Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Poli 101 Notes
Poli 101 Notes
Poli 101 Notes
Go through specific reading of each class posted on syllabus. See downloads for the book.
Feb 13: “2015 will be the last election under FPTP” – kisses, JT
(two pillars: PARL + FED)
Core concepts: FPTP; composition of House; laboratories of democracy
Textbook: pgs. 115-133 (sections 6.3-6.9)
Online reading: Joseph Heath, 2016. “Electoral reform and the illusion of majority
rule”, Policy Options.
Link: https://policyoptions.irpp.org/magazines/june-2016/electoral-reform-and-the-
illusion-of-majority-rule/
Feb 15: Whatever you do, don’t bring beer across provincial
borders
(two pillars: FED + CHAR)
Core concepts: purposes of confederation; provincial autonomy; judicial review
Textbook: pg 180-184 (section 8.8)
Online reading: Emmett Macfarlane, 2018. “In its ‘free-the-beer’ ruling, the Supreme
Court reveals its contradictions”, Macleans Magazine.
Link: https://www.macleans.ca/opinion/in-its-free-the-beer-ruling-the-supreme-court-
reveals-its-contradictions/
Apr 9: The good, the bad, and the ugly of Canadian democracy
No readings assigned
Overview, introduction.
Federalism:
- Is a question of how to distribute power within a country
- Canada has 3 levels of constitutional government which lays out two sets of
governments which are federal and provincial govts.
- In 1867 imp powers were given to the federation now the powers are more
decentralized. Earlier used to be centralized.
Charter of Rights (1982) and judiciary: Canada is a “liberal” country. The charter is a
document that showcases how Canada is a liberal country. Individual rights that the govt
cannot intervene in.
- the supreme court or judiciary protects the rights of citizens through decision making.
- Judges are given imp high levels of powers as they are appointed not elected which is
key to their functioning. Independent judiciary is a key feature.
- Plural identities: managing these various identities for example culturally and
ethnically. Like special cases of Quebec and the indigenous identities. Recognition of
groups and identify their needs.
- Competing liberalisms: includes individual vs group rights.
Group rights include language and indigenous rights, individual rights are the rights
specified by the charter.
House of Commons:
338 MPs (members of Parliament) are elected from approx. equal populated
districts
Functions of the House of Commons:
Legitimation: debate and pass legislation and laws (legitimize state
actions by majority of folks we elected therefore voted in favour of an
action)
Accountability: scrutinize gov decisions by opposition parties and
alow canadians to figure out what is happening in Ottawa.
Representation: represent the interest of Canadians in specific
geographical areas, each MP brings voice from the are they represent
to the parliament.
Ombudsperson: assisting the constituency of the gov, assists
individuals and groups with the rights
Most bills are introduced here
Modern norms in society privileges elections
Member of parliament in the House elected by the people
PM and Cabinet derived from HOC, they become the Government
Main oppositions party called his Majesty’s Loyal Opposition (conservative
party right now) This title sends clear signals that you are still loyal to the
crown even though you are criticizing.
HOC issues:
- Majority vs the minority governments:
- Party with majority government will have a long time to govern and have no problem
keeping seats.
- Minority government must find votes from another party for example NDP agreement
with the liberals to secure seats they can form their own government.
- 2/3rds have been majority governments, comes down to the electoral system produces
artificial majority governments.
- Another convention: whoever was occupying the role of PM gets the first chance to
obtain the confidence of the HOC.
Theories of representation:
- Constituency delegate: when we elect a member of the parliament we hope that they
represent their constituency.
- Trustee form of representation: this when you vote for someone for representation
in the parliament because you trust them, you think they are smart and educated and
they will vote for you.
- Party delegate: we want our MPs to vote in accordance with what their parties tell
them to.
- Party discipline: representatives have the propensity to vote with their party as they
have all the incentives. Strong in Canada as it is a parliamentary form of government
- In Canada parties have the authority to decide who gets to run under the banner. The
party leader can make you an independent MP (enforcement) as most Canadians vote
by looking at the party.
- Advantage: stability in gov, confidence in House, less elections, more time for
electives to act (4 years), easier for voters to see what they transpire
- Disadvantage: makes democracy an illusion, do not need representatives when they
adhere only to party discipline, gaps in representation
- MPs are not powerless, if a party leader pushes MPs to vote for too many things that
are bad for them or their constituencies then the MPs can fight back and depose their
leaders collectively.