The document appears to be an evaluation of student members of a group project. It contains a table rating each student on degree of participation, attitude, interest shown, creativity and depth of analysis. All students received a rating of 5 for each category. It also includes two short answers from a student reflecting on what they learned from the group work and their contributions to the group presentation.
The document appears to be an evaluation of student members of a group project. It contains a table rating each student on degree of participation, attitude, interest shown, creativity and depth of analysis. All students received a rating of 5 for each category. It also includes two short answers from a student reflecting on what they learned from the group work and their contributions to the group presentation.
The document appears to be an evaluation of student members of a group project. It contains a table rating each student on degree of participation, attitude, interest shown, creativity and depth of analysis. All students received a rating of 5 for each category. It also includes two short answers from a student reflecting on what they learned from the group work and their contributions to the group presentation.
Degree of towards the Shown and Members Participation Work and while Depth of Group Working Analysis mates Abad, Karsten Denver H. 5 5 5 5 Abad, Krylle Antoine H. 5 5 5 5
Balagtas, Earl Jay M. 5 5 5 5
Bautista, Aljhon Kobe O. 5 5 5 5 Bebing, Joaquin Rodrigo G. 5 5 5 5 Bejasa, Brixx Lorenz A. 5 5 5 5 Bernabe, Rodlan Isagani E. 5 5 5 5 Bicera, Karl Austin Rei R. 5 5 5 5
1. Did you learn from the grouping?
- Yes, of course by doing a collaboration and brainstorming ideas.
2. Identify your contributions to the group presentation.
- I contribute to the group presentation by giving our ideas and information needed and we collaborate and distributing the tasks.