Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Johnson, Whittington, Scholes 2011, 2 Case Study Discussions - 5
Johnson, Whittington, Scholes 2011, 2 Case Study Discussions - 5
(*) The success followed, and then other operators started to do the same.
The consumers were really satisfied (2003-2008) even though technical
and regulatory changes were happening even more often as the years
were passing.
(*) The competitors at the market were starting to make their strategies
along with the behavior of the consumers; their typical thought was “a
perceived consumer need for
‘Converged’ services” which means that he consumers have kind of the
same needs for services that are close the one to the other such as TV-
Mobile Internet.
(*) All the other operators started to give to the people the famous triple
play, offered for example 3 things to them, mobile internet, stable phone
and TV.
(!!) Vodafone at that period was the only one operator industry in the UK
who was focused on the mobile services and tried to survive at that point
among the others operators just from her skills and quality.
FIXED PHONE: An other extreme fact is that in the UK the fixed line
telephones had a large drop off between the years 2003-2009 with a lot of
people not using any longer the stable phones and only communicate by
their mobiles.
The percentage of the houses that had a fixed phone was half in the UK
compared to the other Europe (12%/24%).
The national network was governmental ( ex. BT) and the government
saw the changes that they were taking place in the UK and in other
countries and took the decision to work together with other private
operators in order to provide internet and other services to the homes that
were using this network .
Other companies took this advantage and worked together with the BT
and they won!
They got really famous and manage to earn a lot of money.
MOBILE PHONES: From year to year the mobile phone users were
increasing rapidly, and with this augmentation, the prices got also very
high. Because if the demand increases then it is reasonable the price to
increase too.
(*) Vodafone was playing a very good part, by being the third best
company in the UK at that time.
(*) In 2009 Vodafone and one other company shared that they would
extend in 5 the countries provided a network nearly global.
Contracts were made to provide low pay sim cards, and this move got a
lot of customers.
Vodafone was also collaborating with Iphone which got her even more
famous.
TV: The television is or better was very very famous in the UK, started
with 5 channels that were from the state and some others private
channels. However the last years with the advertising and the Internet,
television has lost some of her prestige.
At this case, Vodafone and others operators came up with the idea of a
cable connection to the house ,that were using its packets, which was
coming along with the privileges of a huge amount of channels,
broadcastings and internet.
(*) The number of the houses and the small businesses with the
broadband which was increasing rapidly. Most of the English people had
computers and needed internet what’s why they were choosing
sometimes not so good companies because they gave them good packets
to afford everything.
(*) Vodafone should have followed a strategy like BTS these days.
I) Provide services to each client like his are unique, and this is how they
raise their performance, through value enhancement.
The important is the relationships between them and the revenue is not
the only one that matters.
IV) The expansion and the new investments at the mobile data, the
entertainment and the broadband. Also to make more powerful the capital
discipline year by year.
(*) Vodafone was challenged at the 2009, the leadership at the UK was
taken by others operators and she had to do something.
(*) With a lot of work, Vodafone managed to get a very successful place
at the mobile phones world/ internet, the brand was wide known and
along with others companies, Vodafone was even more famous by taking
places to other parts of the UK life (Ex. sports, Formula1)
(*) The best partner for Vodafone seems to be the BT, which would allow
to it to gain the access to the network with less capital investment and left
the partnership that she had with other operators.
(*) The construction of Vodafone’s new and own network would make it
to spend a huge amount of money, revenue and capital but it would let it
to integrate to the market and provide a full packet of services and data
that only Vodafone would have under the established brand that has and
the quality that guarantees.