment Sector: Decatur, 1998–2013 152
6.3 Decatur Employment Share, 1998–2013 154
7.1 Equal Interval Class Break Distributions: Georgia County
Populations, 2010 177
7.2 Quantiles Class Break Distributions: Georgia County Populations, 2010 178
7.3 Natural Breaks Class Distributions: Georgia County Populations, 2010 179
7.4 Sample Venn Diagram 184
xi
xii Figures, Maps, and Tables
Maps
2.1 Atlanta Region, 2010 14
2.2 DeKalb County, Georgia, 2010 15
2.3 City of Decatur, Georgia, 2010 20
2.4 Land Uses, City of Decatur, 2014 21
2.5 Decatur Block Groups, 2010 22
2.6 Land Uses: Decatur Block Groups, 2014 23
2.7 Residential Density: Decatur Block Groups, 2010–2014 25
2.8 Percent White-Only Population: Decatur Block Groups, 2010–2014 26
2.9 Median Household Income: Decatur Block Groups, 2010–2014 28
4.1 Observed and Adjusted-Share-of-Change Population Projections and
Land Uses: Decatur Block Groups, 2010 and 2040 76
7.1 Persons in Poverty: Georgia Counties, 2010 172
7.2 Total Population: Georgia Counties, 2010 173
7.3 Poverty Rate: Georgia Counties, 2010 174
7.4 Equal Interval Classification: Georgia County Populations, 2010 176
7.5 Quantiles Classification: Georgia County Populations, 2010 177
7.6 Natural Breaks Classification: Georgia County Populations, 2010 179
8.1 Decatur Streams and Land Uses, 2014 203
Figures, Maps, and Tables xiii
Tables
2.1 Population Breakdown by Race: City of Decatur, DeKalb County,
and the Atlanta Region, 2010–2014 16
2.2 Population Breakdown by Age: City of Decatur, DeKalb County,
and the Atlanta Region, 2010–2014 16
2.3 Household Income Breakdown: City of Decatur, DeKalb County,
and the Atlanta Region, 2010–2014 17
2.4 Housing Statistics: City of Decatur, DeKalb County, and the Atlanta
Region, 2010–2014 17
2.5 Employment Breakdown by Major Employment Sector: City of Decatur,
DeKalb County, and the Atlanta Region, 2013 18
2.6 Occupation Breakdown: City of Decatur, DeKalb County, and the Atlanta
Region, 2013 19
2.7 Land Uses: City of Decatur and DeKalb County, 2014 21
2.8 Land Uses: Decatur Block Groups, 2014 24
2.9 Residential Population, Area, and Density: Decatur Block Groups,
2010–2014 24
2.10 Population Composition by Race and Ethnicity: Decatur Block
Groups, 2010–2014 26
2.11 Median Household Income: DeKalb County Block Groups, 2010–2014 27
2.12 Computing Lorenz Curve Values 32
2.13 Computing a Gini Coefficient 33
2.14 Gini Coefficients for Decatur, DeKalb County, the State of Georgia,
and the United States, 2010 34
3.1 Observed and Computed Values for Sample Linear Curves 38
3.2 Error of Estimates for Sample Linear Curves 42
3.3 Comparison of the Linear and Geometric Curves 44
3.4 Sample Parabolic Curves 46
3.5 Projected Population for Different Trend Curves and Fit Periods: DeKalb
County, 2040 48
3.6 Selected Population and Household Statistics: Decatur, 1970–2010 50
3.7 Average and Trimmed Average Population Projections: DeKalb
County, 2040 53
xiv Figures, Maps, and Tables
3.8 Projected Population for Four Trend Curves and the 1990–2010 Fit
Period: Decatur, 2040 54
3.9 Computing Goodness of Fit Statistics: Decatur Linear Population
Estimates for the 1990–2010 Fit Period 55
3.10 Goodness of Fit Statistics: Decatur Population Estimates for the
1990–2010 Fit Period 58
4.1 Constant-Share Population Projections: Decatur, 2040 62
4.2 Projected Population Shift: Decatur, 2010–2040 63
4.3 Shift-Share Population Projections: Decatur, 2040 63
4.4 Share of Population Change: Decatur, 2000–2010 64
4.5 Share-of-Change Population Projections: Decatur, 2040 64
4.6 Share-Trend Population Projection: Decatur, 2040 66
4.7 Share Population Projections: Decatur, 2040 66
4.8 Constant-Share Population Projections: Decatur Block Groups, 2040 67
4.9 Projected Population Shift: Decatur Block Groups, 2010–2040 68
4.10 Shift-Share Population Projections: Decatur Block Groups, 2040 69
4.11 Projected Shift-Share Growth Rates: Decatur, 2000–2040 70
4.12 Observed Share of Change: Decatur Block Groups, 2000–2010 71
4.13 Share-of-Change Population Projections: Decatur Block Groups, 2040 72
4.14 Plus-Minus Adjustment for Share-of-Change Population
Projections: Decatur Block Groups, 2010–2040 73
4.15 Adjusted-Share-of-Change Population Projections: Decatur
Block Groups, 2040 74
5.1 Hamilton-Perry Population Projections: Decatur Females, 2020–2040 85
5.2 Hamilton-Perry Population Projections: Decatur Males, 2020–2040 87
5.3 Hamilton-Perry Population Projections: Decatur Total
Population, 2020–2040 88
5.4 Life Table for Females: United States, 2010 92
5.5 Computing Five-Year Survival Rates for Females: United States, 2010 94
5.6 Computing Five-Year Age-Specific Fertility Rates for
Females: DeKalb County, 2010 96
5.7 Estimating Female Births: DeKalb County, 2010–2015 100
5.8 Estimating Female Net Migration: DeKalb County, 2005–2010 101
5.9 Estimating Female Net Migration Rates: DeKalb County, 2005–2010 104
5.10 Projecting Female Net Migration: DeKalb County, 2010–2015 107
5.11 Projecting the Female Population by Age with Constant Rates: DeKalb
County, 2015 108
5.12 Projecting the Male Population by Age with Constant Rates:
DeKalb County, 2015 109
5.13 Projecting the Female Population by Age with Constant Rates: DeKalb
County, 2020 110
5.14 Observed and Projected Five-Year Survival Rates: DeKalb County
Females, 2010–2015 and 2035–2040 112
5.15 Observed and Projected Five-Year Fertility Rates: DeKalb County
Female Births, 2010–2015 and 2035–2040 113
5.16 Observed and Projected Female Population for Different Projection
Methods: DeKalb County, 2010 and 2040 114
5.17 Plus-Minus Adjustment for Projected Ten Percent Net Migration
Increase: DeKalb County Females, 2010–2015 115
5.18 Observed and Projected Female Population for Different Net Migration
Projections: DeKalb County, 2010 and 2040 117
Figures, Maps, and Tables xv
Planning is looking backward at what we can learn from experience, looking around at
what we can learn from observation, . . . looking forward to see where we are going, . . .
choosing where we want to go and figuring out how we can get there.1
Quantitative methods have played a central role in planning education and practice
since the middle of the twentieth century when planners’ vision of planning as an intu-
itive process of design was replaced by a new concept of planning as an applied science.
Several texts have been published over the intervening years that introduced planning
students and practitioners to an array of quantitative methods. The first widely used
methods text, Walter Isard’s 760-page Methods of Regional Analysis (Isard et al. 1960),
was published in 1960. Several planning methods texts were published in the 1970s but
Urban Planning Analysis (Krueckeberg and Silvers 1974) dominated planning educa-
tion in the United States. Only two quantitative methods texts for planning students and
practitioners have been published in North America in the last thirty years: Community
Analysis and Planning Techniques (Klosterman 1990) and Research Methods in Urban
and Regional Planning (Wang and Hofe 2007).
This book describes and applies the most important and widely used urban and
regional analysis and projection methods. It updates and extends Community Analysis
and Planning Techniques by including the trend, share, cohort- component, popu-
lation, and employment analysis and projection methods covered in the earlier text.
Recognizing the critical role that geographic information systems (GIS) play in planning
education and practice, it reviews spatial analysis methods and describes land suitability
methods. The book’s appendices describe data sources for applying the methods in the
book, US census geography, and the US Bureau of the Census’s American Community
Survey. More important, unlike recently published books such as Silva et al. (2015)
and Lipovska and Stepenka (2016), the book applies the methods to an American city
and county, demonstrating in detail how quantitative methods can be used to support
community-based planning.
Planning Support Methods contains nine chapters and three appendices that describe
and apply the quantitative planning methods at the core of planning education and
practice. The book describes the methods’ underlying assumptions, advantages, and
limitations; it also provides guidelines for using the methods and criteria for selecting
the most acceptable projection (or projections) and extensive lists of references for fur-
ther reading. The text can be used in graduate and undergraduate methods courses and
by planning practitioners and others interested in understanding and using planning
methods.
Chapter 1 lays out the intellectual foundations for using the methods described in
the remainder of the book. It argues that planning is a forward-thinking profession that
should promote citizen-centered planning with the public, which involves as many peo-
ple as possible, as completely as possible, in the decisions that affect their lives. It also
suggests that planners should use simple, understandable, and easy-to-use methods like
the ones described in this book to support these efforts.
Chapter 2 describes the City of Decatur, Georgia, and DeKalb County, in which
it is located. The chapter provides background information on Decatur and describes
the city’s population and housing, employment and occupations, land uses, and block
groups. The chapter uses population pyramids, Lorenz curves, and Gini coefficients to
analyze and describe the city’s population and economy.
xvii
xviii Preface
Chapter 3 introduces concepts and terms that will be used throughout the book.
It then describes four trend curves—linear, geometric, parabolic, and Gompertz—that
identify past trends in an area’s growth or decline and continue those trends to project
the future. The chapter uses the trend curves to project Decatur and DeKalb County’s
2040 populations and describes procedures for using trend curves and identifying the
most appropriate trend projections.
Chapter 4 describes share projection methods that project an area’s future pop-
ulation or employment, given projections for a larger area in which it is located. The
constant-share, shift-share, share-of-change, and share-trend methods are used to proj-
ect Decatur’s 2040 population. The constant-share, shift-share, share-of-change, and
adjusted-share-of-change methods are used to project the 2040 population of Decatur’s
thirteen block groups. The chapter concludes by evaluating the share projections for
Decatur and its block groups.
Chapter 5 describes cohort-component projection methods that divide a popula-
tion into age, sex, and racial or ethnic groups or cohorts and deal separately with the
three components of population change—mortality, fertility, and migration. It describes
past mortality, fertility, and migration trends for the United States. It projects Decatur’s
2040 population for ten-year age cohorts and DeKalb County’s 2040 population for
five-year age cohorts, under different survival, fertility, and migration assumptions, and
evaluates the projections.
Chapter 6 describes basic concepts and terms for understanding an area’s econ-
omy and provides economic analysis guidelines. It uses location quotients and shift-
share analysis to understand Decatur’s aggregate economy, industrial composition, and
industrial specialization. The chapter uses the share projection methods described in
chapter 4 to project the 2040 employment in Decatur’s major employment sectors. The
chapter concludes with guidelines for using economic analysis and projection methods.
Chapter 7 provides an overview of the spatial analysis methods that underlie geo-
graphic information systems (GIS) applications. It describes: (1) fundamental spatial
analysis concepts and terminology, (2) methods for locating spatial features, (3) the ras-
ter and vector data models, (4) methods for analyzing spatial and attribute data and
representing spatial relationships, and (5) widely used spatial analysis methods.
Chapter 8 describes land suitability analysis methods that determine the suitabil-
ity of one or more locations for one or more land uses. It introduces four widely used
land suitability analysis methods—map overlay, binary selection, ordinal combination,
and weighted combination. It uses the binary selection method to identify land parcels
and buildings in Decatur’s flood zones. It uses the ordinal combination and weighted
combination methods to identify vacant parcels in DeKalb County that are suitable for
residential and commercial development, given a range of suitability assumptions. It
concludes by describing procedures for computing standardized suitability scores and
opportunities for public involvement.
The final chapter provides guidelines for using the planning support methods
described in the preceding chapters. Seven guidelines are described and applied to the
analyses and projections for Decatur and DeKalb County: (1) use graphs and charts,
(2) use maps, (3) document assumptions, (4) compare to projections by other organi-
zations, (5) combine different information, (6) support other applications, and (7) use
scenarios.
Appendix A describes the US Bureau of the Census’s American Community Survey
that replaced the US decennial population and housing census in 2010. Appendix B
describes the geographic units and codes the US Bureau of the Census uses to collect
and report its data. Appendix C describes free, online sources for data that can be used
to apply the methods described in the book.
newgenprepdf
Preface xix
The book is a collaborative effort of the coauthors and other people who provided
extremely helpful assistance and advice. Henry Renski coauthored chapter 5, Joshua
Drucker and Edward Feser coauthored chapter 6, and Kerry Brooks coauthored
chapter 8. Richard Klosterman coauthored these chapters and wrote the remainder of
the book. Kerry Brooks and Richard Klosterman prepared the maps. Lewis D. Hopkins
contributed greatly to the discussion of scenario planning in the final chapter and the
remainder of the book. Terry Moore and Hyeon-Shic Shin made extremely helpful sug-
gestions for improving large portions of the book. Any errors are the sole responsibility
of the first author.
Terms in the glossary are printed in bold fonts when they first appear in the text.
Additional resources for using this text and the methods it describes are available at
PlanningSupport.org.
Note
1
Isserman (2007, 195).
P
Foundations
lanning and predicting the future are essential human activities.1 Individuals and
families consult weather forecasts to plan their weekend activities and rely on
1
financial advisors to plan their financial futures. Public and private organizations hire
consultants to help identify actions and investments that will benefit them in the
future. Local, regional, state, and national governments hire planners and other pub-
lic policy experts to help them deal with an uncertain and politically contentious
future. Rapid urbanization has brought half the world’s population into cities and an
array of public policy issues—climate change, housing affordability, and food security,
to name a few—demand public attention. The increased interdependence, complex-
ity, and uncertainty of a rapidly urbanizing world requires planning that helps public
officials satisfy their diverse and vocal constituencies and assists private-sector actors
to make and protect their investments.
Planners know that public sector planning is required to promote the collec-
tive interests of the community, consider the external effects of individual and group
action, improve the information base for public and private action, and protect soci-
ety’s most needy members (Klosterman 1985). They also realize that current actions
affect future outcomes and that taking no action is an action in itself. Planning
assumes that individuals, organizations, and communities can control their fates and
act to achieve desired futures and avoid undesirable ones. Without planning, com-
munities can only stumble blindly into a future they make no effort to shape. With
planning, the future is the result of underlying trends and the public’s efforts to
modify them.
However, planners also recognize the obstacles to public sector planning. Annual
budgets and the short terms of elected officials focus public attention on issues
immediately at hand. Property owners are understandably wary of public actions that
may affect the value of their most precious assets and businesses, large and small, and
place their particular interests above those of society at large. In the realm of political
discourse, the rhetoric of protecting property rights and promoting individual free-
dom disparages government efforts to address the long-term collective interests of
the community and protect the poor and powerless.
It is important to remember that people like planning. They prepare plans for
their personal lives, for the organizations to which they belong, and for the compa-
nies that employ them. They care deeply about their neighborhoods and communities
and are concerned about the future they are leaving their children and grandchildren.
Given an opportunity, people turn out night after night to express their concerns and
hopes for a better future. Arbitrary-seeming regulations and the lack of a meaningful
role in shaping their world are what people understandably resist.
Planning is inherently about the future: it is a process of identifying and
implementing actions and policies in the present that will make the future better.
Unfortunately, planners have all too often abandoned their traditional role of help-
ing communities consider what the future may—and should—be. Instead, many
planners focus their efforts largely on pragmatic problem-solving and more imme-
diate concerns of community development, code enforcement, and public/private
development.
Planners’ neglect of the future has several causes. The press of daily job require-
ments and the desire for job security understandably focus planners’ attention on
short-term concerns with clearly identified results. Today’s political environment
1
2 Chapter 1 • Foundations
often makes idealism, visioning, and inspiration seem naively unrealistic. And the
widespread adoption of social science methods has greatly enhanced planners’ ability
to understand the past and present but provides little assistance in helping communi-
ties engage in their collective futures.
I see increasing reason to believe that the view formed some time
back as to the origin of the Makonde bush is the correct one. I have
no doubt that it is not a natural product, but the result of human
occupation. Those parts of the high country where man—as a very
slight amount of practice enables the eye to perceive at once—has not
yet penetrated with axe and hoe, are still occupied by a splendid
timber forest quite able to sustain a comparison with our mixed
forests in Germany. But wherever man has once built his hut or tilled
his field, this horrible bush springs up. Every phase of this process
may be seen in the course of a couple of hours’ walk along the main
road. From the bush to right or left, one hears the sound of the axe—
not from one spot only, but from several directions at once. A few
steps further on, we can see what is taking place. The brush has been
cut down and piled up in heaps to the height of a yard or more,
between which the trunks of the large trees stand up like the last
pillars of a magnificent ruined building. These, too, present a
melancholy spectacle: the destructive Makonde have ringed them—
cut a broad strip of bark all round to ensure their dying off—and also
piled up pyramids of brush round them. Father and son, mother and
son-in-law, are chopping away perseveringly in the background—too
busy, almost, to look round at the white stranger, who usually excites
so much interest. If you pass by the same place a week later, the piles
of brushwood have disappeared and a thick layer of ashes has taken
the place of the green forest. The large trees stretch their
smouldering trunks and branches in dumb accusation to heaven—if
they have not already fallen and been more or less reduced to ashes,
perhaps only showing as a white stripe on the dark ground.
This work of destruction is carried out by the Makonde alike on the
virgin forest and on the bush which has sprung up on sites already
cultivated and deserted. In the second case they are saved the trouble
of burning the large trees, these being entirely absent in the
secondary bush.
After burning this piece of forest ground and loosening it with the
hoe, the native sows his corn and plants his vegetables. All over the
country, he goes in for bed-culture, which requires, and, in fact,
receives, the most careful attention. Weeds are nowhere tolerated in
the south of German East Africa. The crops may fail on the plains,
where droughts are frequent, but never on the plateau with its
abundant rains and heavy dews. Its fortunate inhabitants even have
the satisfaction of seeing the proud Wayao and Wamakua working
for them as labourers, driven by hunger to serve where they were
accustomed to rule.
But the light, sandy soil is soon exhausted, and would yield no
harvest the second year if cultivated twice running. This fact has
been familiar to the native for ages; consequently he provides in
time, and, while his crop is growing, prepares the next plot with axe
and firebrand. Next year he plants this with his various crops and
lets the first piece lie fallow. For a short time it remains waste and
desolate; then nature steps in to repair the destruction wrought by
man; a thousand new growths spring out of the exhausted soil, and
even the old stumps put forth fresh shoots. Next year the new growth
is up to one’s knees, and in a few years more it is that terrible,
impenetrable bush, which maintains its position till the black
occupier of the land has made the round of all the available sites and
come back to his starting point.
The Makonde are, body and soul, so to speak, one with this bush.
According to my Yao informants, indeed, their name means nothing
else but “bush people.” Their own tradition says that they have been
settled up here for a very long time, but to my surprise they laid great
stress on an original immigration. Their old homes were in the
south-east, near Mikindani and the mouth of the Rovuma, whence
their peaceful forefathers were driven by the continual raids of the
Sakalavas from Madagascar and the warlike Shirazis[47] of the coast,
to take refuge on the almost inaccessible plateau. I have studied
African ethnology for twenty years, but the fact that changes of
population in this apparently quiet and peaceable corner of the earth
could have been occasioned by outside enterprises taking place on
the high seas, was completely new to me. It is, no doubt, however,
correct.
The charming tribal legend of the Makonde—besides informing us
of other interesting matters—explains why they have to live in the
thickest of the bush and a long way from the edge of the plateau,
instead of making their permanent homes beside the purling brooks
and springs of the low country.
“The place where the tribe originated is Mahuta, on the southern
side of the plateau towards the Rovuma, where of old time there was
nothing but thick bush. Out of this bush came a man who never
washed himself or shaved his head, and who ate and drank but little.
He went out and made a human figure from the wood of a tree
growing in the open country, which he took home to his abode in the
bush and there set it upright. In the night this image came to life and
was a woman. The man and woman went down together to the
Rovuma to wash themselves. Here the woman gave birth to a still-
born child. They left that place and passed over the high land into the
valley of the Mbemkuru, where the woman had another child, which
was also born dead. Then they returned to the high bush country of
Mahuta, where the third child was born, which lived and grew up. In
course of time, the couple had many more children, and called
themselves Wamatanda. These were the ancestral stock of the
Makonde, also called Wamakonde,[48] i.e., aborigines. Their
forefather, the man from the bush, gave his children the command to
bury their dead upright, in memory of the mother of their race who
was cut out of wood and awoke to life when standing upright. He also
warned them against settling in the valleys and near large streams,
for sickness and death dwelt there. They were to make it a rule to
have their huts at least an hour’s walk from the nearest watering-
place; then their children would thrive and escape illness.”
The explanation of the name Makonde given by my informants is
somewhat different from that contained in the above legend, which I
extract from a little book (small, but packed with information), by
Pater Adams, entitled Lindi und sein Hinterland. Otherwise, my
results agree exactly with the statements of the legend. Washing?
Hapana—there is no such thing. Why should they do so? As it is, the
supply of water scarcely suffices for cooking and drinking; other
people do not wash, so why should the Makonde distinguish himself
by such needless eccentricity? As for shaving the head, the short,
woolly crop scarcely needs it,[49] so the second ancestral precept is
likewise easy enough to follow. Beyond this, however, there is
nothing ridiculous in the ancestor’s advice. I have obtained from
various local artists a fairly large number of figures carved in wood,
ranging from fifteen to twenty-three inches in height, and
representing women belonging to the great group of the Mavia,
Makonde, and Matambwe tribes. The carving is remarkably well
done and renders the female type with great accuracy, especially the
keloid ornamentation, to be described later on. As to the object and
meaning of their works the sculptors either could or (more probably)
would tell me nothing, and I was forced to content myself with the
scanty information vouchsafed by one man, who said that the figures
were merely intended to represent the nembo—the artificial
deformations of pelele, ear-discs, and keloids. The legend recorded
by Pater Adams places these figures in a new light. They must surely
be more than mere dolls; and we may even venture to assume that
they are—though the majority of present-day Makonde are probably
unaware of the fact—representations of the tribal ancestress.
The references in the legend to the descent from Mahuta to the
Rovuma, and to a journey across the highlands into the Mbekuru
valley, undoubtedly indicate the previous history of the tribe, the
travels of the ancestral pair typifying the migrations of their
descendants. The descent to the neighbouring Rovuma valley, with
its extraordinary fertility and great abundance of game, is intelligible
at a glance—but the crossing of the Lukuledi depression, the ascent
to the Rondo Plateau and the descent to the Mbemkuru, also lie
within the bounds of probability, for all these districts have exactly
the same character as the extreme south. Now, however, comes a
point of especial interest for our bacteriological age. The primitive
Makonde did not enjoy their lives in the marshy river-valleys.
Disease raged among them, and many died. It was only after they
had returned to their original home near Mahuta, that the health
conditions of these people improved. We are very apt to think of the
African as a stupid person whose ignorance of nature is only equalled
by his fear of it, and who looks on all mishaps as caused by evil
spirits and malignant natural powers. It is much more correct to
assume in this case that the people very early learnt to distinguish
districts infested with malaria from those where it is absent.
This knowledge is crystallized in the
ancestral warning against settling in the
valleys and near the great waters, the
dwelling-places of disease and death. At the
same time, for security against the hostile
Mavia south of the Rovuma, it was enacted
that every settlement must be not less than a
certain distance from the southern edge of the
plateau. Such in fact is their mode of life at the
present day. It is not such a bad one, and
certainly they are both safer and more
comfortable than the Makua, the recent
intruders from the south, who have made USUAL METHOD OF
good their footing on the western edge of the CLOSING HUT-DOOR
plateau, extending over a fairly wide belt of
country. Neither Makua nor Makonde show in their dwellings
anything of the size and comeliness of the Yao houses in the plain,
especially at Masasi, Chingulungulu and Zuza’s. Jumbe Chauro, a
Makonde hamlet not far from Newala, on the road to Mahuta, is the
most important settlement of the tribe I have yet seen, and has fairly
spacious huts. But how slovenly is their construction compared with
the palatial residences of the elephant-hunters living in the plain.
The roofs are still more untidy than in the general run of huts during
the dry season, the walls show here and there the scanty beginnings
or the lamentable remains of the mud plastering, and the interior is a
veritable dog-kennel; dirt, dust and disorder everywhere. A few huts
only show any attempt at division into rooms, and this consists
merely of very roughly-made bamboo partitions. In one point alone
have I noticed any indication of progress—in the method of fastening
the door. Houses all over the south are secured in a simple but
ingenious manner. The door consists of a set of stout pieces of wood
or bamboo, tied with bark-string to two cross-pieces, and moving in
two grooves round one of the door-posts, so as to open inwards. If
the owner wishes to leave home, he takes two logs as thick as a man’s
upper arm and about a yard long. One of these is placed obliquely
against the middle of the door from the inside, so as to form an angle
of from 60° to 75° with the ground. He then places the second piece
horizontally across the first, pressing it downward with all his might.
It is kept in place by two strong posts planted in the ground a few
inches inside the door. This fastening is absolutely safe, but of course
cannot be applied to both doors at once, otherwise how could the
owner leave or enter his house? I have not yet succeeded in finding
out how the back door is fastened.