Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Economic Feasibility Study of Raw Water Development For Rusunawa in Park Industrial Area Morowali District
Economic Feasibility Study of Raw Water Development For Rusunawa in Park Industrial Area Morowali District
Economic Feasibility Study of Raw Water Development For Rusunawa in Park Industrial Area Morowali District
TABLE 3. ASSUMPTION OF CALCULATION WITH CASH FLOW (DCF) ON CAPITAL (10%) APPROACH
Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Approach on Capital
Interest Rate: 10 %
No Description 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
1 Revenue from subscriptions 5.734.356.000 5.734.356.000 5.734.356.000 5.734.356.000 5.734.356.000 5.734.356.000 5.734.356.000 5.734.356.000 5.734.356.000 5.734.356.000
2 Income from Expenses 1.410.000.000 1.410.000.000 1.410.000.000 1.410.000.000 1.410.000.000 1.410.000.000 1.410.000.000 1.410.000.000 1.410.000.000 1.410.000.000
3 Revenue from new installs 11.867.500.000
4 Total Income 19.011.856.000 7.144.356.000 7.144.356.000 7.144.356.000 7.144.356.000 7.144.356.000 7.144.356.000 7.144.356.000 7.144.356.000 7.144.356.000
5 construction cost 27.255.117.000
6 Operational & Maintenance Cost 660.000.000 660.000.000 660.000.000 660.000.000 660.000.000 660.000.000 660.000.000 660.000.000 660.000.000 660.000.000
7 Cash Flow 18.351.856.000 6.484.356.000 6.484.356.000 6.484.356.000 6.484.356.000 6.484.356.000 6.484.356.000 6.484.356.000 6.484.356.000 6.484.356.000
8 Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) 1,331 1,464 1,611 1,772 1,949 2,144 2,358 2,594 2,853 3,138
Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Approach
9 on Capital 13.788.021.037 4.429.204.918 4.025.050.279 3.659.343.115 3.327.016.932 3.024.419.776 2.749.938.931 2.499.751.735 2.272.820.189 2.066.397.706
10 Total Income (PV)/12 41.841.964.618
11 Net Present Value (NPV) 14.586.847.618
12 IRR 23.9 %
13 Benefit Cost Ratio (BCR) 1,535
TABLE 4. ASSUMPTION OF CALCULATION WITH CASH FLOW (DCF) ON CAPITAL (12%) APPROACH
[2] Arikunto. S, "Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik", Ed. [16] Sutjiningsih. Dwita. Murniningsih, et al,―Economic feasibility
Rev.20. JAKARTA: Jakarta : Rineka Cipta 2010, 2010. analysis of Gintung Dam,‖ IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci., vol. 599, no.
1, 2020, doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/599/1/012053.
[3] D. Mangitung, Ekonomi Rekayasa, Satu. Yogyakarta, 2013.
[17] Wayan. Diasa, ―Analisa kelayakan sistem suplesi air irigasi dengan
[4] Edward. Kuiper, "Water resources project economics, canada. pompa hidram,‖ Jur. Tek. Gradien, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 215–228, 2017.
Canada, 1971.
[18] Zakia. Safriani. Meylis. Et al, ―Feasibility Study on The
[5] Gittinger. J. Price, "Economic analysis of agriculture", edisi kedua, Development of Irrigation Channels” International Journal of Engineering,
Penerbit Universitas Indonesia (UI-Press), Jakarta, 1986. Science and Information Technology (IJESTY) eISSN 2775-2674, Vol2,
No1, 2022.
[6] Hartadi and M. F. Ni, ―Study on the Feasibility of Construction of
Logung Dam in Kudus Regency,‖ no. C, pp. 602–607, 2017.
Open Access This chapter is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits any noncommercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and
reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to
the Creative Commons license and indicate if changes were made.
The images or other third party material in this chapter are included in the chapter's Creative Commons license, unless indicated
otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the chapter's Creative Commons license and your intended use is
not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.