Descriptive Statistics LENGTH OF RICE

Descriptive Statistics
Week 1 week 2 week 3 Week 4
ANAA ANAA ANAA ANAA
Banana Tap Banana Tap Banana Tap Banana Tap
growth growth growth growth
Extract Water Extract Water Extract Water Extract Water
hormone hormone hormone hormone
Valid 24 26 28 24 26 28 24 26 28 24 26 28
Missing 6 4 2 6 4 2 6 4 2 6 4 2
Mean 19.375 18.731 19.857 46.333 51.269 43.286 120.083 115.692 109.786 284.167 289.192 287.643
Std.
8.417 7.411 5.854 20.767 18.207 13.160 17.900 18.255 15.228 13.758 14.224 14.376
Deviation
Minimum 5.000 5.000 6.000 15.000 20.000 20.000 90.000 90.000 89.000 250.000 256.000 256.000
Maximum 35.000 30.000 30.000 95.000 90.000 80.000 152.000 154.000 140.000 298.000 310.000 310.000

DATA INTERPRETATION:

The provided data represents descriptive statistics for an experiment conducted over four weeks, where different substances were tested: Banana Extract, Tap
Water, and ANAA growth hormone. Each week, the measurements were recorded for each substance.

The "Valid" column indicates the number of valid observations recorded for each combination of week and substance. For example, in Week 1, there were 24
valid observations for Banana Extract, 26 for Tap Water, and 28 for ANAA growth hormone. On the other hand, the "Missing" column shows the number of
missing observations or data points for each combination.

The "Mean" column represents the average value calculated for each combination of week and substance. For instance, in Week 1, the mean values were
19.375 for Banana Extract, 18.731 for Tap Water, and 19.857 for ANAA growth hormone. The "Std. Deviation" column indicates the standard deviation,
which measures the dispersion or variability of the data. In Week 1, the standard deviation values were 8.417 for Banana Extract, 7.411 for Tap Water, and
5.854 for ANAA growth hormone.

The "Minimum" and "Maximum" columns represent the minimum and maximum values recorded within each combination of week and substance. For
instance, in Week 1, the minimum values observed were 5.000 for Banana Extract, Tap Water, and ANAA growth hormone, while the maximum values were
35.000, 30.000, and 30.000, respectively.

These descriptive statistics provide insights into the central tendency, variability, and range of values for each substance and week combination. They can help
in understanding the average performance, spread, and extreme values observed during the experiment.

AVOVA TEST

ANOVA
ANOVA - Week 1
Cases Sum of Squares df Mean Square F p
CONTRO
17.164 2 8.582 0.164 0.849
L
Residuals 3928.169 75 52.376
DATA INTERPRETATION:

ANOVA
ANOVA - week 2
Cases Sum of Squares df Mean Square F p
CONTRO
869.799 2 434.899 1.425 0.247
L
Residuals 22882.163 75 305.096
DATA INTERPRETATION:

ANOVA
ANOVA - week 3
Cases Sum of Squares df Mean Square F p
CONTRO
1393.452 2 696.726 2.379 0.100
L
Residuals 21962.086 75 292.828
DATA INTERPRETATION:

ANOVA
ANOVA - Week 4
Cases Sum of Squares df Mean Square F p
CONTRO
328.571 2 164.286 0.822 0.444
L
Residuals 14991.800 75 199.891
DATA INTERPRETATION:
 Correlation
Pearson's Partial Correlations
Week
Variable week 2 week 3 Week 4
1
1. Week Pearson's
—
1 r
p-value —
Pearson's
2. week 2 0.178 —
r
p-value 0.121 —
Pearson's
3. week 3 0.039 0.364 —
r
p-value 0.739 0.001 —
4. Week Pearson's
0.062 0.163 0.165 —
4 r
p-value 0.595 0.156 0.152 —

DATA INTERPRETATION:

The provided data represents Pearson's partial correlations between different variables measured over four weeks: Week 1, Week 2, Week 3, and Week 4.

The diagonal cells, where the week number matches the variable number, display the correlation coefficients (Pearson's r) for each variable with itself. These
correlations are not meaningful since they represent the relationship between a variable and itself, resulting in a correlation of 1. Therefore, no p-values are
provided for these correlations.

The off-diagonal cells show the Pearson's correlation coefficients between different pairs of variables for each week. For example, in Week 2, the correlation
coefficient between Week 1 and Week 2 is 0.178, indicating a weak positive correlation. The corresponding p-value for this correlation is 0.121, which
suggests that this correlation is not statistically significant at a conventional significance level (e.g., α = 0.05).

Similarly, in Week 3, the correlation coefficient between Week 1 and Week 3 is 0.039, indicating a very weak positive correlation. The correlation coefficient
between Week 2 and Week 3 is 0.364, indicating a moderate positive correlation. In Week 4, the correlation coefficient between Week 1 and Week 4 is 0.062,
the correlation coefficient between Week 2 and Week 4 is 0.163, and the correlation coefficient between Week 3 and Week 4 is 0.165. All of these correlations
are weak and positive.

The p-values associated with these correlations provide a measure of statistical significance. In Week 3, the correlation between Week 2 and Week 3 has a p-
value of 0.001, indicating a statistically significant correlation. However, for the remaining correlations, the p-values are greater than 0.05, suggesting that they
are not statistically significant.

These Pearson's partial correlations provide insights into the strength and direction of the relationships between different variables measured in each week.
However, it is important to note that correlation does not imply causation, and further analysis is required to draw meaningful conclusions about the
relationships between these variables.

Descriptive Statistics COLOR OF LEAVES

Descriptive Statistics
Week 1 week 2 week 3 week 4
ANAA ANAA ANAA ANAA
Banana Tap Banana Tap Banana Tap Banana Tap
growth growth growth growth
Extract Water Extract Water Extract Water Extract Water
hormone hormone hormone hormone
Valid 24 26 28 24 26 28 24 26 28 24 26 28
Missing 6 4 2 6 4 2 6 4 2 6 4 2
Mean 1.208 1.231 1.107 1.208 1.231 1.107 2.083 2.038 1.964 2.917 2.923 2.893
Std.
0.415 0.430 0.315 0.415 0.430 0.315 0.504 0.445 0.429 0.282 0.272 0.315
Deviation
Minimum 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 2.000 2.000 2.000
Maximum 2.000 2.000 2.000 2.000 2.000 2.000 3.000 3.000 3.000 3.000 3.000 3.000

DATA INTERPRETATION:

The provided data represents descriptive statistics for an experiment conducted over four weeks, where different substances were tested: Banana Extract, Tap
Water, and ANAA growth hormone. Each week, the measurements were recorded for each substance.

The "Valid" column indicates the number of valid observations recorded for each combination of week and substance. For example, in Week 1, there were 24
valid observations for Banana Extract, 26 for Tap Water, and 28 for ANAA growth hormone. On the other hand, the "Missing" column shows the number of
missing observations or data points for each combination.

The "Mean" column represents the average value calculated for each combination of week and substance. For instance, in Week 1, the mean values were 1.208
for Banana Extract, 1.231 for Tap Water, and 1.107 for ANAA growth hormone. The "Std. Deviation" column indicates the standard deviation, which
measures the dispersion or variability of the data. In Week 1, the standard deviation values were 0.415 for Banana Extract, 0.430 for Tap Water, and 0.315 for
ANAA growth hormone.

The "Minimum" and "Maximum" columns represent the minimum and maximum values recorded within each combination of week and substance. For
instance, in Week 1, the minimum values observed were 1.000 for all three substances, while the maximum values were 2.000.
These descriptive statistics provide insights into the central tendency, variability, and range of values for each substance and week combination. They can help
in understanding the average performance, spread, and the range of values observed during the experiment.

AVOVA TEST
ANOVA
ANOVA - Week 1
Cases Sum of Squares df Mean Square F p
CONTRO
0.235 2 0.117 0.783 0.461
L
Residuals 11.252 75 0.150
DATA INTERPRETATION:

ANOVA
ANOVA - week 2
Cases Sum of Squares df Mean Square F p
CONTRO
0.235 2 0.117 0.783 0.461
L
Residuals 11.252 75 0.150
DATA INTERPRETATION:

ANOVA
ANOVA - week 3_8
Cases Sum of Squares df Mean Square F p
CONTRO
0.190 2 0.095 0.451 0.639
L
Residuals 15.759 75 0.210
DATA INTERPRETATION:

ANOVA
ANOVA - week 4_9
Cases Sum of Squares df Mean Square F p
CONTRO
0.014 2 0.007 0.081 0.922
L
Residuals 6.358 75 0.085
DATA INTERPRETATION:

Correlation
Pearson's Partial Correlations
Week
Variable week 2 week 3 Week 4
1
1. Week Pearson's
—
1 r
p-value —
Pearson's
2. week 2 0.178 —
r
p-value 0.121 —
Pearson's
3. week 3 0.039 0.364 —
r
p-value 0.739 0.001 —
4. Week Pearson's
0.062 0.163 0.165 —
4 r
p-value 0.595 0.156 0.152 —

DATA INTERPRETATION:

The provided data represents Pearson's partial correlations between different variables measured over four weeks: Week 1, Week 2, Week 3, and Week 4.

The diagonal cells, where the week number matches the variable number, display the correlation coefficients (Pearson's r) for each variable with itself. These
correlations are not meaningful since they represent the relationship between a variable and itself, resulting in a correlation of 1. Therefore, no p-values are
provided for these correlations.

The off-diagonal cells show the Pearson's correlation coefficients between different pairs of variables for each week. For example, in Week 2, the correlation
coefficient between Week 1 and Week 2 is 0.178, indicating a weak positive correlation. The corresponding p-value for this correlation is 0.121, which
suggests that this correlation is not statistically significant at a conventional significance level (e.g., α = 0.05).

Similarly, in Week 3, the correlation coefficient between Week 1 and Week 3 is 0.039, indicating a very weak positive correlation. The correlation coefficient
between Week 2 and Week 3 is 0.364, indicating a moderate positive correlation. In Week 4, the correlation coefficient between Week 1 and Week 4 is 0.062,
the correlation coefficient between Week 2 and Week 4 is 0.163, and the correlation coefficient between Week 3 and Week 4 is 0.165. All of these correlations
are weak and positive.

The p-values associated with these correlations provide a measure of statistical significance. In Week 3, the correlation between Week 2 and Week 3 has a p-
value of 0.001, indicating a statistically significant correlation. However, for the remaining correlations, the p-values are greater than 0.05, suggesting that they
are not statistically significant.
These Pearson's partial correlations provide insights into the strength and direction of the relationships between different variables measured in each week.
However, it is important to note that correlation does not imply causation, and further analysis is required to draw meaningful conclusions about the
relationships between these variables.

Descriptive Statistics NUMBER OF LEAVES

Descriptive Statistics
Week 1 week 2 week 3 week 4
ANAA ANAA ANAA ANAA
Banana Tap Banana Tap Banana Tap Banana Tap
growth growth growth growth
Extract Water Extract Water Extract Water Extract Water
hormone hormone hormone hormone
Valid 24 26 28 24 26 28 24 26 28 24 26 28
Missing 6 4 2 6 4 2 6 4 2 6 4 2
Mean 1.500 1.308 1.286 1.875 1.962 1.964 2.042 2.038 1.929 2.833 2.808 2.821
Std.
0.590 0.549 0.460 0.338 0.196 0.189 0.464 0.445 0.378 0.381 0.402 0.390
Deviation
Minimum 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 2.000 2.000 2.000
Maximum 3.000 3.000 2.000 2.000 2.000 2.000 3.000 3.000 3.000 3.000 3.000 3.000

DATA INTERPRETATION:

The provided data consists of descriptive statistics for an experiment conducted over four weeks, involving three different substances: Banana Extract, Tap
Water, and ANAA growth hormone. Each week, the measurements were recorded for each substance.

The "Valid" column indicates the number of valid observations recorded for each combination of week and substance. In Week 1, there were 24 valid
observations for Banana Extract, 26 for Tap Water, and 28 for ANAA growth hormone. The "Missing" column shows the number of missing observations or
data points for each combination, which represents the measurements that were not recorded.

The "Mean" column represents the average value calculated for each combination of week and substance. For example, in Week 1, the mean values were 1.500
for Banana Extract, 1.308 for Tap Water, and 1.286 for ANAA growth hormone. These values indicate the central tendency or the typical value observed for
each substance in each week.

The "Std. Deviation" column indicates the standard deviation, which measures the dispersion or variability of the data. In Week 1, the standard deviation
values were 0.590 for Banana Extract, 0.549 for Tap Water, and 0.460 for ANAA growth hormone. These values suggest the amount of variation or spread
around the mean values for each substance in each week.

The "Minimum" and "Maximum" columns represent the minimum and maximum values recorded within each combination of week and substance. For
example, in Week 1, the minimum value observed was 1.000 for all three substances, and the maximum value observed was 3.000 for Banana Extract, Tap
Water, and ANAA growth hormone. These values indicate the range of values observed for each substance in each week.

These descriptive statistics provide a summary of the data collected during the experiment, offering insights into the average performance, variability, and
range of values observed for each substance in each week.

AVOVA TEST
ANOVA
ANOVA - Week 1
Cases Sum of Squares df Mean Square F p
CONTRO
0.696 2 0.348 1.228 0.299
L
Residuals 21.253 75 0.283
DATA INTERPRETATION:

ANOVA
ANOVA - week 2
Cases Sum of Squares df Mean Square F p
CONTRO
0.129 2 0.064 1.060 0.352
L
Residuals 4.551 75 0.061
DATA INTERPRETATION:

ANOVA
ANOVA - week 3
Cases Sum of Squares df Mean Square F p
CONTRO
0.223 2 0.111 0.607 0.548
L
Residuals 13.777 75 0.184
DATA INTERPRETATION:

ANOVA
ANOVA - week 4_13
Cases Sum of Squares df Mean Square F p
CONTRO
0.008 2 0.004 0.027 0.973
L
Residuals 11.479 75 0.153
DATA INTERPRETATION:
 Correlation
Pearson's Partial Correlations
Variable Week 1 week 2_7 week 3_8 week 4_9
1. Week 1 Pearson's r —
p-value —
2. week 2_7 Pearson's r 0.207 —
p-value 0.071 —
3. week 3_8 Pearson's r 0.185 0.634 —
p-value 0.107 < .001 —
4. week 4_9 Pearson's r 0.026 0.144 0.713 —
p-value 0.821 0.212 < .001 —

DATA INTERPRETATION:

The provided data represents Pearson's partial correlations between different variables measured over four weeks: Week 1, Week 2_7, Week 3_8, and Week
4_9.

The diagonal cells, where the week number matches the variable number, display the correlation coefficients (Pearson's r) for each variable with itself. These
correlations are not meaningful since they represent the relationship between a variable and itself, resulting in a correlation of 1. Therefore, no p-values are
provided for these correlations.

The off-diagonal cells show the Pearson's correlation coefficients between different pairs of variables for each week. For example, in Week 2_7, the correlation
coefficient between Week 1 and Week 2_7 is 0.207, indicating a weak positive correlation. The corresponding p-value for this correlation is 0.071, which
suggests that this correlation is not statistically significant at a conventional significance level (e.g., α = 0.05).

Similarly, in Week 3_8, the correlation coefficient between Week 1 and Week 3_8 is 0.185, indicating a weak positive correlation. The correlation coefficient
between Week 2_7 and Week 3_8 is 0.634, indicating a moderate positive correlation. In Week 4_9, the correlation coefficient between Week 1 and Week 4_9
is 0.026, the correlation coefficient between Week 2_7 and Week 4_9 is 0.144, and the correlation coefficient between Week 3_8 and Week 4_9 is 0.713.
These correlations are all weak and positive.

The p-values associated with these correlations provide a measure of statistical significance. In Week 3_8, the correlation between Week 2_7 and Week 3_8
has a p-value of less than 0.001, indicating a statistically significant correlation. Similarly, in Week 4_9, the correlations between Week 3_8 and Week 4_9
have p-values of less than 0.001, indicating statistically significant correlations. However, for the remaining correlations, the p-values are greater than 0.05,
suggesting that they are not statistically significant.

These Pearson's partial correlations provide insights into the strength and direction of the relationships between different variables measured in each week.
However, it is important to note that correlation does not imply causation, and further analysis is required to draw meaningful conclusions about the
relationships between these variables.