Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Ag Nazri - REPORT WRITING EVALUATION FORM

    Uploaded by

    Mohd Ag Nazri
    5 views3 pages
    This document is a report writing evaluation form that assesses students on reports they submitted in groups. It evaluates introductions, bodies, conclusions, language usage, and assigns points in each category. Introductions are assessed on providing an overview and relevant background. Bodies are evaluated on topic sentences, details, summaries, organization and coherence. Conclusions are assessed on restating main ideas and providing a personal perspective. Language usage considers sentence structure, cohesion, vocabulary, and errors. Points are deducted for late or missing submissions. Total scores are calculated out of 40 and converted to a final mark out of 20.

    Original Description:

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is a report writing evaluation form that assesses students on reports they submitted in groups. It evaluates introductions, bodies, conclusions, language usage, and assigns points in each category. Introductions are assessed on providing an overview and relevant background. Bodies are evaluated on topic sentences, details, summaries, organization and coherence. Conclusions are assessed on restating main ideas and providing a personal perspective. Language usage considers sentence structure, cohesion, vocabulary, and errors. Points are deducted for late or missing submissions. Total scores are calculated out of 40 and converted to a final mark out of 20.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    5 views3 pages

    Ag Nazri - REPORT WRITING EVALUATION FORM

    Uploaded by

    Mohd Ag Nazri
    This document is a report writing evaluation form that assesses students on reports they submitted in groups. It evaluates introductions, bodies, conclusions, language usage, and assigns points in each category. Introductions are assessed on providing an overview and relevant background. Bodies are evaluated on topic sentences, details, summaries, organization and coherence. Conclusions are assessed on restating main ideas and providing a personal perspective. Language usage considers sentence structure, cohesion, vocabulary, and errors. Points are deducted for late or missing submissions. Total scores are calculated out of 40 and converted to a final mark out of 20.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 3

    REPORT WRITING EVALUATION FORM

    LEED 1301
    SECTION: 32

    GROUP MEMBERS

    NAME: MATRIC NO:


    1.Mohd Ag Nazri Bin Timbang S 1.1812029
    2.Muhammad Aiman Syahid Bin Nordin 2.1819845
    3.Ahmed Raza 3.1827481

    VERY GOOD TO AVERAGE TO GOOD POOR TO FAIR VERY POOR


    EXCELLENT

    INTRODUCTION
    ● General overview of ⮚ Good intro with some ⮚ Poor background
    ⮚ Excellent intro with ⮚ No background provided
    SDG and relevance of irrelevant information
    clear, organised and ⮚ Issue too broad/failed to
    topic and Issue included in the ⮚ Issue not indicated
    relevant background establish the issue
    ● Presentation of main background with
    ⮚ A relevant SDG issue adequate research ⮚ Points not clear
    ideas from the article
    presented issue
    2-1.5
    3-2.5 1-0.5

    SEMESTER 1, 2020/21
    BODY
    ● Topic sentence ⮚ Ideas may be presented but
    ⮚ Excellent discussion ⮚ Good discussion of ⮚ Poor discussion of the
    are largely undeveloped or
    ● Supporting details of points points points irrelevant.
    ● Summary of main ideas ⮚ Well-elaborated ⮚ Relevant ideas ⮚ Some main ideas ⮚ No summary of main ideas
    / key points supporting details presented but some presented but may be
    may be inadequately repetitive, irrelevant or OR
    ⮚ Well-organised
    developed not well supported
    ⮚ Excellent coherence ⮚ Not enough to evaluate.
    ⮚ Not summarized well
    ⮚ Somewhat choppy
    & cohesion
    ⮚ Lack of coherence &
    ⮚ Little organisation of
    cohesiveness 1-0
    explanation
    10-8 4-2
    7-5

    VERY GOOD TO AVERAGE TO GOOD POOR TO FAIR VERY POOR


    EXCELLENT

    CONCLUSION
    ● Restatement of main ⮚ Adequate overview of
    ⮚ Effective overview of ⮚ Good overview of ⮚ No conclusion
    ideas and SDG area of topic
    relevance topic topic
    ⮚ Poor conclusion
    ● Overview of topic ⮚ Excellent conclusion
    ⮚ Adequate conclusion ⮚ No clear personal
    ● Personal reflection ⮚ Provides clear personal
    ⮚ Provides personal point of view
    point of view with
    strong justification and point of view but with
    recommendations/ weak justification

    SEMESTER 1, 2020/21
    suggestions 1-0.5

    7-5
    4-2 0

    LANGUAGE
    ● Sentence structure ⮚ Excellent control of ⮚ Comprehensible ⮚ Poor sentence construction
    ⮚ Good sentence
    sentence construction, sentence construction, and word choice with
    ● Cohesion construction,
    punctuation, word punctuation and word errors in punctuations and
    ● Vocabulary choice and cohesion punctuation, word choice cohesion
    choice and cohesion
    ⮚ No errors or very few ⮚ Frequent errors of ⮚ Major problems in
    ● Lifting
    errors of agreement, ⮚ Several errors of agreement, tense and agreement, tense and word
    ● Meaning tense and word order agreement, tense and word order order
    word order
    ⮚ No lifting ⮚ Some lifting ⮚ Major lifting
    ⮚ Minor lifting

    20-16 10-6 5-0


    15-11
    *DEDUCT 1 MARK PER DAY FOR LATE SUBMISSION
    *DEDUCT 1 MARK FOR REPORT SUBMISSION WITHOUT OUTLINE AND ARTICLE
    TOTAL /40

    FINAL MARKS (40÷2 =20) /20

    SEMESTER 1, 2020/21

    You might also like