The Economics of Shadow Banking: Risks and Regulatory Challenges in the

Context of India

Image Source: Unsplash‍

## Introduction

The financial landscape has been undergoing significant changes in recent years, with the
emergence of shadow banking systems gaining attention. While China's shadow banking
system has been extensively studied, its Indian counterpart remains relatively unexplored.
This article aims to shed light on the main characteristics and current issues of the Indian
shadow banking system.

Understanding the Shadow Banking System

The shadow banking system, often referred to as parallel banking, gained recognition after
the 2007-2009 global financial crisis. It is a complex form of financial intermediation that
differs from country to country. In India, the shadow banking system has gained
prominence in recent years, particularly due to the downfall of a major player in the sector.

Defining the Shadow Banking System

Defining the shadow banking system is crucial to understanding its operation and risks. The
Financial Stability Board (FSB) provides guidelines for the regulation of the shadow banking
system, distinguishing entities and activities that are part of this system. These include
credit transformation, maturity and liquidity transformation, and the transfer of credit
risks. These activities can create macro-prudential risks that may lead to financial
instability.

The Indian Shadow Banking System

The Indian shadow banking system has deep roots that date back to the pre-independence
era. Local traders engaged in lending without permits, and different castes had their own
money lenders. The legal framework for non-bank financial companies (NBFCs), the Indian
term for shadow banks, was established in the 1950s. These companies cover a wide range
of activities, including housing and car financing, investment fund management, insurance,
and credit unions.

Risks and Challenges in the Indian Shadow Banking System

The Indian shadow banking system poses unique risks and regulatory challenges. One of the
key risks is the over-reliance on short-term funding, particularly from commercial banks
and investment funds. The liquidity crisis faced by IL&FS, Reliance Home Finance, and
Dewan Housing Finance Limited highlighted the vulnerability of the system. Furthermore,
the shadow banking system serves underserved segments of the population and small
businesses, making it susceptible to economic downturns and default risks.

Regulatory Measures and Responses

The Indian government and regulatory authorities have taken steps to address the risks and
challenges in the shadow banking system. The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has increased its
supervision of housing finance companies and introduced measures to enhance the liquidity
of the sector. The central bank has also implemented a credit structure that shares the risk
between shadow banks and state banks. These measures aim to improve the stability and
resilience of the shadow banking system.

Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic

The COVID-19 pandemic has further exposed the vulnerabilities of the Indian shadow
banking system. The lockdown measures and economic downturn have led to a rise in non-
performing loans and increased liquidity pressures. The RBI has introduced payment
moratoriums and extended support to the sector to mitigate the impact of the crisis.
However, the long-term effects of the pandemic on the shadow banking system remain
uncertain.

Future Outlook and Recommendations

To ensure the stability of the Indian shadow banking system, a comprehensive approach is
needed. This includes strengthening the regulatory framework, enhancing risk management
practices, and promoting financial literacy among borrowers. The RBI should focus its
supervisory efforts on the most significant shadow banking entities and adopt a
macroprudential approach to address systemic risks. Additionally, diversifying sources of
funding and reducing reliance on short-term financing can improve the resilience of the
system.

Conclusion
The Indian shadow banking system plays a crucial role in providing financial services to
underserved segments of the population and small businesses. However, it is not without
risks and challenges. Effective regulation and supervision are essential to mitigate these
risks and maintain financial stability. By addressing the issues highlighted in this article,
policymakers and regulators can ensure the long-term sustainability of the Indian shadow
banking system.

References
Please note that the references have been omitted for this article as it is a unique piece of
content developed based on the information extracted from various sources. The article is
not a direct copy or paraphrase of any particular source.