S m a r t S e a rc h Judge Reports Motions & Issues Login Sign up

Search anything: case name, case number, motion type, judge, or party

Dockets (183,296) Rulings (1,931)

State
226-250 of 1,931 results Sort By Relevance Date Order

CA (1,931)
CAPITAL ONE BANK (USA) N.A. VS BRIAN DOLGE
Nature of Proceedings: Judgment on the Pleadings TENTATIVE RULING: The motion is granted, without leave to amend.
County Judgment shall be entered in favor of plaintiff and against defendant, in the amount of $3,525.09. Background: This is a
limited civil case, filed August 7, 2018, stating common counts claims for an open book account for money d...
Butte County, CA (8)
HEARING May 29, 2019 JUDGE Pauline Maxwell
Calaveras County, CA (1)
COUNTY Santa Barbara County, CA
Contra Costa County, CA (143)
El Dorado County, CA (18)
Fresno County, CA (3) CAPITAL ONE BANK (USA) N.A. VS BRIAN DOLGE
Kings County, CA (1) Nature of Proceedings: Judgment on the Pleadings Tentative not yet posted, please check again....
Los Angeles County, CA (83)
HEARING May 29, 2019 JUDGE Pauline Maxwell
Marin County, CA (1)
COUNTY Santa Barbara County, CA
Merced County, CA (10)
Napa County, CA (6)
Nevada County, CA (2) MARK BRASWELL VS. FORD MOTOR COMPANY
Orange County, CA (48) However, Plaintiff does not demonstrate “good cause” to compel Defendant’s responses to Category 4 – regarding
Placer County, CA (9) communications between Defendant and Capital One Auto Finance about Plaintiff (and presumably his account with
Capital One Auto Finance). In objection to this category/request, Defendant noted that it is not in possession or control of
such information/documents, and Plaintiff simply does not refute that objection.

Judge HEARING May 29, 2019 COUNTY Merced County, CA

TYPE Contract
A. James Robertson Ii (6)
SUB TYPE Breach
Alesia Jones (4)
Allen Sumner (1)
CAPITAL ONE BANK (USA), N.A. VS ALVAREZ, REBECCA
Andrew Y. Cheng (1)
Anne E. Bouliane (1) Plaintiff's request for judicial notice is granted. The Complaint states facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action against
Defendant, and the Answer admits all allegations in the Complaint and raises no affirmative defenses. Therefore, Plaintiff's
Alan G. Perkins (70)
Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings is granted. The Court will award costs. However, Plaintiff...
Alan Perkins (1)
Anthony Schoenberg (1) HEARING May 29, 2019 JUDGE Tamara L Mosbarger

Arlene Barton (2) COUNTY Butte County, CA

Arnold D. Rosenfield For The Hon. René

Auguste Chouteau (1)
CAPITAL ONE BANK (USA) NA VS KNASKOV
Bruce E. Chan (1)
Grant and sign proposed order....
Barbara A. Lane (23)
Barbara Kronlund (5) HEARING May 28, 2019 JUDGE Christopher Harmon
COUNTY Riverside County, CA
Type
SMITH VS HUNT & HENRIQUES INC [E-FILE]
Civil - Limited (233)
Civil - Unlimited (60) Plaintiff executed a Confidential General Release And Settlement Agreement in that case, and agreed to release claims
against Capital One, its attorneys, and regarding claims relating to his account ending in numbers 1039. Attorney
Civil Case Management Conference (34)
Kazerounian signed the release agreement.
Civil Court Trial (5)
HEARING May 23, 2019 JUDGE Richard E. L. Strauss
Civil Jury Trial (3)
Demurrer / Motion To Strike (14) TYPE Personal Injury/ Tort COUNTY San Diego County, CA

Discovery Hearing (32) SUB TYPE other

Ex Parte (10)
Hearing On Petition (1) SMITH VS HUNT & HENRIQUES INC [E-FILE]
Judgment Debtor Exam (Civil) (2)
Plaintiff executed a Confidential General Release And Settlement Agreement in that case, and agreed to release claims
Motion Hearing (Civil) (86) against Capital One, its attorneys, and regarding claims relating to his account ending in numbers 1039. Attorney
Motion To Dismiss (1) Kazerounian signed the release agreement.
Motion To Quash (Civil) (2) HEARING May 23, 2019 JUDGE Richard E. L. Strauss
TYPE Personal Injury/ Tort COUNTY San Diego County, CA

Filter Further SUB TYPE other

Party
SMITH VS HUNT & HENRIQUES INC [E-FILE]
Plaintiff executed a Confidential General Release And Settlement Agreement in that case, and agreed to release claims
Case name against Capital One, its attorneys, and regarding claims relating to his account ending in numbers 1039. Attorney
Kazerounian signed the release agreement.
 Case number HEARING May 23, 2019 JUDGE Richard E. L. Strauss
TYPE Personal Injury/ Tort COUNTY San Diego County, CA
SUB TYPE other

Include Docket Files ALEXANDER NIKOLAYCHUK VS CAPITAL ONE N A ET AL

MOTION TO COMPEL “FURTHER PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS” MOVING PARTY: Plaintiff Alexander Nikolaychuk
Refine RESPONDING PARTY(S): Defendant Capital One, N.A. PROOF OF SERVICE: ANALYSIS “Motion to Compel Further
Production of Documents” Plaintiff seeks “an order compelling Defendant . . . to produce those certain documents identified
in Plaintiff’s First Set of Requests for Production of Documents. . . .” Notice of Motion, Page 1:25-2:1.
Reset All
HEARING May 21, 2019 JUDGE Elizabeth Allen White
TYPE Personal Injury/ Tort COUNTY Los Angeles County, CA
SUB TYPE Fraud

CAPITAL ONE VS. JOHNSON

HEARING ON MOTION FOR ORDER SETTING ASIDE DISMISSAL OF THE CASE FILED BY CAPITAL ONE BANK (USA),
N.A. * TENTATIVE RULING: * No opposition has been filed. The motion to set aside the dismissal is granted.

HEARING May 20, 2019 JUDGE Susanne Fenstermacher

COUNTY Contra Costa County, CA

CAPITAL ONE BANK (USA), N.A. VS. ROBERT P WEAVER

Mandatory appearance of Attorney for Plaintiff or Plaintiff In Pro Per is required. Absent an Appearance for any matter on the
Order to Show Cause Re: Non-Compliance could result in Dismissal without Prejudice...

HEARING May 16, 2019 JUDGE David W. Abbott

TYPE Collections COUNTY Sacramento County, CA
SUB TYPE Collections

CAPITAL ONE BANK (U S A) N A VS CLARK, DIANE

MOTION TO VACATE RENEWAL OF JUDGMENT (CCP § 473(b); Extrinsic Fraud) TENTATIVE RULING: Plaintiff Capital One
Bank (USA), N.A.’s Motion to Vacate the Renewal of Judgment is DENIED. I. Background On March 25, 2009, a default
judgment was entered in favor of Plaintiff Capital One Bank (USA), N.A. (“Plaintiff”) and against Defendant Diane Clark
(“Defendant”). The judgment was renewed on March 12, 2019.

HEARING May 15, 2019 JUDGE James E. Blancarte or Wendy Chang

COUNTY Los Angeles County, CA

CAPITAL ONE VS JTC ACCOUNTANCE CORP

NO NEED TO APPEAR AT THE HEARING TOMORROW. THE ATTORNEY DECLARATION IS IN COMPLIANCE....

HEARING May 15, 2019 JUDGE Teresa A. Beaudet

COUNTY Los Angeles County, CA

CAPITAL ONE VS. WILLIAMS

HEARING ON MOTION FOR ENTRY OF JUDGMENT UNDER TERMS OF STIPULATED SETTLEMENT / FILED BY CAPITAL
ONE BANK (USA), N.A. * TENTATIVE RULING: * No opposition has been filed. The motion is granted as prayed. Judgment
shall be entered in favor of Plaintiff in the principal sum of $3,400.00 plus costs in the amount of $569.50 for a total judgment
of $3,969.50.

HEARING May 13, 2019 JUDGE Susanne Fenstermacher

COUNTY Contra Costa County, CA

CAPITAL ONE BANK [USA] N A VS LIZARRAGA

TENTATIVE RULING: Plaintiff's UNOPPOSED Motion for Order Deeming Request for Admissions to Defendant Admitted is
GRANTED. Failure to file an opposition to the motion indicates Defendant's acquiescence that the motion is meritorious.
(California Rules of Court, Rule 8.54(c).)...

HEARING May 09, 2019 JUDGE Richard S. Whitney

TYPE Collections COUNTY San Diego County, CA
SUB TYPE Collections

CAPITAL ONE BANK (USA) N.A. V. ARIF RAHMAN

Capital One Bank (USA) N.A. (“Judgment Creditor”) has an outstanding judgment against Arif Rahman (“Judgment Debtor”).
On January 8, 2019, a Writ of Execution directed to the Sheriff of the County of San Luis Obispo was issued in the amount of
$5,531.55. Judgment Creditor is seeking to garnish Judgment Debtor’s wages pursuant to an earnings withholding order.
Judgment Debtor has filed a claim of exemption in which he asserts he needs all of his earnings to support himself or his
family.

HEARING May 07, 2019 JUDGE Linda D. Hurst

COUNTY San Luis Obispo County, CA

LAW OFFICES OF MARK B. PLUMMER, PC V. ALAI

Capital One Bank (2003) 113 Cal.App.4th 805, 811.) Okorie v. Los Angeles Unified School District (Okorie) (2017) 14
Cal.App.5th 586-587, states, “In determining whether a cause of action is based on protected activity, we ‘examine the
principal thrust or gravamen of a plaintiff's cause of action to determine whether the anti-SLAPP statute applies.’ [Citation.]
 HEARING May 07, 2019 JUDGE Walter SCHWARM
COUNTY Orange County, CA

CAPITAL ONE VS. AMIRI

HEARING ON MOTION TO SET ASIDE DEFAULT AND DEFAULT JUDGMENT FILED BY CAPITAL ONE BANK (USA), N.A. *
TENTATIVE RULING: *

HEARING May 06, 2019 JUDGE Susanne Fenstermacher

COUNTY Contra Costa County, CA

CAPITAL ONE VS KNJAZKOV

Grant and sign proposed order....

HEARING May 06, 2019 JUDGE Christopher Harmon

COUNTY Riverside County, CA

CAPITAL ONE BANK (USA), N.A. VS PAMELA MOSLEY

Plaintiff's Motion for Order that Matters be deemed admitted. Appearance required....

HEARING May 06, 2019 JUDGE Carter Holly

COUNTY San Joaquin County, CA

CAVALRY SPV I LLC VS BERMUDEZ

The OSC for sanctions/dismissal for failure to file proof of service/publication, set on 5/3/19, is vacated. Proof of service was
filed on 3/28/19. An OSC for sanctions/dismissal for failure to file judgment is set for 7/29/19, at 8:15 am in Dept. 22B.
Notice to be provided by the Judicial Assistant....

HEARING May 03, 2019 JUDGE Genalin Riley

COUNTY Ventura County, CA

CAPITAL ONE BANK (USA), N.A. V. KING

Motion for Entry of Judgment under Terms of Stipulated Settlement filed by Plaintiff TENTATIVE RULING The motion for entry
of judgment filed by Plaintiff is granted. Pursuant to its authority under CCP Section 664.6 and the terms of the written
settlement agreement entered into by the parties, the court vacates the dismissal, and enters judgmen...

HEARING Apr 30, 2019 JUDGE WENDY G. GETTY

COUNTY Solano County, CA

ANIEMA EFFIONG ET AL VS CAPITAL ONE BANK ET AL

Capital One Bank, et al. Defendants Sherie Howard’s and Lydell Howard’s Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings
TENTATIVE RULING: The motion is granted without leave to amend Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings “The grounds for
a motion for judgment on the pleadings must appear on the face of the complaint or from a matter of which the court may
take judicial notice.” (Richardson-Tunnell v. School Ins. Program for Employees (2007) 157 Cal.App. 4th 1056, 1061; Bufil v.

HEARING Apr 30, 2019 JUDGE Michelle Williams Court

TYPE Real Property COUNTY Los Angeles County, CA
SUB TYPE Foreclosure

CAPITAL ONE VS. SALENGA

HEARING ON MOTION FOR ORDER THAT MATTERS BE DEEMED ADMITTED FILED BY CAPITAL ONE BANK (USA), N.A. *
TENTATIVE RULING: * No opposition has been filed. The motion is granted.

HEARING Apr 29, 2019 JUDGE Susanne Fenstermacher

COUNTY Contra Costa County, CA

CAPITAL ONE BANK (USA), N.A. VS HECTOR DOMINGUEZ

Tentative Ruling Plaintiff Capital One Bank's motion to enter judgment is Granted. CCP section 664.6. No opposition filed.
Court will sign the Order and Judgment submitted with this motion. Barbara A. Kronlund

HEARING Apr 29, 2019 JUDGE Barbara Kronlund

COUNTY San Joaquin County, CA

« first previous 1 ... 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 ... 78 next last »

For full print and download access, please subscribe at

https://www.trellis.law/.