Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Pabon and Dagansan For Defense Qteeee
Pabon and Dagansan For Defense Qteeee
Dagansan, Jaquelyn
Pabon, Ana Rose L.
MAY, 2023
iii
DEDICATION
This study is dedicated first to our parents, who were able to provide
financial support not just materially but also emotionally and spiritually that gave
To our friends who have also become our supporters, especially to those
problems that we faced in making this study, that they are truly an ally who
helped us and encourage us that they were not hesitant to lend their help and
To our teachers, who always there that give us new ideas, enlighten us
about research and give us a motivation and inspirational messages to gain more
knowledge to make this study to be successful. That with their expertise we can
And finally, we dedicate this study to our Almighty God, who guide us
through it. And giving us strength, knowledge, and wisdom to make it successful.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
This study was made successful through the aid of significant person who
unconditionally shared their efforts, time, ideas and of course money. With this
regard, the researchers would like to express their utmost gratitude to the
First, we would like to thank our Almighty God for giving us the strength,
knowledge, ability, and opportunity to undertake this research study. Without his
guidance and mercy, we would not be able to accomplish this research and all of
To our dearest parents for their deep consideration for the finances and
undying support throughout the making of the research study. As well as for their
words of encouragement for all those sleepless nights that we’ve spent making
Second, we would like to convey our deep and sincere gratitude to our
thesis adviser, Ms. Leneth Pearl S. Pingot, for providing invaluable guidance,
completion and success of this study. It was a great privilege and honor to work
and study under her guidance. Also, to our beloved panelist, Ma’am Mary
Lovely Suzzeth P. Mendez our panel chairman, to Ma’am Jilla Mae D. Susada
and Mr. JR A. Mantog the other member of panelist, thank you so much for your
Lastly, we’d like to thank Sir Jhon Chell O. Toroba and Sir Jr. Cadalzo,
v
who helped us with this study by giving us their laptops and printers without any
hesitation. And, of course, to our good friends who help and support us to
ABSTRACT
TABLE OF CONTENTS
viii
TITLE PAGE
Title Page i
Approval Sheet ii
Dedication iii
Acknowledgement iv
Abstract vi
Table of Contents vii
List of Figures viii
List of Tables Ix
List of Appendices x
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 1
Rationale of the Study 1
Significance of the Study 3
Statement of the Problem 3
Objectives of the Study 4
Scope and Limitation 5
Theoretical Framework 5
Definition of Terms 7
CHAPTER 2 REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE 9
Definition of Multiplication 9
Problems in Mastering Multiplication 11
Effectiveness of MFM on Mastering Multiplication 14
CHAPTER 3 METHODOLOGY 19
Research Locale and Duration 19
Research Design 20
Respondents of the Study 20
Research Instrument 20
Data Gathering 21
Data Analysis 23
ix
LIST OF FIGURE
FIGURE PAGE
LIST OF APPENDICES
APPENDIX PAGE
1 Steps in Magic Finger Method 46
2 Curriculum Vitae 49
xii
LIST OF TABLES
TABLES PAGE
1 Level of Third Graders’ Multiplication Skills in the
Pre-test 25
2 Level of Third Graders’ Multiplication Skills in the
Post-test 27
3 Difference between Control and Experimental Groups in
Pre-Test 29
4 Difference between Control and Experimental Groups in
Post Test 31
5 Comparison Between Pre-test and Post Test Scores
among Respondents 33
1
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION
Primary school children who have not mastered multiplication which is one
of the basic skills in the four arithmetic operations are regarded as being at-risk
for mathematical failure (Stegemann & Grünke, 2014). The lack of understanding
that it is more difficult for them to achieve higher learning (Stegemann and
Grünke, 2014). Furthermore, Southwell and Penglase (2015) found that most
elementary students cannot solve multiplication problems and that’s the reason
students who did not acquire multiplication skills are most like to fail
very important skills for a pupil, but most of the students face difficulties in
learning it. Undeniably, this also happens among low achievers, which have lack
teachers are lacked of knowledge and did not apply strategies in teaching it
Pupils need to master the four basic skills for the mastery of mathematics. In
2
community (Ramirez et al., 2013). The alarming situation does not only occur at
school level but also at the national level. One of the factors of pupils’
(Cragg et al., 2017). In line with that, teachers who taught memorization method
2016). Undeniably, pupils are still unable to dominate the multiplication with the
and as for the outcome, pupils are not interested in empowering mathematics
(Chinn, 2013).
Meanwhile, Bahadir (2017) wrote that magic finger method helps students
to visualize and facilitate students to store information visually for longer period of
achievement after teaching using the finger method. This method is easily
and able to attract students' attention. Since this has not yet been studied by
eager to explore the use of magic finger method in teaching multiplication. Thus,
multiplication.
3
Curriculum Makers. Through this study, educational content creator may devise
out quality instruction through integrating the use of magic finger method in
teaching multiplication.
Multiplication as part of the newest curriculum. This study will expand their minds
into a greater span and learn tools to enhance their knowledge using finger
method in multiplication.
design suitable intercessions to fit understudy’s needs. The study will also
provide sufficient knowledge for the school administrators the real needs of the
learners in attaining quality education through the use of magic finger method in
teaching multiplication.
Student. This study may assist students in learning how to multiply numbers. It
will provide them a tool that they can easily use and manipulate using their
fingers.
The main focus of this study was to determine the effectiveness of finger
Central Elementary School. Thus, this study sought to answer the following
questions:
4
1. What is the level of the pretest score between control and experimental
2. What is the level of the posttest scores between control and experimental
5. Is there any significant difference between the pretest and posttest scores
The focus of the study was to use magic finger method in mastering
multiplication particularly to the second and third sections of third –grade level in
questionnaire validated by a master teacher. The study was taken between last
April to May 2023, with an intervention that lasted for two weeks and was
consists of five sessions per week. This study was delimited on improving the
competency which was find the missing value in a number sentence involving
multiplication with the said intervention specifically magic finger method was
Theoretical Framework
Piaget was the first to explain the Cognitivism Theory. It is also known as
transferring knowledge to the learner in the most efficient way is by allowing the
(Cacioppo et al., 2013). Thus, Piaget’s Cognitive Learning Theory entails that
humans learn from thinking, we learn from our experiences, and we can improve
our multiplication skills through learning and using new strategies for us to
Other than that, Piaget also attested that the use of strategy in mastering
because he believes in the concept that one of the major challenges encountered
uses their existing knowledge to form a mental structure that an individual uses
students will use schemata to master multiplication. Piaget believed that before
2019).
the use of magic finger method in mastering multiplication (Kirsh, 2013). Also,
ideas (schemas) about how the world operates in response to new information
concept that, students apply the new strategy that they’ve learned which is magic
finger method that will help them in learning and mastering multiplication
that making small changes to that knowledge in order to cope with difficulties that
The researchers believed that the cognitivism theory of Jean Piaget was
deemed appropriate for this study. Particularly in this study, schema of the
mastered the multiples of 1 until 5. Moreover, assimilation occurs the moment the
use a magic finger effectively in solving multiplication, specifically, when they are
Definition of Terms
Cognitivism. Cognitivists believe that humans learn from thinking. They believe
8
that we learn from our experiences and that we can change our behaviors based
students practice and achieve proficiency in content and applied learning skills.
Curriculum is the central guide for all educators as to what essential for teaching
and learning, so that every student has access to rigorous academic experiences
(Malone, 2020).
Magic Finger Method (MFM). Magic finger method is defined as the ability to
Multiplicand. Is the first number in which the other is being multiplied (Su et al.,
2016).
subtraction, and division, in math, multiply means the repeated addition of groups
Numeracy. The ability to understand and deal competently with numbers, tables,
CHAPTER 2
REVIEW RELATED LITERATURE
the topic of the study. This section tackles the different concepts, ideas, and
information that are relevant to the present study. This served as the researcher's
Definition of Multiplication
uses two different amounts. The multiplier is a scaling factor that shows how the
operation changes the size, or scale, of the multiplicative unit. The new scaled
value is the answer to the multiplication. The rescaled result is the product of the
the number of groups and the number in each group are known (Badawi et al.,
2019). More formally, the number of groups indicates the multiplier and the
number in each group refers to the multiplicand, giving the total amount as the
product (Sanaullah et al., 2018). For instance, there are three bags of marbles
and the number of marbles in each bag is two. In this case, the multiplier is three
10
whereas the multiplicand is two. The product which represents the total amount
bags of wool on each sheep, five sheep are carrying the wools. The idea in this
case is, three times as many bags of wool as sheep. Moreover, multiplication is
(MacLane, 2012).
the total number of things in the two groups, each containing three things.
While, Al and Dave (2018) claimed that the concept of multiplication is intuitively
attached to a repeated addition model but the multiplier must be a whole number.
Lo and Luo, (2012) also found that students tended to solve multiplication
on repeated addition.
Although equal groups are the starting point for multiplication, Siemon et
al (2015) stated that this idea is only suitable for small positive integers, not
helpful in fractions and decimals and does not apply to negative numbers.
extended from the notion of times to part of a part in the multiplication of fractions
11
or alternatively the notion of all these open up a question about what is the
changes based on contexts. Chin and Jiew (2019) interpreted the meaning of
changed according to the new context. In the similar vein, Chin and Jiew (2019)
realized the change of meanings in multiplication when both the multiplicand and
multiplier were fractions. All these highlight the complexity in making sense of
multiplication over the longer term. Amy is more sensitive to the changes of
should not only be able to execute the four basic arithmetic operations, they
should, more than anything else, also be able to understand them in terms of
content. Primary school children who have not acquired the basic skills in the
four arithmetic operations are regarded as being at-risk for mathematical failure
12
(Stegemann & Grünke, 2014). The lack of understanding of the basic and
technology has some specific attributes that support the learning of multiplication
new and exciting ways (Schrum & Levin, 2016). The lack of interest in learning
2013). Even though Mathematics is a very important subject for a pupil, but some
may face difficulties in learning it. This also happens among Mathematics low
and procedures (Abdullah et. al., 2014). These are essential in learning
result in rote learning. As a result, learners may not be able to solve non-routine
understand how the multiplication algorithm works before they can identify
However, school pupils who can solve standard operation for multiplication
based on multiplication tables and multiplication facts but this didn’t help them to
teachers can solve multiplication problems but they can’t explain why it works. In
another study done by Harkness and Thomas (2013) states that alternative
multiplication algorithm and they also didn’t realise why it works. Thus,
Pettersson and Andrews (2017) wrote that the way teachers taught
solely based on repeated addition is not enough. Children are meant to develop
a mental model that they can apply to solve symbolic problems as flexibly as
rectangular arrays has been established (Hurst & Hurrel, 2016), because they
multiplicative way of thinking (Hurst & Hurrel, 2016). However, Moser Opitz
14
(2013) states that very few at-risk children benefit from work done with the
multiplicative arrays, only about 30% of the at-risk students surveyed could solve
a problem using the manipulative approach, even though all children had learned
multiplication with the help of rectangular arrays in their second year. Primary
school children who have not acquired the basic skills in the four arithmetic
operations are regarded as being at-risk for mathematical failure (Stegemann &
Grünke, 2014).
individual moves from one number system to another number system such as
negative integers and fractions (Zhang et al., 2014). However, both of them
trying to build their understanding based on the idea of repeated addition in new
Street, 2013). Educator must develop strategies that are underpinned by theories
numeracy skills (Everingham et al., 2017). The educators can develop the
Mutlu et al., (2020) states that the finger knuckles counting method
15
operations. Jay and Betenson (2017) revealed that testing a finger training
symbolic magnitude comparison scores, but on its own was not sufficient to
improve quantitative skills (Anderson, 2013). The two versions of the intervention
that combined both the finger training and number games aspects were
Western Individuals. The role of finger counting which is basic numerical and
multisensory input, which conveys both cardinal and ordinal aspects of numbers.
The data indicate that children with good finger-based numerical representations
show better arithmetic skills and that training finger sense, enhance multiplication
mathematicians.
procedures delineating the proposition, proof, and example along with a pictorial
methods for learning multiplication in the mathematics syllabus can help teachers
to diversify the method of their teaching and learning (Moller et al., 2013). The
current educational situation is that teachers do not dare to apply new discovered
methods from any research and innovation from other individuals (Fugate et al.,
2013). Further the study proved that there are many alternative methods that can
Bahadir (2017) wrote that finger method helps students to visualize and
facilitate students to store information visually for longer period of time. Besides,
after teaching using the finger method. This method is easily accepted and
attract students' attention. Furthermore, Idris et al (2016) states that this method
did not only enhance students’ mastery of learning multiplication but also engage
17
that this method has proven to strengthen the basic concepts of multiplication for
students when the findings show a positive impact. The cross method was
introduced by a Japanese national, which is still used until today. The concept of
a game-like method will be more appropriate for students. Students will compete
costs (Stegemann and Grünke, 2014). Students with different characteristics are
because it may be a necessity rather than a choice for some students. Therefore,
have a positive effect on students in both cognitive and affective aspects. For
this, use of visualization in mathematics education starting from the first stage of
and for students to organize their own knowledge and associate concrete and
CHAPTER 3
METHODOLOGY
particularly, the Grade 3 pupils of the School Year 2022-2023. The Grade 3
classrooms can be found in building 15 and building 16, the front side and right
side of building 21. The school located at Castro Ave., St. Población, Cateel,
Davao Oriental with zip code 8205. The school consist of K-6 grades.
Additionally, the intervention lasted for two weeks within April to May 2023 and
Research Design
can be used to find patterns and averages, make predictions, test causal
addition, the researchers firmly believe that this was the most appropriate
The respondents of this study were the two sections of third-grade level of
experimental and control group. The experimental group was from grade 3
trustworthy with 20 respondents and the control group was from grade 3 integrity
with 17 respondents. The researchers together with the research adviser were
were both consist of all pupils under set 1 class schedule of the week.
Research Instrument
the major tool in data collection. The questionnaires that were used underwent
21
validity and reliability testing. Its validity was established using content validity as
certified by an expert in the field after matching the questionnaire’s content to the
curriculum guide. While, reliability was established through the conduct of pilot
covered by the K-12 curriculum guide. It has twenty (20) items consisted of
multiple choices, matching type, fill in the blank and true or false.
Data Gathering
data.
respondent’s risk.
Elementary School in order to carry out the action research. Permission was
granted, the researchers also send a letter to the 3rd grade class adviser
asking permission to conduct the study and uses the tool with the students.
The study objectives was specified in great detail in the letter requesting
permission to conduct the study as well as the letter sent to the class adviser
and principal.
22
the respondents.
measures, the researchers gave the students a pre-test. Students were given
this as a sneak peek at what to expect in the activities that came after and
5. Retrieval of pretest. The questionnaire was retrieved after the students have
completed the pretest that will be given by the researchers. The data from
6. Carrying out of intervention. The researcher carried out the study with magic
researcher.
8. Retrieval of the post-test. The questionnaire was retrieved once the students
have completed the pre-test that the researcher delivers. The information
interpreted.
23
Data Analysis
questionnaire, tabulation of the raw data was the initial step in encoding the
results. After tabulating the raw data that was gathered, the researcher had a
part was dominated the control group. This means that there was an initial
assumption that the intervention that was used is quite effective. However, it was
reliable, realistic and proper interpretation to the gathered data, it was used
Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS), a software program used for
quantifying data analysis and K-12 DepEd grading system was used for
groups. Moreover, the statistical tools that were used are mean and independent
sample T-test.
Mean. This statistical tool was used in order to determine (1) the level of pretest
scores and (2) post test scores of the respondents from the two groups. In other
Independent sample T-test. This statistical tool was used in determining (3) the
(4) the significant difference of posttest scores between control and experimental
group and lastly, (5) to determine the significant difference between pretest and
CHAPTER 4
RESULT AND DISCUSSION
This chapter presents the results and discussion of the study. The results
are discussed thoroughly and the order is based on the study’s statement of the
problem.
determine the pre-test score in terms of multiplication skills among third graders.
40.59 and experimental group have a grade percentage of 35.75 in which the
third graders did not meet the expected level of multiplication skill.
Table 2. Level of pre-test scores between the control and experimental groups
Grade
Total Standard
Group Mean Percentag Remarks
Score Deviation
e
Did not meet
Control 20 1.13 8.12 40.59
expectation
Did not meet
Experimental 20 1.85 7.50 35.75
expectation
Results in Table 2 showed the control group had a mean score of 8.12 with an
equivalent grade percentage of 40.59, which means it did not meet expectations.
Similarly, the experimental group had a mean score of 7.50 with an equivalent
grade percentage of 35.75, which means it did not meet expectations. The result
26
showed that both the control and experimental groups did not meet expectations,
which means they failed based on their scores in the pre-test. It implied that
and methods used to teach the mathematics courses as the most influential
Jordan et al. (2013) stated that primary school children who have not
acquired the basic skills in the four arithmetic operations are regarded as being
at-risk for mathematical failure. The lack of understanding of the basic and
(Stegemann & Grünke, 2014). Additionally, Southwell and Penglase (2015) found
that most elementary students cannot solve multiplication problems and that’s
In support to that, Voinea & Purcaru (2013) state that the lack of interest.
Mathematics is a very important subject for a pupil, but some may face difficulties
in learning it. This also happens among Mathematics low achievers, which have
understand how the multiplication algorithm works before they can identify
However, school pupils who can solve standard operation for multiplication
based on multiplication tables and multiplication facts but this didn’t help them to
The scores that were obtained in this research and underwent statistical
analysis were from the post-test conducted. Table 3 showed the level of post-test
Table 3. Level of post-test scores between the control and experimental groups
Total Standard Grade
Group Mean Remarks
Score Deviation Percentage
Control 20 3.01 16.60 83.20 Satisfactory
Experimental 20 0.94 19.30 96.25 Outstanding
The table 3 presented that the level of the post-test scores of control group which
is 16.60 which means satisfactory and for experimental group is 19.30 which
means outstanding. Based on the results, the researcher concluded that the
especially true given that the experimental group’s performance was outstanding.
This clarifies why the magic finger method was found to be a successful strategy
in this situation.
improving the multiplication skills of third graders. Also, the intervention that
combined both the finger training and number games aspects was successful in
Bahadir (2017) wrote that finger method helps students to visualize and
facilitate students to store information visually for longer period of time. Besides,
after teaching using the finger method. This method is easily accepted and
attract students' attention. Furthermore, Idris et al (2016) states that this method
29
did not only enhance students’ mastery of learning multiplication but also engage
Also, cognitive learning theory founded on the concept that, students apply the
new strategy that they’ve learned which is magic finger method that will help
multiplication skills.
and experimental group in pretest. This means that both groups have the same
As observed, the pre-test scores of control group shows 8.12 while the
experimental group shows 7.50. The findings implied that the pre-test between
the control and experimental group do not differ significantly which means that
both groups have the same level of knowledge about multiplication, thus, there is
a need to improve the multiplication skills of the third graders. Based on the
supported by the study of Whitacre & Nickerson (2016) which states memorizing
algorithm works before they can identify appropriate learning opportunities for
students. However, school pupils who can solve standard operation for
multiplication based on multiplication tables and multiplication facts but this didn’t
individual moves from one number system to another number system such as
addition as a supportive conception and they are constantly trying to build their
2020).
experimental groups. This answers the question about any significant difference
As observed, the post-test scores of the control group have a mean score
of 16.60 and the experimental group has a mean score of 19.30 which shows
that the respondents’ multiplication skills, without using the intervention, the
result shows that it differ significantly from the post-test scores after the
costs (Stegemann and Grünke, 2014). Students with different characteristics are
the learner to use the most effective cognitive strategy to encode information
(Cacioppo et al., 2013). Also, Piaget’s Cognitive Learning Theory entails that
humans learn from thinking, we learn from our experiences, and we can improve
our multiplication skills through learning and using new strategies for them to
materials, they will able to get the answers easily because according to Giudici et
facts and is suitable for students. Therefore, the Magic Fingers Teaching Method
the students in performing the calculation of the product of the multiplication facts
are applicable to students. This is because the lessons that integrate physical
and mental reflection are more effective in learning the multiplication facts as a
parable told by Marshark, Lang and Albertini (2002), “Tell me, and I will forget;
proven to strengthen the basic concepts of multiplication for students which the
33
multiplication skills after using the strategy to the third graders (Flores, 2016).
between the pre-test and post-test scores of the experimental and control group.
The result implied that the group who received the intervention had a greater
score than the group which did not. It can be shown in the table that the scores of
the experimental group increased after the conduct of magic finger method.
performances between the mean pre-test scores and the mean post-test scores,
with a t-value of -17.938 and a p-value of 0.001. It implied that with the use of
difference as the experimental group can carry out the results of the control
there was a significant difference from the pre-test to the post-test that was more
34
Multiplication fact skill is one of the abilities in arithmetic operations. Low memory
for students is lower but their multiplication facts achievement is much better by
practicing MFTM.
Based on the overall result, it proved that the results of the post-test
those of the study by Bahadir (2017) which states that finger method helps
students to visualize and facilitate students to store information visually for longer
students’ achievement after teaching using the finger method. This method is
complex and able to attract students' attention. In support to the result, Piaget
believed in the concept that a schema is the basic unit of knowledge and
arithmetic skills because people abandon. Bahadir (2017) suggest that use of
both cognitive and affective aspects. For this, use of visualization in mathematics
education starting from the first stage of elementary school will add a new
learning and make it meaningful and for students to organize their own
2016). Also, cognitive learning theory founded on the concept that, students
apply the new strategy that they’ve learned which is magic finger method that will
and multiplication skills. Piaget stated that making small changes to that
2018).
36
CHAPTER 5
SUMMARY, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION
Summary
Mathematics competency.
The respondents of this study were the grade 3 learners of Cateel Central
and 17 in the control group. The data were analyzed using a statistical tool such
as mean for determining the level of pretest scores and post test scores of the
respondents from the two groups and the independent sample for determining
37
the significant difference between pretest and posttest scores of control and
experimental group.
The results showed that the experimental and control groups have the
same level of multiplication skill in the pretest. It was revealed that after
skills of the Grade 3 learners, the post test scores showed that the experimental
group has greater scores than the control group. Magic finger method helped to
improve the multiplication skills of the third graders as implied by the results.
Conclusions
1) The multiplication skills of Grade 3 learners in the pre-test did not meet
2) The pre-test scores between control group and experimental group did not
differ significantly which shows that both groups have the same level of
multiplication skills.
3) The pre-test scores between the two groups did not differ significantly,
which implies that both students have the same levels of background
4) The post-test scores between the two groups differ significantly, which
higher than the control group. This finding showed that the conduct of
5) The result shows that the pre-test and posttest scores among respondents
Recommendations
Based on the findings of the study, the researchers recommend the following:
1.) The researchers suggest that the teachers and students may use the magic
given attention and teachers should give activities that may help them
improve the said skills through using the magic finger method. It is further
fingers whenever the learners are doing calculation by using their fingers as
the manipulation of physical materials, they will be able to get the answers
grade 3 pupils may also be used by future researchers this may gave them a
39
chance to test the effectiveness of magic finger method to another grade like
involving multiplication.
References
Albright, B., & Fox, W. P. (2019). Mathematical modeling with Excel. CRC Press.
Amin, T. G., Jeppsson, F., & Haglund, J. (2015). Conceptual metaphor and
embodied cognition in science learning: Introduction to special
issue. International Journal of Science Education, 37(5-6), 745-758.
Aunio, P., & Räsänen, P. (2016). Core numerical skills for learning mathematics
in children aged five to eight years–a working model for
educators. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 24(5),
684-704.
Badawi, R. D., Shi, H., Hu, P., Chen, S., Xu, T., Price, P. M., ... & Cherry, S. R.
(2019). First human imaging studies with the EXPLORER total-body PET
scanner. Journal of Nuclear Medicine, 60(3), 299-303.
Bahr, D. B., Pfeffer, W. T., & Kaser, G. (2015). A review of volume ‐area scaling
of glaciers. Reviews of Geophysics, 53(1), 95-140.
Barrocas, R., Roesch, S., Gawrilow, C., & Moeller, K. (2020). Putting a finger on
numerical development–reviewing the contributions of kindergarten finger
gnosis and fine motor skills to numerical abilities. Frontiers in
Psychology, 11, 1012.
Barrocas, R., Roesch, S., Gawrilow, C., & Moeller, K. (2020). Putting a finger on
numerical development–reviewing the contributions of kindergarten finger
gnosis and fine motor skills to numerical abilities. Frontiers in
Psychology, 11, 1012.
Cathébras, J., Carbon, A., Milder, P., Sirdey, R., & Ventroux, N. (2018). Data
flow-oriented hardware design of RNS-based polynomial multiplication
for SHE acceleration. IACR Transactions on Cryptographic
Hardware and Embedded Systems, 69-88.
Fugate, J. M., Macrine, S. L., & Cipriano, C. (2019). The role of embodied
cognition for transforming learning. International Journal of School &
Educational `Psychology, 7(4), 274-288.
Ghazi, S. R., Khan, U. A., Shahzada, G., & Ullah, K. (2014). Formal operational
stage of Piaget's cognitive development theory: An implication in
learning mathematics. Journal of Educational Research, 17(2), 71.
Jay, T., & Betenson, J. (2017, June). Mathematics at your fingertips: testing a
finger training intervention to improve quantitative skills. In Frontiers in
Education (Vol. 2, p. 22). Frontiers Media SA.
42
Larsson, E. G., Ngo, H. Q., Ashikhmin, A., Yang, H., & Marzetta, T. L. (2017).
. cell- free massive MIMO versus small cells. IEEE Transactions on Wireless
Communications, 16(3), 1834-1850
May, Y. S., & Ahmad, N. A. (2018). Needs analysis of DoCtor WoRM’s Module in
improving multiplication skills among year four low
achievers. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and
Social Sciences, 8(5).
Moller, S., Mickelson, R. A., Stearns, E., Banerjee, N., & Bottia, M. C. (2013).
Collective pedagogical teacher culture and mathematics achievement:
Differences by race, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status. Sociology of
Education, 86(2), 174-194.
Morra, S., Gobbo, C., Marini, Z., & Sheese, R. (2012). Cognitive development:
neo-Piagetian perspectives. Psychology Press.
Mubarik, M., Budiarto, M. T., & Sulaiman, R. (2018). Using the Schema Owned in
Solving Problems through Assimilation and Accommodation.
In Mathematics, Informatics, Science, and Education International
Conference (MISEIC 2018) (pp. 194-197). Atlantis Press.
Mutlu, Y., Akgün, L., & Akkusci, Y. E. (2020). What Do Teachers Think about
Finger-counting? International Journal of Curriculum and
Instruction, 12(1), 268-288.
43
Neveu, Maëlle, Marie Geurten, Nancy Durieux, and Laurence Rousselle. "Finger
Use and Arithmetic Skills in Children and Adolescents: a Scoping
Review." Educational Psychology Review 35, no. 1 (2023):
2.
Palupi, E. L. W., Sumarto, S. N., & Purbaningrum, M. (2022). Senior high school
student's understanding of mathematical inequality. Jurnal
Elemen, 8(1), 201-215.
Radmehr, F., & Drake, M. (2019). Revised Bloom’s taxonomy and major theories
and frameworks that influence the teaching, learning, and assessment
of mathematics: a comparison. International Journal of Mathematical
Education in Science and Technology, 50(6), 895-920.
Ramirez, G., Gunderson, E. A., Levine, S. C., & Beilock, S. L. (2013). Math
anxiety, working memory, and math achievement in early elementary
school. Journal of Cognition and Development, 14(2), 187- 202.
Sanaullah, A., Yang, C., Alexeev, Y., Yoshii, K., & Herbordt, M. C. (2018). Real-
time data analysis for medical diagnosis using FPGA-accelerated neural
networks. BMC bioinformatics, 19, 19-31.
Scheinholtz, L., Holden, K., & Kalish, C. (2012). Cognitive development and
children’s understanding of personal finance. Consumer knowledge
andfinancial decisions: Lifespan perspectives, 29-47.
Supekar, K., Swigart, A. G., Tenison, C., Jolles, D. D., Rosenberg-Lee, M.,
Fuchs,L., & Menon, V. (2013). Neural predictors of individual
differences in response to math tutoring in primary- grade school
children. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110(20),
8230- 8235.
Thomas, J. R., Martin, P., Etnier, J., & Silverman, S. J. (2022). Research
methods in physical activity. Human kinetics.
Verschaffel, L., Schukajlow, S., Star, J., & Van Dooren, W. (2020). Word
problems in mathematics education: A survey. ZDM, 52, 1-16.
Verschaffel, L., Schukajlow, S., Star, J., & Van Dooren, W. (2020). Word
problems in mathematics education: A survey. ZDM, 52, 1-16.
Yapo, F., Tabiliran, J., Dagami, A., Navales, K., & Tus, J. (2021). The self-
efficacy and academic motivation of the graduating college students
during the Covid-19 pandemic in the Philippines. International Journal of
Advance Research and Innovative Ideas In Education, 7(3), 2128-2139.
Zhang, W Gu, K., Zhai, G., & Yang, X. (2014). Hybrid no-reference quality metric
for singly and multiply distorted images. IEEE
Transactions on
Broadcasting, 60(3), 555-567.
46
Appendix A
your body and your fingers are facing each other. Again each finger will
represent a number. Your pinkies represent the number six, your ring
fingers will represent the number seven, your middle fingers will represent
47
the number eight, your index fingers represent nine, and your thumbs
2. Touch the fingers that represent your multiplication problem together. For
example, if you want to figure out the problem (7x6) you would touch your
left ring finger with your right pinky. Your left fingers represent the number
on the left of the problem, and your right fingers represent the numbers on
the right of the problem. Again, remember that each finger represents a
number and that in this case, your ring finger represents seven and your
pinky represents six. Therefore, you need to touch these together to solve
touch your left index finger with your right ring finger.
48
3. Add the fingers that touch together as well as the fingers beneath them. The
next step is to count the touching fingers as well as the fingers below them.
These will represent the 10s. In this case you would count the ring finger on your
left hand, the pinky on your left hand and the pinky on your right hand. Each
finger that you count will count as 10. In this case, the total is 30.
4. Multiply the remaining fingers. The next step is to add together the number of
fingers on each hand, not including the fingers that are touching. First count the
number of fingers on your left hand that are above the touching fingers - in this
case there are 3. Next, count the number of fingers on your right hand above the
5. Add the two figures together to find your answer. In this case you will
CURRICULUM VITAE
Davao Oriental
Major in Generalist
50
EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND
Tertiary : Davao Oriental State University – Cateel Extension Campus
Mahan-ob, Mainit, Cateel Davao Oriental
CURRICULUM VITAE
Davao Oriental
Major in Generalist
51
EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND