Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Schmidt Ketal 2008
Schmidt Ketal 2008
net/publication/225648196
CITATIONS READS
35 744
6 authors, including:
All content following this page was uploaded by Jörn Theuerkauf on 29 December 2014.
ARTICLE
Received: 1 September 2006 / Accepted: 6 December 2006 / Published online: 13 February 2007
Japan Ethological Society and Springer 2007
Abstract Characteristics of the reproductive behav- on average). During the ten days post-partum, they
iour of wolves (Canis lupus) were studied by radio- spent 85% of their time with pups and travelled
tracking and snow-tracking of four packs in Białowie_za 3.9 km day–1, only. On days 11–30 after parturition,
Primeval Forest (BPF), Poland, in 1995–1999. Signs of females spent 74% of their time tending pups and in-
mating occurred between 12 January and 22 March. creased their daily movement distance to a mean of
Parturition occurred between 19 April and 12 May, and 13.3 km. The females resumed full mobility 50–70 days
the denning period lasted for 49–64 days. During that after parturition, which coincides with termination of
time, wolves used 1–3 den sites, spending on average the weaning process. Anecdotal observations indicated
27 days at each site. The dens were never reused in that pups were tended by other pack members while
consecutive years, but year after year the breeding sites the mother was absent. Compared with the years 1947–
were located in the same parts of the pack’s territory. 1950, in 1995–1999 the breeding season of wolves in
Ten days before parturition pregnant females reduced BPF occurred two weeks earlier. A possible reason was
their normal mobility by half (from 23 to 13.5 km day–1, the 1 to 1.5-degree increase in the mean annual tem-
perature during the last 50 years.
K. Schmidt (&) W. Je˛drzejewski J. Theuerkauf
R. Kowalczyk H. Okarma B. Je˛drzejewska Keywords Canis lupus Wolf Reproduction
Mammal Research Institute, Polish Academy of Sciences, Denning Parental care
17-230 Białowie_za, Poland
e-mail: kschmidt@zbs.bialowieza.pl
W. Je˛drzejewski Introduction
e-mail: wjedrzej@zbs.bialowieza.pl
R. Kowalczyk The basic social unit of the wolf, Canis lupus, popula-
e-mail: rkowal@zbs.bialowieza.pl
tion is the breeding pair and their offspring (Mech
B. Je˛drzejewska 1970, 1999). The wolves breed once a year, and peri-
e-mail: bjedrzej@zbs.bialowieza.pl
odicity of reproduction affects the social behaviour,
Present Address: movements, and structure of the pack (Packard 2003).
J. Theuerkauf The main phases in female reproduction (proestrus,
Carpathian Wildlife Research Station, oestrus, and pup care; Packard et al. 1983) have re-
Museum and Institute of Zoology,
ceived different amounts of scientific attention. Many
Polish Academy of Sciences, ul. Ogrodowa 10,
38-700 Ustrzyki Dolne, Poland studies have been conducted in captivity (reviewed by
Packard 2003). Information on wild wolves’ repro-
Present Address: ductive biology is also available, although often based
H. Okarma
on anecdotal reports of specific aspects of breeding
Institute of Nature Conservation,
Polish Academy of Sciences, Al. Mickiewicza 33, behaviour in North America (Harrington and Mech
31-120 Kraków, Poland 1982; Fuller 1989; Ballard et al. 1991; Boyd et al. 1993;
123
70 J Ethol (2008) 26:69–78
Thiel et al. 1997) and the former Soviet Union (Mak- continental types with clearly marked warm and cold
ridin 1959; Fedosenko et al. 1978; Gursky 1978; Fil- periods. Mean temperatures during the study period
imonov 1980; Vyrypaev and Vorobev 1983; Annenkov were –3.9C in January and 19.1C in July. Mean
1988). More comprehensive information on reproduc- annual precipitation was 622 mm, and snow cover
tive behaviour of wolves in the Voronezh region (the persisted for an average of 96 days per year.
European part of Russia) was provided by Ryabov In BPF, wolves coexist with five species of wild un-
(1988). gulates: European bison Bison bonasus, moose Alces
Most of the data collected by the Russian alces, red deer Cervus elaphus (the main prey of the
researchers (all the papers cited above) and some of wolves), roe deer Capreolus capreolus, and wild boar
those reported by North American authors (Boertje Sus scrofa (Je˛drzejewski et al. 2002). The wolf is a
and Stephenson 1992) come from wolf-control pro- protected species; the population in the Polish part of
grammes, so detailed information on the behaviour of BPF is not legally exploited but some poaching does
free-ranging wolves during the breeding season is still occur. In the Belarussian part of BPF wolf numbers are
limited. The information available to date is mostly controlled (Je˛drzejewska et al. 1996). More informa-
based on the presence of wolves at the den or at ren- tion about Białowie_za Forest and its wolf population is
dezvous sites, or their absence, recorded by visual given by Je˛drzejewska and Je˛drzejewski (1998).
observations (Murrie 1944; Mech 1988) or telemetry
(Harrington and Mech 1982; Ballard et al. 1991). Collecting data on wolf reproduction
The objective of the work reported in this paper was
to obtain data on wolf behaviour in different phases of The study was conducted in 1995–1999 by radio-
their reproductive cycle to increase our understanding tracking and snow-tracking. The wolves were captured
of the biological potential of the species. The particular either with ‘‘fladry’’ and nets (Okarma and Je˛drze-
objectives of the study, conducted in Białowie_za Pri- jewski 1997) or foot-snare traps (equipped with an
meval Forest (BPF), eastern Poland, were to charac- alarm system). Wolves were immobilized with a mix-
terize: ture of ketamine hydrochloride (3.4–4.5 mg kg–1 body
weight) and xylazine hydrochloride (5–6.5 mg kg–1
body weight). They were fitted with VHF radio-collars
1. the timing of the different phases of reproduction
made by Telonics (Mesa, AZ, USA), AVM Instrument
(from proestrus in females until the end of the
(Colfax CA, USA), and Telemetry System (Goleta,
denning period of pups);
CA, USA). Data from six radio-collared females (five
2. the location and use of den sites in the same and
breeding individuals and a non-breeding yearling)
consecutive years; and
belonging to four packs were used for the analyses.
3. movements and den attendance by the breeding
The packs held territories covering 170–300 km2
females from the last weeks of pregnancy until the
(Okarma et al. 1998) and consisted of 2–8 individuals;
end of the denning period.
the number of wolves >1 year old varied from 2 to 5
per pack.
We located the radio-collared wolves two to five
Materials and methods times per week by triangulation from the forest roads.
Each month we also conducted sessions of continuous
Study area 24-h radio-tracking lasting 2–7 days, during which we
located animals every 30 min (in 1995–1996) or every
The study was conducted in the BPF in Eastern Poland 15 min (in 1997–1999). The distance between observers
(5230¢–53N, 2330¢–2415¢E). BPF is a temperate and wolves was, on average, 0.94 km and no detectable
mixed lowland forest characterized by a high percent- effects of observers on wolves’ activity was observed
age of natural stands. It straddles the Polish–Belarus- (Theuerkauf and Je˛drzejewski 2002). The mean radio-
sian border and covers nearly 1,500 km2. The Polish tracking error was 194 m (95% CI: 157–231 m) (The-
part of BPF, where the study was performed, covers uerkauf and Je˛drzejewski 2002). For the purpose of this
600 km2. Approximately 80% of the Polish part is study we used a total of 10,869 radio-locations, which
managed and exploited for timber by the State Forests included 105 sessions of continuous radio-tracking.
and the rest is protected as Białowie_za National Park On the basis of repeated locations from the same
(BNP, 105 km2), which includes a strict reserve area, den sites were searched after the wolves had left
(47 km2) with limited human access. The climate of them. On eight occasions we found the actual dens,
BPF has a transitional character between Atlantic and with signs of recent use by wolves, whereas on seven
123
J Ethol (2008) 26:69–78 71
occasions the den sites were not found and their most We conducted 403.7 km of snow-tracking of radio-
probable locations were determined on the basis of collared packs to record signs of proestrus (urination
telemetry records (supposed dens). with bloody discharge; Kreeger 2003) and probable
We estimated the parturition dates on the basis of copulations (spots 2–10 m in diameter, densely tram-
changes in females’ movements as determined by pled by wolves). The appearance of copulation places
radio-tracking: repeated locations in the same place. In was confirmed by comparing tracks left by copulating
one instance, visual observation of the female in captive wolves (courtesy of the private breeding centre
obvious pregnancy and then after giving birth helped of J. and B. Walencik, Białowie_za, Poland).
us to verify the birth date. Usually, however, it was
possible to determine not the exact date, only the most
reliable range of parturition dates. For analysis of the Results
mobility of the females the most probable date of
parturition was taken as day 0, and the following Oestrus, parturition, denning period and den sites
indicators of their activity were calculated:
Urine markings with blood, as indicators of proestrus
1. Daily movement distance (DMD): the sum of
phase in female wolves, were recorded from 12 January
straight-line distances between consecutive loca-
to 22 March, with the highest frequency (on average,
tions taken at 15 or 30-min intervals during 24-h
0.72 per 1 km of trail) in February (Table 1). Signs of
radio-tracking. Because in some radio-tracking
possible copulations, as read from tracks in the snow,
sessions we temporarily lost contact with animals,
occurred between 13 January and 1 March (Table 1). It
we calculated the DMD on the basis of at least 45
was, however, apparent from the life histories of radio-
locations per day, when taken every 15 min, or at
tracked females that only copulations that occurred
least 16 locations per day, when taken every
between 30 January and 1 March resulted in preg-
30 min. The mean number of locations for esti-
nancies. In one instance (pack Białowie_za National
mating DMD was 72 per day. Such criteria of data
Park in 1999), the bloody vaginal discharge in urine
selection may somewhat underestimate the DMD
markings and possible signs of copulations were seen
compared with calculations based on data fully
during snow tracking in mid January and then again in
covering the 24-h sessions (e.g. Je˛drzejewski et al.
late February. It was apparent from the parturition
2001). DMD was calculated for 50 days before and
date (19–23 April) that the mating observed in Feb-
90 days after parturition.
ruary resulted in pregnancy.
2. Maximum straight-line distance of a female from
The mean number of wolves travelling together
the den: a straight-line distance between the den
declined from 3.8–4.1 in November and December to
and the farthest location of the wolf during a gi-
3.2 in March (Table 1). The breeding pair did not
ven day. We calculated this for 50 days before and
separate from other pack members for mating. In
90 days after parturition on the basis of all
January–1 March, signs of possible copulations were
telemetry data available. Spatial analysis of
recorded on trails of 2–5 wolves moving together
wolves’ locations was performed with the program
(mean 3.6, SE 0.2, n = 29), similarly to the trails with
Tracker (Radio Location Systems, Huddinge,
no signs of mating (2–5 wolves, mean 3.5, SE 0.2,
Sweden).
n = 92; Mann–Whitney U-test, U = 375, P = 0.98).
3. Length of uninterrupted bouts the females were
After pregnancy lasting 63 ± 2 days (Seal et al.
present in/at the den or absent from it. For this
1979), parturition (n = 11) occurred between 19 April
analysis we selected the most complete data set of
and 12 May (Table 2). The denning period lasted from
24-h radio-tracking during the denning period. It
49 to 64 days, i.e. 7–9 weeks (on average 58 days, SE 2)
includes 23 days between 19 April and 22 June. All
and during that time wolves used from 1 to 3, average
locations of radio-tagged females that fell in a ra-
2.25, den sites (SE 0.25), spending on average 27 days
dius of 231 m (upper CI limit of location error)
(SE 4) in each den (Table 2). The longest use of single
around the actual or supposed den were regarded
dens occurred in the strict reserve of the Białowie_za
as locations in or at the den.
National Park, where people had very limited access
On the basis of preliminary assessment of data we (49 days, female Chy_za in 1999), and in the zone of the
distinguished a particularly significant period relative state border where human activity was low (62 days,
to the parturition, 0–10 days before and after birth, for female Siwa in 1998).
further analysis. We divided the remaining period into Among the dens used and found during radio-
20-day intervals, however, because of scarcity of data. tracking (n = 8) five were actual burrows dug out
123
72 J Ethol (2008) 26:69–78
Table 1 Signs of heat in wolves (Canis lupus) as observed during snow-tracking in Białowie_za Primeval Forest, Poland, in 1996–1999
Month Blood in urine Possible copulations Number of wolves travelling together Snow-tracking
(mean N km–1 (mean N km–1 distance in km
of trail ± SE) of trail ± SE) Mean ± SE Minimum–maximum (N tracking events)
either by wolves or, previously, by Eurasian badgers den sites (Ruda: n = 4; Chy_za: n = 2) were situated at a
Meles meles or red foxes Vulpes vulpes. In three distance of 2.8 ± 0.4 km (from 0.3 to 5.9 km) from
instances the lairs or shallow dens were under the roots each other. The den sites used by different neigh-
of uprooted trees (Table 2). bouring packs of wolves (n = 4) were located
The dens used consecutively by a given female in the 11.9 ± 1.4 km from each other (range: 7.2–15.5 km).
same year were located from 0.5 to 4.4 km from each
other (Fig. 1). None of the females used the same den Behaviour of breeding females before and during
in consecutive years. The average distance denning
(mean ± SE) among all dens used by the same female
in different years was 2.4 ± 0.25 km (from 0.4 to Fifty to thirty days before parturition the DMD cov-
5.2 km; n = 30). We also had an opportunity to mea- ered by pregnant females was long (on average,
sure distances between dens used by two females 23 km). It decreased by half only (to 13.5 km, on
belonging to the same pack. One (Ruda) was the mo- average) 10 days before parturition (Fig. 2). During
ther of another (Chy_za) (Je˛drzejewski et al. 2005). the first 10 days post-partum the breeding females
Chy_za gave birth to pups for the first time in the year travelled only 3.9 km day–1. As early as days 11–30,
after the death of Ruda (Table 2). On average, their however, they resumed greater mobility, and 2 months
123
J Ethol (2008) 26:69–78 73
123
74 J Ethol (2008) 26:69–78
Discussion
123
J Ethol (2008) 26:69–78 75
was in the tundra of Nenets region (northern duration of use of a single den or nest varied from
Russia)—necropsies of shot wolves provided evidence 11 days to 2 months in north-central Minnesota (Fuller
that oestrus occurred in March–April (Makridin 1959), 1989) and from 3 to 4 months in Minnesota and south-
thus pups were born in May–June. Our data from BPF central Alaska (Harrington and Mech 1982; Ballard
located at 52–53N, with copulations recorded mostly et al. 1987). Reuse of dens by wolves for several years
in February and parturition between 19 April and 12 (Ballard and Dau 1983; Fuller 1989) or even centuries
May, fit this geographic pattern well. Interestingly, the (Mech and Packard 1990) is a well-known phenome-
study conducted in the Belarussian part of BPF in non in North America. It has also been reported from
1947–1950 revealed that copulation of wolves occurred the tundra zone in northern Russia, where there is a
in early March and parturition between 4 and 21 May shortage of places suitable for den location (Makridin
(Gavrin and Donaurov 1954), i.e. approximately 1959).
2 weeks later than in 1995–1999. The possible reason It has been shown by Thiel et al. (1998) that wolves
for earlier breeding season of wolves in recent years is may tolerate humans close to the dens as a response to
the warming of the climate—during the last 50 years protection. It seems, however, that wolves in Central
the mean annual temperature in BPF increased from and Eastern Europe are very sensitive to human dis-
6.5 to 7.5–8C (Je˛drzejewska and Je˛drzejewski 1998). turbance during the denning period as a result of long-
Our earlier analyses (Je˛drzejewski et al. 2001) lasting persecution, particularly the taking of pups
revealed that during the mating period (January– from the den (Je˛drzejewska et al. 1996). That was
March) adult wolves became very mobile, travelling probably also the reason wolves in our area were never
markedly longer daily distances (26.2–26.6 km) com- found to use particular dens more than once and they
pared with the annual mean value (22.8 km). They also usually moved pups to the second and occasionally the
marked their territory more during that time—inci- third den or nest. Theuerkauf et al. (2003b) reported
dence of ground scratching and urine marking was that, in BPF, wolves avoided humans, who were pres-
highest in January and February, respectively (Zub ent in the forest more frequently in the summer than in
et al. 2003). Duration of wolves’ daily activity peaked the winter, and human-made structures such as settle-
during the mating season (February–March) and then ments and roads.
again in August, when pups began to travel with other Filimonov (1980) reported that in Kazakhstan
pack members (Theuerkauf et al. 2003a). In contrast wolves moved their pups in response to human dis-
with previous reports (Gursky 1978), in BPF there was turbance to a new den sites located 4 and 9 km from
no increase in the vocal activity of wolves related to the the natal den. In the steppe-forest and steppe zone of
mating period; in January–March wolves howled rarely Ukraine and Moldova wolves frequently carried pups
compared with summer and the early autumn months to new sites in May–June in response to human pres-
(Nowak et al. 2006). ence associated with mowing grass and hay-making on
In BPF wolves avoided reusing dens in consecutive wood meadows near the natal dens (Gursky 1978). In
years and usually used more than one den during a the Voronezh region, Russia, Ryabov (1988) reported
single breeding season. The minimum time the female shifts to new den sites 0.4–6 km from the natal dens,
wolf could be expected to use the natal den is between again in response to human disturbance. Wolves can
3 and 5 weeks, until the pups are mobile enough also move pups for natural reasons, for example the
to explore its entrance (Packard 2003). The actual drying out of the only source of drinking water nearby,
123
76 J Ethol (2008) 26:69–78
as observed in the Tien-Shan Mountains, Kazakhstan 5 h (Packard et al. 1992). It was only 51–70 days post-
(Fedosenko et al. 1978). partum, i.e. at the end of the denning period, that the
Despite frequent changes of denning sites during a female resumed long-distance travel. A pup age of
single pup-rearing season, Eurasian wolves seem con- 70 days means termination of the weaning process
servative in using the same part of their territory for (Packard et al. 1992). Young began to follow adults in
locating nests year after year (Gursky 1978; this study). hunting and the kill sites may be used as temporary
In BPF, wolf den sites were located in relatively quiet, rendezvous sites for pups (Gray 1993).
remote places, at greater distances from villages, forest Harrington and Mech (1982) and Ballard et al.
edges, and intensively used roads than expected at (1991) have shown that in Minnesota and Alaska,
random (Theuerkauf et al. 2003c). Ciucci and Mech USA, pups before weaning were left unattended by
(1992) suggested that location of wolves’ dens tend to breeding females for only 2–20% of the time. In
be random relative to the territory centre, although it comparison with those regions, in BPF the breeding
can be more central in large territories. Our wolves had females were leaving pups for a relatively long time
rather small territories (Je˛drzejewski et al. 2007) and during a day in the course of their first month of life
their dens seemed to be located centrally. This is, (15–35% of the time, on average). This raises a ques-
however, in accordance with observations by Zub et al. tion whether other pack members assisted in tending
(2003), who showed that wolves in BPF concentrate pups when a breeding female was away. Both Har-
their scent-marking activity in the central zones of the rington and Mech (1982) and Ballard et al. (1991)
territories surrounding the dens. suggested that rather than tending pups the yearlings
In Eurasia, types of wolf-breeding site were deter- stay at the den to beg for food from adults. Mech et al.
mined by local physiographic and soil conditions, and (1999), however, have recently proved that auxiliary
included dens dug by wolves themselves, setts of bad- wolves may actually contribute food for pups rather
gers and burrows of red foxes, nests on the ground in than compete for it. On the basis of observations of
dense bushes, under tree roots or fallen trees, and—in wolves in Yellowstone National Park, USA, Thurston
the mountains—caves and rock crevices (Filimonov (2002) documented that non-breeding members of
1980; Vyrypaev and Vorobev 1983; Annenkov 1988; packs (both females and males) provided substantial
Ryabov 1988; this study). A particularly convenient care for pups by attending the homesites, playing with,
opportunity for Eurasian wolves is the use of badger watching, following, and regurgitating to pups. Parents
setts, which are large, deep, and located in well-drained tended to be at the homesite more during the first
soil. Wolves usually adapt the sett by enlarging one or month of pups’ life, whereas alloparents (helpers) were
two entrances. Wolf litters reared in old badger setts present more later on. Our study provided an anec-
have been reported from Kyrgyzstan (Vyrypaev and dotal report of den attendance by a yearling female in
Vorobev 1983), Kazakhstan (Annenkov 1988), Russia one pack. Our earlier analysis of mobility of wolves in
(Ryabov 1988), and Poland (this study). In the Voro- BPF (Je˛drzejewski et al. 2001) also suggested that
nezh region (central Russian), one-third of all nest sites subadult non-breeding females provided care for pups,
of wolves were located in old badger setts (Ryabov because their daily movements during the denning
1988). period (on average, 4.3–8.6 km day–1 in May–June)
On the basis of the time the females spent at the den were even shorter than those of adult breeding females
sites, Ballard et al. (1991) reported that in south-cen- (5–15.7 km). It was probably the adult male that did
tral Alaska the breeding females of smaller packs—- most of the hunting to provide food, as his daily
forced to participate in obtaining and providing food movements were rather long (on average, 25.7 km in
for pups—started exploring areas further from the den May). Thus, our findings correspond to the conclusion
site earlier than those from larger packs. Ryabov by Mech (1999) that in a typical wolf pack, adult par-
(1988) reported that in central Russia breeding females ents guide the activities of the pack in a division-of-
began to hunt 10–15 days after parturition. Pulliainen labour system, in which the females are predominantly
(1965) reported that during the early phases of denning concerned with pup care and defence and males with
period breeding females hunted within a radius of food-provision and hunting.
2 km around a den site. In BPF, even though breeding
females increased their mobility as early as 11–20 days Acknowledgments This study was financed by the budget of
after parturition, they moved (and possibly hunted) not the Mammal Research Institute PAS, the Polish State Commit-
tee for Scientific Research (grants 6P20401905 and 6P04F02612),
far from the den site, to enable return to the pups for the European Natural Heritage Fund (Euronatur, Germany), the
nursing. Until the pups are seven weeks old, the German Academic Exchange Service (to JT), and the German
interval between suckling bouts may not be longer than Donor’s Association for the Promotion of Sciences and
123
J Ethol (2008) 26:69–78 77
Humanities (to JT). We thank S. Śnie_zko, R. Kozak, I. Ru- radio-collared wolves, (Canis lupus) in Białowie_za Primeval
czyński, M. Chudziński, P. Wasiak, S. Rouys, and R. Gula, and Forest in Poland. Can J Zool 79:1993–2004
numerous students and volunteers, who helped during the field Je˛drzejewski W, Schmidt K, Theuerkauf J, Je˛drzejewska B, Selva
work. Permission to capture and radio-collar wolves were issued N, Zub K, Szymura L (2002) Kill rates and predation by
by Ministry of Forestry and Nature Protection and the Director wolves on ungulate populations in Białowie_za Primeval
of Białowie_za National Park. Forest (Poland). Ecology 83:1341–1356
Je˛drzejewski W, Branicki W, Veit C, Medugorac I, Pilot M,
Bunevich AN, Je˛drzejewska B, Schmidt K, Theuerkauf J,
Okarma H, Gula R, Szymura L, Förster M (2005) Genetic
References diversity and relatedness within packs in an intensely hunted
population of wolves Canis lupus. Acta Theriol 50:3–22
Annenkov BP (1988) The wolf in the Alakolsk valley. Akad Je˛drzejewski W, Schmidt K, Theuerkauf J, Je˛drzejewska B,
Nauk Kazakhskoi SSR Tr Inst Zool 44:69–73 [in Russian] Kowalczyk R (2007) Territory size of wolves Canis lupus:
Ballard WB, Whitman JS, Gardner CL (1987) Ecology of an linking local (Bialowieza Primeval Forest, Poland) and
exploited wolf population in south-central Alaska. Wildl Holarctic-scale patterns. Ecography (in press)
Monogr 98:1–54 Kreeger TJ (2003) The internal wolf: physiology, pathology, and
Ballard WB, Dau JR (1983) Characteristic of gray wolf, Canis pharmacology. In: Mech LD, Boitani L (eds) Wolves:
lupus, den and rendezvous sites in south central Alaska. Can behavior, ecology and conservation. The University of
Field Nat 97:299–302 Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 192–217
Ballard WB, Ayres LA, Gardner CL, Foster JW (1991) Den site Makridin VP (1959) Materials on the biology of wolf in tundra of
activity patterns of gray wolves, Canis lupus, in south central the Nenets national region. Zool Zh 38:1719–1728 [in
Alaska. Can Field Nat 105:497–504 Russian with English summary]
Boertje RD, Stephenson RO (1992) Effects of ungulate avail- Mech LD (1970) The wolf: the ecology and behavior of an
ability on wolf reproductive potential in Alaska. Can J Zool endangered species. Natural History Press, Garden City,
70:2441–2443 New York
Boyd DK, Ream RR, Pletscher DH, Fairchild MW (1993) Mech LD (1988) The Arctic Wolf: living with the pack.
Variation in denning and parturition dates of a wild gray Voyageur Press, Stillwater, MN
wolf, Canis lupus, in the Rocky Mountains. Can Field Nat Mech (LD) (1999) Alpha status, dominance, and division of
107:359–360 labor in wolf packs. Can J Zool 77:1196–1203
Ciucci P, Mech LD (1992) Selection of wolf dens in relation to Mech LD (2002) Breeding season of wolves, Canis lupus, in
winter territories in northeastern Minnesota. J Mammal relation to latitude. Can Field Nat 116:139–140
73:899–905 Mech LD, Packard JM (1990) Possible use of wolf, (Canis lupus),
Fedosenko AK, Zhiryakov VA, Grachev YA (1978) Some data den over several centuries. Can Field Nat 104:484–485
on the ecology and behavior of wolves in the Northern Tien- Mech LD, Wolf PC, Packard JM (1999) Regurgitative food
Shan and Dzungara Alatau. Byull Mosk Obshch Ispyt Prir transfer among wild wolves. Can J Zool 77:1192–1195
Otd Biol 83(3):5–18 [in Russian with English summary] Murrie A (1944) The wolves of Mount McKinley. Fauna of the
Filimonov AN (1980) Behavior of the Kazakhstan wolves in National Parks of the United States. Fauna Ser. 5, Wash-
various situations. In: Bibikov DI (ed) Behaviour of wolves. ington, DC
Institut Evolucionnoi Morfologii i Ekologii Zhivotnykh, Nowak S, Je˛drzejewski W, Schmidt K, Theuerkauf J, Mysłajek
Akademiya Nauk SSSR, Moskva, pp 60–76 [in Russian] RW, Je˛drzejewska B (2007) Howling activity of free-ranging
Fuller TK (1989) Denning behavior of wolves in north-central wolves (Canis lupus) in the Białowie_za Primeval Forest and
Minnesota. Am Midl Nat 121:184–188 the Western Beskidy Mountains (Poland). J Ethol (in press).
Gavrin VF, Donaurov SS (1954) The wolf in Białowie_za DOI 10.1007/s10164-006-0015-y
Primeval Forest. Zool Zh 33:904–924 [in Russian] Okarma H, Je˛drzejewski W (1997) Livetrapping wolves with
Gray DR (1993) The use of muskox kill sites as temporary nets. Wildl Soc Bull 25:78–82
rendezvous sites by arctic wolves with pups in early winter. Okarma H, Je˛drzejewski W, Schmidt K, Śnie_zko S, Bunevich
Arctic 46:324–330 AN, Je˛drzejewska B (1998) Home ranges of wolves in
Gursky IG (1978) The wolf in the northwestern Black Sea region Białowie_za Primeval Forest, Poland, compared with other
(habitats, structure of populations, reproduction). Byull Eurasian populations. J Mammal 79:842–852
Mosk Obshch Ispyt Prir Otd Biol 83(3):29–38 [in Russian Packard JM (2003) Wolf behavior: reproductive, social, and
with English summary] intelligent. In: Mech LD, Boitani L (eds) Wolves: behavior,
Harrington FH, Mech LD (1982) Patterns of homesite atten- ecology and conservation. The University of Chicago Press,
dance in two Minnesota wolf packs. In: Harrington FH, Chicago, pp 35–65
Paquet PC (eds) Wolves of the world. Noyes Publications, Packard JM, Mech LD, Seal US (1983) Social influences on
NJ, pp 81–105 reproduction in wolves. In: Carbyn LN (ed) Wolves in
Je˛drzejewska B, Je˛drzejewski W (1998) Predation in vertebrate Canada and Alaska: their status, biology, and management.
communities. The Białowie_za Primeval Forest as a case Report Series, no 45. Canadian Wildlife Service, Edmonton,
study. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York AB, pp 78–85
Je˛drzejewska B, Je˛drzejewski W, Bunevich AN, Miłkowski L, Packard JM, Mech LD, Ream RR (1992) Weaning in an arctic wolf
Okarma H (1996) Population dynamics of wolves Canis pack: behavioural mechanisms. Can J Zool 70:1269–1275
lupus in Białowie_za Primeval Forest (Poland and Belarus) in Pulliainen E (1965) Studies on the wolf (Canis lupus L.) in
relation to hunting by humans, 1847–1993. Mammal Rev Finland. Ann Zool Fenn 2:215–259
26:103–126 Ryabov LS (1988) Characteristics of wolves (Canis lupus L.)
Je˛drzejewski W, Schmidt K, Theuerkauf J, Je˛drzejewska B, reproduction in the Central Black Earth Region. Ekologiya
Okarma H (2001) Daily movements and territory use by 6:42–48 [in Russian]
123
78 J Ethol (2008) 26:69–78
Seal US, Plotka ED, Packard JM, Mech LD (1979) Endocrine Thiel RP, Haller WH, Schultz RN (1997) Early den digging by
correlates of reproduction in the wolf I. Serum progester- wolves, Canis lupus, in Wisconsin. Can Field Nat 111:481–
one, estradiol and LH during the estrous cycle. Biol Reprod 482
21:1057–1066 Thiel RP, Merril S, Mech LD (1998) Tolerance by denning
Theuerkauf J, Je˛drzejewski W (2002) Accuracy of radiotelemetry wolves, Canis lupus, to human disturbance. Can Field Nat
to estimate wolf activity and locations. J Wildl Manage 112:340–342
66:859–864 Thurston LM (2002) Homesite attendance as a measure of
Theuerkauf J, Je˛drzejewski W, Schmidt K, Okarma H, Ruczyński alloparental and parental care by gray wolves (Canis lupus)
I, Śnie_zko S, Gula R (2003a) Daily patterns and duration of in Northern Yellowstone National Park. MSc thesis, Texas
wolf activity in the Białowie_za Forest, Poland. J Mammal A and M University, USA
84:243–253 Vyrypaev VA, Vorobev GG (1983) The wolf in Kyrgyz-
Theuerkauf J, Je˛drzejewski W, Schmidt K, Gula R (2003b) stan—ecological and geographic description. Izdatelstvo
Spatiotemporal segregation of wolves from humans in the Ilim, Frunze [in Russian]
Białowie_za Forest (Poland). J Wildl Manage 67:706–716 Zub K, Theuerkauf J, Je˛drzejewski W, Je˛drzejewska B, Schmidt
Theuerkauf J, Rouys S, Je˛drzejewski W (2003c). Selection of den, K, Kowalczyk R (2003) Wolf pack territory marking in the
rendezvous, and resting sites by wolves in the Białowie_za Białowie_za Primeval Forest (Poland). Behaviour 140:635–
Forest, Poland. Can J Zool 81:163–167 648
123