Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Ebook PDF Looking at Movies Sixth Edition 6th Edition
Ebook PDF Looking at Movies Sixth Edition 6th Edition
CHAPTER 1
Looking at Movies 1
Learning Objectives 2
Looking at Movies 2
What Is a Movie? 3
The Movie Director 6
Ways of Looking at Movies 6
Invisibility and Cinematic Language 8
Cultural Invisibility 10
Implicit and Explicit Meaning 11
Viewer Expectations 13
Formal Analysis 15
Alternative Approaches to Analysis 20
Cultural and Formal Analysis in the Star Wars Series 23
Analyzing Looking at Movies 28
Screening Checklist: Looking at Movies 28
Questions for Review 29
CHAPTER 2
Principles of Film Form 31
Learning Objectives 32
Film Form 32
Form and Content 32
Form and Expectations 35
Patterns 36
Fundamentals of Film Form 40
Movies Depend on Light 40
Movies Provide an Illusion of Movement 41
Movies Manipulate Space and Time in Unique Ways 43
Realism, Antirealism, and Formalism 49
Verisimilitude 54
vii
viii Contents
Cinematic Language 55
Looking at Film Form: Donnie Darko 57
Content 57
Expectations 57
Patterns 58
Manipulating Space 59
Manipulating Time 60
Realism, Antirealism, and Verisimilitude 60
Analyzing Principles of Film Form 61
Screening Checklist: Principles of Film Form 61
Questions for Review 61
CHAPTER 3
Types of Movies 63
Learning Objectives 64
The Idea of Narrative 64
Types of Movies 67
Narrative Movies 68
Documentary Movies 69
Experimental Movies 74
Hybrid Movies 81
Genre 82
Genre Conventions 85
Story Formulas 85
Theme 85
Character Types 86
Setting 86
Presentation 86
Stars 87
CHAPTER 4
Elements of Narrative 115
Learning Objectives 116
What Is Narrative? 116
Characters 120
Narrative Structure 124
The Screenwriter 129
Elements of Narrative 129
Story and Plot 129
Order 134
Events 136
Duration 136
Suspense versus Surprise 140
Repetition 141
Setting 142
Scope 143
Looking at Narrative in Stagecoach 143
Story 144
Narration and Narrator 144
Characters 144
Narrative Structure 146
Plot 147
Order 147
Diegetic and Nondiegetic Elements 147
Events 148
Duration 148
Suspense 149
Setting 149
Scope 149
Analyzing Elements of Narrative 151
Screening Checklist: Elements of Narrative 151
Questions for Review 152
CHAPTER 5
Mise-en-Scène 153
Learning Objectives 154
What Is Mise-en-Scène? 154
Design 155
The Production Designer 155
Elements of Design 156
Setting, Decor, and Properties 157
Costume, Makeup, and Hairstyle 160
Lighting 166
Quality 167
Lighting Ratios 168
Direction 169
x Contents
Composition 171
Kinesis 176
Approaches to Mise-en-Scène 178
Looking at Mise-en-Scène in Sleepy Hollow 181
Lighting and Setting 182
Costumes, Makeup, and Hairstyle 184
Analyzing Mise-en-Scène 186
Screening Checklist: Mise-en-Scène 186
Questions for Review 186
CHAPTER 6
Cinematography 187
Learning Objectives 188
What Is Cinematography? 188
The Director of Photography 188
Production Terms and Tasks 188
Cinematographic Properties of the Shot 190
Film and Digital Formats 191
Black and White 193
Color 194
Lighting Sources 198
Lenses 199
Framing of the Shot 201
Implied Proximity to the Camera 204
Depth 207
Camera Angle and Height 209
Eye Level 209
High Angle 210
Low Angle 210
Dutch Angle 211
Bird’s-Eye View 211
Camera Movement 211
Pan and Tilt Shots 213
Dolly Shot 214
Zoom 215
Crane Shot 216
Handheld Camera 217
Steadicam 217
Framing: What We See on the Screen 218
Open and Closed Framing 220
Framing and Point of View 222
Speed and Length of the Shot 223
Speed of the Shot 223
Length of the Shot 226
Special Effects 227
Looking at Cinematography in Moonlight 230
Analyzing Cinematography 233
Screening Checklist: Cinematography 233
Questions for Review 234
Contents xi
CHAPTER 7
ACTING 235
Learning Objectives 236
What Is Acting? 236
Movie Actors 237
The Evolution of Screen Acting 242
Early Screen-Acting Styles 242
D. W. Griffith and Lillian Gish 243
The Influence of Sound 244
Acting in the Classical Studio Era 246
Method Acting 249
Screen Acting Today 251
Technology and Acting 256
Casting Actors 257
Factors Involved in Casting 258
Aspects of Performance 258
Types of Roles 258
Preparing for Roles 260
Naturalistic and Nonnaturalistic Styles 262
Improvisational Acting 264
Directors and Actors 265
How Filmmaking Affects Acting 266
Framing, Composition, Lighting, and the Long Take 267
The Camera and the Close-up 270
Acting and Editing 272
Looking at Acting 272
Michelle Williams 275
Analyzing Acting 278
Screening Checklist: Acting 278
Questions for Review 279
CHAPTER 8
EDITING 281
Learning Objectives 282
What Is Editing? 282
The Film Editor 283
Functions of Editing 285
Fragmentation 286
Juxtaposition and Meaning 289
Spatial Relationships between Shots 292
Temporal Relationships between Shots 293
Duration, Pace, and Rhythm 297
xii Contents
CHAPTER 9
SOUND 319
Learning Objectives 320
What Is Sound? 320
Sound Production 321
Design 322
Recording 323
Editing 323
Mixing 324
Describing Film Sound 324
Pitch, Loudness, Quality 324
Fidelity 325
Sources of Film Sound 326
Diegetic versus Nondiegetic 326
On-screen versus Offscreen 327
Internal versus External 328
Types of Film Sound 329
Vocal Sounds 329
Environmental Sounds 331
Music 332
Contents xiii
Silence 338
Types of Sound in Steven Spielberg’s War of the Worlds 340
Functions of Film Sound 343
Audience Awareness 344
Audience Expectations 345
Expression of Point of View 346
Rhythm 347
Characterization 348
Continuity 348
Emphasis 349
Looking at (and Listening to) Sound in Orson Welles’s
Citizen Kane 350
Sources and Types 352
Functions 352
Characterization 353
Themes 355
Analyzing Sound 356
Screening Checklist: Sound 356
Questions for Review 356
CHAPTER 10
FILM HISTORY 357
Learning Objectives 358
What Is Film History? 358
Basic Approaches to Studying Film History 359
The Aesthetic Approach 359
The Technological Approach 359
The Economic Approach 360
The Social History Approach 360
A Short Overview of Film History 361
Precinema 361
Photography 361
Series Photography 362
1891–1903: The First Movies 363
1908–1927: Origins of the Classical Hollywood Style—The Silent Period 366
1919–1931: German Expressionism 370
1918–1930: French Avant-Garde Filmmaking 372
1924–1930: The Soviet Montage Movement 373
1927–1947: Classical Hollywood Style in Hollywood’s Golden Age 376
1942–1951: Italian Neorealism 380
1959–1964: French New Wave 382
1947–Present: Movements and Developments in
International Cinema 385
England and the Free Cinema Movement 386
Denmark and the Dogme 95 Movement 387
xiv Contents
CHAPTER 11
How the Movies Are Made 409
Learning Objectives 410
Money, Methods, and Materials: The Whole Equation 410
Film and Digital Technologies: An Overview 412
Film Technology 412
Digital Technology 415
Film versus Digital Technology 416
How a Movie Is Made 417
Preproduction 417
Production 418
Postproduction 420
The Studio System 420
Organization before 1931 420
Organization after 1931 421
Organization during the Golden Age 422
The Decline of the Studio System 424
The Independent System 426
Labor and Unions 427
Professional Organizations and Standardization 428
Financing in the Industry 429
Contents xv
Glossary 443
Permissions Acknowledgments 457
Index 461
PREFACE
Students in an introductory film course who read Look- A Focus on Analytic Skills
ing at Movies carefully and take full advantage of its me-
dia program will finish the course with a solid grounding A good introductory film book needs to help students
in the major principles of film form as well as a more make the transition from the natural enjoyment of mov-
perceptive and analytic eye. A short description of the ies to a critical understanding of the form, content, and
book’s main features follows. meanings of movies. Looking at Movies accomplishes
this task in several different ways:
xvii
xviii Preface
Available in the ebook and on the Looking at Movies stu- produced in the aspect ratio of the original source—will
dent website, these features can be accessed at digital serve as accurate reference points for students’ analyses.
.wwnorton.com/movies6.
Five Hours of Moving-Image Media
Video Tutorials The ebook and student website that accompany Looking
A series of video tutorials—written, directed, and hosted at Movies offer five hours of video content:
by Dave Monahan—complement and expand on the
book’s analyses. Ranging from 2 to 15 minutes in length, • The twenty-eight video tutorials described above
were specifically created to complement Looking
these tutorials show students via moving-image media
at Movies and are exclusive to this text. Because
what the book describes and illustrates in still images. they are viewable in full-screen, they are suitable
The Sixth Edition offers one new tutorial on the Star for presentation in class as well as for students’
Wars series that expands on the in-text analysis. Help- self-study. In addition to the longer video tutorials,
ful as a quick review of core concepts in the text, these there are also over fifty short-form animations
tutorials also provide useful models for film analysis, based on illustrations in the print text.
thus helping students further develop their analyti- • A mini-anthology of thirteen complete short films,
cal skills. Available in the ebook and on the Looking at ranging from 5 to 30 minutes in length, provides a
Movies student website, these tutorials can be found at curated selection of accomplished and entertaining
digital.wwnorton.com/movies6. examples of short-form cinema, as well as useful
material for short in-class activities or for students’
analyses. Most of the films are also accompanied by
Screening Checklists optional audio commentary from the filmmakers.
Each chapter ends with an Analyzing section that in- This commentary was recorded specifically for
cludes a Screening Checklist feature. This series of lead- Looking at Movies and is exclusive to this text.
ing questions prompts students to apply what they’ve
learned in the chapter to their own critical viewing, in
class or at home. Accessible Presentation;
Effective Pedagogy
The Most Visually Dynamic Among the reasons that Looking at Movies is considered
Text Available the most accessible introductory film text available is its
clear and direct presentation of key concepts and unique
Looking at Movies was written with one goal in mind: pedagogical organization. The first three chapters of the
to prepare students for a lifetime of intelligent and per- book—“Looking at Movies,” “Principles of Film Form,” and
ceptive viewing of motion pictures. In recognition of the “Types of Movies”—provide a comprehensive yet truly
central role visuals play in the film-studies classroom, introductory overview of the major topics and themes
Looking at Movies includes an illustration program that of any film course, giving students a solid grounding in
is both visually appealing and pedagogically focused, as the basics before they move on to study those topics in
well as accompanying moving-image media that are sec- greater depth in later chapters.
ond to none. In addition, pedagogical features throughout provide
a structure that clearly identifies the main ideas and pri-
Hundreds of In-Text Illustrations mary goals of each chapter for students:
The text is illustrated by over 750 illustrations in color
and in black-and-white. Nearly all the still pictures were Learning Objectives
captured from digital or analog film sources, thus en- A checklist at the beginning of every chapter provides a
suring that the images directly reflect the textual dis- brief summary of the core concepts to be covered in the
cussions and the films from which they’re taken. Unlike chapter.
publicity stills, which are attractive as photographs but
less useful as teaching aids, the captured stills through- Extensive Captions
out this book provide visual information that will help Each illustration is accompanied by a caption that elab-
students learn as they read and—because they are re- orates on a key concept or that guides students to look
Preface xix
at elements of the film more analytically. These captions Writing About Movies
expand on the in-text presentation and reinforce stu-
dents’ retention of key terms and ideas. Written by Karen Gocsik (University of California, San
Diego) and the authors of Looking at Movies, this book
Analyzing Sections is a clear and practical overview of the process of writing
At the end of each chapter is a section that ties the terms, papers for film-studies courses. In addition to provid-
concepts, and ideas of the chapter to the primary goal ing helpful information about the writing process, the
of the book: honing students’ own analytical skills. This new Writing About Movies, Fifth Edition, offers a sub-
short overview makes explicit how the knowledge stu- stantial introduction-in-brief to the major topics in film
dents have gained in the chapter can move their own studies, including an overview of the major film theories
analytical work forward. A short Screening Checklist and their potential application to student writing, prac-
provides leading questions that students can ponder as tical advice about note-taking during screenings and
they screen a film or scene. private viewings, information about the study of genre
and film history, and an illustrated glossary of essential
Questions for Review film terms. This inexpensive text is available separately
A section at the end of each chapter tests students’ knowl- or in a significantly discounted package with Looking at
edge of the concepts first mentioned in the Learning Ob- Movies.
jectives at the beginning of the chapter.
Beyond the in-text pedagogy, the abundant resources
that accompany Looking at Movies are designed to help Resources for Instructors
students succeed.
All of the following resources are free to adopters of
Looking at Movies and can be found at wwnorton.com/
instructors or by clicking the Instructor Resources tile
InQuizitive: A game-like, media-rich, at digital.wwnorton.com/movies6. Contact your local
interactive quizzing tool sales representative for access.
***
HIJK New to the Sixth Edition, Use interactives to help students understand
InQuizitive is Norton’s game-like quizzing tool. filmmaking decisions. Six interactives found at
InQuizitive uses interactive question types and rich DIGITAL.WWNORTON.COM/MOVIES6 provide stu
media to help students understand key film terms dents with hands-on practice manipulating key con-
and concepts from the book. InQuizitive is adaptive, cepts of filmmaking and formal analysis. Students can
so students receive extra help on the concepts they work at their own pace to see how elements such as
might be struggling with, and it integrates seamlessly lighting, sound, editing, composition, and color func-
with your learning management system, making tion within a film. A new interactive for the Sixth Edi-
it easy to track student progress. A code to access tion features a 3D rendering of the set for the famous
InQuizitive is found in every new copy of Looking cabin scene from Charlie Chaplin’s The Gold Rush.
at Movies, Sixth Edition, or students can purchase Students are able to move freely around the virtual
access at DIGITAL.WWNORTON.COM/MOVIES6. space with their “camera” to attempt different shot
set-ups and compositions.
Make sure your students know about the
ebook. Students can get all of the great content Use the Interactive Instructor’s Guide (IIG) and
of the print book enhanced with animations, video Norton Coursepacks to plan and prep your
tutorials, and links to interactives with the Looking course. This searchable, sortable site for instructors
at Movies, Sixth Edition ebook. All students who contains over 1,000 resources for class prep and pre-
purchase a new print book get automatic access to the sentation, including all of the video content from the
ebook. Students can purchase the ebook at DIGITAL student site, hundreds of downloadable images, Lec-
.WWNORTON.COM/MOVIES6 as a standalone prod ture PowerPoints, suggestions for in-class activities,
uct for just a fraction of the cost of the print text. clip suggestions from the popular Clip Guide, a 700+
For instructor access to the ebook, contact your question test bank, and more. Finally, Norton Course-
Norton sales representative. packs for Blackboard and other learning management
systems are available free of charge to instructors who
Incorporate exclusive Looking at Movies video
adopt Looking at Movies. Norton Coursepacks allow
content into your course. Students can find over
you to plug customizable quizzes, chapter overviews,
five hours of video content at DIGITAL.WWNORTON
and links to media right into your existing online
.COM/MOVIES6, including twenty-eight 5-to-30-
course. For access to the IIG and Norton Coursepacks,
minute video tutorials on key concepts in the book,
contact your Norton sales representative or request
written, directed, and narrated by Dave Monahan.
access at WWNORTON.COM/INSTRUCTORS.
These videos are ideal for in-class presentation or for
assigning to students for at-home viewing. In addi
tion to the video tutorials, the site also offers over
fifty short animations and a collection of thirteen com
pete short films.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
Writing a book seems very much at times like the col- recording and design. A number of talented university
laborative effort involved in making movies. In writing and community friends helped create the new Camera
this Sixth Edition of Looking at Movies, I am grateful as Moderator module that re-creates a scene from Char-
to my generous partners at W. W. Norton & Company. lie Chaplin’s The Gold Rush. Mark Eaton modeled the
Chief among them is my editor, Pete Simon, who has set, furnishings, and props; Mark Sorenson designed
thoughtfully guided and improved every edition. Other the costumes; Michael Rosander and Anthony Lawson
collaborators at Norton were Thom Foley, senior project played ‘The Lone Prospector’ and ‘Big Jim McKay’;
editor; Benjamin Reynolds, associate production direc- Stephanie Galbraith did make-up; and Boston Dao set
tor; Carly Fraser Doria, media editor; Alex Lee, media the lights. Brittany Morago scanned the actors, assem-
editorial assistant; Cooper Wilhelm, media project ed- bled the various digital components, and developed the
itor; Rachel Truong and Pat Cartelli, media designers; software for the interactive.
Kimberly Bowers, marketing manager; Gerra Goff, asso Thanks, too, to Melissa Lenos (Donnelly College), who
ciate editor; and Katie Pak, editorial assistant. It has been authored the questions and feedback for the exciting
a pleasure to work with such a responsive, creative, and new InQuizitive feature and who produced the lecture
supportive team. PowerPoints for this edition; to Kevin Sandler (Arizona
My sincere thanks to my longtime mentor Richard State University), author of the instructors’ Test Bank
Barsam, who wrote the first two editions of Looking at and Coursepack supplements; and Richard Wiebe (Uni-
Movies before I joined him as co-author for the three versity of Iowa), who authored the Clip Guide.
editions that followed. Richard’s knowledge and love of Love and thanks to my family: Julie, for her patience
cinema permeate every chapter in this book. Each new and support; Iris, for teaching me about narrative gam-
word I write is in service to his original vision. ing and contributing an illustration to the new Star Wars
I would also like to thank the faculty, staff, and stu- tutorial; and Rae, for helping me to look at all movies
dents of the Film Studies Department at the University with fresh eyes.
of North Carolina, Wilmington. My colleagues Todd
Berliner, Glenn Pack, Sue Richardson, Mariana John-
son, Elizabeth Rawitsch, Shannon Silva, Andre Silva, Reviewers
Tim Palmer, Carlos Kase, Chip Hackler, Terry Linehan,
Georg Koszulinski, Lexi Cavazos, Alex Markowski, and I would like to join the publisher in thanking all the pro-
David Kreutzer contributed expertise and advice, as did fessors and students who provided valuable guidance as
university colleagues Dale Cohen, Richard Blaylock, and I planned this revision. Looking at Movies is their book,
Myke Holmes. Film Studies students Christian Wheeler, too, and I am grateful to both students and faculty who
Greg Guidry, Shanik Ramirez, Austin Chesnutt, Connor have cared enough about this text to help make it better.
Lummert, Alexis Dickerson, Garrett Farrington, and Thoughtful and substantive reviews from the follow-
Brendan Murphy—as well as alumni Charles Riggs and ing colleagues and fellow instructors helped shape both
Kevin Bahr—served as research assistants. Charles Riggs the book and its media program for this Sixth Edition:
contributed invaluable research and ideas to the revi- Drew Ayers (Eastern Washington University), Claudia
sion of chapter 11. My colleague Aaron Cavazos deserves Calhoun (New York University), Kathleen Coate (Nor-
special thanks for his postproduction contributions to mandale Community College), Laurene DeBord-Foulk
this edition’s new media additions, including the new (University of Nevada, Las Vegas), Ryan Friedman (Ohio
Star Wars formal analysis tutorial. Aaron created the State University), Anna Froula (East Carolina Univer-
animation and motion graphics and supervised the sound sity), Robert S. Goald (University of Nevada, Las Vegas),
xxiii
xxiv Acknowledgments
Sarah Hamblin (University of Massachusetts, Boston), Neil Goldstein, Daryl Gonder, Patrick Gonder, Cynthia
Matthew Hanson (Eastern Michigan University), Peter Gottshall, Curtis Green, Michael Green, William Green,
Lester (Brock University), Shellie Michael (Volunteer Tracy Greene, Michael Griffin, Peter Hadorn, William
State University), William Molloy (Brookdale Com- Hagerty, Mickey Hall, Stefan Hall, Cable Hardin, John
munity College), Matthew Montemorano (Brookdale Harrigan, Catherine Hastings, Sherri Hill, Glenn Hopp,
Community College), Kensil Bradford Owen (Califor- Tamra Horton, Alan Hutchison, Mike Hypio, Tom Isbell,
nia State University, San Bernadino), Jennifer Proctor Christopher Jacobs, Delmar Jacobs, Mitchell Jarosz,
(University of Michigan), Paul N. Reinsch (Texas Tech John Lee Jellicorse, Jennifer Jenkins, Robert S. Jones,
University), Jared Saltzman (Bergen Community Col- Matthew Judd, Charles Keil, Joyce Kessel, Mark Kessler,
lege), Kevin Sandler (Arizona State University), Mark Garland Kimmer, Tammy A. Kinsey, Lynn Kirby, David
von Schlemmer (University of Central Missouri), Phil- Kranz, James Kreul, David Kreutzer, Mikael Kreuz-
lip Sipiora (University of South Florida), and Katherine riegler, Andrew Kunka, Nee Lam, G. S. Larke-Walsh, Cory
Spring (Wilfred Laurier University). Lash, Elizabeth Lathrop, Melissa Lenos, Leon Lewis, Mil-
Since the First Edition’s publication in 2004, the pub- dred Lewis, Vincent LoBrutto, Jane Long, John Long, Al-
lisher and authors of Looking at Movies have depended bert Lopez, Jay Loughrin, Daniel Machon, Yuri Makino,
on constructive criticism and good advice from the hun- Travis Malone, Todd McGowan, Casey McKittrick, Ma-
dreds of scholars and teachers who have used the book in ria Mendoza-Enright, Andrea Mensch, Sharon Mitchler,
their courses over the years. The following people all had Mary Alice Molgard, John Moses, Sheila Nayar, Sarah
a hand in shaping previous editions of Looking at Mov- Nilsen, Stephanie O’Brien, Jun Okada, Ian Olney, Hank
ies: Rebecca Alvin, Sandra Annett, Edwin Arnold, Antje Ottinger, Dan Pal, Mitchell Parry, Frances Perkins, Chris-
Ascheid, Dyrk Ashton, Tony Avruch, Peter Bailey, Scott tina Petersen, Gary Peterson, Klaus Phillips, W. D. Phil-
Baugh, Harry Benshoff, Mark Berrettini, Yifen Beus, lips, Alexander Pitofsky, Lisa Plinski, Leland Poague,
Mike Birch, Robin Blaetz, Richard Blake, Ellen Bland, Walter Renaud, Patricia Roby, Carole Rodgers, George
Carroll Blue, James Bogan, Laura Bouza, Katrina Boyd, Rodman, Stuart Rosenberg, Michael Rowin, Ben Rus-
Aaron Braun, Karen Budra, Don Bullens, Gerald Bur- sell, Kevin Sandler, Bennet Schaber, Mike Schoenecke,
gess, Derek Burrill, James B. Bush, Jeremy Butler, Gary Hertha Schulze, David Seitz, Matthew Sewell, Timothy
Byrd, Ed Cameron, Jose Cardenas, Jerry Carlson, Emily Shary, Robert Sheppard, Rosalind Sibielski, Robert Sick-
Carman, Diane Carson, Donna Casella, Robert Castaldo, els, Nicholas Sigman, Charles Silet, Eric Smoodin, Jason
Beth Clary, Darcy Cohn, Megan Condis, Marie Connelly, Spangler, Michael Stinson, Ken Stofferahn, Bill Swan-
Roger Cook, John G. Cooper, Robert Coscarelli, Bob son, Molly Swiger, Joe Tarantowski, Susan Tavernetti,
Cousins, Angela Dancy, Donna Davidson, Rebecca Dean, Edwin Thompson, Frank Tomasulo, Deborah Tudor, Bill
Marshall Deutelbaum, Kent DeYoung, Michael DiRaimo, Vincent, Richard Vincent, Ken White, Mark Williams,
Carol Dole, Rodney Donahue, Dan Dootson, John Ernst, Deborah Wilson, Elizabeth Wright, Suzie Young, and
James Fairchild, Adam Fischer, Craig Fischer, Tay Michael Zryd.
Fizdale, Dawn Marie Fratini, Isabelle Freda, Karen Ful- Thank you all.
ton, Paul Gaustad, Christopher Gittings, Barry Goldfarb, Dave Monahan
6TH EDITION
LOOKING AT MOVIES
Citizen Kane (1941). Orson Welles, director. Pictured: Orson Welles.
Star Wars: The Last Jedi (2017). Rian Johnson, director. Pictured: Kelly Marie Tran and John Boyega.
LOOKING AT MOVIES
CHAPTER
1
2 Chapter 1 Looking at Movies
LEARNING OBJECTIVES
After reading this chapter, you should be able to
nn appreciate the difference between passively watching
movies and actively looking at movies.
nn understand the defining characteristics that distinguish
movies from other forms of art.
nn understand how and why most of the formal
mechanisms of a movie remain invisible to casual
viewers.
nn understand the relationship between viewers’ 1
Looking at Movies fluenced the way many Americans perceived same-sex relation
ships and gay rights. In the 13 years since the film’s release, LGBT
characters and story lines have become increasingly commonplace,
In just over a hundred years, movies have evolved into and the U.S. Supreme Court legalized same-sex marriage. Recently,
a complex form of artistic representation and commu- even popular horror films have contributed to the cultural conversa
nication: they are at once a hugely influential, wildly tion on a number of social issues. Jordan Peele’s Get Out (2017)
[2] confronts racism and privilege; The Purge (2013; director James
profitable global industry and a modern art—the most
DeMonaco) and its three (so far) sequels examine America’s gun
popular art form today. Popular may be an understate-
culture; and Don’t Breathe (2016; director Fede Alvarez) is a critical
ment. This art form has permeated our lives in ways that portrait of urban and social decay.
extend far beyond the multiplex. We watch movies on
hundreds of cable and satellite channels. We buy movies
online or from big-box retailers. We rent movies through
the mail and from Redbox machines at the supermarket.
We TiVo movies, stream movies, and download movies obligations—a form of escape, entertainment, and plea-
to watch on our televisions, our computers, and our sure. Motion pictures had been popular for 50 years
smartphones. before even most filmmakers, much less scholars, con-
Unless you were raised by wolves—and possibly even sidered movies worthy of serious study. But motion pic-
if you were—you have likely devoted thousands of hours tures are much more than entertainment. The movies
to absorbing the motion-picture medium. With so much we see shape the way we view the world around us and
experience, no one could blame you for wondering why our place in that world. Moreover, a close analysis of any
you need a course or this book to tell you how to look at particular movie can tell us a great deal about the artist,
movies. society, or industry that created it. Surely any art form
After all, you might say, “It’s just a movie.” For most with that kind of influence and insight is worth under-
of us most of the time, movies are a break from our daily standing on the deepest possible level.
What Is a Movie? 3
Movies involve much more than meets the casual ment”), originates from the name that filmmaking pi-
eye . . . or ear, for that matter. Cinema is a subtle—some oneers Auguste and Louis Lumière coined for the hall
might even say sneaky—medium. Because most movies where they exhibited their invention; film derives from
seek to engage viewers’ emotions and transport them the celluloid strip on which the images that make up
inside the world presented on-screen, the visual vocabu- motion pictures were originally captured, cut, and pro-
lary of film is designed to play upon those same instincts jected; and movies is simply short for motion pictures.
that we use to navigate and interpret the visual and aural Because we consider all cinema worthy of study, acknowl-
information of our “real life.” This often imperceptible edge that films are increasingly shot on formats other
cinematic language, composed not of words but of myr- than film stock, and believe motion to be the essence
iad integrated techniques and concepts, connects us to of the movie medium, this book favors the term used in
the story while deliberately concealing the means by our title. That said, we’ll mix all three terms into these
which it does so. pages (as evidenced in the preceding sentence) for the
Yet behind this mask, all movies, even the most bla- sake of variety, if nothing else.
tantly commercial ones, contain layers of complexity To most people, a movie is a popular entertainment,
and meaning that can be studied, analyzed, and appre- a product produced and marketed by a large commer-
ciated. This book is devoted to that task—to actively cial studio. Regardless of the subject matter, this movie
looking at movies rather than just passively watching is pretty to look at—every image is well polished by an
them. It will teach you to recognize the many tools and army of skilled artists and technicians. The finished
principles that filmmakers employ to tell stories, convey product, which is about 2 hours long, screens initially
information and meaning, and influence our emotions in movie theaters; is eventually released to DVD and
and ideas. Blu-ray, streaming, download, or pay-per-view; and ul-
Once you learn to speak this cinematic language, timately winds up on television. This common expecta-
you’ll be equipped to understand the movies that per- tion is certainly understandable: most movies that reach
vade our world on multiple levels: as narrative, as ar- most English-speaking audiences have followed a good
tistic expression, and as a reflection of the cultures that part of this model for three-quarters of a century. Of
produce and consume them. course, in this century, that distribution chain is evolv-
ing. Increasingly, movies are released simultaneously to
the theatrical and home-video markets. Companies such
What Is a Movie? as Amazon and Netflix produce original films for both
theatrical release and their streaming services. In 2017,
Now that we’ve established what we mean by looking at Netflix produced two big-budget feature films that were
movies, the next step is to attempt to answer the decep- released directly to its streaming subscribers: Bright (di-
tively simple question, What is a movie? As this book will rector David Ayer) and Okja (director Bong Joon-ho).
repeatedly illustrate, when it comes to movies, nothing Regardless of their point of origin, almost all of these
is as straightforward as it appears. ubiquitous commercial, feature-length movies share an
Let’s start, for example, with the word movies. If the other basic characteristic: narrative. When it comes to
course that you are taking while reading this book is “In- categorizing movies, the narrative designation simply
troduction to Film” or “Cinema Studies 101,” does that means that these movies tell fictional (or at least fiction-
mean that your course and this book focus on two differ- alized) stories. Of course, if you think of narrative in its
ent things? What’s the difference between a movie and a broadest sense, every movie that selects and arranges
film? And where does the word cinema fit in? subject matter in a cause-and-effect sequence of events
For whatever reason, the designation film is often is employing a narrative structure.
For all their creative
applied to a motion picture that critics and scholars flexibility, movies by their very nature must travel a
consider to be more serious or challenging than the mov straight line. A conventional motion picture is essen-
ies that entertain the masses at the multiplex. The still tially one very long strip of images. This linear quality
loftier designation of cinema seems reserved for groups makes movies perfectly suited to develop subject matter
of films that are considered works of art (e.g., “French in a sequential progression. When a medium so compat-
cinema”). The truth is, the three terms are essentially ible with narrative is introduced to a culture with an al-
interchangeable. Cinema, from the Greek kinesis (“move ready well-established storytelling tradition, it’s easy to
4 Chapter 1 Looking at Movies
1. Laura Mulvey, “Kiarostami’s Uncertainty Principle,” Sight and Sound 8, no. 6 (June 1998): 24–27.
2. Philip Lutgendorf, “Is There an Indian Way of Filmmaking?” International Journal of Hindu Studies 10, no. 3 (December 2006): 227–256.
What Is a Movie? 5
a small object in her hand. The audience sees every cast The other primary collaborators on the creative
member at once and continually from the same angle team—screenwriter, actors, director of photography, pro
and in the same relative size. The object in one perform duction designer, editor, and sound designer—all work
er’s hand is too small to see clearly, even for those few with the director to develop their contributions, and the
viewers lucky enough to have front-row seats. The play- director must approve their decisions as they progress.
wright, director, and actors have very few practical op- The director is at the top of the creative hierarchy, re-
tions to convey the object’s physical properties, much sponsible for choosing (or at least approving) each of
less its narrative significance or its emotional meaning those primary collaborators. A possible exception is the
to the character. In contrast, a movie version of the same screenwriter, though even then the director often con-
story can establish the dramatic situation and spatial tributes to revisions and assigns additional writers to
relationships of its subjects from the same wide-angle provide revised or additional material.
viewpoint, then instantaneously jump to a composition The director’s primary responsibilities are perfor-
isolating the actions of the character holding the object, mance and camera—and the coordination of the two.
then cut to a close-up view revealing the object to be a The director selects actors for each role, works with
charm bracelet, move up to feature the character’s face those actors to develop their characters, leads rehearsals,
as she contemplates the bracelet, then leap 30 years blocks performances in relationship with the camera on
into the past to a depiction of the character as a young set, and modulates those performances from take to take
girl receiving the jewelry as a gift. Editing’s capacity to and shot to shot as necessary throughout the shoot. He
isolate details and juxtapose images and sounds within or she works with the director of photography to de-
and between shots gives movies an expressive agility im- sign an overall cinematic look for the movie and to vi-
possible in any other dramatic art or visual medium. sualize the framing and composition of each shot before
and during shooting. Along the way, as inspiration or
obstacles necessitate, changes are made to everything
The Movie Director from the script to storyboards to blocking to edits.
Throughout this book, we give primary credit to the mov- The director is the one making or approving each
ie’s director; you’ll see references, for example, to Patty adjustment—sometimes after careful deliberation, some
Jenkins’s Wonder Woman (2017) or to Guillermo del times on the fly.
Toro’s The Shape of Water (2017). You may not know On the set, the director does more than call “action”
anything about the directorial style of Ms. Jenkins or and “cut” and give direction to the actors and cinema-
Mr. del Toro, but if you enjoy these movies, you might tographer. He or she must review the footage if neces-
seek out their work in the future. sary, decide when a shot or scene is satisfactory, and say
Still, all moviegoers know—if only from seeing the that it’s time to move on to the next task. In the editing
seemingly endless credits at the end of most movies— room, the director sometimes works directly with the
that today’s movies represent not the work of a single editor throughout the process but more often reviews
artist, but a collaboration between a group of creative successive “cuts” of scenes and provides the editor with
contributors. In this collaboration, the director’s role feedback to use in revision.
is basically that of a coordinating lead artist. He or she
is the vital link between creative, production, and tech-
nical teams. The bigger the movie, the larger the crew, Ways of Looking at Movies
and the more complex and challenging the collabora-
tion. Though different directors bring varying levels of Every movie is a complex synthesis—a combination of
foresight, pre-planning, and control to a project, every many separate, interrelated elements that form a co-
director must have a vision for the story and style to in- herent whole. A quick scan of this book’s table of con-
form the initial instructions to collaborators and to ap- tents will give you an idea of just how many elements
ply in the continual decision-making process necessary get mixed together to make a movie. Anyone attempt-
in every stage of production. In short, the director must ing to comprehend a complex synthesis must rely on
be a strong leader with a passion for filmmaking and a analysis—the act of taking apart something complicated to
gift for collaboration. figure out what it is made of and how it all fits together.
Ways of Looking at Movies 7
1 2
3 4
5 6
A chemist breaks down a compound substance into Recognizing a viewer’s tendency (especially when sit-
its constituent parts to learn more than just a list of in- ting in a dark theater, staring at a large screen) to identify
gredients. The goal usually extends to determining how subconsciously with the camera’s viewpoint, early film-
the identified individual components work together making pioneers created a film grammar (or cinematic
toward some sort of outcome: What is it about this par- language) that draws upon the way we automatically in-
ticular mixture that makes it taste like strawberries, or terpret visual information in our real lives, thus allow-
grow hair, or kill cockroaches? Likewise, film analysis ing audiences to absorb movie meaning intuitively—and
involves more than breaking down a sequence, a scene, instantly.
or an entire movie to identify the tools and techniques The fade-out/fade-in is one of the most straight-
that compose it; the investigation is also concerned with forward examples of this phenomenon. When such a
the function and potential effect of that combination: transition is meant to convey a passage of time between
Why does it make you laugh, or prompt you to tell your scenes, the last shot of a scene grows gradually darker
friend to see it, or incite you to join the Peace Corps? The (fades out) until the screen is rendered black for a mo-
search for answers to these sorts of questions boils down ment. The first shot of the subsequent scene then fades
to one essential inquiry: What does it mean? For the rest in out of the darkness. Viewers don’t have to think about
of the chapter, we’ll explore film analysis by applying what this means; our daily experience of time’s passage
that question to some very different movies: first, and marked by the setting and rising of the sun lets us under-
most extensively, the 2007 independent film Juno, and stand intuitively that significant story time has elapsed
then the perennial blockbuster Star Wars film series. over that very brief moment of screen darkness.
Unfortunately, or perhaps intriguingly, not all movie A low-angle shot communicates in a similarly hid-
meaning is easy to see. As we mentioned earlier, mov- den fashion. When, near the end of Juno (2007; direc-
ies have a way of hiding their methods and meaning. So tor Jason Reitman), we see the title character happily
before we dive into specific approaches to analysis, let’s transformed back into a “normal” teenager, our sense of
wade a little deeper into this whole notion of hidden, or her newfound empowerment is heightened by the low
“invisible,” meaning. angle from which this (and the next) shot is captured.
Viewers’ shared experience of literally looking up at
powerful figures—people on stages, at podiums, memo-
Invisibility and Cinematic Language rialized in statues, or simply bigger than them—sparks
The moving aspect of moving pictures is one reason for an automatic interpretation of movie subjects seen from
this invisibility. Movies simply move too fast for even
the most diligent viewers to consciously consider every-
thing they’ve seen. When we read a book, we can pause
to ponder the meaning or significance of any word, sen-
tence, or passage. Our eyes often flit back to review some-
thing we’ve already read in order to further comprehend
its meaning or to place a new passage in context. Sim-
ilarly, we can stand and study a painting or sculpture or
photograph for as long as we require to absorb whatever
meaning we need or want from it. But until very recently,
the moviegoer’s relationship with every cinematic com-
position has been transitory. We experience a movie shot,
which is capable of delivering multiple layers of visual and
auditory information, for the briefest of moments before Cinematic invisibility: low angle
When it views a subject from a low camera angle, cinematic lan
it is taken away and replaced with another moving image
guage taps our instinctive association of figures who we must lit
and another and another. If you are watching a movie
erally “look up to” with figurative or literal power. In this case, the
the way it is designed to be experienced, there is little penultimate scene in Juno emphasizes the newfound freedom and
time to contemplate the various potential meanings of resultant empowerment the title character feels by presenting her
any single movie moment. from a low angle for the first time in the film.
Another random document with
no related content on Scribd:
DANCE ON STILTS AT THE GIRLS’ UNYAGO, NIUCHI
I see increasing reason to believe that the view formed some time
back as to the origin of the Makonde bush is the correct one. I have
no doubt that it is not a natural product, but the result of human
occupation. Those parts of the high country where man—as a very
slight amount of practice enables the eye to perceive at once—has not
yet penetrated with axe and hoe, are still occupied by a splendid
timber forest quite able to sustain a comparison with our mixed
forests in Germany. But wherever man has once built his hut or tilled
his field, this horrible bush springs up. Every phase of this process
may be seen in the course of a couple of hours’ walk along the main
road. From the bush to right or left, one hears the sound of the axe—
not from one spot only, but from several directions at once. A few
steps further on, we can see what is taking place. The brush has been
cut down and piled up in heaps to the height of a yard or more,
between which the trunks of the large trees stand up like the last
pillars of a magnificent ruined building. These, too, present a
melancholy spectacle: the destructive Makonde have ringed them—
cut a broad strip of bark all round to ensure their dying off—and also
piled up pyramids of brush round them. Father and son, mother and
son-in-law, are chopping away perseveringly in the background—too
busy, almost, to look round at the white stranger, who usually excites
so much interest. If you pass by the same place a week later, the piles
of brushwood have disappeared and a thick layer of ashes has taken
the place of the green forest. The large trees stretch their
smouldering trunks and branches in dumb accusation to heaven—if
they have not already fallen and been more or less reduced to ashes,
perhaps only showing as a white stripe on the dark ground.
This work of destruction is carried out by the Makonde alike on the
virgin forest and on the bush which has sprung up on sites already
cultivated and deserted. In the second case they are saved the trouble
of burning the large trees, these being entirely absent in the
secondary bush.
After burning this piece of forest ground and loosening it with the
hoe, the native sows his corn and plants his vegetables. All over the
country, he goes in for bed-culture, which requires, and, in fact,
receives, the most careful attention. Weeds are nowhere tolerated in
the south of German East Africa. The crops may fail on the plains,
where droughts are frequent, but never on the plateau with its
abundant rains and heavy dews. Its fortunate inhabitants even have
the satisfaction of seeing the proud Wayao and Wamakua working
for them as labourers, driven by hunger to serve where they were
accustomed to rule.
But the light, sandy soil is soon exhausted, and would yield no
harvest the second year if cultivated twice running. This fact has
been familiar to the native for ages; consequently he provides in
time, and, while his crop is growing, prepares the next plot with axe
and firebrand. Next year he plants this with his various crops and
lets the first piece lie fallow. For a short time it remains waste and
desolate; then nature steps in to repair the destruction wrought by
man; a thousand new growths spring out of the exhausted soil, and
even the old stumps put forth fresh shoots. Next year the new growth
is up to one’s knees, and in a few years more it is that terrible,
impenetrable bush, which maintains its position till the black
occupier of the land has made the round of all the available sites and
come back to his starting point.
The Makonde are, body and soul, so to speak, one with this bush.
According to my Yao informants, indeed, their name means nothing
else but “bush people.” Their own tradition says that they have been
settled up here for a very long time, but to my surprise they laid great
stress on an original immigration. Their old homes were in the
south-east, near Mikindani and the mouth of the Rovuma, whence
their peaceful forefathers were driven by the continual raids of the
Sakalavas from Madagascar and the warlike Shirazis[47] of the coast,
to take refuge on the almost inaccessible plateau. I have studied
African ethnology for twenty years, but the fact that changes of
population in this apparently quiet and peaceable corner of the earth
could have been occasioned by outside enterprises taking place on
the high seas, was completely new to me. It is, no doubt, however,
correct.
The charming tribal legend of the Makonde—besides informing us
of other interesting matters—explains why they have to live in the
thickest of the bush and a long way from the edge of the plateau,
instead of making their permanent homes beside the purling brooks
and springs of the low country.
“The place where the tribe originated is Mahuta, on the southern
side of the plateau towards the Rovuma, where of old time there was
nothing but thick bush. Out of this bush came a man who never
washed himself or shaved his head, and who ate and drank but little.
He went out and made a human figure from the wood of a tree
growing in the open country, which he took home to his abode in the
bush and there set it upright. In the night this image came to life and
was a woman. The man and woman went down together to the
Rovuma to wash themselves. Here the woman gave birth to a still-
born child. They left that place and passed over the high land into the
valley of the Mbemkuru, where the woman had another child, which
was also born dead. Then they returned to the high bush country of
Mahuta, where the third child was born, which lived and grew up. In
course of time, the couple had many more children, and called
themselves Wamatanda. These were the ancestral stock of the
Makonde, also called Wamakonde,[48] i.e., aborigines. Their
forefather, the man from the bush, gave his children the command to
bury their dead upright, in memory of the mother of their race who
was cut out of wood and awoke to life when standing upright. He also
warned them against settling in the valleys and near large streams,
for sickness and death dwelt there. They were to make it a rule to
have their huts at least an hour’s walk from the nearest watering-
place; then their children would thrive and escape illness.”
The explanation of the name Makonde given by my informants is
somewhat different from that contained in the above legend, which I
extract from a little book (small, but packed with information), by
Pater Adams, entitled Lindi und sein Hinterland. Otherwise, my
results agree exactly with the statements of the legend. Washing?
Hapana—there is no such thing. Why should they do so? As it is, the
supply of water scarcely suffices for cooking and drinking; other
people do not wash, so why should the Makonde distinguish himself
by such needless eccentricity? As for shaving the head, the short,
woolly crop scarcely needs it,[49] so the second ancestral precept is
likewise easy enough to follow. Beyond this, however, there is
nothing ridiculous in the ancestor’s advice. I have obtained from
various local artists a fairly large number of figures carved in wood,
ranging from fifteen to twenty-three inches in height, and
representing women belonging to the great group of the Mavia,
Makonde, and Matambwe tribes. The carving is remarkably well
done and renders the female type with great accuracy, especially the
keloid ornamentation, to be described later on. As to the object and
meaning of their works the sculptors either could or (more probably)
would tell me nothing, and I was forced to content myself with the
scanty information vouchsafed by one man, who said that the figures
were merely intended to represent the nembo—the artificial
deformations of pelele, ear-discs, and keloids. The legend recorded
by Pater Adams places these figures in a new light. They must surely
be more than mere dolls; and we may even venture to assume that
they are—though the majority of present-day Makonde are probably
unaware of the fact—representations of the tribal ancestress.
The references in the legend to the descent from Mahuta to the
Rovuma, and to a journey across the highlands into the Mbekuru
valley, undoubtedly indicate the previous history of the tribe, the
travels of the ancestral pair typifying the migrations of their
descendants. The descent to the neighbouring Rovuma valley, with
its extraordinary fertility and great abundance of game, is intelligible
at a glance—but the crossing of the Lukuledi depression, the ascent
to the Rondo Plateau and the descent to the Mbemkuru, also lie
within the bounds of probability, for all these districts have exactly
the same character as the extreme south. Now, however, comes a
point of especial interest for our bacteriological age. The primitive
Makonde did not enjoy their lives in the marshy river-valleys.
Disease raged among them, and many died. It was only after they
had returned to their original home near Mahuta, that the health
conditions of these people improved. We are very apt to think of the
African as a stupid person whose ignorance of nature is only equalled
by his fear of it, and who looks on all mishaps as caused by evil
spirits and malignant natural powers. It is much more correct to
assume in this case that the people very early learnt to distinguish
districts infested with malaria from those where it is absent.
This knowledge is crystallized in the
ancestral warning against settling in the
valleys and near the great waters, the
dwelling-places of disease and death. At the
same time, for security against the hostile
Mavia south of the Rovuma, it was enacted
that every settlement must be not less than a
certain distance from the southern edge of the
plateau. Such in fact is their mode of life at the
present day. It is not such a bad one, and
certainly they are both safer and more
comfortable than the Makua, the recent
intruders from the south, who have made USUAL METHOD OF
good their footing on the western edge of the CLOSING HUT-DOOR
plateau, extending over a fairly wide belt of
country. Neither Makua nor Makonde show in their dwellings
anything of the size and comeliness of the Yao houses in the plain,
especially at Masasi, Chingulungulu and Zuza’s. Jumbe Chauro, a
Makonde hamlet not far from Newala, on the road to Mahuta, is the
most important settlement of the tribe I have yet seen, and has fairly
spacious huts. But how slovenly is their construction compared with
the palatial residences of the elephant-hunters living in the plain.
The roofs are still more untidy than in the general run of huts during
the dry season, the walls show here and there the scanty beginnings
or the lamentable remains of the mud plastering, and the interior is a
veritable dog-kennel; dirt, dust and disorder everywhere. A few huts
only show any attempt at division into rooms, and this consists
merely of very roughly-made bamboo partitions. In one point alone
have I noticed any indication of progress—in the method of fastening
the door. Houses all over the south are secured in a simple but
ingenious manner. The door consists of a set of stout pieces of wood
or bamboo, tied with bark-string to two cross-pieces, and moving in
two grooves round one of the door-posts, so as to open inwards. If
the owner wishes to leave home, he takes two logs as thick as a man’s
upper arm and about a yard long. One of these is placed obliquely
against the middle of the door from the inside, so as to form an angle
of from 60° to 75° with the ground. He then places the second piece
horizontally across the first, pressing it downward with all his might.
It is kept in place by two strong posts planted in the ground a few
inches inside the door. This fastening is absolutely safe, but of course
cannot be applied to both doors at once, otherwise how could the
owner leave or enter his house? I have not yet succeeded in finding
out how the back door is fastened.