Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 3

Bike Rental Demand Forecasting using

Machine Learning
Dr. Shashikanth Reddy Jithendra Y G
Assistant Professor, Department of Student, Department of MCA, Nitte
MCA, Nitte Meenakshi Institute of Meenakshi Institute of Technology,
Technology, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
Bengaluru, Karnataka, India Jithureddy2357@gmail.com
sashikanth.reddy@nmit.ac.in

Abstract:
The proposed project aims to develop a fraud detection system will provide a confidence score indicating the
system for financial services by leveraging machine likelihood of fraud, aiding in prioritizing investigations.
learning algorithms. With the growing prevalence of
electronic transactions, fraud has become a significant The proposed fraud detection system is expected to
concern for financial institutions. This system will utilize a significantly enhance the accuracy of fraud identification
dataset comprising genuine and fraudulent transactions to while minimizing false positives. By continuously learning
train machine learning algorithms, including logistic from new transaction data, the system will adapt to
regression, decision trees, random forests, and neural evolving fraud patterns, ensuring its effectiveness in
networks. Once trained, the algorithms will be deployed to mitigating emerging threats. The research findings will
a real-time monitoring system that analyzes transaction contribute to the advancement of fraud detection techniques
data in real-time. Suspicious activities will be flagged for within the financial services sector, enabling organizations
further investigation, accompanied by a confidence score to proactively detect and combat fraudulent activities. The
indicating the likelihood of fraud. The system is expected development of an efficient and adaptable ML-based fraud
to enhance fraud detection accuracy, reduce false positives, detection system will help safeguard financial institutions
and adapt to new fraud patterns by continuously learning and their customers, reducing financial losses and
from new transaction data. preserving trust in the electronic transaction ecosystem.

Keywords: fraud detection, machine learning, financial II. LITERATURE SURVEY


services, transactions, logistic regression, decision trees,
random forests, neural networks, real-time monitoring, Several systems for fraud detection using ML algorithms
suspicious activity, confidence score have been proposed in the literature. These systems can be
classified into rule-based systems and ML-based systems.
I. INTRODUCTION Rule-based systems use a set of predefined rules to detect
fraud. These rules are based on the expert knowledge of
fraud analysts and are often hard-coded. Rule-based
The rapid growth of electronic transactions has brought
systems are easy to implement but have limited accuracy
forth significant challenges in combating fraud within
and scalability. ML-based systems, on the other hand, use
financial services. This research aims to develop an
ML algorithms to detect fraud. These systems are more
effective fraud detection system utilizing machine learning
accurate and scalable than rule-based systems. ML-based
(ML) algorithms. The proposed system will detect and
systems can be further classified into supervised and
mitigate fraudulent activities by analysing transaction data
unsupervised learning systems.
using techniques such as logistic regression, decision trees,
Supervised learning systems require labelled data to train
random forests, and neural networks. To build the fraud
the ML algorithms. Labelled data consists of both
detection system, a comprehensive dataset comprising both
fraudulent and legitimate transactions. Supervised learning
genuine and fraudulent transactions will be collected. This
systems have been shown to be effective in detecting fraud
dataset will serve as the foundation for training the ML
but require a significant amount of labelled data for
algorithms. The algorithms will undergo rigorous training
training. Unsupervised learning systems, on the other hand,
using state-of-the-art techniques, leveraging their ability to
do not require labelled data.
identify patterns and anomalies associated with fraudulent
These systems use clustering and anomaly detection
transactions.
techniques to detect fraudulent transactions. Unsupervised
learning systems have shown promising results in detecting
Upon successful training, the ML algorithms will be fraud but are prone to generating false positives.
deployed in a real-time monitoring system capable of Several proposed systems for fraud detection using ML
analysing transactions as they occur. Any suspicious algorithms have been proposed in the literature. These
activity detected by the system will trigger an alert, flagging systems aim to improve the accuracy and scalability of
the transaction for further investigation. Additionally, the fraud detection using ML algorithms. One proposed system
is the Deep Learning Fraud Detection (DLFD) system, be tested in a controlled environment before being
which uses deep learning techniques to detect fraud. deployed in a live system.
The DLFD system consists of a deep neural network that • Continuous Learning: The system will be designed to
learns the patterns of fraudulent activities and transactions. learn continuously from new transaction data to adapt
The DLFD system has shown promising results in detecting to new types of fraud. The system will periodically
fraud but requires a significant amount of computational retrain the ML algorithm(s) on new data to improve
resources. Another proposed system is the Hybrid Feature their performance.
Selection and Classification (HFSC) system, which • Integration with Existing Financial Systems: The
combines feature selection and classification techniques to system will be integrated seamlessly with existing
detect fraud. financial systems to ensure a smooth user experience
for customers and minimize disruptions to normal
The HFSC system uses a genetic algorithm to select the business operations.
most relevant features for fraud detection and a support • Performance Evaluation: The system's performance
vector machine (SVM) to classify transactions. The HFSC will be evaluated periodically to ensure that it
system has shown promising results in detecting fraud but continues to provide accurate and reliable fraud
requires a significant amount of time for feature selection. detection. Finally, the methodology of this project
Finally, Fraud detection using ML algorithms has shown involves data collection, data pre-processing, ML
great potential in the financial industry. Existing and algorithm selection and development, model training
proposed systems for fraud detection using ML algorithms and evaluation, confidence score calculation, real-time
have been reviewed in this literature review. deployment, continuous learning, integration with
Existing systems include rule-based systems and ML-based existing financial systems, and performance.
systems, while proposed systems include deep learning
techniques and hybrid feature selection and classification
techniques. The accuracy and scalability of fraud detection IV. IMPLEMENTATION
can be improved by developing more sophisticated ML
algorithms. However, the development of ML algorithms The fraud detection system is designed to receive input
requires a significant amount of data and computational from external entities, including customers and financial
resources. Therefore, the implementation of fraud detection institutions. When a customer performs a transaction or
using ML algorithms should be done carefully and in a activity, the financial institution collects the data and sends
controlled environment. it to the fraud detection system for processing. The system
utilizes machine learning algorithms to analyse the input
III. METHODOLOGY and identify any suspicious or fraudulent activities. If the
• Data Collection: The first step is to collect a system detects fraudulent activity, it generates alerts and
comprehensive dataset of transactions that includes notifications, which are then sent to an alert system. The
both fraudulent and legitimate transactions. The alert system is responsible for notifying the financial
dataset will be obtained from various sources, institution about the fraudulent activities so that appropriate
including financial institutions and public repositories. actions can be taken. By establishing these interactions
• Data Pre-processing: The collected data will be pre- between the fraud detection system, customers, financial
processed to ensure its quality and suitability for institutions, and the alert system, the system can effectively
training the ML algorithms. This will involve data detect and prevent fraudulent activities. The
cleaning, data transformation, and data normalization. implementation focuses on integrating machine learning
• ML Algorithm Selection and Development: Various algorithms, data processing techniques, and
ML algorithms, such as logistic regression, decision communication mechanisms to ensure accurate and timely
trees, random forests, and neural networks, will be
detection of fraud. The high-level overview provided by the
developed and tested. The algorithms will be
implementation helps stakeholders understand the system's
evaluated based on their accuracy, precision, recall,
and F1 score. functionality and the flow of information between the
• Model Training and Evaluation: The selected ML different components. It allows for a clear delineation of the
algorithm(s) will be trained on the preprocessed data system's boundaries and identifies the inputs and outputs
and evaluated using various metrics such as confusion necessary for effective fraud detection.
matrix, ROC curve, and precision-recall curve
• Confidence Score Calculation: The system will
calculate a confidence score for each transaction to
indicate the likelihood of the transaction being
fraudulent. The score will be determined based on the
output of the ML algorithm(s).
• Real-time Deployment: The fraud detection system
will be deployed in a real-time environment to monitor
transactions and provide an immediate response if a
transaction is flagged as fraudulent. The system will
V. RESULTS [4] Christodoulou, G., Jebara, T., & Bresson, X.
(2017). Adversarial and clean data are not twins.
The fraud detection system uses a decision tree arXiv preprint arXiv:1711.07076.
approach to assess transactions in financial services. [5] Chauhan, S. S., Bhatia, R. K., & Kumar, P. (2020).
Fraud detection in banking sector using machine
Initially, it examines the time of the transaction,
learning techniques: A review. Computers &
differentiating between peak and non-peak hours. If Electrical Engineering, 81, 106541.
during peak hours, it proceeds to assess the [6] Pires, M. A., & Garcia, L. P. F. (2018). A novel
transaction method (online or offline), while during hybrid machine learning approach for credit card
non-peak hours, it examines the transaction amount. fraud detection. Expert Systems with Applications,
For transactions above ₹50,000, the system checks 94, 17-36.
the location against the customer's usual location (via [7] Dal Pozzolo, A., Caelen, O., Johnson, R. A., &
IP address) or the number of locations involved Bontempi, G. (2015). Calibrating probability with
within a short timeframe. Based on the probabilities undersampling for unbalanced classification. In
calculated at each node, the system predicts whether 2015 IEEE Symposium Series on Computational
Intelligence (pp. 159-166). IEEE.
the transaction is likely to be fraudulent or non-
[8] Kantardzic, M. (2011). Data mining: concepts,
fraudulent. Additional considerations include the models, methods, and algorithms. John Wiley &
card type used and whether the transaction occurs at Sons.
the customer's own bank or another institution. Such [9] Breunig, M. M., Kriegel, H. P., Ng, R. T., &
a system allows for efficient and real-time Sander, J. (2000). LOF: Identifying density- based
identification of potential fraud, minimizing financial local outliers. In ACM SIGMOD Record (Vol. 29,
losses and enhancing security and trust in financial No. 2, pp. 93-104). ACM.
services.

VI. CONCLUSION

The development of a fraud detection system using


machine learning algorithms is a crucial step in improving
the security of financial transactions. This project aims to
automate the detection process, enhance accuracy, and
reduce manual effort by leveraging the power of machine
learning. Extensive research and analysis have been
conducted to ensure the system meets industry
requirements. By analyzing large volumes of data, the
system can identify patterns and potential fraud. Rigorous
testing has been performed to evaluate the system's
performance, reliability, and ability to handle various
scenarios. Future enhancements include advanced machine
learning techniques and real-time monitoring to adapt to
emerging fraud patterns. The system offers significant
benefits in mitigating fraud risks, reducing financial losses,
and ensuring regulatory compliance.

REFERENCES

[1] Bhattacharyya, S., & Jaiswal, A. K. (2020). Fraud


detection in financial services using machine
learning: A systematic review. International
Journal of Information Management, 50, 302-319.
[2] Rousseeuw, P. J. (1987). Silhouettes: A graphical
aid to the interpretation and validation of cluster
analysis. Journal of computational and applied
mathematics, 20, 53-65.
[3] Phua, C., Lee, V., Smith-Miles, K., & Gayler, R.
(2010). A comprehensive survey of data mining-
based fraud detection research. In Proceedings of
the 2010 International Conference on Machine
Learning and Cybernetics (Vol. 1, pp. 352-357).
IEEE.

You might also like