This document contains the results of a plagiarism check on a content sample that found 0% plagiarized content. It also includes survey results from 137 students about parental involvement in their education. The results show that most students were between 13-15 years old, more were boys than girls, most had parents who were self-employed, and most agreed that parental control positively impacts student achievement.
The Travels of Macarius, Patriarch of Antioch: Written by his Attendant Archdeacon, Paul of Aleppo, In Arabic. Volume I and II. Translated By F. C. Belfour London: Printed for the Oriental Translation Fund, 1837
This document contains the results of a plagiarism check on a content sample that found 0% plagiarized content. It also includes survey results from 137 students about parental involvement in their education. The results show that most students were between 13-15 years old, more were boys than girls, most had parents who were self-employed, and most agreed that parental control positively impacts student achievement.
This document contains the results of a plagiarism check on a content sample that found 0% plagiarized content. It also includes survey results from 137 students about parental involvement in their education. The results show that most students were between 13-15 years old, more were boys than girls, most had parents who were self-employed, and most agreed that parental control positively impacts student achievement.
This document contains the results of a plagiarism check on a content sample that found 0% plagiarized content. It also includes survey results from 137 students about parental involvement in their education. The results show that most students were between 13-15 years old, more were boys than girls, most had parents who were self-employed, and most agreed that parental control positively impacts student achievement.
Scale variance if item deleted Corrected- item total correlation Cronbach’s alpha if item deleted my parents’ job does not give them enough time to get involved in my studies 8.50 7.355 .781 .757 Lack of formal education doesn’t allow my parents get involved in my education 8.92 7.076 .809 .746 Lack of knowledge of the school curriculum makes my parents not to get involved in my studies 8.31 8.349 .479 .843 Language barriers doesn’t allow my parents get fully involved in my studies 8.69 9.290 .450 .844 My parents financial capability to provide for my educational materials makes my parents not to be involved in my education 8.36 7.248 .675 .788 3.7 PROCEDURE FOR DATA ANALYSIS The questionnaire will be personally shared by hand to the respondents.The questionnaire was allowed for answering for (15) minutes with the respondents before submitting of the questionnaire for further computing. 3.8 Method of Data analysis Data collection will be properly analyzed in next chapter (chapter 4) using statistical analysis chart and simple percentage In the statistical chart, all the table would show a display of each respondent based on the questions provided.DATA ANALYSIS AND D1SCUSSION OF FINDINGS 4.1 INTRODUCTION In this chapter, collected data from the questionnaires were compiled interpreted, and analyzed in an appropriate manner.Deductions were made from the necessary information collected and relevant chart was contrasted.a necessary information collected from the questionnaire is appropriately out in tabulated form in the sequence and statistical manner in order to relate respondent's answers with certain identifiable characteristics.This is derived by construction of statistical tables that involves the responses, number of responses and percentage with brief comments.Part two has to do with the main analysis by using simple percentages to ascertain the correlation of variables stated under research questions in first chapter one. 4.1.1 ANALYSIS OF RESPONDENTS’ CHARACTERISTICS A sum total of one hundred and fifty (150) questionnaires were given out of which only one hundred and thirty-seven (137) that represent 91. 3% respondents (consisting of 137 students) were considered more viable and reliable for this study. Thirteen (13) questionnaires that represent 8.7% were rejected due to inadequate and improper filling of information on the questionnaire.One hundred and thirty-seven (137) questionnaires considered properly useful for this study and these represent 91.3% positive responses. TABLE 4.1.1 Distribution of respondents according to their age Responses No of responses Percentage (%) 8-12 years 43 31.4 13-15 years 85 62.0 16 years and above 9 6.6 Total 137 100 The table above shows distribution of respondents according to their age distribution. Total of 43 (31. 4%) of the total sample size with respondents were between 8-12 years while 85 respondents (6. 6%) were 16 years and above.The above table shows chart and distribution of the students according to their ages. Total of 43 (31.4%) of the total sample size with students were between 8-12 years while 85 students (6.6%) were 16 years and above. TABLE 4.1.2 Sex Distribution Sex No of responses Percentage (%) Boys 81 59.1 Girls 56 40.
9 Total 137 100 The one above shows distribution
of the students according to their sex 81 respondents that covered 59.1% are Girls, 56 respondents that covered 40.9% are boys Class distribution 4.1.3 Class No of Responses Percentage (%) JSS1 -SS1 41 29.9 JSS2-SS2 47 34.3 JSS3-SS3 49 35.8 Total 137 100 The table above shows distribution of Students according to their classes Total of 41 (29.9%) of the total sample size with Students were JSS1 to SS1 Students While 47 Students representing 34.3% where JSS2 to SS2 students and 49 Students representing 35. 8%were JSS3 to SS3 Students. TABLE 4.1.4 Parent Employment Distribution Responses No of Responses Percentage (%) Employed by self 75 54.7 Employed 49 35.8 Unemployed 13 9.5 Total 137 100 The table above shows the distribution of Students according to the job done by their parents Total of 75 (54.7%) of the total sample size with students’ parents that are self-employed while 49(35.8% respondents’ parents were employed 13 respondents representing 9.5% were not employed.Bar charts showing Parental control and students’ educational achievement Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid strongly agreed 151 22.1 22.1 22.1 agreed 366 53.6 53.6 75. 7 disagreed 101 14.8 14.8 90.5 strongly disagreed 39 5.7 5.7 96.2 undecided 26 3.8 3.8 100.0 Total 683 100.0 100.0 TABLE 4.1.5 Chi square distribution showing the relationship between parental control and students’ educational achievement S/N STATEMENT SA A D SD U 1 My parents often monitor my movement with and outside the home which doesn’t allow me misbehave 34 25.0% 63 46.0% 24 17.5% 11 8.0% 5 3.6% 2 My parents often censor what I watch on television 24 17.5% 73 53.3% 26 19.0% 8 5.8% 6 4. 4% 3 My parents often scold me each time I misbehave 21 15.363.010.2.0.6% 4 My parents often censor the kind of friends I keep at home and in school 40 29.1% 80 58.4% 19 6.6% 5 3.6% 3 2.2% 5 My parents often censor the parties I attend to keep me from bad occurrences 36 26.3% 62 45.3% 28 20.4% 7 5.1% 4 3.0% Mean total 31.0 72.8 20.2 7.8 5.2
Matched Sources
Report Generated: Sun, Jan 14, 2024 by plagiarismremo
The Travels of Macarius, Patriarch of Antioch: Written by his Attendant Archdeacon, Paul of Aleppo, In Arabic. Volume I and II. Translated By F. C. Belfour London: Printed for the Oriental Translation Fund, 1837