Chapter 3 Part 2

You might also like

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 3

Date: Sun, Jan 14, 2024

Exclude Url: No Rocords Found 0

100% 0% 0%
Unique ContentPlagiarized ContentParaphras

Content Checked For Plagiarism:

Item total statistics Scale mean if item deleted


Scale variance if item deleted Corrected- item total
correlation Cronbach’s alpha if item deleted my
parents’ job does not give them enough time to
get involved in my studies 8.50 7.355 .781 .757
Lack of formal education doesn’t allow my parents
get involved in my education 8.92 7.076 .809 .746
Lack of knowledge of the school curriculum makes
my parents not to get involved in my studies 8.31
8.349 .479 .843 Language barriers doesn’t allow
my parents get fully involved in my studies 8.69
9.290 .450 .844 My parents financial capability to
provide for my educational materials makes my
parents not to be involved in my education 8.36
7.248 .675 .788 3.7 PROCEDURE FOR DATA
ANALYSIS The questionnaire will be personally
shared by hand to the respondents.The
questionnaire was allowed for answering for (15)
minutes with the respondents before submitting
of the questionnaire for further computing. 3.8
Method of Data analysis Data collection will be
properly analyzed in next chapter (chapter 4)
using statistical analysis chart and simple
percentage In the statistical chart, all the table
would show a display of each respondent based
on the questions provided.DATA ANALYSIS AND
D1SCUSSION OF FINDINGS 4.1 INTRODUCTION In
this chapter, collected data from the
questionnaires were compiled interpreted, and
analyzed in an appropriate manner.Deductions
were made from the necessary information
collected and relevant chart was contrasted.a
necessary information collected from the
questionnaire is appropriately out in tabulated
form in the sequence and statistical manner in
order to relate respondent's answers with
certain identifiable characteristics.This is derived
by construction of statistical tables that involves
the responses, number of responses and
percentage with brief comments.Part two has to
do with the main analysis by using simple
percentages to ascertain the correlation of
variables stated under research questions in first
chapter one. 4.1.1 ANALYSIS OF RESPONDENTS’
CHARACTERISTICS A sum total of one hundred
and fifty (150) questionnaires were given out of
which only one hundred and thirty-seven (137)
that represent 91.
3% respondents (consisting of 137 students) were
considered more viable and reliable for this study.
Thirteen (13) questionnaires that represent 8.7%
were rejected due to inadequate and improper
filling of information on the questionnaire.One
hundred and thirty-seven (137) questionnaires
considered properly useful for this study and
these represent 91.3% positive responses. TABLE
4.1.1 Distribution of respondents according to
their age Responses No of responses Percentage
(%) 8-12 years 43 31.4 13-15 years 85 62.0 16
years and above 9 6.6 Total 137 100 The table
above shows distribution of respondents
according to their age distribution. Total of 43 (31.
4%) of the total sample size with respondents
were between 8-12 years while 85 respondents (6.
6%) were 16 years and above.The above table
shows chart and distribution of the students
according to their ages. Total of 43 (31.4%) of the
total sample size with students were between
8-12 years while 85 students (6.6%) were 16 years
and above. TABLE 4.1.2 Sex Distribution Sex No of
responses Percentage (%) Boys 81 59.1 Girls 56
40.

9 Total 137 100 The one above shows distribution


of the students according to their sex 81
respondents that covered 59.1% are Girls, 56
respondents that covered 40.9% are boys Class
distribution 4.1.3 Class No of Responses
Percentage (%) JSS1 -SS1 41 29.9 JSS2-SS2 47 34.3
JSS3-SS3 49 35.8 Total 137 100 The table above
shows distribution of Students according to their
classes Total of 41 (29.9%) of the total sample size
with Students were JSS1 to SS1 Students While 47
Students representing 34.3% where JSS2 to SS2
students and 49 Students representing 35.
8%were JSS3 to SS3 Students. TABLE 4.1.4 Parent
Employment Distribution Responses No of
Responses Percentage (%) Employed by self 75
54.7 Employed 49 35.8 Unemployed 13 9.5 Total
137 100 The table above shows the distribution of
Students according to the job done by their
parents Total of 75 (54.7%) of the total sample size
with students’ parents that are self-employed
while 49(35.8% respondents’ parents were
employed 13 respondents representing 9.5%
were not employed.Bar charts showing Parental
control and students’ educational achievement
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent Valid strongly agreed 151 22.1 22.1 22.1
agreed 366 53.6 53.6 75.
7 disagreed 101 14.8 14.8 90.5 strongly disagreed
39 5.7 5.7 96.2 undecided 26 3.8 3.8 100.0 Total
683 100.0 100.0 TABLE 4.1.5 Chi square
distribution showing the relationship between
parental control and students’ educational
achievement S/N STATEMENT SA A D SD U 1 My
parents often monitor my movement with and
outside the home which doesn’t allow me
misbehave 34 25.0% 63 46.0% 24 17.5% 11 8.0% 5
3.6% 2 My parents often censor what I watch on
television 24 17.5% 73 53.3% 26 19.0% 8 5.8% 6 4.
4% 3 My parents often scold me each time I
misbehave 21 15.363.010.2.0.6% 4 My parents
often censor the kind of friends I keep at home
and in school 40 29.1% 80 58.4% 19 6.6% 5 3.6% 3
2.2% 5 My parents often censor the parties I
attend to keep me from bad occurrences 36 26.3%
62 45.3% 28 20.4% 7 5.1% 4 3.0% Mean total 31.0
72.8 20.2 7.8 5.2

Matched Sources

Report Generated: Sun, Jan 14, 2024 by plagiarismremo

You might also like