Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Externality
Externality
Externality
Externalities, Pollution
and Global Warming
ECON 1210
Economics and Society
Fall 2023
1
Introduction
⚫ Recall: Markets are usually a good way to
organize economic activity
⚫ In the absence of market failures, the market
outcome is efficient, maximizes total surplus
⚫ One major type of market failure: externalities
⚫ Externality: the uncompensated impact of
one person’s actions on the well-being of a
bystander
2
Externalities and Efficiency
⚫ In the presence of externality, market
equilibrium is no longer efficient
⚫ Individual’s estimates of resources value (or
cost) are not correct (from the society’s point
of view)
⚫ Traditional belief: Government to step in to
ensure efficient resource allocation
⚫ And to protect the interest of bystanders as
well
3
Negative Externality
⚫ Negative Externality: the effect on bystanders
is adverse
Example:
⚫ the neighbor’s barking dog
4
Pollution: A Negative
Externality
⚫ Firms burn huge quantities of fossil fuels
(coal, natural gas, oil) that cause acid rain
and global warming
⚫ Firms dump toxic waste into rivers, lakes, and
oceans
⚫ These environmental issues are
simultaneously everybody’s problem and
nobody’s problem
5
Pollution: A Negative
Externality
⚫ Example of negative externality:
Air pollution from factory
⚫Firm does not bear the full cost
8
Analysis of a Negative Externality
P The market for gasoline
$5 Social cost
=private+ external cost
4 external
cost External cost
3 = value of the
negative impact
2 on bystanders
= $1 per gallon
1 (value of harm
Supply (private cost)
from smog,
0 greenhouse gases)
0 10 20 30 Q
(gallons) 9
Analysis of a Negative Externality
P The market for gasoline
The socially
$5 optimal quantity
Social
cost is 20 gallons.
4
S At any Q < 20,
3 value of additional gas
exceeds social cost.
2
At any Q > 20,
D
social cost of the
1
last gallon is
greater than its value
0
0 10 20 25 30 Q to society.
(gallons) 10
Analysis of a Negative Externality
P The market for gasoline
$5 Mkt eqm (Q = 25)
Social
cost is greater than
4 social optimum
S
(Q = 20).
3 overproduction
resulted in DWL
2 (red triangle)
D One solution:
1 impose a corrective
tax of $1/gallon on
0 sellers, shift supply
0 10 20 25 30 Q
(gallons) curve up $1 11
Internalizing the Externality
⚫ Internalizing the externality: altering
incentives so that people take account of the
external effects of their actions
⚫ previous example: $1/gallon tax on sellers
makes sellers’ costs equal to social costs
⚫ When market participants must pay social costs,
the market eqm matches the social optimum.
⚫ Imposing the tax on buyers would achieve the
same outcome: market Q will equal optimal Q
12
Summary For Pollution: A
Negative Externality
With negative externality, QMarket >QSocial Optium
firms over-produce (DWL exist)
→Remedy: The government can internalize the
externality by imposing corrective tax
Price S’
Q’ Q Quantity 13
Externality in Consumption
⚫ Consumption of alcohol, tobacco, and
gasoline (private driving) all create negative
externality to the society
⚫ Govt impose a heavy corrective tax on these
goods to alter the incentives of customers, in
order to mitigate of negative externality
14
Corrective Tax Rate
(Levy / Charges) in HK
⚫ Alcohol: 100% tax rate for alcohol with
strength of more than 30% by volume
⚫ Cigarettes: $2.5 / each cigarette, tax for a
pack of 20-stick cigarettes = $50
⚫ About 67% of the selling price of $74 / pack
16
Case Study: Environmental
Levy on Plastic Shopping Bags
in HK
⚫ Survey indicates that some 8 billion
(8,000,000,000) plastic shopping bags are
disposed of at landfills every year in HK
⚫ This translates into more than 3 plastic
shopping bags per person per day, which
apparently go beyond our needs
17
Case Study: Environmental Levy
on Plastic Shopping Bags in HK
⚫ Address the problem of
abuse, gov introduced
an levy of $1 HKD on
each plastic shopping
bag at the retail level
⚫ Estimated negative
externality of each
plastic bag = ?
18
Positive Externality
⚫ Positive Externality: the effect on bystanders is
beneficial
Example:
⚫ When you get a flu vaccination, everyone you
come into contact with benefits
⚫ Research and Development (R&D) creates
knowledge others can use
⚫ Renovating your house increases neighboring
property values
⚫ Restores of historical building 19
Positive Externalities from
Education
⚫ A more educated population benefits society:
⚫ lower crime rates: educated people have
more opportunities, so less likely to rob and
steal
⚫ better government: educated people make
better-informed voters
⚫ People do not consider these external
benefits when deciding how much education
to “purchase”
20
Positive Externalities from
Education
⚫ Result: market eqm Q of education too low
⚫ How govt may improve the market outcome:
⚫ subsidize cost of education
40
▪ Draw the social
value curve
S
30 ▪ Find the socially
optimal Q
20 ▪ What policy
would internalize
10 this externality?
D
0 Q 22
0 10 20 30
Analysis of a positive externality
Mkt eqm Q = 20
P The market for flu shots
$50 Social optimal Q = 25
external Underproduction
40 benefit resulted in DWL (red
triangle)
S
30
Social value
20 = private value
+ $10 external benefit
10 To internalize the
D
externality, use
0 Q subsidy = $10/shot
0 10 20 25 30 23
Summary: Corrective Tax and
Subsidy to Deal With
Externalities
⚫ If negative externality
⚫ market produces a larger quantity than is
socially desirable
⚫ If positive externality
⚫ market produces a smaller quantity than is
socially desirable
24
Summary: Corrective Tax and
Subsidy to Deal With
Externalities
⚫ remedy the problem: “internalize the
externality”
⚫ tax goods with negative externalities
⚫ ideal corrective tax = external cost
25
Public Policies Toward
Negative Externalities
Market-based policies
⚫ provide incentives so that private decision-
makers will choose to solve the problem on
their own
⚫ Corrective Tax
26
Public Policies Toward
Negative Externalities
Command-and-control policies: Regulation
⚫ regulate behavior directly. Examples:
27
Policy Option: Example
28
Policy Option: Regulation Vs
Corrective Tax
⚫ Policy options
⚫ 1. regulation: require each plant to cut
emissions by 25%
⚫ 2. corrective tax: make each plant pay a tax
on each ton of SO2 emissions. Set tax at
level that achieves goal.
29
Policy Option: Regulation Vs
Corrective Tax
⚫ Under Policy option 1, regulation, firms have
no incentive to reduce emissions beyond the
25% target
⚫ Suppose cost of reducing emissions is
lower for “Ace Electric” than for “Billy
Power”
⚫ Socially efficient outcome: “Ace Electric”
reduces emissions more than “Billy
Power”
30
Policy Option: Regulation Vs
Corrective Tax
⚫ Corrective tax is a price on the right to pollute
⚫ Under policy option 2, tax on emissions gives
firms incentive to continue reducing emissions
as long as cost of doing so is less than the tax
⚫ If a cleaner technology available, tax gives
firms incentive to adopt it
⚫ Tax payment is money!
33
Policy Option: Tradable
Pollution Permits
⚫ A system of tradable pollution permits
achieves goal at lower cost than regulation
⚫ Firms with low cost of reducing pollution
(Ace Electric) sell whatever permits they
can
⚫ Firms with high cost of reducing pollution
(Billy Power) buy permits
⚫ Result: incentive to reduce pollution: permit =
money
34
Tradable Pollution Permits
in the Real World
⚫ Emission of greenhouse gases causes the
global warming
⚫ The primary greenhouse gas in the
atmosphere is the emission of carbon dioxide
⚫ Carbon emissions trading is a form of
emissions trading that specifically targets
carbon dioxide
35
Tradable Pollution Permits
in the Real World
⚫ Carbon emissions permits traded in Europe
since Jan 1, 2005
⚫ Recall: permit = money
36