If UFOs are real, shouldn`t they produce some real

physical effects ?

Again, the answer is that they do. There are rather well-authenticated cases spanning a
wide variety of "physical effects." Car-stopping cases are one important class. UFOs have
repeatedly been associated with ignition failures and light-failures of cars and trucks
which came near UFOs or near which the UFOs moved. I would estimate that one could
assemble a list of four or five dozen such instances from various parts of the world.
Interference with radios and TV receptions have been reported many times in
connection with UFO sightings. There are instances where UFOs have been reported as
landing, and after departure, holes in the ground, or depressions in sod or disturbed
vegetation patterns have been described. In many such instances, the evident reliability
of the witnesses is high, the likelihood of hoax or artifice small. A limited number of
instances of residues left behind are on record, but these are not backed up by
meaningful laboratory analyses, unfortunately.

A physical effect that does not typically occur under conditions where the description of
events might seem to call for it, relates to sonic booms. Although there are on record a
few cases where fast-moving UFOs were accompanied by explosive sounds that might be
associated with sonic booms, there are far more instances in which the reported
velocity corresponded to supersonic speeds, yet no booms were reported. A small
fraction of these can be rationalized by noting that the reporting witnesses were
located back within the "Mach cone" of the departing UFO; but this will not suffice to
explain away the difficulty. One feels that if UFOs are solid objects, capable of leaving
depressions in soil or railroad ties when they land, and if they can dash out of sight in a
few seconds (as has been repeatedly asserted by credible witnesses), they should
produce sonic booms. This remains inexplicable; one can only lamely speculate that
perhaps there are ways of eliminating sonic booms that we have not yet discovered;
perhaps the answer involves some entirely different consideration.

If we include among "physical effects" those that border on the physiological, then there
appear to be many odd types. Repeatedly, tingling and numbness have been described
by witnesses who were close to UFOs; in many instances outright paralysis of a UFO
witness has occurred. These effects might, of course, be purely psychological,
engendered by fear; but in some instances the witnesses seem to have noted these
effects as the first indication that anything unusual was occurring. A number of
instances of skin-reddening, skin-warming, and a few instances of burns of very unusual
nature are on record. These physiological effects are sufficiently diverse that caution is
required in attempting generalization. Curiously, a peculiar tingling and paralysis seem
to be reported more widely than any other physiological effects. A person who is almost
unaware of the ramifications of the UFO evidence may think it absurd to assert that
people have been paralyzed in proximity to UFOs; the skeptic might find it
inconceivable that such cases would go unnoticed in press and medical literature. Far
from it, I regret to have to say, on the basis of my own investigations. I have
encountered cases where severe bodily damage was done, or where evident hazard of
damage was involved, yet the witness and his family found ridicule mounting so much
faster than sympathy that it was regarded wiser to quietly forget the whole thing. At an
early stage of my investigations I would have regarded that as quite unbelievable; UFO
investigators with longer experience than mine will smile at that statement, but
probably they will smile with a degree of understanding. I could cite specific
illustrations to make all this much clearer, but will omit them for space-limitations,
except for a few remarks in the next section.

http://www.ufoevidence.org/documents/doc616.htm

/Siyavash
2006-11-16 19:52
Direct URL ť